Last AC game that got 85+ MC was Black Flag.
Every game that isn’t made by Sony gets shit on here. They’re threatened very easily, and know that 3rd party games like this will run better on Xbox
Why against gow and not against another full fledged open world?How would you rate the graphics compared to what's out there now? How would you rate it against PS4 God of War for example? Is it on the realm of what you would consider 'next-gen'? What games do you consider next-gen?
Thats been like a standard feature of third and first person games for a couple of gens now. At least Valhalla has a run button, Odyssey didnt, and as much as i adore that game, i would of loved a run button.So far so good! It’s definitely better looking than the last game on a XoX.
Pros so far:
I do like the slight change up to the battle system to use shields more.
I also like the new item and points of interest system.
Cons so far:
I do not like the click L to run
I miss alexios
Yong is a flimsy next-door gamer sometimes invited to previews because he has a following. He's sometimes useful for gathering and regurgitating early sources, but that's all the reference I'd use him for.
I think it's the teams. That Unity team was very talented, had the best version of the Anvil engine and its really sad that we never got another AC from them. It is obvious that the Black Flag team just used their own version of the engine to make origins and now this game.The cost of scaling the game from 1 city to a massive open-world game working with a 1.3 TF base console.
Did the same and both run like shit
LOL. What a fucking disaster if lots of PC players are doing this and having similar results.Did the same and both run like shit
Game runs like absolute shit for me. 3700x with RTX 3080. Crashed when changing settings. Crashed after I lowered it to 1080 because it had ridiculous frame rate drops at 4k. It won't even detect my generic PS4 controller which works fine in Watchdogs. My experiment with Ubisoft+ is not looking so good.
Beginning. It seems to run fine now. I think settings changes don't really stick and that is causing the game to run worse. Restarting the game after changing something helps. I'm fine running it at 1080p if required, but may try a medium 4k if I get bored.Yikes! The game runs absolutely fine for me. Never dips below 60FPS. Where are you at in the game? I'm still in the beginning.
Just started playing it. Did the benchmark and average FPS is about 80FPS with 4k/Ultra on a 3090. I'm well above 70FPS while playing unlocked framerate but with VSYNC turned on at 120Hz. Will be back with some graphics feature impressions.
I have some 5 hours in Valhalla and intend to finish it before the month ends, but yeah in populated places framerate dips below 60 which is annoying as fuck. But outside of them it is smooth.Oh boy what have I done...
If I can get $15 worth of fun out of these two games in the next month then whatever.
If nothing else at least I'll get to check out all the DLC for Anno 1800 and decide if any of them are worth a permanent purchase.
The guy plays on normal and then moan about the game being easy...with 2 other levels of difficulty available that you can change anytime.
How would you rate the graphics compared to what's out there now? How would you rate it against PS4 God of War for example? Is it on the realm of what you would consider 'next-gen'? What games do you consider next-gen?
I don't think that's the main issue... I mean making it harder would fix that maybe (not that the combat seem involved enough anyway) but then instead of 45 hours of bloat you get more. This being his main complaint would probably make it an even worse experience.