To be fair Japan has always been suspicious of foreigners, that's why it's such a monoculture. That is largely because the yanks nuked them though... twice.
Lack:Assassins Creed - “The Holy Land” modern day Israel - Character: Altaïr Ibn-La’Ahad ( Arabic )
Assassins Creed II - Location: Florence, Italy - Character: Ezio Auditore ( Italian )
Assassins Creed III - Location: Boston, New York, American Colonial Frontier - Character: Ratonhnhaké:ton (Connor Kenway) ( American )
Assassins Creed IV Black Flag - Location: The Caribbean - Time Period: The Golden Age of Piracy (18th Century) - Character: Edward Kenway ( British )
Assassins Creed Unity - Location: Paris, France - Character: Arno Dorian ( French )
Assassins Creed Origins - Location: Egypt - Character: Bayek of Siwa ( Egyptian )
Assassin Creed Odyssey - Location: Greece - Character: Kassandra/Alexios ( Greeks )
Assassins Creed Valhalla - Location: Norway/England - Character: Eivor (Scandinavian )
U see, every other AC game has a main character that depicted the time period and ethinic location of the game, now lets see what is happening to AC Shadows.
Assassin Creed Shadows- Location: Sengoku Japan - Character: Some African dude.
and ppl still dont know why the backlash.
You dont understand the situation at all. This has nothing to do with assassins creed itself, it is a symptom of a wider cultural issue. This shitty game is merely a trigger for surfacing much larger, older resentments. The Japanese are pissed because thomas lockley insinuated in his book that the Japanese were slave owners, this is a fabrication and it touches on the comfort women issue which is a giant political pitfall between Korea and Japan, whether you agree with the Japanese or not the rift between them and the Koreans is real because they believe it is historical revisionism and the Koreans do not. If you were to believe thomas lockleys bullshit then black people would then have reason to resent the Japanese as former slavers, this is not a video game issue it is history being re written to accommodate videogame bullshit. (the Wikipedia page is still a giant battleground in both japan and the west, both triggered by this game). Race relations in America are almost irreparable because of a history that is then transplanted onto Europe where it doesnt belong, this leads to BLM riots is countries with barely any black people, unarmed police and no history of harsh racial policing. Mass Media consumption is the number 1 cause of this (this includes videogames).
Black people who do not understand the deeper issue and merely interpret it as millions of racist Japanese and white people are going to live their lives with the assumption they are so hated people will seek to ban a game because they cant stand to look at them, it then becomes a hostile self fulfilling worldview. culture wars in the west are leading to a rise in far right parties across the globe, race relations have plummeted in the past 10 years (going from 72% of whites feeling good about them and 66% of black Americans in 2013 to 43% and 33% respectively), why?
If you want to stick your head in the ground and be myopic about this then nothing matters, sit back and let the destructive cultural forces mold you and everything around you. People in the first world are petty, if you make everything about race and you keep annoying them with grievance politics the problems that will hit you transcend media.
This. Apparently the Japanese government looked into it. Called him out. And now this guy is fired. He was basically ground zero of pushing the Yauske narrative.Apparently Japan started an investigation on Thomas Lockley , the guy "consulting" Ubisoft about Yasuke, whom he said was "legendary samurai". He had also claimed that black slaves were popular in feudal Japan.
Japan said people could demand compensation over the fake assumptions of black slavery in Japan and Nihon University erased Thomas Lockley's work and resume. He has pretty much vanished since.
I think that's the main reason Japan is so angry.
It's a matter concerning Japanese history, Japanese historians would generally be the best source of knowledge on a matter like this, no?
STOP GIVING THEM IDEAS!For Japanese gamers it's also a nation matter. I think a better analogy would be making Captain America or Spider-Man Asian (like, Chinese).
Nah, latinos are under the black people in the modern oppression pyramid, it could never happen.STOP GIVING THEM IDEAS!
Next thing ya know Black Panther will be Latino
This is an absurd fallacy. Of course not. Ethnicity is in no way an indication of academic rigor.
And your source for the Yasuke Samurai narrative is confusing largely ambiguous conjecture for historical fact. Yasuke getting a stipend and a sword no more makes him a Samurai than my drama teacher giving me a whistle and a truncheon makes me a UK police officer.
you should definitely never check out the very popular and very japanese; japanese spiderman (takuya yamashiro) or black captain america (first appeared in 2003)For Japanese gamers it's also a nation matter. I think a better analogy would be making Captain America or Spider-Man Asian (like, Chinese).
you should definitely never check out the very popular and very japanese; japanese spiderman (takuya yamashiro) or black captain america (first appeared in 2003)
Your concern should be how it will be received in Japan, not how many copies it will theoretically sell (in primarily western counties).I cant wait for the article with "Assassin's Creed: Shadows sold 10 million copies"
I think he means race swapping in the US version and not an interpretation in Japan as the Emissary from Hell. And I think we're ok with Black Captain America: Brave New World that's coming soon.you should definitely never check out the very popular and very japanese; japanese spiderman (takuya yamashiro) or black captain america (first appeared in 2003)
I cant wait for the article with "Assassin's Creed: Shadows sold 10 million copies"
Your concern should be how it will be received in Japan, not how many copies it will theoretically sell (in primarily western counties).
Can confirm. Japan was a lovely place to live in, even though I was a visible minority and didn't speak more than survival Japanese.As long as one isn’t acting like a fucking idiot (*cough* Logan Paul *cough*), every person I’ve ever known or followed who went to Japan said the VAST majority of the people there were friendly and polite. Sure, a few of them encountered a rare case of open xenophobia/racism, but that was definitely the exception to the rule.
It's complete brain rot garbage that's made accessible. Of course it will.I cant wait for the article with "Assassin's Creed: Shadows sold 10 million copies"
Really Amazon? Unless that's where all the sales numbers are from that's news to me. Why don't we wait 1 month after the release and then we'll see.You know it.
Seems to be doing reasonably well.
Assassin's Creed Shadows Tops Amazon Japan's PS5 Best Sellers List
The standard edition of Assassin's Creed Shadows is currently the number one best-seller on Amazon Japan's PS5 Best Sellers list. It is priced around ...www.spieltimes.com
Really Amazon? Unless that's where all the sales numbers are from that's news to me. Why don't we wait 1 month after the release and then we'll see.
wow, i never knew that about the MCR guy!Don’t forget Peni Parker.
Gerard Way Discusses His Marvel Debut with "Edge of Spider-Verse"
"Umbrella Academy" writer and rock singer Gerard Way talks with CBR News about the new, female Spider-Man he's introducing in "Spider-Verse."www.cbr.com
Actually created by Gerard Way, one of the My Chemical Romance guys, he’s done comics like Umbrella Academy (that the show was based on), a run on DC’s Doom Patrol, etc.
he was a nobody that Nobunaga liked cause the color of his skin, he followed Nobunaga and when Nobunaga died he was gone, he had 0 relevance on Japanese history, thats is the facts, u can dance around all you want, it ll change nothing.So what are the historic facts then?
Yes, i have the same concern as how Star Wars will be received on TatooineYour concern should be how it will be received in Japan, not how many copies it will theoretically sell (in primarily western counties).
Your question would make sense if it started off honestly. Not everyone was angry at Sucker Punch. A bunch of idiots accused them of cultural appropriation but were laughed at. It became worse when the island of Tsushima made the studio ambassadors of the island thanks to their great work.A question just popped in my mind, Why everyone was angry at Sucker Punch for doing GoT but everyone is OK with Ubi doing this shit work ?
and lets not forget that SP did an amazing job portraying Japanese culture and yet it receive substantial more backlash than Ubi is getting right now.
Your question would make sense if it started off honestly. Not everyone was angry at Sucker Punch. A bunch of idiots accused them of cultural appropriation but were laughed at. It became worse when the island of Tsushima made the studio ambassadors of the island thanks to their great work.
Trying to frame it as a double standard is dishonest as the controversy surrounding AC Shadows from the start was far far more polarizing and virulent than anything regarding Ghost of Tsushima.
To be fair, a lot of the same outlets that were "concerned" about Tsushima are the same ones that are praising this to high heaven.Your question would make sense if it started off honestly. Not everyone was angry at Sucker Punch. A bunch of idiots accused them of cultural appropriation but were laughed at. It became worse when the island of Tsushima made the studio ambassadors of the island thanks to their great work.
Trying to frame it as a double standard is dishonest as the controversy surrounding AC Shadows from the start was far far more polarizing and virulent than anything regarding Ghost of Tsushima.
The implication that people were raging as GOT but fine with Shadows is completely false and you know it.
That poster thought they had a gotcha moment but did not. There was no virulent campaign demanding GOT to be canceled, there weren't hundreds of thousands of dislikes on the trailers, there weren't hundreds of videos talking about the various controversies. Anyone trying to say that GOT's initial reception was more negative than AC Shadows is either lying or wasn't paying attention. Since that poster has been on Gaf since 2019, I'll go with the former.To be fair, a lot of the same outlets that were "concerned" about Tsushima are the same ones that are praising this to high heaven.
But, to your point, that doesn't mean it's a double standard or an agenda-driven oversight. You could assume the outlet learned its lesson or that it's different people at the helm.
Note that my post clearly cited the person whose bio has him listed as a Japanese Historian, not just a random Japanese bloke off of 2chan.
So what are the historic facts then?
This has received much more attention. I don't even remember much backlash about GoT.A question just popped in my mind, Why everyone was angry at Sucker Punch for doing GoT but everyone is OK with Ubi doing this shit work ?
and lets not forget that SP did an amazing job portraying Japanese culture and yet it receive substantial more backlash than Ubi is getting right now.
Anyone can call themselves a historian. Doesn't mean they have the credentials to actually back that up. And when they make up shit like this guy does about Yasuke and call it historical fact, it's clear that this guy is anything but.
he was a nobody that Nobunaga liked cause the color of his skin, he followed Nobunaga and when Nobunaga died he was gone, he had 0 relevance on Japanese history, thats is the facts, u can dance around all you want, it ll change nothing.
Whether he was a samurai or not isn't all that relevant so I'm not sure why people get hung up about that. Even assuming he was, it wouldn't tell us a much more about his accomplishments. There is some evidence suggesting he was, but no one can say for sure.I am confused, you're calling an actual historian who has written multiple books on the Sengoku period as someone who 'make shit up' but want people to trust you, a forum poster, without citing any actual articles etc ?
He was given a stipend, house and allowed to carry swords. I don't know much but that sounds like he was given similar treatment to samurai's.
Will AC Shadows over-state his real life accomplishments? Of course, it's a fucking video game.
Most, if not all, of the thing da Vinci designs for Ezio in AC2 were also not things that were made in real life beyond possibly conceptions or drawings.
well, in the game, da vinci also didn't parkour the rooftops & assassinate anyone. neither did any other historic figure making an appearance in an assassin's creed game. because, in every other ac game, you never played as an actual historic figure. despite ubi's denial, ac shadows is not 'business as usual'. they've never before had to go to the trouble of digging up someone real in order to justify their choice of a protagonist. which, of course, they're completely free to do. it's just that, whether you're good with it or not, I think that it's sorta hard to deny what's going on...Most, if not all, of the thing da Vinci designs for Ezio in AC2 were also not things that were made in real life beyond possibly conceptions or drawings.
Whether he was a samurai or not isn't all that relevant so I'm not sure why people get hung up about that. Even assuming he was, it wouldn't tell us a much more about his accomplishments. There is some evidence suggesting he was, but no one can say for sure.
The larger problem is that he essentially took the spot of other more deserving black characters. My issue is that western media go on and on about black representation but their efforts are mainly restricted to race-swapping known characters or romanticizing historical ones to extreme levels such as Yasuke. If they were so concerned about representing black people, they would go out of their way to present lesser known history and characters who have much more information about them. Why pick the one black man in Japan of the time without that much written about him rather than someone such as Sundiata Keita who founded the Mali Empire? Hell, there's even a black woman named Amanirenas who was queen of the Kushite who engaged freakin' Roman legions and probably had her troops steal a bust of Augustus. The war against the Romans apparently halted their expansion to some parts of Africa but you never hear about her.
In summary, if those people were really concerned about the history and representation of black people, they would research black historical figures and set their stories in black societies/civilizations, but they aren't and are merely interested in the money, which is why they won't take risks by using lesser known empires but instead more famous ones guaranteed to generate interest and money and simply shoehorn black people into them (such as the one with a black woman jarl, GTFO with this shit).
I went a bit on a tangent, but Yasuke wouldn't have been my first choice. I think he's very interesting given the circumstances surrounding his existence and what he saw, but making him into that mythological figure and inventing so much stuff about him to aggrandize him is moronic. For the record, I don't mind Yasuke at all and think he's awesome, but his inclusion does nothing to teach people (or at least make them aware) more about black historical figures or events that Ubisoft managed to do in the past.
I am confused, you're calling an actual historian who has written multiple books on the Sengoku period as someone who 'make shit up' but want people to trust you, a forum poster, without citing any actual articles etc ?
He was given a stipend, house and allowed to carry swords. I don't know much but that sounds like he was given similar treatment to samurai's.
Will AC Shadows over-state his real life accomplishments? Of course, it's a fucking video game.
Most, if not all, of the thing da Vinci designs for Ezio in AC2 were also not things that were made in real life beyond possibly conceptions or drawings.
It's really not that much of a stretch. You're playing around with history in a 17 year old franchise, eventually you're going to play as a fictionalized version of a historical figure or an analogue to one. And Naoe is the fictional daughter of a real historical figure btw.well, in the game, da vinci also didn't parkour the rooftops & assassinate anyone. neither did any other historic figure making an appearance in an assassin's creed game. because, in every other ac game, you never played as an actual historic figure. despite ubi's denial, ac shadows is not 'business as usual'. they've never before had to go to the trouble of digging up someone real in order to justify their choice of a protagonist.
I've said it before: I don't think Ubisoft would've had Yasuke as a protagonist 10 years ago. I doubt that they'd have Naoe or another woman as a playable character either (although they were already doing the whole double bill thing by Syndicate).which, of course, they're completely free to do. it's just that, whether you're good with it or not, I think that it's sorta hard to deny what's going on...
The leap in logic isn't massive at all. That's why the main conclusion is: it's uncertain. There are certainly pointers to suggest that he was but no definitive proof. In the absence of certainty, you don't state something is a fact.It's circumstantial evidence combined with a massive leap of logic.
That wasn't really a thing during Nobunaga's time as far as I'm aware. Hideyoshi who took over after Nobounaga actually solidified and restricted the class of samurai and made the demarcation of the rank much clearer. Hideyoshi himself was a daimyo but there's nothing specifically saying when he became a samurai. It's assumed that when he was doing important bureaucratic work for Nobuanga, he had already become a samurai. The fact that he was also a daimyo also pretty much implies that he was a samurai at one point or another.If Yasuke trained in actual Samurai Sword techniques and swore himself to his master Oda Nobunaga as a Bonafide Samurai, I guarantee that the historical record would have explicitly called him a Samurai.
My gripe has nothing to do with the historicity of his portrayal as a Samurai and everything to do with his inclusion in the game as nothing more than a token black dude.
Anyone can study a masters degree and write books. Doesn't mean he's a credible historian.
Again the mere fact that he seems to confuse his own conjecture regarding Yasuke as historical fact is enough to let me know everything I need to about this brand of "historian".
agree regarding the hysteria. it's ubi's game/franchise, to do with what they will, & it's not like what they're doing is revolutionary or unheard of. but i'm still of the opinion that this breaking with precedent, & seeking out historic justification for the choice of protagonist, can't help but come off as feeling 'cooked'. i mean, as you mention, naoe's fictional. just as have been all other ac protagonists...It's really not that much of a stretch. You're playing around with history in a 17 year old franchise, eventually you're going to play as a fictionalized version of a historical figure or an analogue to one. And Naoe is the fictional daughter of a real historical figure btw.
I've said it before: I don't think Ubisoft would've had Yasuke as a protagonist 10 years ago. I doubt that they'd have Naoe or another woman as a playable character either (although they were already doing the whole double bill thing by Syndicate).
It's just not worth the hysteria. Up until this point, nobody batted an eye at fictional versions of Yasuke out of Japan that cast him as a samurai or some type of warrior.
"But those were fantasy games, this claims to be historical fiction!" What's the difference? The name of the genre is just a name - it doesn't actually address the content. Ancient aliens, gods and other scifi shit qualify AC as fantasy as well. Ironically, people who claim to be real Japanese culture respecters are admitting a biased importance places on western media by drawing all of these arbitrary lines to explain why this is oh so bad.
all i'm pointing out is that this choice of yasuke as protag can be both. it can be a free, considered choice, completely at the discretion of the developer, & it can also feel a bit overt/manipulative. it can be, quite non-hysterically, both things at once. & i happen to think it very obviously is both...
Kinda weird to just dismiss someone with decade(s) of history in the field just because he doesn't align with your point of view.
you guys do have a point here, although the choice of welsh is a stretch.
my reference was from the argument that the ethnicity should be based on the setting but even so upon researching it i learned that much of the population was african, indigenous, and the european popluation was significantly spanish, and as far as the most common ethnicity to commit piracy it would've been the french, as they legalized it to try and disrupt the spanish trade taking place there.
yep. you can choose to either play or not play a game, & you can explain your choice. &, personally, that's about as far as i'm willing to take it...It's whatever Ubisoft thinks can get them the most money.