Zathalus
Member
Yes, exactly. It's apparently the same for both consoles.So basically GCN flops instead of RDNA2 Flops?
I remember that's how Microsoft described BC with the Series consoles.
Yes, exactly. It's apparently the same for both consoles.So basically GCN flops instead of RDNA2 Flops?
I remember that's how Microsoft described BC with the Series consoles.
Yes, exactly. It's apparently the same for both consoles.
Edit: I believe NXGamer mentioned that the PS5 will run games in three back compat modes: PS5 (full clocks), PS4 Pro (Ps4 Pro clocks), or PS4 (PS4 clocks). They all run in GCN emulation mode though so you don't get the RDNA2 benefits as someone else mentioned.I didn't know that was the case with the PS5 as well. I don't remember it being mentioned in the Road to PS5.
Still it's interesting how much native ports matter.
I think they have updated the BC on PS5. Hence why we get 120 FPS PS4 games now played on PS5 (Warzone as an example).
Yeah, it was mentioned in a DF article a while back. It makes sense as Native PS5 games do get a performance boost over the enhanced titles. Fallen Order springs to mind.I didn't know that was the case with the PS5 as well. I don't remember it being mentioned in the Road to PS5.
Still it's interesting how much native ports matter.
No, Alex explicitly says it is not a native app.
Timestamped.
Not sure what you mean.
What is it that you no comprendes?
Yeah, it was mentioned in a DF article a while back. It makes sense as Native PS5 games do get a performance boost over the enhanced titles. Fallen Order springs to mind.
The text and the video explicitly say this is a BC+ title right?
But does that mean its a native PS5 game or a BC+ title?
In case it wasnt obvious im being facetious about this........wondering how people are failing to understand this is a BC+ title when its been explicitly said to be a BC+ title.
BC game with a 60fps (or 120fps) upgrade instead of just standard BC with no real improvements, I think.Thanks. The fuck is "gen 9 aware"? BC but not BC?
The text and the video explicitly say this is a BC+ title right?
But does that mean its a native PS5 game or a BC+ title?
In case it wasnt obvious im being facetious about this........wondering how people are failing to understand this is a BC+ title when its been explicitly said to be a BC+ title.
I'm honestly curious, can you link me videos or articles where he was intellectually dishonest? And about what exactly?
its a stupid new buzz word "gen 9 aware" , like some advanced AI or some shit
I don't think I've seen games like this referred to as "BC+" or "gen 9 aware" before.
I had to check again because it was such a brief [and only] mention. So John says, "you get the best picture quality on the Series X, but they are relatively the same". But neither he nor Alex says why. Is it the resolution, texture quality, IQ, or something else, they never mentioned. They also didn't show the actual differences either, apart from this one sentence. So take it as you will.
He's purposely dismissive of consoles cause he likes when people throw a fit about plastic boxes. He likes PC and all his little comments are just too piss the shitty people who harass him and the other DF guys off.Alex can be a smug PC master race type at times, and his dismissiveness of consoles can be aggravating as well.
That being said, the sheer hate he gets here is massively puzzling, or the fact that people think he is a Microsoft shill. He obviously knows his stuff, and I always find articles and videos from him to be worth it, he often spots things that others miss.
I guess he was dismissive of Playstation in the past and that got him his hate-club and the idea that people think he has a Microsoft bias, when he actually has a PC master race bias.
How can we shout at each other without the summaries?
Well damn is it that serious
PC2.Which system does he prefer?
Disastrous?Our review of this disastrous remaster is going to be up tomorrow. Stay tuned.
He's a nice friendly chap, I honestly don't get the hate thrown at him or at Michael (NXG) here. Just pretty unnecessary.The best thing about Alex is how much some of you guys dislike him. Me and Alex both think it's hilarious.
I agree. It's a 20-minute+ video; they should have talked about the differences more and show them. I zoned out for a second and missed out on that quick statement and ended up posting an incomplete summary on the forum.Isn't the point of a comparison to discuss those differences?
To quote myself because I am really disappointed at a lot of these remasters. Another thing i don't like is the indoor lighting. How it just looks so dark, where as on the original the gun was lit and everything popped more despite that being less realistic because WHO CARES it's a video game.I have mixed feelings about the color and lighting changes. Also I don't like how the particles, bloom and lens flares look now at points.
But at the same time the bloom could look really overblown at times on OG. I think mostly, they should have taken more care with the color grading, and particles/flares.
Xbox, but only slightly. It also doesn't count as it is not a native version on either console.Im to lazy to read all your bullshit or watch the video so can someone just quote me the answer to the following question: who was this "another one" for ?
Im to lazy to read all your bullshit or watch the video so can someone just quote me the answer to the following question: who was this "another one" for ?
It is not grown up to make a baseless statement and then when reached for a comment say ''Its basically in every video he's in'', thus providing no exact examples. Nobody can thus verify what you mean because if its so omni-present, one thing may have annoyed more than it would any other.So in your world, it's not grown up to dislike the views of someone who is consistently intellectually dishonest?
Ok... whatever.
Calling for actual facts usually does not land well with folks who just dislike on x and then not highlight why that is.I'm honestly curious, can you link me videos or articles where he was intellectually dishonest? And about what exactly?
So you basically can't really point out a specific notion of this behavior, because its apparently omnipresent.It's basically in every video he's in. There's rarely a case where he's not dropping one clanger or another.
Then it wouldn't be too hard to point out something specific, wouldn't you?Anytime he's discussing consoles, pretty much. It's a known quantity at this point.
"...which is why I brought Alex Battaglia here with me to talk about...."
Turned it off.
No thanks.
I had to check again because it was such a brief [and only] mention. So John says, "you get the best picture quality on the Series X, but they are relatively the same". But neither he nor Alex says why. Is it the resolution, texture quality, IQ, or something else, they never mentioned. They also didn't show the actual differences either, apart from this one sentence. So take it as you will.
Thanks. The fuck is "gen 9 aware"? BC but not BC?
"...which is why I brought Alex Battaglia here with me to talk about...."
Turned it off.
No thanks.
I hate DRS when it is "agressive". Its very noticeable: Marvels Avengers ps5 ..ughDAT aggressive DRS 2160p.
It should be even a case of study to see how gamers perceive the heavy variation in IQ.
It's true though. He gets little digs in about consoles in every video and no I'm not going to go back and find timestamps.It is not grown up to make a baseless statement and then when reached for a comment say ''Its basically in every video he's in'', thus providing no exact examples. Nobody can thus verify what you mean because if its so omni-present, one thing may have annoyed more than it would any other.
That's why people ask for examples so that statements such as yourselves gain prominence and coherency and aren't just hollow words.
Calling for actual facts usually does not land well with folks who just dislike on x and then not highlight why that is.
As is evidenced by the very reaction given:
So you basically can't really point out a specific notion of this behavior, because its apparently omnipresent.
Noted.
You may also just say you made that original statement because it scores a lot of ''Hey i agree'' thumbs up likes. In fact i'd rather appreciate that then just making the statement as given.
Then it wouldn't be too hard to point out something specific, wouldn't you?
And why specifically Alex-only? Why not John or Rich or anyone else on the team? It surely cannot be that only Alex is doing this. *
* Note that i am not invested in that. I just watched an entertaining video.
Wait I thought avengers PS5 was 2160cb on the horizontal axis?I hate DRS when it is "agressive". Its very noticeable: Marvels Avengers ps5 ..ugh
Wait I thought avengers PS5 was 2160cb on the horizontal axis?
Understood, but is that what’s happening on the PS5 avengers and it’s soft image? Should not have to engage drs that much with cb already.CB don't prevent DRS. They can be both add to the game.
Only in quality mode its 2160p where it looks great. In performance mode it's "checkerboard 1800p" but in reality the game doesn't come close to that. The other game that looks kinda shit due to aggressive DRS is the ps5 patched version of Division 2.Wait I thought avengers PS5 was 2160cb on the horizontal axis?