Jesus this is some selective and potentially misleading stuff.
First, it's muddying the water mixing software and "services". It gives no breakdown of what is game sales and what is software. Given the disparity in cost between the PS online service and the Nintendo Switch online service that alone creates a large discrepancy.
Physical gives us the closest we have to a game sales split in the form of physical because as far as I'm aware there aren't any services being sold physically. On that we can see that the Switch "appears" to be much healthier than the PS (17% vs 5%) but then we have the digital question which as I mentioned is impossible to distinguish because it's a dirty figure that contains multiple non-game factors like subscription services and micro-transactions.
We really do need a source and a split to understand the numbers at the moment because they mix factors and lack context which makes them very unreliable.
Why you should never compare home consoles to portable consoles
PlayStation owners buy more
-games
Also this part that you've labelled as "playstation and Nintendo Sales breakdown" doesn't provide a breakdown of one versus the other. It looks like figures for just one company rather than a comparison. Is this taken from a Sony shareholder report? that would make more sense looking at the figures
PlayStation and Nintendo sales breakdown
Basically, we're gonna need a source and some more detail. There is some muddy number malarky going on here and any time something decides to combine services and software into a single figure without making a distinction I'm always curious what they're hiding