I thonk that was 9.2 on AMD's old architecture. On RDNA 9.2 is worth quite a bit more in-game, no?9.2 TF is that in between a 5700 and 5700xt ? Isn't this what a lot of people are saying for months ? I just didn't realize those Gpu where that close to a RTX2080.
Yes it is, but for some reason i didn't realize a 5700xt was close to a rtx 2080, minus the ray tracing.I thonk that was 9.2 on AMD's old architecture. On RDNA 9.2 is worth quite a bit more in-game, no?
Eh, not quite.
We had super expensive consoles come out in the past, but the hardware didn't make up for it.
Even the original Playstation was still cheaper than the Saturn and the 3DO and graphically speaking, it was better.
i just honestly hope they work on this as some games i cant play without headphones on ...seems to be in quite a few games where it sits on a menu the jet engine engages.
Sony is not much if a hardware manufacturing company anymore beyond image sensors. r&d for playstation is now all done in San Francisco, so maybe 5 will turn out better? All the best stuff comes out of San Francisco.
9.2 TF is that in between a 5700 and 5700xt ? Isn't this what a lot of people are saying for months ? I just didn't realize those Gpu where that close to a RTX2080.
Nope, it'll be like 10% more powerful than the 1080ti, about the same as the next Xbox.
Half these stories are probably manufactured to get the other team sweating, this comes a day after another site said Scarlet will be an entire generation ahead of the PS5. It's the corporate edition of "my dad could beat up your dad".
Which is the reason I made that move, now realizing the massive leaps in PC hardware these past several years isn't a joke. But neither is the cost...I don't think they will release much later from Microsoft. They learned from the PS3.
Having a 2080 in 2021 is like having a 1070 today. Why not have what we can today?
For cutting edge I rather go to a PC.
Yes it is, but for some reason i didn't realize a 5700xt was close to a rtx 2080, minus the ray tracing.
Problem with the 5700 cards is they leech power, run super hot and super loud. The5700xt is closer to the rtx 2700 super but while consuming 2x the power and making 5x the noise. And this is with a smaller 7nm process. AMD literally had to brute force the 5700 to make it comparable to nvidias high end parts....using a smaller method.
Good, it doesnt need to be cheap. I'd rather they launch expensive and give us good hardware.
PlayStation 5 To Be Almost As Powerful As RTX 2080; GPU To Be Clocked At 2GHZ - Rumor
According to rumors from a known insider, the PlayStation 5 console is going to be almost as powerful at the NVIDIA RTX 2080 GPUwccftech.com
A few hours ago, Komachi leaked Oberon sample clocks, which is assumed to be the same as Ariel and Gonzalo, both considered to be the name of the APU for the PlayStation 5. The gen2 number is extremely high, and it would put the console ahead of the AMD Navi 5700 GPU and almost on par with the RTX 2080 in terms of power.
According to this leak- the GPU will be clocked at an insane 2ghz.
This equates to 9.2 TF on the RDNA architecture. Or roughly 14 TF on the GCN Architecture aka over double the power of the X1X. Almost RTX2080 power.
I like you. I like you alot
That's a rumour at best but... the power won't match 2080.
Don’t worry PC gamers, PS5 won't match the power of Nvidia's RTX 2080 - report
An insider report has uncovered some potential new details on Sony’s next-generation console and how it could match up to current PC hardware.www.trustedreviews.com
This is silly to me. Consoles aren't necessarily supposed to go this route, and not a single expensive console has been successful. Are we really so bothered by graphical limitations despite the good things that came from them? On top of the casual demographic that would be completely ignored because premium prices like that have a more hardcore demographic, especially when we look at PC.Good, it doesnt need to be cheap. I'd rather they launch expensive and give us good hardware.
This is silly to me. Consoles aren't necessarily supposed to go this route, and not a single expensive console has been successful. Are we really so bothered by graphical limitations despite the good things that came from them? On top of the casual demographic that would be completely ignored because premium prices like that have a more hardcore demographic, especially when we look at PC.
I'd much rather the console be affordable at $3-400 than have a $6-700 console and spend years not playing any new games because I'd have to wait a pretty long while for a major price drop. The PS4 launched at $400 and developers have now figured out ways to optimize PBR, temporal AA, AO, and global illumination at once.
TL;DR It's not needed and I personally don't see the point.
VR is a novelty. Unless all games will be made in first person from here on out, what's the point? I fail to see the issue with mid-gen upgrades or multiple versions of the same console in general.Cause for VR to really take off the machine must be powerful.
Sony will use best possible cooling methods and parts to get the machine as quite and cool as possible. They will surely not be skimping on quality components this time around as the Xbox One X has raised the bar in terms of fit and finish. Scarlett sure as hell will try to raise the bar in terms of quality compared to One X. Sony sure as hell won't want PS5 to be of lower quality compared to an outgoing Xbox One X. Imagine that scenario. MS would have a field day beating that drum to customers.Tech NeoGAF:
So if this ends up being true, they'll surely think about cooling solutions because the jet engine fans the PS4(Pro) had will surely melt down?!
Would liquid cooling be feasible and not cost prohibitive here?
More likely 1.8Ghz, anything above that power consumption spikes, AMD Game clock as they say.it wont be clocked at 2GHZ, the gpu will be at 1.6 GHZ at most. you can come back to this comment a few months from now and ask how do I know! I don't but it won't be at 2GHZ, the heat and power at that clock is too high for a SoC
true. I very highly doubt that a similar gpu to 5700 xt can be squeezed in a tiny box under a cheap cooling solution and operate at 2 GHz maintaining acceptable temp and noise levels.All this shit is garbage. Everyone looking for clicks, it’s best to ignore it and wait for the actual specs.
There will be 500 YouTube videos about this tomorrow, and next week there will be more about why these weren’t right.
It’s nice to imagine in your head, but don’t give clicks to people that just want to spread trash.
true. I very highly doubt that a similar gpu to 5700 xt can be squeezed in a tiny box under a cheap cooling solution and operate at 2 GHz maintaining acceptable temp and noise levels.
Something like 1,6 GHz seem much more probable.
Thanks. Fellers like making new threads about every tiny rumor, I see.
Next-Gen PS5 & XSX |OT| Console tEch threaD
Could you provide a link? I can't find anything on the subject. Shit bro it's buried in this thread somewhere 50 pages back. @SonGoku help me outwww.neogaf.com
Depends on what is your definition of almost. Apparently 5700 xt is within 20 % of rtx 2080 super performance and yet AMD asks for only half of what 2080 super goes for. Seems like a crazy good deal that 5700 xt is or is it that 2080 s is crazy overpriced
btw basic 2070 is already double the xb1x performance.
I’m in regardless. I’ve bought every PS system at launch. I’ve already got money in the bank just waiting for a preorder.
I love some power, but I love Sony’s first party games more. Whatever it takes so their devs can create their vision.
All previous Playstations featured most of the best and most innovative games of their generation, so yes will feature fun and interesting games. Spoiler: Sony studios won't stop making games and they won't stop being supported by all the important 3rd party companies.Great. Will it also have fun and interesting games, or did they spend all their time and focus on the hardware?
Hm That's such a non issue. Put an accelero 4 or any cheapo aio with kraken mounting kit and whoila easy 2Ghz locked at all times at super low temp and noise levels while still being cheaper than 2070s.Lol dude 2080 super is its own class video card same with 2080 ti.
That 5700xt is running red hot and can't even beat a 2070 super in 9 out of the 10 games. Because the performance of the card is a rollercoaster, and a super 2070 is pretty much a 1080 ti which will be 3 years old by the time that console launches which will be the lowest budget GPU performance nvidia will sell in that time period on PC.
There is a reason why nobody buys those cards on PC. They are even dropping in price as we speak while the 2000 super series are selling like hot cakes atm and increasing its price as result.
The only reason i can think off that 2ghz clock making sense if they are pushing out a new GPU chip that is based at the 5700xt and improves performance that matches that. However they also still need to cool it and power consumption is very real at this point.
The safest bet atm is a 5700 what's going to sit in that box which makes more sense, with a budget ryzen CPU by 2020 standards and some ram and a ssd that don't push the bank. Then sell it off for 399.
Sony are taking over the pro/semi pro camera market from Canon and Nikon (this is old news by now), they also involved in a million other business areas.Sony is not much if a hardware manufacturing company anymore beyond image sensors. r&d for playstation is now all done in San Francisco, so maybe 5 will turn out better? All the best stuff comes out of San Francisco.
This is how I see the next generation being introduced - I think Sony will have a few PS5 only titles early on - but I could be completely wrong.BC is a given for both next-gen consoles, so Sony could be about to position the PS5 as a deluxe/expensive console for the first two years of its life, while continuing to support the PS4/Pro.
These low level APIs seems to make more difference for CPU (these Jaguars in the PS4 sure perform pretty good compared to a PC with a core i3, which should be much faster than the jaguars), for the GPU, I'm not so sure, once the CPU processed everything and pass the data to the GPU it does its thing, that's probably more dependent on programmer's skills.9.2TF on the new RDNA architecture is (supposedly) ~25% faster than 9.2TF would be on the current consoles. So that would make it about as fast as a current 2080. Add in the fact that with the much lower API overheads of the console development envoirement and teams of programmers optimising code down to the console metal, it could potentially give real world performance closer to a 2080Ti.
Consoles and PC hardware act totally differently.Always wanted to ask this. How can they achieve such prowess on "cheap" devices? Do they operate on a loss?
Ya.Considering this will be released next year. Being almost at the level of a 2018 GPU isn’t out of the ordinary given the price point they’re trying to hit.
Im in this camp too. 1080ti performance, 16gb of ram , ssd. And some unexcpected gimmick in the controller that rise the price. $500.Nope, it'll be like 10% more powerful than the 1080ti, about the same as the next Xbox.
Half these stories are probably manufactured to get the other team sweating, this comes a day after another site said Scarlet will be an entire generation ahead of the PS5. It's the corporate edition of "my dad could beat up your dad".
That's the thing, they don't need it they got there first party games. There is absolute no need for them to go bankrupt by pushing top end hardware inside a box at losses or to push high price that pushes consumers away. They can simple just release a PS5 pro 2 years later with a better GPU or CPU and be done with it. All there hardware is going to function like PC's anyway. Should be easy BC with it.
Which makes all these rumors about the specs highly unlikely.