• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

Riftbreaker dev : Next-Gen Features Have to Be Fitted to XSS Memory; It Would Have Been Much Easier with XSX Only

ethomaz

Banned
You need to take into account over head, even VRAM is sucked by videos, not the mention RAM. I guess it's still more efficient to do this on console. Most of the effect are much more bound by compute ability then by memory size... Effect I mean, texture are obviously affected...
I'm aware of that but 10GB has it own reservation on Series S too.
At the least the last releases I checked the minimum RAM is on pair or a bit higher than Series S... I know it is not a direct comparison but it is not like PC minimum RAM is lower than Series S... PS5 and Series X is more inline with recommended RAM on PC.
 
I'm aware of that but 10GB has it own reservation on Series S too.
At the least the last releases I checked the minimum RAM is on pair or a bit higher than Series S... I know it is not a direct comparison but it is not like PC minimum RAM is lower than Series S... PS5 and Series X is more inline with recommended RAM on PC.
At what resolution and with what effects? There are minimum specs and recommended. Any evidence XSS doesn't meet minimum?
 
Last edited:

FrankWza

Member
It's arguably not ready for full time yet. The service is there, the hardware is there but the games aren't yet. 18 million subs for what is is right now is actually pretty impressive. When they start putting out monthly (?) brand new games for the service is when you'll see the service realized to it's full potential. I think some naysayers are going to be surprised when it explodes tbh.
That’s the point though. If the hardware is there but the service and games aren’t discount the hardware to entice. If they have this giant vault of cash that, according to users here, is just play money. You lock gamers into your eco and when the exclusives come you can bump up gpu. They are planning that anyway based on the gold price raise they tried last week.
Narrative from WHOM?
from posters HERE. They’re not hard to find.
Since you nor any other forum member has the full picture on the breakdown on how much people are paying the argument is moot.
no. That is THE argument. That nobody knows because the numbers aren’t shared. That’s the doubt. I would like to know how many are paying full price because I’m saying that many ARE paying $1 or various discounted gp deals. Otherwise, they’re padded. I know you want to make it a moot point but it’s anything but when you’re shouting 18 million with little substance.
$500 for a series s and the supposed amazing gpu for 3 years is too good to be true, no? Next gen gaming at its finest
 

S0ULZB0URNE

Member
MS was trying to get the most performance for a mass market price. They could have installed 100GB of RAM but everyone knows that wouldn't be cost effective. Price for the customer VS the BOM for them to build the device was their primary concern. They wanted to make a box they can push down to $200 or less. The PS5 or XSX will NEVER be $200. Being $200 with a mature and content filled Gamepass will be hard for the average gamer to ignore. Developers should talk to MS if they need some help making their games work on the XSS. It would benefit everyone.
I don't see a 4TF Xbox console being sold for $299 a appealing price for the mass market.
$199 XSS would of suited that market way better.
 

longdi

Banned
Considering it has the same performance in the 12 TFLOPS XSX with less I/O stutters (as reported by DF)? Curious ;).

60 FPS mode plus jump from 1080p to 1440p for a patch, it does not seem like a bad free update.
consoles are constrained affordable boxes. that's all there is to them, doesnt matter if its SS,SX or PS5. port or not, most graphics options at low-med at 1440p, ouch.

seems like there is more OS overheads in every newer gen consoles. too much streaming recordings cards switching jazz. i have asked how much 'metals' these 'instant do it all' consoles have access to, these days.

i wonder if sony may consider dropping 4k hdr from their in game OS. keep the high resolution output only if you are not in games
 
Last edited:

THE DUCK

voted poster of the decade by bots
This is a contradiction to everything I read. That Microsoft has so much money they can do whatever they want. They don’t need to make games from zeni multiplat and everyone is paying $10-$15 for gamepass per month. If this is the case, why do they need to milk the s for the extra $100 at all? Why not just make it $199 or better yet $99 and while they’re at it, let’s price the x at $299. They can sell tens of millions and still spend less than any big acquisition and lock all these people into their eco.
It simply doesn't make sense to sell a product at a loss when you can't even manufacture enough at $299 (currently). When they need to, they need will drop the price to keep units moving.
Taking a huge loss on every unit at $99 doesn't factor into that.

They may be willing to lose some (as console makers often doo) but there is a limit. If they drop too far, too much potential profit from gamepass would be eaten up by hardware losses. In your $99 scenario, if they sold an extra 10 million, they would need need to absorb a billion dollars in loses. Since they would probably sell anyhow at $199, that makes no sense.
 

Panajev2001a

GAF's Pleasant Genius
i wonder if sony may consider dropping 4k hdr from their in game OS. keep the high resolution output only if you are not in games
Why? Just not to have a small win against XSX? I do not get you here :).

First of all it would cause the screen to horribly flash whenever the system UI needs to overlay/mix with games which has been designed to do often and seamlessly (on Xbox you will have your TV switching modes between HDR and non HDR as you go in and out of a game even temporarily and that is why they have the additional in game OS UI overlay, to limit that from happening). Second, they can efficiently swap in and out OS some of the required memory when the OS is not in the foreground and recreate some buffers, so again not sure what your point is.
 
Last edited:

longdi

Banned
you are right, i did think of hdr is still too messy but i am not sure why waste resources on 4k assets for game OS, those are done in vector 3d? how much resources it is currently taking? if it's small and inconsequential, than i like to see SX upgrade to 4k ui too
 

Bo_Hazem

Banned

Panajev2001a

GAF's Pleasant Genius
4TF of GPU power and because it's only GPU, only graphics are gonna be affected... What's not to be understood? Games complexity will remain the same as if S didn't exist
Are we still stuck at a time when GPU’s only processed pretty pixels only and not essentially being a giant vector unit co-processor for intensive general computation?

XSS’s GPU is not only powered by less CU’s than XSX, but it is clocked lower and apparently also has a single shader engine (though I do not have a hard proof of the latter):
u4AGkzi.jpg


Less shader engines would mean less ROP (RB in AMD wording, affects pixel fillrate/blending), Rasteriser and Primitive processing unit, and possibly less async compute engines to dispatch and prioritise async work (the latter is not a given, it was just common for AMD to match the ACE’s count to the number of Shader Arrays which in this case it would go from 4 to 2).

On top of that you have a lower clockspeed (~1.825 GHz for XSX and ~1.565 GHz for XSS). This would reduce the peak performance of all the shared units like the Geometry Engine as well as the other HW that does not get counted in the 4 TFLOPS number. This affects geometry processing too.

Still, you have a point, limited RAM with about 5.5 GB less available RAM for games compared to XSX (8 GB on XSS, OS taking up all of the 2 GB slow, 56 GB/s, portion of RAM) is going to be a limiting factor first.

Then you would XSS dropping RT or cutting framerate if RT had to be kept (and we are seeing resolution in DRS dropping to less than 720p in launch window software already). Cutting framerate or dropping RT was not the “same experience as XSX but at 1440 (or even 1080p)” as it was stated btw.

Some more data about the specs here: https://www.eurogamer.net/articles/xbox-series-s-review-digitalfoundry (of course the article rational part and hope springs eternal emotional sing-off at the end is there, but it is a Leadbetter article ;))
 
Last edited:
I don't see a 4TF Xbox console being sold for $299 a appealing price for the mass market.
$199 XSS would of suited that market way better.
Guess which system will hit $199 first. I don't think the PS5 will hit $199 EVER.
That’s the point though. If the hardware is there but the service and games aren’t discount the hardware to entice. If they have this giant vault of cash that, according to users here, is just play money. You lock gamers into your eco and when the exclusives come you can bump up gpu. They are planning that anyway based on the gold price raise they tried last week.

from posters HERE. They’re not hard to find.

no. That is THE argument. That nobody knows because the numbers aren’t shared. That’s the doubt. I would like to know how many are paying full price because I’m saying that many ARE paying $1 or various discounted gp deals. Otherwise, they’re padded. I know you want to make it a moot point but it’s anything but when you’re shouting 18 million with little substance.
$500 for a series s and the supposed amazing gpu for 3 years is too good to be true, no? Next gen gaming at its finest
They did share the numbers. They have 18 mil subs. If you choose to not believe that that is on you. You've been fighting the good fight trying to convince people of 'loopholes' and that Gamepass isn't a good value but I think the only people who are buying that are people who don't have the Xbox in the first place so that's good I guess.

The XSS is for the budget gamer; it is for people who don't need 4K. There is no other product like it on the market. I yet to see anyone show that the XSS is missing features that the other systems have. I have not heard that this particular developer us using the features available to them like velocity architecture, variable rate shading, or sampler feedback streaming. I am certain that the lower specs of the XSS make it harder to develop for but that is why it is important to reach out to MS for assistance. MS should ensure their development environment is mature. Is that what this developer is complaining about? Immature dev kits? The dev stated " Still, it doesn't look like it will require that much work to be running well at 1080p on the XSS. " How does that fit the narrative that the XSS is holding things back? Do you think that the PS5 and XSX will be limited to 1080p because the XSS is 1080p?
 

S0ULZB0URNE

Member
Guess which system will hit $199 first. I don't think the PS5 will hit $199 EVER.

They did share the numbers. They have 18 mil subs. If you choose to not believe that that is on you. You've been fighting the good fight trying to convince people of 'loopholes' and that Gamepass isn't a good value but I think the only people who are buying that are people who don't have the Xbox in the first place so that's good I guess.

The XSS is for the budget gamer; it is for people who don't need 4K. There is no other product like it on the market. I yet to see anyone show that the XSS is missing features that the other systems have. I have not heard that this particular developer us using the features available to them like velocity architecture, variable rate shading, or sampler feedback streaming. I am certain that the lower specs of the XSS make it harder to develop for but that is why it is important to reach out to MS for assistance. MS should ensure their development environment is mature. Is that what this developer is complaining about? Immature dev kits? The dev stated " Still, it doesn't look like it will require that much work to be running well at 1080p on the XSS. " How does that fit the narrative that the XSS is holding things back? Do you think that the PS5 and XSX will be limited to 1080p because the XSS is 1080p?
Oh we know MS will drop the price.
It should of been $199 at launch though.
 
Oh we know MS will drop the price.
It should of been $199 at launch though.
Nope. They have the best price next gen console right now. You already can't get more for less. They can drop the price later to continue to move units. They are already taking a loss on the system right now. Despite what some say here the XSS is an impressive piece of tech. It is not cheaply tossed together.
 
Last edited:

Clear

CliffyB's Cock Holster
Stone cold truth of the matter is that were anyone in game-dev been asked as to whether having different memory limits between SKU's was a good idea, they'd answer absolutely and unequivocally no.

Its a decision that makes sense economically and from a top-level engineering sense only. From a production standpoint it fundamentally shackles devs to targeting the lower end and finding ways to build out on PS5/SX.
 
Stone cold truth of the matter is that were anyone in game-dev been asked as to whether having different memory limits between SKU's was a good idea, they'd answer absolutely and unequivocally no.

Its a decision that makes sense economically and from a top-level engineering sense only. From a production standpoint it fundamentally shackles devs to targeting the lower end and finding ways to build out on PS5/SX.
Pretty sure PC development has the same issues seeing how they are all sorts of specs games have to run on. Last time I checked MS has a unified development environment that should make fitting those games in XSS RAM more manageable. Making a box more gamers could access was more important than making the most powerful box.
 

Clear

CliffyB's Cock Holster
Pretty sure PC development has the same issues seeing how they are all sorts of specs games have to run on. Last time I checked MS has a unified development environment that should make fitting those games in XSS RAM more manageable. Making a box more gamers could access was more important than making the most powerful box.
PC doesn't really enter into it, we're talking about spec differences on closed systems where limitations are absolute and must be observed always.
 

S0ULZB0URNE

Member
Nope. They have the best price next gen console right now. You already can't get more for less. They can drop the price later to continue to move units. They are already taking a loss on the system right now. Despite what some say here the XSS is an impressive piece of tech. It is not cheaply tossed together.
How is that? The next gen starts at $399.
 

Astral Dog

Member
Imagine the shitstorm if major third party developer drops support for XSS, because RAM limitations.
I don't think this will ever happen, developers need as much install base as possible (yes more than pretty graphics these days) unless XSS flops hard nobody can afford to ignore it, what they can do in some cases is chop the XSS version until it runs.

And PS5 could have a noticeable advantage with exclusive games, considering its the same specs no matter what console.
 
How is that? The next gen starts at $399.
Sure man. Outside of Sony 1st party what games will PS5 have that WON'T be on the XSS? Outside of graphics there is nothing the XSS can't do that the PS5 can.

I don't think this will ever happen, developers need as much install base as possible (yes more than pretty graphics these days) unless XSS flops hard nobody can afford to ignore it, what they can do in some cases is chop the XSS version until it runs.

And PS5 could have a noticeable advantage with exclusive games, considering its the same specs no matter what console.
Both consoles will have games that aren't on the other. The true test will be MS Flight Simulator. If it runs poorly on the XSS there might be an argument to be made about the XSS holding something back.
 
Last edited:

S0ULZB0URNE

Member
Sure man. Outside of Sony 1st party what games will PS5 have that WON'T be on the XSS? Outside of graphics there is nothing the XSS can't do that the PS5 can.


Both consoles will have games that aren't on the other. The true test will be MS Flight Simulator. If it runs poorly on the XSS there might be an argument to be made about the XSS holding something back.
No game on XSS will give a true next gen experience.
 
No game on XSS gives a true next gen experience.
Nothing to show.
Hitting XB 360/PS3 resolutions in 2021 FTL.
Hmmm sounds like fanboy nonsense. I thought it was gameplay that defined next-gen not resolutions. I have not seen any evidence that the XSS is holding back gameplay especially if they use the full feature set of the console. The resolution is the primary sacrifice and that is already known.
 

THE DUCK

voted poster of the decade by bots
PC doesn't really enter into it, we're talking about spec differences on closed systems where limitations are absolute and must be observed always.

It matters in that all of these companies "complaining" about xss already have to deal with much worse, the xss is hardly the black sheep of the group of systems they have to develop for.
 

FrankWza

Member
They did share the numbers. They have 18 mil subs. If you choose to not believe that that is on you. You've been fighting the good fight trying to convince people of 'loopholes' and that Gamepass isn't a good value but I think the only people who are buying that are people who don't have the Xbox in the first place so that's good I guess.
18 million subscribers sounds great. Unfortunately, without context we don’t know how many are paying $1 or how many are temporary subs. That’s what Msoft does and does consistently. There are those who choose to believe it and those who don’t. It’s not lying, it’s more like partial truth. Remember, this is the same company who not long ago advertised “most powerful console” and changed that shit QUICK when they started getting beat in head to heads. So yes, they have announced 18 million. Now, they can elaborate and let everyone know the breakdown.
 

AgentP

Thinks mods influence posters politics. Promoted to QAnon Editor.
It matters in that all of these companies "complaining" about xss already have to deal with much worse, the xss is hardly the black sheep of the group of systems they have to develop for.
They don't have to "deal" with it. There is no qualifying organization for a PC game. If it performs poorly the devs don't get punished. Xbox is not an open platform, so they have to test and optimize for two seperate HW targets and that means more resources and test time. The API mitigates that to some extent at the expense of "coding to the metal" so to speak.
 

FrankWza

Member
It simply doesn't make sense to sell a product at a loss when you can't even manufacture enough at $299 (currently). When they need to, they need will drop the price to keep units moving.
Taking a huge loss on every unit at $99 doesn't factor into that.

They may be willing to lose some (as console makers often doo) but there is a limit. If they drop too far, too much potential profit from gamepass would be eaten up by hardware losses. In your $99 scenario, if they sold an extra 10 million, they would need need to absorb a billion dollars in loses. Since they would probably sell anyhow at $199, that makes no sense.
I agree. My $299 and $99 scenario is for those who are delusional enough to think that Msoft stature as a company would have them miss out on making money whenever they can and the game business is something they’re in to just hang around and toy with. Usually it comes up when one brings up the 7.5 billion investment in zeni that will take years to make back. Because if they discounted both systems $100 they would sell millions and millions of consoles and lock millions of millions into their eco. It would be an investment as well. There are those that think the 7.5 billion was a drop in the bucket because the company has x amount of profit this year. Although, it has calmed some since the news of doubling gold came out so...
 
Are we changing what we were just saying?
Are we? If we are saying that XSS is holding back next gen resolutions then I guess we agree. I don't know when MS said that XSS wasn't a lower resolution console though.

18 million subscribers sounds great. Unfortunately, without context we don’t know how many are paying $1 or how many are temporary subs. That’s what Msoft does and does consistently. There are those who choose to believe it and those who don’t. It’s not lying, it’s more like partial truth. Remember, this is the same company who not long ago advertised “most powerful console” and changed that shit QUICK when they started getting beat in head to heads. So yes, they have announced 18 million. Now, they can elaborate and let everyone know the breakdown.
How does that affect you as a gamer especially one that doesn't play Xbox? Have you filed a complaint to the BBB for their 'Xbox powerful console' claims? You can also let them know about their potential deception about the Gamepass number too. This is obviously pretty important to you. It is your choice to see some sort of deception in their press releases but you can do something about it.

I agree. My $299 and $99 scenario is for those who are delusional enough to think that Msoft stature as a company would have them miss out on making money whenever they can and the game business is something they’re in to just hang around and toy with. Usually it comes up when one brings up the 7.5 billion investment in zeni that will take years to make back. Because if they discounted both systems $100 they would sell millions and millions of consoles and lock millions of millions into their eco. It would be an investment as well. There are those that think the 7.5 billion was a drop in the bucket because the company has x amount of profit this year. Although, it has calmed some since the news of doubling gold came out so...
It seems like the delusion is that MS has to release their software on other consoles in order to recoup their investments with their studios. I don't ever remember seeing someone saying that MS does not need to make money.

The XSS is one way they are trying to make money by lowering the cost of entry into console gaming. Dev may complain but gamers that don't have tons of disposable income aren't. People said that MS doesn't care about gamers but that is hard to argue when look at their console offerings.
 
Last edited:

Redlancet

Banned
Who's we? The fanboys you mean? I know it's fun on Gaf to poke fun at anything Microsoft but one dev has voiced his opinion on the S, that's definitely not conclusive to how the S will cope going forward. You honestly think Microsoft hasn't extensively tested all in house projects on both consoles? They built the S to run next gen games at lower resolution and without certain bells and whistles, if it couldn't do that they either would have bumped up the specs or scrapped the idea.

You people need to wake up and smell the coffee. Microsoft are not going to spend billions on R@D while talking to first and third party developers on a console that will hold back next gen games lol.
i dont if this post is serious or just trolling,dont know anymore
 

FrankWza

Member
How does that affect you as a gamer especially one that doesn't play Xbox? Have you filed a complaint to the BBB for their 'Xbox powerful console' claims? You can also let them know about their potential deception about the Gamepass number too. This is obviously pretty important to you. It is your choice to see some sort of deception in their press releases but you can do something about it.
It’s a poor representation of segment of an industry I support.
It seems like the delusion is that MS has to release their software on other consoles in order to recoup their investments with their studios. I don't ever remember seeing someone saying that MS does not need to make money.
No. The delusion is that they can spend money without a return. That’s how so many of you are getting 3 years of gamepass for $1. You’re paying for 3 years of gold upfront at god knows what kind of markup which actually has no value. That’s why it was going to double before all the crying.
 
Last edited:

S0ULZB0URNE

Member
Are we? If we are saying that XSS is holding back next gen resolutions then I guess we agree. I don't know when MS said that XSS wasn't a lower resolution console though.


How does that affect you as a gamer especially one that doesn't play Xbox? Have you filed a complaint to the BBB for their 'Xbox powerful console' claims? You can also let them know about their potential deception about the Gamepass number too. This is obviously pretty important to you. It is your choice to see some sort of deception in their press releases but you can do something about it.


It seems like the delusion is that MS has to release their software on other consoles in order to recoup their investments with their studios. I don't ever remember seeing someone saying that MS does not need to make money.

The XSS is one way they are trying to make money by lowering the cost of entry into console gaming. Dev may complain but gamers that don't have tons of disposable income aren't. People said that MS doesn't care about gamers but that is hard to argue when look at their console offerings.
I said XSS isn't next gen. You are attempting to spin this away.
 
I don't know when MS said that XSS wasn't a lower resolution console though.

Xbox Series S delivers four times the processing power of an Xbox One console and supports experiences up to 120fps,” says Liz Hamren, head of platform engineering and hardware at Xbox. “The primary difference between Xbox Series X and Xbox Series S is in resolution. Through talking to our customers, we found that many of our fans prioritize framerate over resolution, so we wanted to build a console that didn’t require a 4K TV.”


EDIT : also Jason Ronald said it here. Timestamped at 0:53

 
Last edited:
I said XSS isn't next gen. You are attempting to spin this away.
The XSS and XSX are in the same gen. There has been no evidence that outside of graphics it can't do something the PS5 or XSX can do. If you have any evidence you can post the examples. You make the claim prove your point.

It’s a poor representation of segment of an industry I support.

No. The delusion is that they can spend money without a return. That’s how so many of you are getting 3 years of gamepass for $1. You’re paying for 3 years of gold upfront at god knows what kind of markup which actually has no value. That’s why it was going to double before all the crying.
Please point out anyone that said MS wants to spend money with no return. The argument is that they don't need the PlayStation to make money not that they don't want to make any at all. That is the delusion. The XSS exists because MS is trying to find more avenues to make money. They have to appeal to more than just the hardcore.

I don't like Sony's paywall cloud saves or their refund policy. They won't be rolling those policies back unlike the XBL Gold price hike. I am assuming you'll get on Sony about that. Those are also poor representations of an industry you support. Maybe even more closely if you use Sony products.


EDIT : also Jason Ronald said it here. Timestamped :


OK? This supports my point that MS never said that the XSS was not a low resolution console. In your quote they said gamers preferred high frame rate. The XSS is more than capable of that.
 
Last edited:

S0ULZB0URNE

Member
The XSS and XSX are in the same gen. There has been no evidence that outside of graphics it can't do something the PS5 or XSX can do. If you have any evidence you can post the examples. You make the claim prove your point.


Please point out anyone that said MS wants to spend money with no return. The argument is that they don't need the PlayStation to make money not that they don't want to make any at all. That is the delusion. The XSS exists because MS is trying to find more avenues to make money. They have to appeal to more than just the hardcore.

I don't like Sony's paywall cloud saves or their refund policy. They won't be rolling those policies back unlike the XBL Gold price hike. I am assuming you'll get on Sony about that. Those are also poor representations of an industry you support. Maybe even more closely if you use Sony products.


OK? This supports my point that MS never said that the XSS was not a low resolution console. In your quote they said gamers preferred high frame rate. The XSS is more than capable of that.
XSX and have PS5 games in 120fps that the XSS does not.
 
OK? This supports my point that MS never said that the XSS was not a low resolution console. In your quote they said gamers preferred high frame rate. The XSS is more than capable of that.

Just wanted to show quote from MS when they say that XSS is just a lower resolution console, but it is not when there are other sacrifices beyond resolution.

I said XSS isn't next gen. You are attempting to spin this away.

The XSS and XSX are in the same gen. There has been no evidence that outside of graphics it can't do something the PS5 or XSX can do. If you have any evidence you can post the examples. You make the claim prove your point.

XSS doesn't have a 120fps mode in Destiny 2, while PS5/XSX does.
 

FrankWza

Member
Please point out anyone that said MS wants to spend money with no return.
Not that they want to. That they can and will and it’s no big deal.
I don't like Sony's paywall cloud saves or their refund policy.
What paywall cloud saves? The one on PS5 for PS5 games before they’ve allowed expansion storage to be used? That will be sorted out. You can backup PS4 saves on PS4 and PS5.
They won't be rolling those policies back unlike the XBL Gold price hike.
The gold price hike will be applied elsewhere. You think they’re not getting their pound of flesh?
The XSS exists because MS is trying to find more avenues to make money.
it falls in with how they do things. They’re intentionally gimping their premium console and “most powerful Xbox” by extending the floor. The perfect way to never reach their ceiling. That’s exactly what’s going to happen with gp and it gpu. They doubled the price of gold for what? What’s the value of their gold subscription and why did it need to be doubled? Maybe it was so they could keep churning that $1 loophole and have people preload 3 years of gold at $360 instead of $180? We’ll see...
 
XSX and have PS5 games in 120fps that the XSS does not.

Gears 5 runs at 120fps in multi-player mode on XSS just like the XSX. Just because a dev refuses to make a feature work on the XSS doesn't mean it isn't capable. The XSS also doesn't have raytracing in Control but Watchdogs Legion has it. It's on the developer to use the features available to them.

Not that they want to. That they can and will and it’s no big deal.

What paywall cloud saves? The one on PS5 for PS5 games before they’ve allowed expansion storage to be used? That will be sorted out. You can backup PS4 saves on PS4 and PS5.

The gold price hike will be applied elsewhere. You think they’re not getting their pound of flesh?

it falls in with how they do things. They’re intentionally gimping their premium console and “most powerful Xbox” by extending the floor. The perfect way to never reach their ceiling. That’s exactly what’s going to happen with gp and it gpu. They doubled the price of gold for what? What’s the value of their gold subscription and why did it need to be doubled? Maybe it was so they could keep churning that $1 loophole and have people preload 3 years of gold at $360 instead of $180? We’ll see...
There is no way to backup your PS5 game saves outside of the cloud which is behind a paywall. Sony will have their 'pound of flesh' as you put it. I do like how you didn't comment on the horrible refund policy and gave them the benefit of the doubt on the cloud save paywall.

You have no idea how MS will make their money but it does appear that unlike with Sony you think MS has some sort of sinister motive. I'll judge MS based on reality not on my personal feelings. The one fact is that MS has multiple avenues to get money and if that avenue is to make great games and services I'll support them. They go the Sony route on cloud saves and refunds I won't.

There was no 'intentional gimping' there was the creation of another device more people could afford. You might not like that but the gamers who actually bought it and play it do and they voted with their wallets and not just made comments on a forum. I'd take the customers word over someone who is not. Even the devs who complain about it not having enough RAM admit that the CPU is good and it's a great move for consumers even if it's less than ideal for them.
 
Top Bottom