PropellerEar
Member
I own a Switch OLED, can I join in?![]()
![Oh Yeah Reaction GIF by Nora Fikse Oh Yeah Reaction GIF by Nora Fikse](https://media1.giphy.com/media/fKZORYE5SBR5PuVq3R/200.gif)
I own a Switch OLED, can I join in?![]()
I own a Switch OLED, can I join in?![]()
Dude, you really are clueless. Look at my posts in the A80J thread. I know Sony has not delivered on their promises yet. Grow up.You literally said this:
So you thought you'll be able to play games using VRR when it arrives in the next few days.
And I'm the clueless one?
I don’t have to overcompensate for anything…What is it with you and small screens?
Are you trying tell us something?
![]()
Being wrong or not informed and stating something wrong is not lying. Seems you do not know what it means to lie either.Yes.
You really needs to research better what lies means.
Hint... it means you are not telling the actual truth.
Like you are doing right now.
Dude, you really are clueless. Look at my posts in the A80J thread. I know Sony has not delivered on their promises yet. Grow up.
Being wrong or not informed and stating something wrong is not lying. Seems you do not know what it means to lie either.
Look at my posts in the A80J thread. I know Sony has not delivered on their promises yet.
You bought 2 copies? What a baller.Plaued about 4 hours each on Series X and PS5 last night. IMO PS5 feels better and looks better even while using a CX with VRR enabled for the Series X. Both were played in Quality mode. Also, the loading times on the PS5 were really nice.
OMG I'm lying in polls! How dare I!!!!! The horror! Again, grow up. I've already shown proof that my tv will be arriving in a week and I've shown proof that Sony said vrr is coming. You just don't want to accept those receipts. Grow up.Why would I need to look at your posts anywhere else when you're lying in polls and bragging in performance threads about things you don't (and won't) have access to?
It's hilarious that you think other people are the problem here.
You still are not showing lies. Nice try though.Why would I need to look at your posts anywhere else when you're lying in polls and bragging in performance threads about things you don't (and won't) have access to?
It's hilarious that you think other people are the problem here.
Oops:
Not the guy you replied to but I paid full price on PSN, Xbox I just bought an Argentine key for £25 and redeemed through a free VPN. You get £5 back in reward points on Xbox too so essentially £20.You bought 2 copies? What a baller.
TL'DW
PS5 12-15% better framerate in performance mode
PS5 upto ~10% higher dynamic res in performance mode
PS5 upto 300% faster loading while respawning or fast traveling 7ish vs 20ish seconds.
I expect it to happen for all multiplatform games.
You still are not showing lies. Nice try though.
Why? Did you buy the PSN after because of better performance?Not the guy you replied to but I paid full price on PSN, Xbox I just bought an Argentine key for £25 and redeemed through a free VPN. You get £5 back in reward points on Xbox too so essentially £20.
I think I'm starting to understand a certain subsection of this forum. You all lie, you all bullshit, but yet you're all somehow delusional enough to think you're telling the truth. It pairs well with the dreams and delusions.
You didn't show an intent to deceive. That's what makes a lie.I think I'm starting to understand a certain subsection of this forum. You all lie, you all bullshit, but yet you're all somehow delusional enough to think you're telling the truth. It pairs well with the dreams and delusions.
Prepare to be...I expect it to happen for all multiplatform games.
I bought for PS first, I buy all From games on PS.Why? Did you buy the PSN after because of better performance?
Were you in a coma and just wake up today into this console generation, or...?I expect it to happen for all multiplatform games.
I think I'm starting to understand a certain subsection of this forum. You all lie, you all bullshit, but yet you're all somehow delusional enough to think you're telling the truth. It pairs well with the dreams and delusions.
You bought 2 copies? What a baller.
Cerny is a fantastic engineer.![]()
Hilarious that people still choose to ignore that Cerny video. Twitter fanboys bragging about raw specs they don't understand. Good shit still coming back to haunt them.
You didn't show an intent to deceive. That's what makes a lie.
Taking big talk with no receipts. Good on you.
I've never been banned for bullshitting or lying. I've been banned for name calling, trolling, and being a communist.The receipts are the fact that everyone's posts are here on record along with the fact that you all collectively get banned for the same things over and over again.
So keep going.
![]()
Go back and read again please.Being wrong or not informed and stating something wrong is not lying. Seems you do not know what it means to lie either.
The own user's posters are receipts... c'mon.You didn't show an intent to deceive. That's what makes a lie.
Taking big talk with no receipts. Good on you.
I just copy/pasted op to get back on it.I don’t think anyone can realistically contest the fact that PS5 is the definitive platform to play this game on. Just the 7 seconds loading times compared to 21 seconds makes this a blowout even before considering the technical advantage. It’s pretty much the biggest blow out we’ve seen between the 2 consoles in my opinion.
Still, I’ll use my Series S to have a secondary play through where I’ll experiment with different play styles like magic/stealth whilst being a warrior class on PS and going for plat.
If that would have something to do with the SSD or compression, series s should be the fastest (as it loads much lower res content).![]()
bless you ssd.
Just stop.but tech critics need to hold studios accountable for producing PS3 era graphics.
That's not how any of this works.series s should be the fastest (as it loads much lower res content).
That doesn't matter, ps5 ssd is much faster regardlessIf that would have something to do with the SSD or compression, series s should be the fastest (as it loads much lower res content).
It just shows again that the game is in an unoptimized state, especially on Xbox. I would guess that it is still using the Xbox one compatible packaging so it loads only extra packages for the newer consoles while the PS5 got a native app (as the PS4 version is an extra download).
This game so far does not reflect any hardware difference, just plain development priorities.
I just replayed DS3 last month, Elden Ring graphics are shit compared to it. Both on PC.I think the performance issues are distracting from the fact that this is a really bad looking game. I get that this is a performance review thread, but tech critics need to hold studios accountable for producing PS3 era graphics. The game in the catacombs looks like Dark Souls 1. I am not exaggerating. The open world looks a little better but still a gen behind Horizon in every way and no the art style does not save the game here.
Maybe it looks better when you get to the castles, but sekiro did not look like this. Bloodborne and DS3 did not look this bad. BB especially had some gorgeous environments.
Are we ever going to have graphics analysis beyond just pixel and framerate counting?
I know NXGamer reads these threads, and I dont want to be overly critical of him since this is meant to be a performance review video, but I really hope we start to really be critical of games looking this bad in 2022.
P.S i played at 1440p 60 fps on High Settings on PC.
It looks better on PS5 ?Plaued about 4 hours each on Series X and PS5 last night. IMO PS5 feels better and looks better even while using a CX with VRR enabled for the Series X. Both were played in Quality mode. Also, the loading times on the PS5 were really nice.
Game looks fine to me. From (and most devs actually) will never achieve Sony first party visuals and nobody was expecting that.I think the performance issues are distracting from the fact that this is a really bad looking game. I get that this is a performance review thread, but tech critics need to hold studios accountable for producing PS3 era graphics. The game in the catacombs looks like Dark Souls 1. I am not exaggerating. The open world looks a little better but still a gen behind Horizon in every way and no the art style does not save the game here.
Maybe it looks better when you get to the castles, but sekiro did not look like this. Bloodborne and DS3 did not look this bad. BB especially had some gorgeous environments.
Are we ever going to have graphics analysis beyond just pixel and framerate counting?
I know NXGamer reads these threads, and I dont want to be overly critical of him since this is meant to be a performance review video, but I really hope we start to really be critical of games looking this bad in 2022.
P.S i played at 1440p 60 fps on High Settings on PC.
Eh. The architecture between the two consoles is nearly identical save for the split ram architecture in the XSX and the PS5 IO. They literally both use the same Zen 2 CPU and GPUs from the same RNDA 2.0 family. Do you think devs go around optimizing for the 2070 and then do it all over again for the 2080? Of course not. If the game runs a 1440p 55 FPS on a 10 tflops RDNA 2.0 card, it should run at above 60 fps on a 12 tflops RDNA 2.0 card without any dev input. The fact that it does not is something you need to talk to MS engineers about.Is there any surprise which platform would fair better for a game developed by From software? it's a japanese studio. They won't spend more time optimizing Xbox compared to PS5.
Nobody should take this as an indication of hardware design or performance capabilities. Not every game is optimal on every platform.
Nah, i just want them to at least match their own previous output. Sekiro, Dark Souls 3 and Bloodborne all looked better. Especially Sekiro which is a gorgeous looking game.Game
Game looks fine to me. From (and most devs actually) will never achieve Sony first party visuals and nobody was expecting that.
It looks better on PS5 ?
Eh. The architecture between the two consoles is nearly identical save for the split ram architecture in the XSX and the PS5 IO. They literally both use the same Zen 2 CPU and GPUs from the same RNDA 2.0 family. Do you think devs go around optimizing for the 2070 and then do it all over again for the 2080? Of course not. If the game runs a 1440p 55 FPS on a 10 tflops RDNA 2.0 card, it should run at above 60 fps on a 12 tflops RDNA 2.0 card without any dev input. The fact that it does not is something you need to talk to MS engineers about.
Last gen, Sekiro was native 1800p on the XSX and 1800 checkerboard on the PS4 Pro. PS4 Pro was only performing slightly better because it was rendering literally half of the pixels. Not because FromSoft spent their time optimizing the PS4 version. The X1X GPU was never outperformed by a much weaker PS4 Pro GPU like we have seen time and time again this gen. If anything, we saw the X1X outperform the Pro beyond its 44% tflops advantage with games like RDR2 rendering 100% more pixels compared to the Pro version. Likely due to its 12 GB of VRAM and 380 GBps of bandwidth but thats the point, the console had an incredible GPU that was given enough bandwidth to show off its tflops.
I think it's time MS is pressured to give some answers. If I am in the market for a GPU and I buy a more expensive GPU with more tflops, i want better performance, every time. It's time you guys start asking some questions on twitter. I know Phil and co. respond to xbox fans far more than Sony execs. You know DF wont.
This is exactly how resource loading works. The series s gets much lower res textures, those are also much, much smaller on the SSD. The cpu is at least as strong as the PS5 CPU. Compression tech doesn't matter much, as the texture size is mich smaller (and also compressed). The only thing that can make loading that much faster is the implementation. Has nothing to do with the hardware as any of the performance differences in this game.That's not how any of this works.
You are not taking into the account the difference in the I/O architectures/speed.This is exactly how resource loading works. The series s gets much lower res textures, those are also much, much smaller on the SSD. The cpu is at least as strong as the PS5 CPU. Compression tech doesn't matter much, as the texture size is mich smaller (and also compressed). The only thing that can make loading that much faster is the implementation. Has nothing to do with the hardware as any of the performance differences in this game.
Currently the best way to play the game is the PS4 pro version on a PS5 or the Xbox series x version with a VRR capable tv. Both are just not optimal options. I really hope from software fixes some of the issues. In this generation the cpu shouldn't be the problem.
Or we must wait for the next generation to play this game without compromise.
Come on now handsome fish we have dozens maybe hundreds of posts explaining/discussing the reasons of it since nearly 1.5 year now, and you were around.I will say this though, it is extremely troubling to see the Xbox x not at least on par or performing better than the ps5.
The SSD for the Ps5 is a given as it's just much faster, but those 2 extra T-flops surely are meant to count for something, it really does not add up.
handsome you say, you have been added to my Christmas card listCome on now handsome fish we have dozens maybe hundreds of posts explaining/discussing the reasons of it since nearly 1.5 year now, and you were around.