Yeah, exactly, I don't know why people are so shocked about that. Retirement is typically planned and announced in advanced, and this was everything but that, it was way too sudden. Sarah Bond's resignation just feels like a response to his "retirement", which I could certainly understand if it was something she didn't agree with.
Slight /s on my part but you know what I meanDenchDeckard living under a rock, confirmed
Slight /s on my part but you know what I mean
Satya told him to fire more people and he gave him a report with 300 made up names while hiring new assistants.But why now and not earlier?
Yes because major corporations are notorious for listening to their "communities." Hence why Sony just shuttered the only studio likely to provide the Bloodborne remaster their fans have been desperately hoping for.
However, speaking of echo chambers, some people on this forum really have an outsized obsession with "Xbox influencers."
Phil's retirement was planned for a few years. Just how it went down, wasn't.
That's the entire point. Is to distance the Xbox culture as far as possible and introduce Microsoft gaming.Obviously. I also think that Asha will be out of touch and ruin whatever culture is left at Xbox.
Beginning, most likely, with axing future hardware plans, the single biggest financial albatross around the gaming division's neck.
Really? His kinda funny video that streamed yesterday generated over 60k views though![]()
Does he actually think that people believe he genuinely retired on his own terms?
That weird dance that corporations do with their communications is getting tiresome. They spit out a lie, we know it's a lie and they know we know it's a lie and somehow we all have to accept being lied to.
What difference would that make when can't comprehend what you're reading?Try thinking.
Actually seen it both ways. I work for a very large corporation and it has been happening a lot lately. Long term leaders decide to retire, but the company wants to hold off on announcing. A date is set and they control the timing. Others get a package and are told they are retiring. If they want their package, they follow along.Which part? Getting forced out but then pretending it was just an early retirement?
Actually seen it both ways. I work for a very large corporation and it has been happening a lot lately. Long term leaders decide to retire, but the company wants to hold off on announcing. A date is set and they control the timing. Others get a package and are told they are retiring. If they want their package, they follow along.
As much as I dislike Greg for being a fucking bitch and selling out his best friend for what essentially came down to social media points Greg isn't some random"Trust me bro" is a nobody with zero connections making claims that they know something. This ain't that. If you think Greg Miller is full of shit then that's another thing altogether.
As much as I dislike Greg for being a fucking bitch and selling out his best friend for what essentially came down to social media points Greg isn't some random
I never miss a chance to tease Dench.
TimDog was saying since last year that Phil was leaving. I think they decided to fire him earlier than planned but he was going to leave anyway.
Yeah I know but no one believes the appearances in the first place so it's just weird.Agreed. It's because appearances matter to corpos and people in press (and certain influencers) will be painfully obtuse and austically literal with what was "officially stated".
Yeah I know but no one believes the appearances in the first place so it's just weird.
Heard similar.
But Microsoft don't actually need a quick money grab so why would they sell them instead of keeping the ips?What are your thoughts on Microsoft potentially divesting Activision, Bethesda and other content heavy subsidaries and selling them to private equity? Some have argued that the cash could be used to further AI investments.
I think it's hard to imagine MS being happy as just a third party developer.But Microsoft don't actually need a quick money grab so why would they sell them instead of keeping the ips?
Gaming Revenue fell by 9% in the latest earnings report. That is significant. My guess is, numbers are not looking any better since that report came out or maybe even worse. I do not believe this was Spencer making a last stand against the evil corporation. He has embraced that corporation his entire career. If anything, he was allowed to step down and save face. ABK was a make or break for him. It did not work out as well as it was expected to. What makes it worse, I would hate to see where MS gaming would be without it.If Spencer really was pushed that abruptly, the only cause I can think that justifies it was that he wasn't following an order, or he missed his projections to such a degree that Nadella lost faith.
When Bonnie Ross was pushed, it was because she burned $500 million on a Halo live service that forgot to make the live service part.
Spencer's track record is slipping, but there isn't one event recently I can point to that would be the straw on the camels back. Happy to be educated on that.
I see it more likely he was handed new orders and wouldn't execute them. So, Nadella brought in someone who would.
Sure thing. You definitely know more than me.Except he wasn't firedI suppose you can write your opinion but to basically state a lie as fact just makes you look like an idiot.
English not your first language I presume, I apologise.What difference would that make when can't comprehend what you're reading?
Heard similar.
The big event finishing Spencer was CoD bombing,If Spencer really was pushed that abruptly, the only cause I can think that justifies it was that he wasn't following an order, or he missed his projections to such a degree that Nadella lost faith.
When Bonnie Ross was pushed, it was because she burned $500 million on a Halo live service that forgot to make the live service part.
Spencer's track record is slipping, but there isn't one event recently I can point to that would be the straw on the camels back. Happy to be educated on that.
I see it more likely he was handed new orders and wouldn't execute them. So, Nadella brought in someone who would.
Amazingly, at Microsoft, it seems you can, for about 15 to 20 years, be an abject failure, until you get a golden parachute and everyone has to suffer for your incompetence.Of course it wasn't planned, but that misses the entire point of his firing.
He was fired because for over 10 years, he failed to make Xbox the #1 product in gaming. You can fault Satya Nadella for a lot of things, but getting rid of Spencer isn't one of them. Nadella made the decision that any rational person would make; you were given close to $100,000,000,000, and you failed to use that money to make a successful product. You've failed on a level that is incomprehensible to 99% of humanity.
Aaron Greenberg is next. You can't be an executive at a trillion dollar company and fail to execute. It sucks to say this, but a bunch of people at Xbox are going to be fired because of Phil Spencer's decisions.
I think it is just contempt for their customers even more than their employees… so not sure how people astroturf and stan for them as much as they do when they have a corporate history of the opposite…One might think that lying is in Microsoft's DNA...
That's actually a good question. If someone were constantly lying to me, I wouldn't celebrate it.I think it is just contempt for their customers even more than their employees… so not sure how people astroturfers and stan for them as much as they do when they have a corporate history of the opposite…
Grow upEnglish not your first language I presume, I apologise.