asdasdasdbb
Member
PS Potable
So now it's water?
PS Potable
If you give it a PS6 name, there will be PR and legal repercussions if a PS6 game is not released on it.PrayStation 6 Portable
Cause you gotta pray it will actually have games worth playing on it.
I like my "Play5tation Portable" way better. "P5 Portable" would be super accurate to its abilities as well.Playstation Portable (PS Potable). No. No one would confuse it with the original PSP.
If you give it a PS6 name, there will be PR and legal repercussions if a PS6 game is not released on it.
If there is expectation that all games will be released on it, what will happen when the PS7 is eventually released? Does it mean cross-gen with PS6 will have the "PS6P" as the least common denominator in 2035-2042? This handheld will be too weak by then.
If you give it a PS6 name, there will be PR and legal repercussions if a PS6 game is not released on it.
Because it implies it will play PS6 games portably.Why is ps6 handheld problematic?
ever heard of the New 3DS... or the DSi...
also all games will release on it. they have to guarantee parity or people will not trust it.
Sony has completely butchered the support for their last 3 systems that aren't a mainline PS console (Vita, PSVR, PSVR2) so without a guarantee of full parity, people will not trust its longevity
The PR argument has more weight than the legal one. There's no precedent nor legislation that would enforce this, so good luck to whoever might try to sue them over that. Courts generally ere on the side of common sense when it comes to end of life expectations.
I'm all for it to be called PS6 portable handheld lite or whatever. I just hope it won't still be supported when PS7 and PS6 become cross-gen next next gen.
YOOOOooooo... This thing is in no way guaranteed to last as long as PS6. LOLit will be supported for as long as the PS6 gets games. they have to guarantee that, otherwise noone will trust it.
you can't trust the creators of the PSVita without tying it 100% to the home console
YOOOOooooo... This thing is in no way guaranteed to last as long as PS6. LOL
Does it tho?well, it needs to.
Does it tho?
Parity? y u tarded bro?absolutely. guaranteed parity needs to he a key selling point after what they did with the Vita and their VR headsets
It isn't going to do that?Because it implies it will play PS6 games portably.
It will do that WITH DEV EFFORT. That effort wont be automatic, nor feasible for all PS6 games.It isn't going to do that?
U fancy ass gitPSP³
I can honestly see this happening.PS Portal Pro
I don't think that's smart. Many associate the Portal with a pointless gimmick. It either needs the name of a well-known real handheld or something completely new.I can honestly see this happening.
With PS6 games, we ain't getting cross buy for free. You will get combo discount. But not free. It will take too much dev work to get a true PS6 game to run well on this handheld. PS5/6 cross gen title will simply run the PS5 low power version to run on the handheld.When this thing hasnt crossbuy with the next gen console uts dead on arrival anyways
Imma bet you
I mean, the most straightforward thing is to just name it what it is: Playstation 6 Portable (assuming that it is a down-specced PS6).I don't think that's smart. Many associate the Portal with a pointless gimmick. It either needs the name of a well-known real handheld or something completely new.
Name your terms if you are serious.$1000. Thanks for the easiest bet
I kinda dig this logic? But at the same time, "PS6" docked being spanked by PS5 Pro doesn't seem right either ..I agree but all suggestions are awful.
PS6 Handheld should just be named PS6. After all it also definitely has a dock. And it's the Console targeting the mainstream price point. The actual successor to PS4/5/etc.
PS6 has no business being called PS6 when it's going to launch at 749-899$. It should just be called PS6 Pro.
PS6: Hybrid, 499-549$
PS6 Pro: Traditional, 749-899$
If Sony wants to make a 999-1,199$ console over the PS6 they can call it PS6 Max I guess.
You're adding the utility of being a hybrid to it. It also can be made for up to 150$ cheaper than base PS5. Being cheaper is also value.I kinda dig this logic? But at the same time, "PS6" docked being spanked by PS5 Pro doesn't seem right either ..
Nah bro, I'm kinda with it. I just dont know if 3rd party and core gamer support will be strong enough to make this work financially.You're adding the utility of being a hybrid to it. It also can be made for up to 150$ cheaper than base PS5. Being cheaper is also value.
XSS also didn't really beat XOX in everything. That's just moore's law. If they want every playstation to be a generational improvement, that means by the time PS7 is here it's completely irrelevant because 80% of the playerbase are on an older console or PS7e or PS7 Portable.
The important thing is to learn from the failures of Series S. The idea of a cheap console is not bad. It's just important to apply what Steve jobs said: don't sell junk.
It's better to just rebrand for the post moore's law era. Targeting specific pricing points.
PC is also suffering from this, transistor/$ rising hurts like hell:
1070 beat 980 Ti
2070S matched 1080 Ti
3070 matched 2080 Ti
4070S matched 3080 Ti
5070 could only match 4070 Ti in Raster and actually loses in PT.
To quote margin call, the party is over as of this morning.