That's not actually what I said. I did say that it did turn out good/alright since it looked really bad when the reveal trailer came out. I've read enough text of these official reviews to see that this will be a good game for some people. It has had 3 really negative reviews total, and one of them is from IGN which shouldn't be taken seriously whether they praise or slam a game.
Yup, better to just ignore sites you personally don't like. Makes sense. Just ignore Nintendo Life, Nintendo Enthusiast, Kotaku, and all others too. Better trust none of them.
Don't take it too personal, but your reading comprehension has been off in this thread. You basically put words in my mouth, and that kind of annoyed me.
Here's what you said:
So basically, this game turned out good. 3DS gains yet another solid title to its library. The initial showings looked poor, but it's nice that Next Level Games pleasantly surprised us.
Based on the reviews we got, that's not what we can infer. Perhaps it's an issue with how you are writing, maybe English isn't your first language. You could have provided some context to make a reasonable statement. Now that this did not happen, and other posters as well as me question your statement, you become passive aggressive. But well, if you just wish to ignore negative reviews for the game (as indicated by your comment on ignoring IGN already), the statement does make sense. You could have said for example:
So basically, ignoring the negative reviews, this game turned out good. 3DS gains yet another solid title to its library. The initial showings looked poor, but it's nice that Next Level Games pleasantly surprised us.
Small change, but now it makes more sense.
Also, people liked Nier enough in order for Taro Yako to create Nier Automata. Negative praise toward Nier and God Hand is in the minority. I admit that those titles may not have been the best comparison, but Code Name S.T.E.A.M is a game that I like a lot and it has a high user review average.
You're still just referencing "people"/"people that played" - without any kind of measurement that's a pretty bold statement. That's why people use review averages to have an indication of the general feeling about a game's quality. That's at least more specific that the pretty vague statements you are making here.
And I also liked Code Name STEAM, but I see where the review scores are coming from and definitely wouldn't give it a much higher rating. There was simply too much wrong with the game.
.
