Topher
Gold Member
Is this still a graphics thread?
Yeah, I'd say things have become rather graphic....
Is this still a graphics thread?
This is the crux of it.
Windows version yes, but I was referring to the Xbox Series X/S version.Gotcha, it came out last year originally, that's why I don't think it's mentioned this year.
I'm not sure I understand what you are saying? Why would xbox feed anything here?
From what I've seen Microsoft gave them access a lot earlier than Sony did. Maybe this is what he meant not exactly bribing Digital Foundry but giving them access a lot earlier. That could be a way to make them feel like they owe Microsoft something.
What? I never claimed that.As in someone from upper management at Xbox fed HeisenbergFX4 bad information on purpose. No idea what the point of that would be though.
Sounds to me like MS paid for DF to lavish praise for Xbox One X.
Again, we are basing this off of 0% evidence.
From what I've seen Microsoft gave them access a lot earlier than Sony did. Maybe this is what he meant not exactly bribing Digital Foundry but giving them access a lot earlier. That could be a way to make them feel like they owe Microsoft something.
Bribing sounds so sinisterAs in someone from upper management at Xbox fed HeisenbergFX4 bad information on purpose. No idea what the point of that would be though.
I'm repeating what HeisenbergFX4 said.
"they were just swayed to be more pro Xbox"
What's your problem now?
And feeding me bad info is way different then friends chatting back in forth while waiting on a raid or something along those lines
Supposedly they did....
This would have been fine if DF had just declared their analysis of Xbox One X was a paid promotion. Providing that analysis in the guise of independent journalist coverage is disingenuous at best. Obviously this does not mean every game analysis done by DF is suspect and their even coverage of the games suggests that is not the case, imo.
In the back of my mind, I'm wondering who else Microsoft has paid for positive coverage. Somehow I doubt this is an isolated case.
It doesn’t excuse it and it’s not okay but it is what it is, I’m pretty sure they all do it and it’s happening in all industries. But it’s usually easy to see a bias shine through, it’s no different than hearing someone talk here and most posters here are like an open book including myself. It is what it is.Sure, but that doesn't excuse any of it. Like I said above, the only thing done wrong here, imo, is that the coverage done by DF on Xbox One X was not disclosed as a paid promotion. Same applies to all companies and if they are found out to be engaging in bribery, as it were, then their reputations take a hit. I don't think we should go down the road of "well they all do it so it is ok".
We targeted DF to be pro Xbox and it started with the Xbox One X reveal
If all this talk about MS/DF just leads to more accusations of MS buying off influence (especially with the mindset that Sony or even Nintendo don't partially do it themselves), and people dismissing Digital Foundry even moreso no matter what while trying to prop up known disingenuous, fanboy content masquerading as "analysis" when that content has people who don't even play 4% of a game, then was bringing up the claim that a buy-off of DF for influence...in a thread where their video is praising PS5 games no less....was it honestly even worth it?
What? I never claimed that.
Just taking a piss
It was Gears 5.I'm sure Kingtrash did a hit piece on them at the time of Gears Ultimate, I don't know what people expected them to say
Sounds to me like MS paid for DF to lavish praise for Xbox One X.
Bribing sounds so sinister
I have always used the same wording anytime I brought this up because its the exact wording used by the greenest of the rats
We targeted DF to be pro Xbox and it started with the Xbox One X reveal
I will not give other specifics here
And feeding me bad info is way different then friends chatting back in forth while waiting on a raid or something along those lines
Hope my contacts don't burn me for leaking this DM from last year .. sheeat.
Your not saying that Heisenberg fabricated a DM right?
I'm not saying anything, it's up to individual users to believe what they want to believe.
The above picture is just as credible as anything else I've read in this topic today.
I'm not saying anything, it's up to individual users to believe what they want to believe.
The above picture is just as credible as anything else I've read in this topic today.
Try to get this mod approved and see your account burn.I'm not saying anything, it's up to individual users to believe what they want to believe.
The above picture is just as credible as anything else I've read in this topic today.
Dont try to argue with anyone here.I'm not saying anything, it's up to individual users to believe what they want to believe.
The above picture is just as credible as anything else I've read in this topic today.
Yeah. Sucks. Oh well. Not sure why they opted to not. Unreal Engine 5 looks...realfully agree. I still think they should have stuck with unreal to give the engine development more time.
People got too emotional.Still unsure if what’s happening in this thread is progress in getting over console warring or not. On one hand I don’t see 400% zoom screenshots of a tree leaf and/or 1 fps drop graphs; on the other we’re discussing industry bribery on a best graphics thread…
Anyway, here’s a Returnal screenshot:
Still unsure if what’s happening in this thread is progress in getting over console warring or not. On one hand I don’t see 400% zoom screenshots of a tree leaf and/or 1 fps drop graphs; on the other we’re discussing industry bribery on a best graphics thread…
Anyway, here’s a Returnal screenshot:
Oh come off it. I surely believe HeisenbergFX4 actually saw something. As near as I can tell, it indicates companies spend money on goodwill, which I believe we all knew. Now, they wouldn't spend the money if they didn't believe it worked. But places like DF wouldn't take the money unless they believed they could do it and still retain their integrity.I'm not saying anything, it's up to individual users to believe what they want to believe.
The above picture is just as credible as anything else I've read in this topic today.
It was Gears 5.
Kingthrash just pointed out that analysis wasn't much of an analysis, and got shit from DF supporters and DF them selves.
Well in the end basically John finally admitted reading straight from MS script for what was supposed to be "professional" analysis.
After this shit show John has kept clear of corp PR.
Looks so good on the Director’s Cut but the game itself loses me after a while. I hate all the package micromanagement. I really only play it for the eye candy.Looks great. I'm going to get back to Death Stranding. Very good looking game IMO even though it isn't elegible for this list.
Then they should tell it was a promotion instead.How he expected them to do a full analysis when they were in the Coalition's studio I don't know.
How is it, they went to the studio and were given the details on the game, they had no chance in that situation of running a full analysis.Then they should tell it was a promotion instead.
Its no big deal several people here and some in this very thread knows who I game with and in all likely hood the very person I am speaking aboutYour not saying that Heisenberg fabricated a DM right?
There were straight out lies and convenient omition on essential info.How is it, they went to the studio and were given the details on the game, they had no chance in that situation of running a full analysis.
They then went through what they were told by The Coalition, none of which proved to be false.
For some idiot to then attack them for that is pathetic, probably jealousy that nobody on the industry would ever take his channel seriously.
Yes, we knew they were fake and I wanted the hysterics to ensue.Anyone remember that developer that posted that fake PS5 dev kit foto?
Then he posted a prototype of the controller which was a DualShock 4 right next to a Sony laptop.
Mod of War I believe he sent you those pictures if I'm not wrong and you shared them with the community.
Present them- I’ll wait.lol, are you seriously telling me you guys bullshit meter senses didnt go tingling.
Do I seriously need to give you guys tips on how to present your leaks instead of this clout/boys club bullshit? Only videogame leakers pull this nonsense. Seriously go read some leaks from literally any other industry and see if this flies.
No, that's not how it works. When we get leaks in order to protect the leak we get information and that information verified by a mod. We don't get the actual receipts. The information here is that MS went after DF to buy favourable coverage for the xbox and John was the least likely to be bought. You can choose not to accept that but it is what it is.
He says that they did.
There were straight out lies and convenient omition on essential info.
You didn't even know the game in question just pointing out your lack of knowledgeSuch as?
You didn't even know the game in question just pointing out your lack of knowledge
Do the work and see the videos in question.You said DF lied, what about?
Well in the last COD analysis, if I remember right, they said FPS issue on ps5 was caused because GPU is less powerful. VGTech later reported such FPS hitching were basically a bug. Though it's always Tom behind such imprecise incompetent assessment.You said DF lied, what about?
Did you miss my post earlier where I said he has a history of leaking information that has proven to be correct? That's why he has more credibility than your example.I'm not saying anything, it's up to individual users to believe what they want to believe.
The above picture is just as credible as anything else I've read in this topic today.
Well in the last COD analysis, if I remember right, they said FPS issue on ps5 was caused because GPU is less powerful. VGTech layer discovered such FPS hitching were basically a bug. Though it's always Tom behind such imprecise incompetent assessment.
Do the work and see the videos in question.
Go to look the video. You have a finger.Quote in the article where it says that or timestamp it please.