This is understood. What I am saying is not even really about that. MS does not own Activision yet. The whole point is that MS wants to look good to regulators to get this deal done. Sony would hope that it fails. Simple as that.
Jim is simply countering Phil's good guy statements with clear cut facts about their agreement.
That's the point I'm getting at as well. I don't see how Ryan accomplishes much in regards to Spencer trying to look good to regulators by basically saying they offered us 3yrs, we wanted 5yrs. When what MS was offering was above and beyond what is normally offered to begin with, it just seems weak from a PR standpoint. IMO.