• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

NeoGAF Ban Review/Justice Project

Status
Not open for further replies.
No, that's the kind of shit men talk about offline on their working breaks. And even then you usually only do that with proper colleagues.

If GAF people are your good pals, either meet up with them IRL or find good pals outside these realms.

But you aren't fooling anyone with your wanking. I have seen what it can do. It wasn't pretty.

Someone who beats you at 4D chess any day of the week, thinks there is coffee inside a nebula, and teabags on any Minecraft world you may ever attempt to make, let alone the fact that you bought Minecraft.

You sure don't like drama but your farewell letter is exactly that, ofcourse with a little bracket note as a PS thrown in.

Boys Club Behavior.
He is banned. Let the dead rest.
 

Stouffers

Banned
Stiflers Mom Stiflers Mom If you think being asked not to post threads about your masturbation habits is a form of oppression, this isn’t the right place for you. Take care.


:p
 

OnionSnake

Banned
Which post?
Can't find it but something about kyle rittenhouse in Politics. The report rejection says "he was quoting a video, context is key" however that doesn't jive with the TOS saying "Sexual, racial, or ethnic slurs will not be tolerated in any form and are bannable on the first offense." any form being the confusing part for me. Either way, moderation on politics seems a little confusing to me since I am getting warning without actually explaining to me what the warnings are for?
 

Rentahamster

Rodent Whores
Can't find it but something about kyle rittenhouse in Politics. The report rejection says "he was quoting a video, context is key" however that doesn't jive with the TOS saying "Sexual, racial, or ethnic slurs will not be tolerated in any form and are bannable on the first offense." any form being the confusing part for me. Either way, moderation on politics seems a little confusing to me since I am getting warning without actually explaining to me what the warnings are for?
I think most rational people would appreciate the difference between someone using a derogatory slur themselves, and someone merely quoting another to make a point about a topic. The nature of intent in both circumstances is different.
 

Nobody_Important

“Aww, it’s so...average,” she said to him in a cold brick of passion
Stiflers Mom Stiflers Mom , sorry to see you go I really enjoyed a lot of your posts. Maybe take a break for a while and come back when things level out and calm down here.
I feel like things have been the calmest they have been in months. At least in the politics sections. Things were HEATED leading up to the election and the aftermath was even worse. It was nothing but conspiracies and arguments.


I feel like the last month or so has been so much better. I am actually happier when I post and browse because I don't have to worry about sifting through nonsense or receiving personal attacks.
 

OnionSnake

Banned
I think most rational people would appreciate the difference between someone using a derogatory slur themselves, and someone merely quoting another to make a point about a topic. The nature of intent in both circumstances is different.
Guess the TOS should be updated since it’s pretty clear in saying any form.
 

OnionSnake

Banned
Maybe I'm in the wrong here, but I feel like the current form is reasonable, and your interpretation is an excessively hyper literal one.
Maybe, but gray areas are where things get unruly. Either way it’s for the moderators to enforce, but the current TOS as it stands is confusing to me as a whole that’s just a recent example.
 

Airbus Jr

Banned
Wow king of foxes ban is it temp or perm ?

The hell happened here ?!?!?

Stiflers Mom acount closure? Why ? Man...im gona miss this guy ( or her?)

Stiff please come back😫
 
Last edited:

Mod of War

Ω
Staff Member
Can't find it but something about kyle rittenhouse in Politics. The report rejection says "he was quoting a video, context is key" however that doesn't jive with the TOS saying "Sexual, racial, or ethnic slurs will not be tolerated in any form and are bannable on the first offense." any form being the confusing part for me. Either way, moderation on politics seems a little confusing to me since I am getting warning without actually explaining to me what the warnings are for?
That was me- allow me to assist along with other rational adults in the room.


Think of our Bill O'Rights Bill O'Rights TOS as a living document.
 
Yeah, I get it. "Boy's Club Behavior" is not wanted here anymore. Wait, where have I heard that before?

I know you're gone now, but in case you're reading this, and to help clarify for everyone else, you should know that discussion of sexual matters not being allowed is nothing new. I've seen people suspended and banned for doing for so for years now.

Still, sorry to see you go. I'm sorry to see a lot of our members go lately.
 

Peggies

Gold Member
I feel like things have been the calmest they have been in months. At least in the politics sections. Things were HEATED leading up to the election and the aftermath was even worse. It was nothing but conspiracies and arguments.


I feel like the last month or so has been so much better. I am actually happier when I post and browse because I don't have to worry about sifting through nonsense or receiving personal attacks.
But Stiflers Mom wasn't one of the crazies. He didn't even write a lot in politics.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom