• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

Baby Yoda Canceled Amid Accusations of Genocide

VAL0R

Banned
Doesn't the female frog creature say they aren't fertilized? Therefore they are not frog babies yet, correct?

Edit:

o·vum
/ˈōvəm/
Learn to pronounce

noun
BIOLOGY

  1. a mature female reproductive cell, especially of a human or other animal, which can divide to give rise to an embryo usually only after fertilization by a male cell.
    "the ovum contributes one chromosome of each pair to the fertilized cell"
 
Last edited:

Kamina

Golden Boy
These people must not be watching any animal documentaries either.

Sometimes things dont turn out well. Stop trying to turn the world into your comfort-zone. It will never happen. And raising children in a fake comfort-zone environment will only make them soft, giving them a mental handicap when they arrive in the unforgiving real world eventually.
 

Pallas

Gold Member
It’s the law of nature.

lMtaoYH.gif
 

DeepEnigma

Gold Member
Puppet. Guessing they didn't want an excessive CGI nightmare that was the prequel trilogy. Yoda looks so dated in the prequels now, whereas Yoda in the original trilogy is timeless. Baby "Yoda" has some janky moments, but he generally looks more real than CGI would.

I believe they wanted to stick to practical effects puppeteering for him like the originals. I like it, actually.
 
S

SLoWMoTIoN

Unconfirmed Member
Good too much SW cancer out as is.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Redlancet

Banned
If reporters braved and scoured the depths of society for these opinions and they spouted their ridiculous opinions on TV, the people would become a laughing stock and the news stations would either be ridiculed for stupidity or for bullying/exploiting the mentally ill for cheap screen time. They’d likely lose rational viewers.

But when it’s on the internet, they concentrate a few of the worst tweets, throw 2 minutes of writing to tie the cherry picking together, then publish it and people willingly share the manufactured controversy. It’s bottom feeder behaviour by big and small outlets alike, and while people with their head screwed on will instantly dismiss it for the inane rambling it is, even here people give it more credibility than it’s worth by discussing it and letting it feed into the larger picture of outrage culture that’s amplified so easily and so well on the internet.
man you are so rigth on the spot
 
Top Bottom