Those numbers must be based on the Activision deal closing? I don’t see how they would hit those otherwise.
Planning to sell in 3 years what the Wii/Switch/PS2(?) was capable of doing in one is not possible without the Activision deal? Did Xbox really fucked up that much to you?Those numbers must be based on the Activision deal closing? I don’t see how they would hit those otherwise.
~45M max.
Series S/X will sell less than Xbox One.
Did Xbox really fucked up that much to you?
I personnaly love Playstation and consider it my main source of gaming experiences since the PS2. But I can still admit that Xbox does have some advantages. If they can't sell 30 millions of consoles in 3 years it would make them closer to the Wii U level of fail than ever. I don't think that the brand will be going that low in the next few years. As long as the Series S and X can play all third parties games and be sold cheaper than the PS5 then IMHO they will continue to sell relatively well.They didn’t fuck up that bad, it’s just that Sony has a very tight grip on the market so it’s extremely difficult to compete.
The issue is that Series S/X has already lost any momentum they had.I personnaly love Playstation and consider it my main source of gaming experiences since the PS2. But I can still admit that Xbox does have some advantages. If they can't sell 30 millions of consoles in 3 years it would make them closer to the Wii U level of fail than ever. I don't think that the brand will be going that low in the next few years. As long as the Series S and X can play all third parties games and be sold cheaper than the PS5 then IMHO they will continue to sell relatively well.
They hope to match XBO sales.Those numbers must be based on the Activision deal closing? I don’t see how they would hit those otherwise.
Microsoft's sales goals for the new Xbox Series revisions
They expect 3 years sales from 2024 to 2027 to be between 25M and 29M, and for a 2027 LTD between 56M and 59M
This would men Microsoft expects the current XBS to reach 30M sales before the refreshes hit
I agree with that. But being 60 millions X/S to 120+ millions PS5 is what I call a uphill battle. The Series X and S are not that much weaker than the PS5 in their core proposition. You can play games like FIFA, Fortnite, GTA 5 like the PS5. And Xbox will have a few exclusives like Starfield in the next few years( I hope). Don't get me wrong, FOR ME buying a Series console and not having the opportunity to play games like GOW Ragnarok and Demon's Souls is an aberration. But there is enough casuals that I can't see Xbox failling to convince them to buy Xbox consoles at the right price. Once again, the Xbox situation is really weak, but not catastrophic like the Wii U was, IMHO.The issue is that Series S/X has already lost any momentum they had.
Most of what they have sold were mostly the core Xbox fanbase, but seeing how PS5 outsold even Series S despite a Series pricecut during the holidays, it's going to be an uphill battle from here on out.
Probably just as bad.Probable.
Now, imagine the sales without the cheap box…
Why clearly? They are already declining, up to -25% YoY now.Xbox One had solid launch numbers but it fell off hard because of lack of first party games.
Series X/S gen clearly won't have that problem, so I'm expecting it will translate to better sales in second half of gen, so I'm expecting 60+ millions consoles sold.
Call of Duty on Game Pass effect is really hard to predict, but if it will be bigger then I'm expecting the I can see 65+ million consoles sold.
I mean. That kinda obvious when before Starfield launch they had almost 2 years gap between AAA first party releases.Why clearly? They are already declining, up to -25% YoY now.
Fair points, but this is the first gen where we see Xbox really struggling against Playstation right from the start, to the point that Spencer had to come out and say that Xbox as a brand is becoming unsustainable and that just releasing games isn't going to change anything. That doesn't show confidence in their own brand and it reflects in sales.I agree with that. But being 60 millions X/S to 120+ millions PS5 is what I call a uphill battle. The Series X and S are not that much weaker than the PS5 in their core proposition. You can play games like FIFA, Fortnite, GTA 5 like the PS5. And Xbox will have a few exclusives like Starfield in the next few years( I hope). Don't get me wrong, FOR ME buying a Series console and not having the opportunity to play games like GOW Ragnarok and Demon's Souls is an aberration. But there is enough casuals that I can't see Xbox failling to convince them to buy Xbox consoles at the right price. Once again, the Xbox situation is really weak, but not catastrophic like the Wii U was, IMHO.
There is a good discussion to have about how much sales potential the S/X have in the next few years, how much having good exclusives( or not) can help them or hinder them, what impact the rumored PS5 Pro will have on the market, the Switch 2 can help them or doom them depending of your POV... But looking at "official" xbox projections of less than 30 millions consoles sold in 3 years and finding it not realist is weird to me. Xbox really have a good grasp of the US market. And that market seems to be sensible to prices. So I can see Xbox managing no matter what those sales numbers if they commit to manufacture them in the first place. A failure would hopefully means that Sony PS5 is doing even better than expected, and that would mean more great games from Sony.
Yes to all of your points. And as a PS fan since 2000, I love seing the situation moving this way. Hope that it means that Xbox will have to compete the right way, with games. But in the leaks you can see that they want to buy zenimax too, so that would help them a lot to accomplish their sales objectives if it happen. They are here to stay. And until we see them stop caring that much about the gaming market I will suppose that they will do what they can to stay relevant. And console sales are a key metric in this space. So I can see them selling consoles a lot cheaper than Sony or Nintendo to stay in the race until next gen. We have seen 300 dollars Xbox One X to give you an idea of what they can do. But I have to admit thatFair points, but this is the first gen where we see Xbox really struggling against Playstation right from the start, to the point that Spencer had to come out and say that Xbox as a brand is becoming unsustainable and that just releasing games isn't going to change anything. That doesn't show confidence in their own brand and it reflects in sales.
And while Xbox is struggling on all fronts, Sony is breaking record after record with every game they release and the PS5 still has momentum going. Even more so now that supply issues have been resolved.
Switch 2 will release soon as well, going by the rumors, making it even harder for MS to reach the casuals. Because Nintendo is also a factor.
Personally, I've always seen MS as a cancer in gaming, disrupting the entire industry.Yes to all of your points. And as a PS fan since 2000, I love seing the situation moving this way. Hope that it means that Xbox will have to compete the right way, with games. But in the leaks you can see that they want to buy zenimax too, so that would help them a lot to accomplish their sales objectives if it happen. They are here to stay. And until we see them stop caring that much about the gaming market I will suppose that they will do what they can to stay relevant. And console sales are a key metric in this space. So I can see them selling consoles a lot cheaper than Sony or Nintendo to stay in the race until next gen. We have seen 300 dollars Xbox One X to give you an idea of what they can do. But I have to admit thatHeisenberg007 post made me think. If they have to sell more than they did in the last few years, and do not have the means(great games) to do so, I can see them failing their objectives.
Will those 4 first-party games increase their market share and console sales? If Starfield didn't, how will Hellblade 2, Avowed, and South of Midnight?I mean. That kinda obvious when before Starfield launch they had almost 2 years gap between AAA first party releases.
But I don't know if you noticed, but they already have 4 first party games announced for 2024. And looking at the Bethesda leaked list of games in development, I expect that this won't repeat.
Oh I will. Not sure about you thoughBut don't worry. They will still be in third place so you can sleep well![]()
I am more ambivalent about them. In recent years they have been the cancer that you are talking about. And their pay to use online was the same a long time ago. But they did do some good for the industry. I don't care about it, but some people prefer the Xbox controller to Sony Dualshock series of controllers. In the 360 they did fund some good games and I still hope that they will one day retry that strategy. Their failures in recent years can be rectified, and they can be a good concurrent to Sony and Nintendo if they try to. Sadly they just want to buy the industry. And when we know that the gaming industry is bigger than the cinema, and that it is easier to control IMHO, I can see then continue to try in the next decade. As long as they stay profitable, there is no reason not to.Personally, I've always seen MS as a cancer in gaming, disrupting the entire industry.
The way I see it, is that due to their incompetence, they now throw money in every direction to buy up everything they can and just outspend Sony and any other company that stands in their way. They even literally discussed that.
Lower prices can be competed with, ee already see rumors/leaks of a PS5 Slim. All they have to do is to not be too expensive compared to Series consoles.
I wouldn't be suprised if they give up after this gen. The plans they've had, that we're seeing now, can already have changed.
Although, they can ofcourse continue and just postpone the inevitable. They do have the money to drag on some more. It just doesn't seem logical, given how they don't seem to have a clear direction.
Considering they have been wrong about their releases, wrong about the competition, wrong about their sales forecasts, let me just say they are going to be dead wrong about this too. It’s not going to pass the 50 million mark.
You could very well be right. Time will tell.I am more ambivalent about them. In recent years they have been the cancer that you are talking about. And their pay to use online was the same a long time ago. But they did do some good for the industry. I don't care about it, but some people prefer the Xbox controller to Sony Dualshock series of controllers. In the 360 they did fund some good games and I still hope that they will one day retry that strategy. Their failures in recent years can be rectified, and they can be a good concurrent to Sony and Nintendo if they try to. Sadly they just want to buy the industry. And when we know that the gaming industry is bigger than the cinema, and that it is easier to control IMHO, I can see then continue to try in the next decade. As long as they stay profitable, there is no reason not to.
A PS5 slim will hurt them, but I can see Sony not pushing it to the max. The Ps4 Pro had no price cut in many countries because Sony believed that they could go away with it. Same for Nintendo and the Switch. Few or no price cuts. This will give Xbox a way to compete, by being cheap. But i may be wrong. As for Microsoft getting out of the gaming market? If the activision merger does not happen, I can see it happen like you. But they are really serious about it, so I am sadly getting accoustumed to the idea that they will buy it this year...
I thought it was over 25 million already? or am I mixed up? SO you think its not going to do another 25 million in 5 years, when it did 25 million in less than 3?
Not it has not sold 25 million and yes the sales keep going down.
I do not consider PC a concurrent to Playstation and Nintendo. More of a side piece. With Sony not making a successor to the PS VITA and Nintendo not trying to have a powerful console since the Gamecube, I think that Sony and Nintendo will recognise that they target different audience and make it so no one harm the other. A duopoly would be evident and really usefull to both. No one can beat Nintendo at their own game, so Sony needs to have competition or they will get complacent. I do agree that without Xbox disruptions like wanting to buy Activision, Zenimax, Nintendo(You could very well be right. Time will tell.
I just think that the industry will be a lot healthier, with more healthy competition if it's just Playstation, Nintendo and PC.
Honestly, PC can replace Xbox easily, as can Playstation. So the Xbox demographic will be split across those two platforms.I do not consider PC a concurrent to Playstation and Nintendo. More of a side piece. With Sony not making a successor to the PS VITA and Nintendo not trying to have a powerful console since the Gamecube, I think that Sony and Nintendo will recognise that they target different audience and make it so no one harm the other. A duopoly would be evident and really usefull to both. No one can beat Nintendo at their own game, so Sony needs to have competition or they will get complacent. I do agree that without Xbox disruptions like wanting to buy Activision, Zenimax, Nintendo()the market will be healtier. But we would need to see another company to try to compete, and IMHO any company would be like Xbox , but worse as they would not have the advantage of being already here that Xbox have. Can you imagine a Tencent console, or a Amazon one? So better the devil we know than another one.
For PC to replace Xbox they would need to have a reason to compete with Playstation. Can you see games being exclusive to PC and not Playstation? From a user POV, yes there is not much difference between the two. But in the gaming market consoles are vastly different in terms of target audience, how much money can they give to peripherals and games, royalties etc. I do admit that since PC exist the Xbox console use is a lot less evident. But for me I didn't care about them before, so it did not change a lot outside of making games like Ori be more accessible to me than before. PC is not the prefered way to play sport games and some games that have a heavy console lineage like GTA( in terms of numbers, of course a PC is perfectly fine today for almost all games). Do you want xbox to go third party? Or for them to disappear? If they go third party then yes I can see them being on PC and continuing like before, with maybe selling branded Xbox PCs as a side activity. But them being gone would not make the PC a concurrent to Playstation and Nintendo IMHO.Honestly, PC can replace Xbox easily, as can Playstation. So the Xbox demographic will be split across those two platforms.
PC will run the same games (minus exclusives) at higher performance, Playstation will be more convenient and more attractive to a (more) casual demographic.
Nintendo has it's own demographic.
Ever since MS decided to release their games day 1 on PC, there is practically no reason for Xbox to exist, anyway.
For PC to replace Xbox they would need to have a reason to compete with Playstation. Can you see games being exclusive to PC and not Playstation?
3rd party would make more sense. But I just have a problem with MS, not necessarily with Xbox.From a user POV, yes there is not much difference between the two. But in the gaming market consoles are vastly different in terms of target audience, how much money can they give to peripherals and games, royalties etc. I do admit that since PC exist the Xbox console use is a lot less evident. But for me I didn't care about them before, so it did not change a lot outside of making games like Ori be more accessible to me than before. PC is not the prefered way to play sport games and some games that have a heavy console lineage like GTA( in terms of numbers, of course a PC is perfectly fine today for almost all games). Do you want xbox to go third party? Or for them to disappear? If they go third party then yes I can see them being on PC and continuing like before, with maybe selling branded Xbox PCs as a side activity. But them being gone would not make the PC a concurrent to Playstation and Nintendo IMHO.
I loved games like FTL, and Rogue Legacy, Binding of Isaac, who did not get a console version until they got their first taste of success on PC, or never in FTL case. But outside of war games, that are historically a PC type of games, with k+m interface by default, and indies, that thrive better on Steam, most games have no reason not to be on consoles. I dunno, just consider some games as PC games first and others as consoles games and don't really think of them much beyond that. I may have to rethink about this a little.like Warhammer: Total War and Escape from Tarkov?
Easily. Competition can come in many forms. PC vs console already is competition itself.
3rd party would make more sense. But I just have a problem with MS, not necessarily with Xbox.
Competition is good, but not the way they handle it.
You have proof that Starfield didn't move consoles? Because last time I checked Series S...console that "nobody wanted" was sold out on Amazon UK.Will those 4 first-party games increase their market share and console sales? If Starfield didn't, how will Hellblade 2, Avowed, and South of Midnight?
Yeah.You have proof that Starfield didn't move consoles?
![]()
So you have data from one country, and you somehow extrapolated it for entire world?
Holy shit man. I saw few of your "analysis" in other threads, but you are bringing some "good stuff" even here.
I mean..I can do it too
![]()
Starfield drives two best sales weeks for Xbox Series X/S this year in the UK | VGC
Bethesda’s game appears to be a system seller for Xbox…www.videogameschronicle.com
Is it?Because last time I checked Series S...console that "nobody wanted" was sold out on Amazon UK.
Let's hope. Maybe it'll make them reconsider dropping out of the hardware game. If these leaks really highlight anything it's how bad Microsoft is for gaming as an industry.~45M max.
Series S/X will sell less than Xbox One.