BennyBlanco
aka IMurRIVAL69
The audience theyre after doesnt play videogames
-
Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.
[VG Tech] Forspoken PS5 Frame Rate Test (Demo)
- Thread starter Lunatic_Gamer
- Start date
- Review
The audience theyre after doesnt play videogames
ChorizoPicozo
Member
No. It was designed for PS5.
adamsapple
Or is it just one of Phil's balls in my throat?
That's not an encouraging sign then if a game designed for modern hardware hits lows of 720p while also not hitting a consistent 60 fps.
This seems like 2023's Babylon's Fall with a higher budget.
01011001
Banned
I mean, that's even worse tbh... and how exactly do you know thaz btw? are you part of the dev team?
mrcroket
Member
That is the same resolution that nvidia use in DLSS quality mode in 1440p resolution.
//DEVIL//
Member
1 - No
2- you are outputting at 4k TV. so assuming you are right ( you are not), your first upscale is from that whatever weird resolution to 2k. then upscaled again to 4k = look like shit.
3-
Last edited:
mrcroket
Member
OK almost balance mode, the point is that these kind of resolutions are also used on even powerful PCs, especially when games use raytracing. And no, 1440p looks great on a 4k TV, it's not the same as looking at a monitor.
And with fsr 2.0 scaling to 1440p it will looks probably great but hey my pc has a bigger pixel count than poor consoles...
This looks a next gen game for you?
//DEVIL//
Member
Well yeah. its a first wave of next-gen games. think of it something Killzone on PS4. it's utilizing the PS5 power in things you may not notice very much. like, I did not notice much of pop-in renders during fast movement. the lighting and magic effects are so much and so amazing without drop-in frames. it's a next-gen game.
Last edited:
In Cold Blood
Banned
I will eat the Crow.
In my defence I thought it had to be supported on the PS5 API, which apparently it didn't.
Last edited:
diffusionx
Gold Member
I wrote about this in the other thread but this is the whole point of FSR/DLSS. Nobody laughs at 4090 or calling it underpowered for using DLSS which renders at as low as one quarter of resolution.
Tripolygon
Banned
Now that's how you do it.
There is no "API" specific to implementing FSR, it's just code that will run on "any" GPU using already existing graphics API.
The series s has these resolutions all the time. This is just a shit game that doesn't even look good. I love all the xbox fanboys in here acting like this is some W. Most of us PS fans have just finished GOW - this doesn't bother us at all.
alabtrosMyster
Banned
That reminds me of ICO.Another example of why you should not trust announcement/reveal trailers :
In Cold Blood
Banned
I saw that both MS with Direct X11 and Direct X12, and Vulkan were supporting it, which is how I assumed it was going to be able to be used on the wide range of GPUs regardless of make, as pretty much every single PC game uses either Vulkan or DX.Now that's how you do it.
There is no "API" specific to implementing FSR, it's just code that will run on "any" GPU using already existing graphics API.
On top of that the Xbox uses DX12.
We then had Sony who hadn't at that point supported it directly.
With what was said about Vulkan and DX I guess that Sony had to make their API support it, which it appeared they hadn't.
I was never saying that the PS5 couldn't do FSR, of course it could.
My initial thought was that Sony was going to roll out their own Temporal Upscaling tech, and we had already seen Insomniac use their own solution and it was pretty good.
We also see how UE5 has a version of Temporal reconstruction which works well.
Anyway, it kinda makes we wonder why MS and Vulkan even bothered announcing that they were going to support it when it doesn't even need them to.
