• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

[Bloomberg] ‘Grand Theft Auto’ Maker Rockstar Games Asks Workers to Return to Office Five Days a Week

Or is it possible these companies have detailed metrics that show most workers (not all) are more effective when working in office?

The above part of your post strikes me as pretty conspiratorial. I don't think most companies writing checks care about supporting the oil industry. I think they mostly care about the overall efficiency of their employees.

That may be the case for some, but I not for all. I just hate how these companies follow trends. My company has us coming in twice a week up from once a week. And I kid you not, their excuse was that several other major
companies in the area were doing the same or more, and they felt like it would be better for collaboration. Nothing to do with performance or effectiveness.
 

Kacho

Member
No sorry that's wrong. I disagree

Im in IT, its all about stats and our stats show that we are more productive working from home than in the office. In my case. Not talking about anyone else's experience here. I'm sure each company has their methods of tracking productivity.

It might be down to culture, type of work, the weather. It could be all of the above, fuck only knows. Either way a company or organisation can be less or more productive in the office or WFH. It goes both ways but its not a universal truth for all industries.
So management sees that you guys are less productive in the office because you’re all “fucking around” and they are ok with this? Sorry bud, not buying it.

curious, do you also feel that way about people proclaiming the opposite? Or are you only concerned with "anecdotes" being positive instead of negative?
I don’t care about anyone’s anecdotes. I just understand why companies are slowly making people return to the office.
 

Men_in_Boxes

Snake Oil Salesman
That may be the case for some, but I not for all. I just hate how these companies follow trends. My company has us coming in twice a week up from once a week. And I kid you not, their excuse was that several other major
companies in the area were doing the same or more, and they felt like it would be better for collaboration. Nothing to do with performance or effectiveness.

Isn't collaboration a form of effectiveness? You'd rather perform well on collaboration than not.

I just look at the incentives on both sides. Obviously most people would rather work from home. I don't see a strong incentive from companies to keep employees out of their homes if it meant losing efficiency. What do they stand to gain?

So far, I've only seen one person who said it's because companies want to stimulate the local economy. That sounds absurd to me.
 
So management sees that you guys are less productive in the office because you’re all “fucking around” and they are ok with this? Sorry bud, not buying it.


I don’t care about anyone’s anecdotes. I just understand why companies are slowly making people return to the office.

Of course you not buying it and I wasn't selling you anything either. Just gave you my personal experience. The call to be in the office 3 days a week comes from the execs. My manager fucking hates office days and the stats go to the guys in the suits. What they do with it is not my concern.

As I said this is just my experience since when Covid hit to the present day and I did say this productivity argument office vs WFH can go both ways.
 

sendit

Member
Isn't collaboration a form of effectiveness? You'd rather perform well on collaboration than not.

I just look at the incentives on both sides. Obviously most people would rather work from home. I don't see a strong incentive from companies to keep employees out of their homes if it meant losing efficiency. What do they stand to gain?

So far, I've only seen one person who said it's because companies want to stimulate the local economy. That sounds absurd to me.
I think it is a reasonable take. For example, imagine spending billions to fully erect massive sky scraping offices only to be hit by a pandemic and have the majority of your employees WFH.
 

Jetpac

Member
No I get it. You are a troll with no point. Leave it alone my guy. Your initial response was basic and had no point other than to sound like an alt account. When that happens…just leave it alone, please.

Buddy you’re the one online complaining about OTHER PEOPLE working from home. How much more pathetic can that get? Me leave it alone? lol I will do that. I’m going to leave it alone. Imagine getting upset over something that doesn’t even affect you lmfao.
 

Men_in_Boxes

Snake Oil Salesman
I think it is a reasonable take. For example, imagine spending billions to fully erect massive sky scraping offices only to be hit by a pandemic and have the majority of your employees WFH.
What percentage of companies construct massive skyscrapers? I don't think it's too many.

Also, wouldn't WFH be flourishing in the indie - AA gaming scene if it actually brought benefit to the end product?
 
Last edited:
That may be the case for some, but I not for all. I just hate how these companies follow trends. My company has us coming in twice a week up from once a week. And I kid you not, their excuse was that several other major
companies in the area were doing the same or more, and they felt like it would be better for collaboration. Nothing to do with performance or effectiveness.

Sitting in the office right now and you can hear a pin drop. Everyone is in their own bubble. But hey must be in the office for 'better collaboration' 😂

Might as well be at home on my comfy couch.
 
Isn't collaboration a form of effectiveness? You'd rather perform well on collaboration than not.

I just look at the incentives on both sides. Obviously most people would rather work from home. I don't see a strong incentive from companies to keep employees out of their homes if it meant losing efficiency. What do they stand to gain?

So far, I've only seen one person who said it's because companies want to stimulate the local economy. That sounds absurd to me.

On collaboration, I would agree with you if it was impossible to collaborate from home. Now in some small cases, I can see where maybe being in the office face to face promotes slightly better collaboration. And coming in once or twice a week seems like it should satisfy those cases imo. My company used that excuse but we still use Teams at out desks even when in the office...lol. As far as the economy thing, if you think having to spend 100s on gas every month, the employer having to rent out a space, utilities, office needs, people buying lunch more often and work clothes doesn't stimulate the economy, I'm not sure what else to say.
 
Nature is healing

Game won't release in 2025 if half the staff is working from home IMO

Makes sense. You want your employees to actually work on the game in their billable hours

They asking the workers to work!

Haha


They/them going to have to return to work. Good.

This is a smart move. Hopefully more companies follow.

Oh no! God forbid people actually have to “go” to work.
How's that corpo boot leather taste?
 
Sitting in the office right now and you can hear a pin drop. Everyone is in their own bubble. But hey must be in the office for 'better collaboration' 😂

Might as well be at home on my comfy couch.

This. I've been back in the office once or twice a week for almost 2 years and we rarely ever get together face to face to collaborate. Half the time it's people coming by my desk to talk about things like what they did on their vacation.
 

Men_in_Boxes

Snake Oil Salesman
On collaboration, I would agree with you if it was impossible to collaborate from home. Now in some small cases, I can see where maybe being in the office face to face promotes slightly better collaboration. And coming in once or twice a week seems like it should satisfy those cases imo. My company used that excuse but we still use Teams at out desks even when in the office...lol. As far as the economy thing, if you think having to spend 100s on gas every month, the employer having to rent out a space, utilities, office needs, people buying lunch more often and work clothes doesn't stimulate the economy, I'm not sure what else to say.
Oh I'm sure it stimulates the economy. I just don't believe companies would want to stimulate the local economy at the expense of their bottom line.
 
Buddy you’re the one online complaining about OTHER PEOPLE working from home. How much more pathetic can that get? Me leave it alone? lol I will do that. I’m going to leave it alone. Imagine getting upset over something that doesn’t even affect you lmfao.
That’s literally the point of the OP…but we still pushing forward with the making it personal are we? 🤦‍♂️
 
Last edited:
This. I've been back in the office once or twice a week for almost 2 years and we rarely ever get together face to face to collaborate. Half the time it's people coming by my desk to talk about things like what they did on their vacation.

BBBBBB BINGO !!!! lol

Being in the office 3 times a week I can attest to that. Like i said in a previous post. Half the time its just peope fucking around.
 

Kacho

Member
And why is that?
In Rockstar’s case, they have a massive consumer product nearing completion and they want everyone back in the office to get it over the finish line. More accountability, easier to collaborate, etc. Employees who aren’t happy with that can look for a job elsewhere.
 
They/them going to have to return to work. Good.

Because only pronoun people work from home...

Whats Wrong With You GIF by Red Table Talk
 

Kacho

Member
...companies in general are slowly moving back to full time office because they have a massive consumer product nearing completion? There really aren't a lot of those so that can't be the reason "in general".
What? No that’s why I said in Rockstars case when talking about shipping a massive consumer product.

In general companies are making people return to the office to improve productivity, accountability, collaboration, among other things.
 

ReBurn

Gold Member
They made everyone where I work go back into the office because most managers didn't know how to manage remote workers. Only the IT team gets to work from home now.
 

Kacho

Member
Except those companies give statements, no quantifiable hard data, so unless you have access to data the rest of us don't, why do you "understand" those statements, but not anyone saying the opposite?
If people were equally as productive working remotely then companies wouldn’t be forcing them to return to the office and they would have sold their property years ago. The return to full time office work inevitable for most people.
 

Sleepwalker

Member
They made everyone where I work go back into the office because most managers didn't know how to manage remote workers. Only the IT team gets to work from home now.
This and the leases is what it comes down to.


Lots of people here enjoy their commutes tho, so please by all means keep posting on GAF while stuck in traffic.
 
Last edited:
If people were equally as productive working remotely then companies wouldn’t be forcing them to return to the office and they would have sold their property years ago.
you have no insight into what drove the decisions of the execs for these companies, that data is not available to anyone, nobody knows and all you can do is speculate, so by saying you "understand" even though you can't actually know the reasonings, while simultaneously dismissing people saying the opposite, you're just showing bias.

I mean I can tell you what the CEO of the SaaS company I worked for thought about this, but you'll just discount it as "anecdotal" and "unquantifiable" anyway, since they don't care enough to make a public statement out of it, and I suspect even if all the companies operating perfectly fine with remote made similar statements, you'd still only "understand" the ones that agree with your views.
 

Lethal01

Member
Edit - And I'm sure they have the metrics to back it up.

Unlikely, I know from experience the higher up literally ignore the Metrics based on how they feel.
They are rarely any more sensible than the people you see post on this forum.

I've seen them literally complain about employees being more productive due mid way through discussions about how much they will pay us for assistance replacing them with AI.
 
Last edited:

Kacho

Member
you have no insight into what drove the decisions of the execs for these companies, that data is not available to anyone, nobody knows and all you can do is speculate, so by saying you "understand" even though you can't actually know the reasonings, while simultaneously dismissing people saying the opposite, you're just showing bias.

I mean I can tell you what the CEO of the SaaS company I worked for thought about this, but you'll just discount it as "anecdotal" and "unquantifiable" anyway, since they don't care enough to make a public statement out of it, and I suspect even if all the companies operating perfectly fine with remote made similar statements, you'd still only "understand" the ones that agree with your views.
Sorry Rockstar having their employees return to the office upsets you so much. They won’t be the last company to do it.
 

Justin9mm

Member
See it really depends on the role and industry you are in. I'm an office professional in Accounting. My role specifically requires no client facing interaction and I don't collaborate with my team as each member of my finance team has their own tasks which don't really involve the other. I do a lot of process work that is autonomous. I work from home 3 days a week and 2 in the office. When I'm in the office, one of the days, no one from my team is basically there, on the other day, I sit at my desk and don't interact because my job doesn't require me to. I feel that for me specifically, I don't need to be there, I'm more productive at home because I don't have to get up early to get the train which takes me 1 hour and a half each way. I also get more work done because I have less distractions at home then in the office.

But I think for majority of roles in Rockstar, collaboration would be the biggest part of the role, there are so many moving parts to game development and they would be constantly interacting and working together to bring their project to life. It's one big project that relies on this. So of course naturally, Rockstar wanting 100% collaboration is perfectly normal. If people don't like that, then they probably shouldn't be working in the industry. Projects and collaboration go hand in hand. As long as the company has some sort of flexibility to work from home if absolutely needed on an adhoc basis then I see no problem.
 

STARSBarry

Gold Member
What’s with Gaf’s hate boner against remote work lol?

Race to the bottom mentality, same thing every time a union is mentioned. Essentially because they have a shitty none unioned job where they don't get to work from home, then everyone should have a shitty none unionised job where they can't work from home. Slap on 30 days paid leave a year + 2 weeks paid sick no issue + bank holidays, overtime rates and flexi and their frothing at the mouth imagining how I should have a shitter time at work because they have a shitter time at work.

Effectively people want to drag you down to their level, rather than try to raise themselves up. It's a tale as old as time.
 
Last edited:

Fake

Member
People here are reporting by their experience that home office is fine, just works and is way more productive than work on office.

Game companies are trying to make devs back to office.

Something is not right.
 

Kacho

Member
That's a weird response considering I haven't talked about Rockstar once in any of my posts; I guess you ran out of ways to mask being fervently pro sitting in an office and decided to just make a completely random reply instead.
Oh well, good chat, have a nice day.
I’m very much in the pro return to office camp here, which I made clear in my very first post in this thread. Not sure what mask you’re referring to.
 
Top Bottom