Courtesy the Detroit News.
A summary of what the Michigan Supreme Court will consider:
I went to a competing Catholic high school in metro Detroit. This is all kinds of fucked up. And inexcusable.
In reading through the briefs, she was the only middleschooler denied admission to Notre Dame Prep from its associated middle school.
Detroit News said:But the parents of Winkler sued Notre Dame and the Marist Fathers of Detroit Inc., alleging that she was denied admission to the private school because of a learning disability and arguing this runs afoul of anti-discrimination laws. She was a student at a middle school also run by the Marist Fathers.
James Walsh, a lawyer representing the Marist Fathers of Detroit Inc., said the student was not rejected for admission on religious grounds when asked by a justice.
You dont have to give religious justification to fire your ministerial employee. A religious school has an absolute right under the First Amendment to decide who to admit or not admit, Walsh said during oral arguments.
This child, we dont want to teach our religion to, he said, emphatically, after a later question.
A summary of what the Michigan Supreme Court will consider:
(1) whether the doctrine of ecclesiastical abstention involves a question of a courts subject matter jurisdiction over a claim; (2) whether the Court of Appeals correctly concluded that consideration of Winklers challenge to the defendants admission decision would have impermissibly entangled the trial court in questions of religious doctrine or ecclesiastical polity; and (3) whether the Court should overrule Dlaikan v Roodbeen.
I went to a competing Catholic high school in metro Detroit. This is all kinds of fucked up. And inexcusable.
In reading through the briefs, she was the only middleschooler denied admission to Notre Dame Prep from its associated middle school.