No, I didn’t think the standard combat in Fallout 4 was good and I doubt I would have enjoyed Fallout 4 had it not been for vats. I also doubt I would have enjoyed Skyrim if it wasn’t for the combat freedom.I noticed you say that you enjoyed VATS, did you think the standard combat was also good? Because if you did its odd you didn't think starfields combat look good because it looked very similar to Fallout4's.
The visuals of Skyrim and fallout4 is a similar situation to starfield. Looks good enough but lacking visual features other games have.
The creature comment my have jumped at you, but that does not stop it from not making sense.
They look like robots? How do robots move? How do you know the aliens dont move like robots?
Crabs in real life move pretty robotic anyway. Your comment dont make much sense when robota can now move like this.
Your gonna hate me for saying this, but the picture above reminds me of No man's skyEither some of y'all have completely forgotten what PS3 games looked like, or I had a busted ass Sega Genesis equivalent PS3, cause anyone who thinks this looks like a PS3 game needs to visit an optometrist at the earliest.
VATS was just a workaround for poor FPS gameplay and it sucked all the fun out of the game. Booo vatsI am just going to put this out there,
I think i have around 250 hours in Fallout 4, and I honestly believe I don't think i would have got to twenty hours if it was not for the vats system.
I love the system and somehow IMO it really makes the game special.
I have tried to play it without, but everything feels so janky and floaty.
I really hope starfield has vats as a perk or a skill, i will be super dupah disappointed if it does not
It will be playable in third person.This game looks insane to me and I'm not even a scifi guy like that.
My only issue is the perspective. First person literally makes me nauseous.
If this was 3rd person perfected I'd buy an Xbox by launch.
It looks THAT good. And I'm not saying this as a warrior or anything but watching the reveal it reiterated to me that frankly, all games are not in fact created equally.
The sheer density of the systems and ambition of scale would have me put this as the first AAAA game I've ever seen.
Rdr2 is the closest to that from last gen, but the rigid mission structure hurt.
It stands alone in that classification from what I've seen.
The faces are horrific to me but I admittedly normally dislike games that seek photorealism. Past that though, it's literally breaking my brain.
To Bethesda and another 40+ million sold.
Good analysis. I think he is dead on that the characters need subsurface scattering to feel more alive. And the performance needs work. Stuff like RT GI is probably a pure fantasy wishlist item at this point but considering it will be coming to PC as well who knows.
Those are TRUE shots from the video. The game looks EXACTLY like that. You guys gotta be trolling right now.Come on guys, this does NOT look like a 720p PS3 game, texturing and lighting alone. While those shots may be the upmost cranked to the max circumstances at the moment, and it remains to be seen how the final product will fare, PS3, it is not.
They are basically a MS/Sony buzzfeed at the moment. Ignoring recently released next gen patches in favour of spending time covering everything MS showcase related. It just so happens that MS stuff is 9-12 months out.
I've written shit you've probably seen. WTH? Lol.Reading comprehension is hard, I know. I have not been trolling this game either.
They are basically a MS buzzfeed at the moment. Ignoring recently released next gen patches in favour of spending time covering everything MS showcase related.
I wasn't trolling, and I agree with you.I've written shit you've probably seen. WTH? Lol.
That said, this game looks really good, especially at this scale. I'm just not seeing the issue aside from performance. I've said before, its the best looking Bethesda game they've ever made. No hyperbole.
I live with a chip on my shoulder. That's how I stay dope. LolI wasn't trolling.
Stop viewing everything with a chip on your shoulder.
They said everything after the first hour was running on the xsx. So Diablo 4, Starfield and Kojima was rendered on the XSX using machine learning A.I.They could for sure optimize performance, but I think we're seeing a rough cut on PC, so who knows what the XSX version will look like at launch, unless this is captured running from an XSX (I didn't see the usual disclaimer about that during the live stream or any of the 4K uploads).
I live with a chip on my shoulder. That's how I stay dope. Lol
Genuine question: whats your honest opinion on the visuals? Performance needs work. Certainly. But the visuals are a huge step up.
Yeah, I really dig the art direction. Reminds me a lot of Interstellar.
If they sure up that framerate and tone down some of that ancient GeForce 3 bloom (or a mod to do so), this will be sublime looking.
It obviously on the whole does not look like a PS3 game, especially not in terms of interactivity.Come on guys, this does NOT look like a 720p PS3 game, texturing and lighting alone. While those shots may be the upmost cranked to the max circumstances at the moment, and it remains to be seen how the final product will fare, PS3, it is not.
No, not really. Rendering wise its a full blown PBR model that takes better account of its materials than Fallout 76/Fallout 4 did.Character model wise (like every Bethesda game) it comes close unfortunately.
The comments are more annoying. ''It looks like a PS3 game.'' Surejan.gif.
But not a PS3 game, rather, shots from a indevelopment build of Starfield, stressing indevelopment.Those are TRUE shots from the video. The game looks EXACTLY like that. You guys gotta be trolling right now.
I think they game looks fantastic! Can't wait to play it. To each their own.The comparisons with Fallout 4 and Halo really makes the game look better than my initial impression (but those are really rough looking games), I think that the first planet they chose to show really does the game a disservice, it's so ugly and uninspiring. Overall very uneven, sometimes it looks really bad and sometime it looks good.
30fps is still a bit unbelievable given what we are seeing, let go of native 4K. 30fps on a game that can be played in first person? Come on.
You complain about people trolling Sony threads yet here you are doing the same.