• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

David Jaffe: Herman Hulst pushed for playstation's Japan Studios closure.

Danjin44

The nicest person on this forum
They had a State of Play not that long ago focused entirely on Japanese games. I think it makes more sense for them to market and occasionally fund Japanese titles like they’ve done sometimes with Street Fighter and Final Fantasy as opposed to trying to start a new Japanese studio in an already crowded market.

Now, they could try to purchase a Japanese studio like Capcom or Square, but that’s a whole other can of worms that could spark some controversy. So let’s not dig that up at least in this thread.
THANK GOD for 3rd party games, it wasn't for them I have no reason to own PS5 at this point. I just miss quirky first party Japanese games Sony used give me, thats all.
 

Ozzie666

Member
Not everyone enjoys the titles produced from Sony Japan, but they add to Sony's overall portfolio. The more you strip these things away, the more boring your offerings are going to become. These titles add something, even if they just break even. You'll end up like Ubisoft, with a stigma about your game offerings. As it stands Sony already has the single player cinematic rep, I am fine with those games myself. Variety is important though.
 
Last edited:

Doom85

Member
THANK GOD for 3rd party games, it wasn't for them I have no reason to own PS5 at this point. I just miss quirky first party Japanese games Sony used give me, thats all.

Well, aside from the fact I do like Sony’s western games generally, I own a PS5 also because I don’t trust Switch to run all third party games well, and lord knows Xbox appeals to me very little. And no, I don’t do PC gaming.
 

Danjin44

The nicest person on this forum
Well, aside from the fact I do like Sony’s western games generally, I own a PS5 also because I don’t trust Switch to run all third party games well, and lord knows Xbox appeals to me very little. And no, I don’t do PC gaming.
Unfortunately for me most of them dont appeal to me and I tried, I played Horizon, God of War Ragnarok, The Last of Us 2 and Ghost of Tsunami and didn't like any of them.

I dont know what exactly I should look forward to.....maybe Rise of the Rōnin but other than that they have nothing for me.
 
Last edited:

Northeastmonk

Gold Member
Fortnite isn’t even the biggest game player , sales, or revenue wise buddy. Get over your hate boner.

Go check out Minecraft, Roblox, and Genshin Impact. That’s the kind of money all these places want.

Edit: I was wrong. Seems like 2022 Fortnite made almost 6 billion and Genshin made 4 billion.

Really though I’d much rather make a successful gacha game than a BR like Fortnite. Far more work.
6 billion dollars. That’s F you money man. :) from a single game.

I don’t sit there hating it all day. I don’t honestly care, but that’s what I think they’re all chasing. Roblox was interesting because Minecraft blew up and Roblox was just blocks. Make your own mini game with block shaped people. It’s absolutely crazy. You’d literally need to make some sorta building sim in a popular skin and you’ll make billions off today’s kids.
 

YukiOnna

Member
I don't really know about believing Jaffe or not, but nothing under Jim Ryan and Hulst era has instilled confidence in the opposite. Buying up 3rd party exclusives isn't really going to change that and isn't their games to begin with, not promoted partnerships.

I definitely miss the WWS era under Shuhei which also brought us Bloodborne, or even Freedom Wars. Asobi isn't really enough to cover types such as Patapon to Gravity Rush to Last Guardian and it's that they sort of lack their identity as a Japanese company or living up to Worldwide Studios these days, but that's just me. I need to see more than just paying out for FF. Rise of the Ronin is one of those, yes.
 

EDMIX

Member
Are you serious!? Just because the game has Japanese setting it doesn't fucking make it Japanese game,

Oh I see, so Sony's issue is Japan itself? Because so many other games from Japan Studio sold more then Ghost Of Tsushima and evil Sony didn't give em sequels, gotcha lol

So...Sony doesn't seem to have an issue with Japan as clearly many studios still exist there, they don't have anything against the setting as clearly Ghost Of Tsushima exist

So...I don't get your point of saying anything regarding east or west, you are merely looking at more successful developers being rewarding for making successful titles.

Where they suppose to punish Sucker Punch and reward the Ico team? If that game moved 10 million units, we'd fucking see a sequel JUST like we get many GT titles, just like Team Asobi expanding.

This has nothing to fucking do with east vs west.

It has to do with games selling continuing to do business and games not selling going under. That isn't a east vs west type idea, that is business in general

You think Evolution studios NOT being Japanese magically was going to allow them to make flop after flop or?

What team in the west do you know under Sony that is just allowed to make endless flops? lol
 

Fake

Member
When did those games launch?

Re-read what I posted. I said 'pushing', never 'release'. Sony indeed pushed many GaaS on their state of play/Playstation Direct, not to mention buying the Destiny company and their possible tlous multiplayer.
 

ulantan

Member
Re-read what I posted. I said 'pushing', never 'release'. Sony indeed pushed many GaaS on their state of play/Playstation Direct, not to mention buying the Destiny company and their possible tlous multiplayer.
How has that failed? What happened to indicate failure?
 
Last edited:

Kenpachii

Member
Dunno why people are against gaas, sony isn't a charity they need money and growth and gaas is exactly the direction u need to move into to stay relevant in the market.
 
Game development is not a charity, you need to bring in money or risk closure.
Such a sterile view to have for a brand that has had great success from their normal and expected business practices. Especially when considering what fans want and expect, and the whole notion of catering to one's loyal base.
 

Kenpachii

Member
Such a sterile view to have for a brand that has had great success from their normal and expected business practices. Especially when considering what fans want and expect, and the whole notion of catering to one's loyal base.

True, subscriptions and digital content bring in a lot of money for sony now. So they should follow there loyal fanbase and develop gaas like content.
 
Last edited:
fans want
🤔
SdsKB2k.jpg
 
True, subscriptions and digital content bring in a lot of money for sony now. So they should follow there loyal fanbase and develop gaas like content.
Maybe, but not if the risk is unknown and it will definitely have some kind of effect on resources, and subsequently the quality of trying to cook too many pies at once.
 

Men_in_Boxes

Snake Oil Salesman
Such a sterile view to have for a brand that has had great success from their normal and expected business practices. Especially when considering what fans want and expect, and the whole notion of catering to one's loyal base.

PlayStations "loyal base" is Fortnite and Warzone players. Those two games are waaaaay more popular than anything coming from first party.
 

Kenpachii

Member
Maybe, but not if the risk is unknown and it will definitely have some kind of effect on resources, and subsequently the quality of trying to cook too many pies at once.

So was multiplayer and subscriptions yet here we are. I wouldn't be shocked if the most played games on PS5 are all multiplayer games to start with that are all gaas based.

Good luck in investing in the PS6 area 400+ million for a single player game that can bomb at any moment.
 

ArtHands

Thinks buying more servers can fix a bad patch
Not everyone enjoys the titles produced from Sony Japan, but they add to Sony's overall portfolio. The more you strip these things away, the more boring your offerings are going to become. These titles add something, even if they just break even. You'll end up like Ubisoft, with a stigma about your game offerings. As it stands Sony already has the single player cinematic rep, I am fine with those games myself. Variety is important though.

We’re getting bunch of gaas soon
 
PlayStations "loyal base" is Fortnite and Warzone players. Those two games are waaaaay more popular than anything coming from first party.
I thought Gaff was an older group of players. PlayStation started out with Japanese games, and the switch to more Western content didn't really happen until sometime around the PS3 gen. Sony wanted a piece of 360's popularity at a time when they weren't so popular like today.

I'd prefer the old PlayStation to today's by a lot.
 

Phase

Member
Game development is not a charity, you need to bring in money or risk closure.
This sentiment always annoys me. They bring in enough money, as do most of these companies. They don't just want a consistent stream of money, they want an exponentially growing stream regardless of if it will eventually kill the quality of their products and alienate their customers.
 
Last edited:

Men_in_Boxes

Snake Oil Salesman
I thought Gaff was an older group of players. PlayStation started out with Japanese games, and the switch to more Western content didn't really happen until sometime around the PS3 gen. Sony wanted a piece of 360's popularity at a time when they weren't so popular like today.

I'd prefer the old PlayStation to today's by a lot.

GAF is not representative of PlayStations user base. PlayStation players overwhelmingly prefer multiplayer despite people here trying to ignore that fact.
 
Was shutting down the Japanese studios really a hard decision? They have been underperforming massively. AstroBot team is the only one worthwhile, and they moved staff over to them and increased headcount.

They still work strongly with partners like Kojima too, so I dunno why Jaffe makes this out to be some huge ordeal. It's stuff we already know
 

killatopak

Member
You have an amazing lists of Japanese IP and you keep squandering them Sony. Please. At least bring back Bloody Roar since you now own EVO. Make Asobi make Ape Escape or something.
 

Bernardougf

Gold Member
I wonder how long the people living in denial about this gaas situation from Sony are going to wait to wake up and see the fire burning trough the multiple smoke signs that we had in the last year or so ...

And dont need to @ me because is always the same people in every topic with news about this literally beeing the doggy seated on the table in the burning room saying "its fine"

Meanwhile Im going to try and find the date for the next SP game from sony first party studios... oh yes.. I cant .. there is none.

" but but but sony only announce games close to launch now" ... really ?.... bullshit.
SM 2 - 2 1/2 years
God of war - 2 years
Horizon FW - 2 years
 

SlimySnake

Flashless at the Golden Globes
Was shutting down the Japanese studios really a hard decision? They have been underperforming massively. AstroBot team is the only one worthwhile, and they moved staff over to them and increased headcount.

They still work strongly with partners like Kojima too, so I dunno why Jaffe makes this out to be some huge ordeal. It's stuff we already know
It’s just a microcosm of a bigger issue. The western focus on cinematic games, The new gaas focus, and just cutting off your roots. It sent a bad message and we are now seeing just how poorly Herman has run his western studios to the ground.

Now he’s replaced Connie booth with his stooge from GG. The European takeover of Sony is complete. Japanese studios are gone. Us studios are making and failing at gaas games. Naughty dog is in disarray. Cory has spent 5 years on his new ip with nothing to show for it and worse doesn’t have it ready to go into production so they are doing dlc he himself said he would never do because he wanted to tell the story and finish it in two games. Bend has only revealed a logo after 4.5 years. Bp and sucker punch have been mia for 3 years. Media molecule almost 4 years too.

Things add up.
 
Last edited:

EDMIX

Member
Such a sterile view to have for a brand that has had great success from their normal and expected business practices. Especially when considering what fans want and expect, and the whole notion of catering to one's loyal base.

Considering some of the IP that move monster units on PS...I'd be very, very careful of making that flawed ass argument lol

They have done well having many genres and different types of games they support, I don't see that changing as even buying some of those teams is so that THEY could make those online games as oppose to having their other core single player teams make them.

PS's base is not simply just solely single player, by the numbers, factually, objectively...that simply isn't true.

So using your exact logic, it literally supports Sony going towards a online direction......
 
Considering some of the IP that move monster units on PS...I'd be very, very careful of making that flawed ass argument lol

They have done well having many genres and different types of games they support, I don't see that changing as even buying some of those teams is so that THEY could make those online games as oppose to having their other core single player teams make them.

PS's base is not simply just solely single player, by the numbers, factually, objectively...that simply isn't true.

So using your exact logic, it literally supports Sony going towards a online direction......
It's not really an argument, just a desire that I know will never be reverted back to. :messenger_crying: Personally couldn't give a fuck about business, just my own personal enjoyment.
 

EDMIX

Member
It's not really an argument, just a desire that I know will never be reverted back to. :messenger_crying: Personally couldn't give a fuck about business, just my own personal enjoyment.

Sony wanted a piece of 360's popularity at a time when they weren't so popular like today.

I'd prefer the old PlayStation to today's by a lot.
smh, if this is merely your personal opinion, i'm not really sure why you are arguing with others on here.

What you are saying by your own admission isn't rooted by any business logic, but simply by a personal subjective opinion of what you like.....

What I'm saying doesn't have shit to do with what i personally like or not, the logic of catering to a loyal fanbase is NOT a subjective thing just talking about what you like, you are directly questioning how they run their business and making a point on how they should.

I'm point out to you that its flawed as the vast majority on PS (like on all platforms mind you) are based on multiplayer online games.

Thus...you are actually suggesting they indeed support that um "loyal fanbase" that happens to be majority online MP titles....

You are not in that majority friend.
This sentiment always annoys me.
Continue to the let it lol This isn't about feelings, this is about reality and business.

The absolute vast majority of what I play is singleplayer...this year alone, Hogwarts, Octopath 2, FFXVI, Spiderman 2, Baldur's Gate 3 (i don't partake in any of the MP stuff lol) Starfield, Yakuza title coming up and much more, not 1 MP title was bought by me this year lol

annnd I'm still going to say this move makes sense. Most are playing Fifa, Madden, Destiny, Call Of Duty, Fortnite, APEX etc.
 
smh, if this is merely your personal opinion, i'm not really sure why you are arguing with others on here.
Oh wait, *looks around* is this the business board, or the gaming board? Don't like my posting style?
Sad Universal Music GIF by Sigrid Bernson


And I'm not arguing, people are just quoting my posts.
 
Top Bottom