Md Ray
Member
DarkMage619: lol nup! gamepass babayy!! muhahahahaha!Isn’t the ps5 digital actually better value when you factor in storage and processing delta?
DarkMage619: lol nup! gamepass babayy!! muhahahahaha!Isn’t the ps5 digital actually better value when you factor in storage and processing delta?
Well you get 25? highly regarded games with ps5 if subscriptions are the name of the game. Probably fit them all on the ps5 even.DarkMage619: lol nup! gamepass babayy!! muhahahahaha!
Dirt 5 dropped to 900p on both XSX and PS5.PS5 resolution is dynamic 1296p-2160p. Series X is 1008p-2160p
*rubs eyeballs*
Not even a full 1080p on the X is a new record.
In 60fps or 120fps? New low record for 60 by this game I think.Dirt 5 dropped to 900p on both XSX and PS5.
He never said that it was better value than the PS5.Isn’t the ps5 digital actually better value when you factor in storage and processing delta?
Don’t waste your time.Dirt 5 dropped to 900p on both XSX and PS5.
It is but can anyone actually find one it like the rarest console ever way more rare then the disc PS5Isn’t the ps5 digital actually better value when you factor in storage and processing delta?
Metro Exodus on PS5 says hello.PS5 resolution is dynamic 1296p-2160p. Series X is 1008p-2160p
*rubs eyeballs*
Not even a full 1080p on the X is a new record.
True, that would be crazytalk.He never said that it was better value than the PS5.
Deffo, if you have the money to buy a ps5 digital and you can actually find one as evidence is showing less than 10 percent of manufactured units are digital ps5s then its the best valued box if you don’t take into account cost prices for first party Sony games etc.True, that would be crazy
They will stop eventually. But the thought of 30hz slide shows should be enough to dissuade anyone from such follyTrue, that would be crazytalk.
If a total tightass and looking for lowest cost just go with xone or ps4 since 99.9% of games are coming to the platforms…..sadly.
Isn’t the ps5 digital actually better value when you factor in storage and processing delta?
And one minute loading times. Those are the worst.They will stop eventually. But the thought of 30hz slide shows should be enough to dissuade anyone from such folly
In 60fps or 120fps? New low record for 60 by this game I think.
Rift Apart in Performance RT already reached that mark. Check VGtech.
Yeah I forgot to add thatAnd one minute loading times. Those are the worst.
- 60hz mode:
- PS5 scales from: 1296p to 2160p
- SX scales from: 1008p to 2160p.
- However SX enjoys higher dynamic resolution on average.
'If' XSX has enough headroom to run the game at "slightly higher resolution" (again needs confirmation, no figures provided) during races why it needs to drop that much lower after the so called 'camera cuts'? What's going on, any theories?
Wait for VRS tier 2. It will give the SS ability to push the PS5 hard or so I have been told....Racing games seems to be making a comeback this gen. So many racing games in less than 2 years. Excellent performance on the two big boys. Series S is terrible as always and missing modes.
You don’t frighten me PlayStation pig dogs!! Go and boil your bottoms sons of a Cerny lover
It would be a really good topic for a thread.Another title where the XSS version of the game performs significantly better than version on the most powerful console of last generation. To boast higher resolution and higher frame rates than the X1X is quite the feat for a $300 system. That is to say nothing about the X1, the system the XSS replaced, version of this game which isn't even in the conversation. It's great to see what is possible if a developer puts in some time on the XSS. Jason Ronald and his team deserve tons of credit for what is clearly the best value in gaming this generation. Kudos.
It would be a really good topic for a thread.
Comparing all the games on PS4 Pro and XSS as they have the same GPU tflop number, and a CPU with the same amount of cores.
It's really the best example of how RDNA 2 Compares to GCN.
'If' XSX has enough headroom to run the game at "slightly higher resolution" (again needs confirmation, no figures provided) during races why it needs to drop that much lower after the so called 'camera cuts'? What's going on, any theories?
Rift Apart in Performance RT already reached that mark. Check VGtech.
In 60fps or 120fps? New low record for 60 by this game I think.
Really glad I grabbed this in the EA Xbox sale. It has 120 support AND Atmos!
I think the current record is The Medium, which can go as low as around 900p on a 12 Tflops machine but it's a 30 fps game. Unbelievable. I can't think of a worse optimized game than that.
PS5 resolution is dynamic 1296p-2160p. Series X is 1008p-2160p
*rubs eyeballs*
Not even a full 1080p on the X is a new record.
Just to clarify, the medium drops to that low of a resolution when its doing a picture in picture mode for its dual worlds, you're seeing two 900p windows rendered with different worlds at the same time.
Same dude lied about the resolution of the Xbox One version of Dying Light 2, him saying it doesn't make it true.Love the quotations on 'if' and 'so called' even when it's directly stated in the video lol.
I think the current record is The Medium, which can go as low as around 900p on a 12 Tflops machine but it's a 30 fps game. Unbelievable. I can't think of a worse optimized game than that.
Same dude lied about the resolution of the Xbox One version of Dying Light 2, him saying it doesn't make it true.
Did you just link a video from some rando who made a video after DFs? I wonder where they got those pixel counts from.I don't know if we should be calling it "lying". We've had numerous games where DF, NX, VGTech and other analysis have different results from each other. Doesn't make any of them liars.
For DL 2 I don't think NXgamer has done a last gen video, if he has I couldn't find one.
VGTech lists XBO resolution as 720p.
DF lists as 864p
This third analysis I found on Youtube also has 864p
I can't find any other source that compares metrics.
Did you just link a video from some rando who made a video after DFs? I wonder where they got those pixel counts from.
It has a fixed resolution, there's no DRS they can hide behind. VGTech has corrected DF multiple times before (and they've thanked him for it). Oliver(?) is lying. Maybe they took the PS4 res and thought "yeah Xbox One looks about the same", but that doesn't matter, they lied about it.If it had, the video would probably link it. That source looks like an independent person ala that elemenoppee channel.
There aren't any other videos on YT which compare last gen version with metrics.
Anyway, my point is we have seen VGTech, NXGamer and DF give different resolution metrics in their testing all to frequently. It's not uncommon and it doesn't mean one of them is deliberately lying for some reason.
Oliver(?) is lying. Maybe they took the PS4 res and thought "yeah Xbox One looks about the same", but that doesn't matter, they lied about it.
I would wait for someone else's, like vgtech, before getting my panties in a bunch.for this engine and the progress they have made since the launch title of Dirt 5 it could be anything. Potentially the frequency of the PS5 gpu allows a higher lower bounds to maintain the 60 fps when switching the camera. No idea tbh, just a suggestion.
The reality is no human is going to spot 2 frames out of 60 thats lower resolution when switching a camera, which who would actually switch a camera that often anyway?
The xbox is holding a higher resolution on average while actually playing the game which is a much more important metric.
You shouldn't call him a liar without evidence.Same dude lied about the resolution of the Xbox One version of Dying Light 2, him saying it doesn't make it true.
No, I don't think that. It could be due to laziness, counting pixels from one but not the other since the look similar or something else. Who knows? Lets call it being wrong rather than straight up lying (they shouldn't be stating things as facts though). Like blind ass Tom, he's wrong a lot.But why would he need to lie lol, are you suggesting he's on the take from MS to make the XBO version look like its running 100p pixels more ?
Presenting things as a fact when they are wrong. I'll call him wrong instead of a liar, if that's better.You shouldn't call him a liar without evidence.
How old is this game? Is it just the patch that's new or has the game just been ported to current gen machines?/
Yeah, that's better. He likely just made a mistake and equated PS4 and XOS resolutions.Presenting things as a fact when they are wrong. I'll call him wrong instead of a liar, if that's better.
I thought some of the development community were/are the biggest detractors based on their public comments.Yup and the biggest detractors don't own the system and usually don't know what they are talking about
It could very well be what Darsxx82 suggested on the last page, maybe the last gen versions weren't the priority for development, with the new gen being the primary focus.A
All new gen consoles run at what looks like 100% locked 60 FPS at high resolutions. Which is pretty damn good.
Any local split screen?Just wanted to pop in to say that this is a really fun game. It looks great, and they just dont make arcade racers like this like they used to. In a lot of ways, it takes me back to the glory days of the great xbox 360 arcade racers, like the original grid, project gotham, blur, split second, and ridge racer. Its the total opposite of gran turismo, and its more focused then forza horizon. Its 40 bones on xbox now, definitely worth your cash if you miss the hey days of arcade racing games
I’m a known detractor of Xbox and their online drm activations. That said if you were only going to do Xbox as a gamepass service I could see the XSS. They make sense together.Yup and the biggest detractors don't own the system and usually don't know what they are talking about. The XSS is perfectly fine for it's target audience and you can't get better performance for less money.