Neofire
Member
I didn't insinuate that Sony was a bad choice for them, I stated that they were a bad choice for Sony.
![Eyes :eyes: đź‘€](https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/7.0/png/unicode/64/1f440.png)
Anyone who has played their games knows they have a decent amount of good games under Leyou's umbrella but I digress.
I didn't insinuate that Sony was a bad choice for them, I stated that they were a bad choice for Sony.
R.I.P Warframe, microtransactions/pay to win city with Tencent funding you.
It makes more sense to be with Tencent than with Sony. I don't see why Sony would want these studios.
They are very successful focusing on single player games. They don't need to change that.Because they are somehow lacking in the online department?
Last gen Sony had tons of shooters. Too many to keep track of.... KZ, Resistance, MAG, SOCOM, Warhawk/Starhawk, a couple of those PC-based ones like Planetside. I might have even missed a few.They are very successful focusing on single player games. They don't need to change that.
They had some onlines like GT or Street Fighter, and the online games are mostly dominated and saturated by multi games. And most of these multis like GTA, CoD, Destiny, FIFA (and now Fortnite?) etc already have marketing deals with Sony.
And well, if they want to bet harder on multi it wouldn't help to buy 2nd (or 3rd) tier studios.
Yeah. Agreed.It would be an interesting acquisition but I don't really understand why Sony would want to invest into some port studios and Warframe.
You should have hoped harder.i hope Sony gets them and not Tencent
They are very successful focusing on single player games. They don't need to change that.
Sony is getting 30% of all the money that all the games make on PlayStation, including these 3rd party online games. In fact they just invested $250M in the company behind one of them.And why leaving on the table the HUGE amount of money brought by online games?