Thank god you are here to moderate all of this........... Somebody should give you a job on the staff.
This
I can easily tell the difference in asset quality. Go back to last month's thread, because it seems you have memory problems.
And what's your issue with Turing exactly...? What's wrong with it?
It definitely seems that you have a problem with understanding what you read, as I clearly wrote that Maxwell, Pascal, Turing, GCN 4, RDNA1 and RDNA 2 are 'roughly comparable'. And that they have different 'FLOPs efficiency'.
According to your belief, the 3070 should be at least 11 times (actually 12 times, but it seems you'll never learn the correct FLOPs value of Geforce GPUs) more powerful than the Radeon 7850. However, in reality, the 5888 CUDA cores Ampere GPU does not want to follow your belief, as it is only 7 times stronger than the Radeon 7850.
The more anger there is in Buggy Loop's post, the more it means that he is losing his imaginary fight.
Well, it's not a problem for me. But it definitely seems to be a big problem for you. You should try complaining to CDPR directly.
What devs are you speaking of? Do you realize that Overdrive Mode is almost exclusively Nvidia's work?
Yeah, you definitely have a reading problem - I'll make it easier for you:
Defend? Defend???
People were running PS4 version on PS5 because FromSoftware set the resolution too high in the native 'next gen' versions.
And you think FromSoftware put their A team on the job when the time came to optimize the Xbox version?
You with your banning again...
Yeah, I despise FSR2 (FSR3 to almost the same extent).
Oh, memory problems again... Go watch the video and you'll remember why.Reality : Alex from DF had to compare Switch 2's DLSS implementation in cyberpunk 2077 to be equivalent to running 1080p DLAA on PC and yet there's many times it resolved better than CNN E preset.
And you conveniently left out your DLSS 4 SR fantasy.
Some one posted a video and can drop to 34fps and drops to 45 fps are common
This thread is pure bait and I think deep down we all know this..... I love these threads to be honest, and SubTooth is just so much fun lol..This time i was actually faster than you.
Buggy is my homie though, no harm intended, besides, it's all fun and jokes and not something to be taken seriously - like you often seem to remind people, right ?
Relaaaaaaaaaxxxx
And probably will run even worse. Anyway nothing of shocking, people should already aware RE can't run at stable 60 fps on Nintendo (outside the ps4 porting) or they are very naive. Pragmata already show the fps you get on switch 2. Well at least there is the VRR. The only way to have stable fps would be 30 maybe even 40 fps but for unknows reasons Capcom never target such fps lock in this engine.
Uh oh OP!
Yikes... sorry for your loss.
I don't think many of us thought it would be, but for most people that own a Switch 2 they will not even notice. The fact you can play this game on the go is a major selling point for many.I cant wait for df videos. Its basically gonna be - "ye, its good for handheld", but still not gonna be anywhere near ps5/sx level
Spukc next gen how? Its same re engine, they only added things for pc in general like path tracing. Same engine as re4 which was crossgen game
I agree with you, having these games on the go, if they are ported well, is definitely worth something (DOOM Eternal albeit it looks more than decent, at 30 FPS, is not a good port).Some of you really need some fucking daylight
having a next gen resi game on an handheld is dope as fuck
I will be double dipping if the game turns out great on the ps5 pro.
.
Without a doubt Doom Eternal was a step too far on the original Switch, even for panic room. I am hoping we get Switch 2 ports of both Doom and Eternal.I agree with you, having these games on the go, if they are ported well, is definitely worth something (DOOM Eternal albeit it looks more than decent, at 30 FPS, is not a good port).
It is funny the Nintendo new HW fan cycle: "HW specs do not matter, we do not play specs" —> "OMG this is going to be PS5 / XSS level visuals on the go, look at the trailers and how close they are!!!! The same!!! Suck it! Amazing specs and power!!!" —> "HW specs do not matter, it is good enough to have even cut down version of games on the go"
Sure is major selling poi t, but I wonder how many seitch owners even take it out of house.
That feels a lot like saying RE2 will sell more on PS1 than on Dreamcast…
Who knows?, but portability is not always taking a console outside, many times my wife is monopolising the TV, so it's handy to be able to play in handheld mode. like you say many will also play in docked mode, and they will simply see it as a Resident evil game, totally unaware of any graphical differences or the fact they are being discussed on niche internet gaming forums in the first place.
The Switch's true value as we all know comes from being able to play on the toilet, two of mens favourite past times - merged into a perfect symbiosis.
Play too long and you get up gyrating like Elvis..
www.nintendolife.com
Here is the creators voice video about the Switch 2 RE9 release. And a quote from the developer.
"Nintendo Switch 2 has improved graphical specs, so we wondered if Requiem could run on it – and it did, with ease. When we, the development team, first saw it in our hands, we were sceptical too, so we had to do a triple take. We thought to ourselves 'Oh, this is really running on Nintendo Switch 2?. It all worked so smoothly that we just decided to go ahead with the game as-is and make it for the console. With specs like these in handheld mode, it looks great.
Resident Evil Requiem 'Creator's Voice' Video Dives Into The Switch 2 Release
"I feel like GameChat was made just for Resident Evil'
Subzero putting in that overtime
It is funny the Nintendo new HW fan cycle: "HW specs do not matter, we do not play specs" —> "OMG this is going to be PS5 / XSS level visuals on the go, look at the trailers and how close they are!!!! The same!!! Suck it! Amazing specs and power!!!" —> "HW specs do not matter, it is good enough to have even cut down version of games on the go"
It's not like game run at the more stable 60 fps ever eh you people can be happy about capcom games on Switch 2 but I don't see something of miraculous. It's a respectable port but fps and IQ issues take a hit.
I mean… no one read all that, right?I can easily tell the difference in asset quality. Go back to last month's thread, because it seems you have memory problems.
And what's your issue with Turing exactly...? What's wrong with it?
Wasn't the 980Ti compared to the 1070 years ago?
Wasn't PS5 constantly compared to the 1080Ti before release?
So you don't have a problem with comparing Ampere's FLOPs with PS4, but you do have a problem with comparing Turing and Ampere (Turing's direct successor). OK...
It definitely seems that you have a problem with understanding what you read, as I clearly wrote that Maxwell, Pascal, Turing, GCN 4, RDNA1 and RDNA 2 are 'roughly comparable'. And that they have different 'FLOPs efficiency'.
Turing has the best performance/FLOPs ratio - does it change anything in the words I wrote?
Have you ever wondered why the 3070 has twice as many cores as the 2080, but the same number of TMUs?
Why 1660Ti has only 60% of the 3050 cores, but more TMUs than the 3050?
According to your belief, the 3070 should be at least 11 times (actually 12 times, but it seems you'll never learn the correct FLOPs value of Geforce GPUs) more powerful than the Radeon 7850. However, in reality, the 5888 CUDA cores Ampere GPU does not want to follow your belief, as it is only 7 times stronger than the Radeon 7850.
The more anger there is in Buggy Loop's post, the more it means that he is losing his imaginary fight.
Well, it's not a problem for me. But it definitely seems to be a big problem for you. You should try complaining to CDPR directly.
Maybe they'll decide to use more realistic settings on S2. And everyone will be grateful to you that it's finally possible to traverse the city without getting drops to 23-25 fps all the time.
What devs are you speaking of? Do you realize that Overdrive Mode is almost exclusively Nvidia's work?
Do you think that it's a coincidence that every time Nvidia presents a new tech, Cyberpunk appears in the promotional video?
Do you think that only the geniuses at CDPR know how to use Nvidia's frame generation and that's why their game appeared in the FG's promotional video?
Yeah, you definitely have a reading problem - I'll make it easier for you:
The difference in framerates between the PS4 Pro (high 20s) and the Switch 2 (low 20s) during car traversal in CP2077 is extremely obvious.
Defend? Defend???
Do you think I care about extremely rich companies or some plastic boxes or silicon chips? You think I am you?
People were running PS4 version on PS5 because FromSoftware set the resolution too high in the native 'next gen' versions.
If they can't optimize the game (and they clearly have problems with optimizing just about everything), they should just set the performance mode to 1080p-2160p (instead of 1512p-2160p) and leave everything else alone. It would be much better that way.
And you think FromSoftware put their A team on the job when the time came to optimize the Xbox version?
You with your banning again...
Why do you want to ban me exactly?
Am I the one spamming CP2077 images like a madman or you are?
My posts are somewhat informative, yours are mostly childish, personal insults.
Yeah, I despise FSR2 (FSR3 to almost the same extent).
I would never choose to use it voluntarily - even in a 4K to 8K scenario.
You really think PSSR is bad in AC: Shadows or Ghost of Yotei...
Then you not only have problems with your memory and your reading, but it seems you should have your eyes checked.
Oh, memory problems again... Go watch the video and you'll remember why.
Hint: because it runs at a dynamic 720-1080p and it occasionally reaches 1080p. When that happens, DLSS naturally switches to DLAA.
'resolved better'...
Here's a quote, you cherry-picker (DF, Oct 3rd, 2025, 6m36s): 'Switch 2 looks to be using a form of adaptive sharpening at that output resolution of 1080p after DLSS has done its job.'
And more: 'I imagine the sharpening was added by CDPR to Cyberpunk to increase that contrast and apparent detail at the cost of increased aliasing.'
So, how many games actually use the full DLSS SR CNN model?
Or is CP2077 the absolute best-case scenario example and every other game has worse DLSS on Switch 2?
But you wouldn't pick only what suits your agenda, would you?
And you conveniently left out your DLSS 4 SR fantasy.
So... when is it coming to Switch 2?
One year later: The Switch 2 is almost matching the Series S in some games… Those comments aged like milk.
Looks amazing on handheld mode too, the game looks smooth and clean. Great achievement.
Image quality looks superior for Switch 2 in RE9. XSS is a total embarrassment at this point, still gobsmacked it costs more than a PS5.
He's right.
Looks like he wants to join his friend in the other side… Sad indeed. Back to the topic… After a few hours playing, this game looks gorgeous on Switch 2.
He is not. The LOD (level of polygonal details) in almost every multiplat I seen is drawback notably compared Series S hardware. Again it's fine, it's an handheld, but no need to spread fanboyistic absurdity. And let's not talk the drop to 360p resolution because although the dlss, 360p upscaled is quite visible especially in motion. And again, switch 2 it's fine for what is it, but series S hardware is in an other league for obvious reason, there is nothing of outraging to admit it.
