• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

Digital Foundry: Nintendo Switch CPU and GPU clock speeds revealed

Status
Not open for further replies.
I mean, if the games have performance issues while in handheld mode compared to docked then I'd agree with you but if that's not the case and they run just as good as docked mode but at lower resolution then it'd be only a waste of energy as you wouldn't even notice the difference on the 720p screen.

I actually think they did the right thing here. The system would run hot way more often if docked mode were enabled just by plugging the charge cable.

Why is that funny? I think everyone knows that running android eats up unnecessary resources and kills battery life? Running literally anything else would be a net performance gain?

not the same way windows does on a PC
 
So... let me get this right...

People were expecting the power of a low-end desktop (at least as powerful as XB1 or PS4) in a very small chassis, run all games 60 fps/1080p docked or in portable, have a great battery life while on the go and cheap. Unrealistic much?

However, we should be thankful that CPU stays at the same clock and memory bandwith can stay at a very good 1600MHz (if devloppers so choose). For the GPU, sure 768MHz while docked is disappointing. Even then, architectural benefits should fill some gaps with the PS4/XB1. We have to remember that, in portable mode, we only have to care about 720p resolution rendering which, imo, is very feasible with that cpu at these clocks. And, at these clocks, 3GB of RAM is well more than enough.

I agree with you in that people are being unrealistic, and I am happy with the specs, actually find it impressive for a handheld.

But this is the fault of Nintendo for marketing this as a console since the beginning. First they denied it was a hybrid, then they said it was a home console first and foremost. They created the unrealistic expectations
 
Seeing the reaction of people in this thread, especially at the beginning, they were pretty much expecting this.

Um, no? People were expecting, for the most part, something about in between of the extremes that you stated, and what the specs actually are.

You are over exaggerating, and Nintendo underdelivered. Nobody expected what you quoted but the expectation was still not on the other extremity. The specs are worse than even the most level headed expectations. Just as nobody expected a portable PS4 at 199, people surely did not expect them to be THIS bad.
 

sanstesy

Member
If you price this at 200 it flies off the shelves.. If you offer custom design Switch handhelds based around Pokemon releases it will fly even higher imo... Everytime a damn pokemon game comes out people seem to find money to buy the exclusive handhelds that come with them lol.. I expect the switch to be the same.

It will be $249 like the rumors suggest. Still an acceptable price.
 

IC5

Member
Nintendo no longer has to split their focus between home console and handheld. This is what the WiiU should have been.

There wont be a companion portable system. This is it. When viewing things from the perspective of a portable, this all makes sense. It will look nice, but it needs battery life. And reality is, batteries aren't that great in 2016.

In addition to just looking nice and being a potable----its supposed to somehow support local multiplayer/co-op, while in portable mode. The marketing is really selling this as a portable which you take with you for the day or evening. And can share with friends. Then when you get home, you can sit in your favorite chair and view it on your TV. And the way the specs split for docked Vs. Portable----it should hopefully be fairly seamless in graphical impact and performance.

This thing is a portable, which docs with your TV. Things like Shield, laptops, and some of these other weird ultra portable PC things, are trying to be that main console/system but somehow kinda portable. Yeah, some smartphones are more powerful. But try playing a high end game for more than an hour, before your battery is empty.

Switch is a portable, first. And its got a couple of tricks and accessories, to play better in your living room.
 

Lom1lo

Member
We are running on Nvidia flops, coding to the metal, small OS footprint, and secret cores now.
Well the last point could still be true, we dont know how they customized the Chip. I wouldnt bet on it, but its possible. There has to be a reason for the fans right ?
 

EatChildren

Currently polling second in Australia's federal election (first in the Gold Coast), this feral may one day be your Bogan King.
Hopefully this finally kills the feverish hopes and dreams from some Nintendo diehards routinely insistent on Nintendo resecuring mainline AAA third party support once and for all. As beginning with the Wii Nintendo is completely, utterly disinterested in pursuing straight competition with Sony and Microsoft software markets.

The techhead in me is disappointed. But reality is my PC already fills that void and no amount of portability of third party games would make me buy them.

At least with this direction affordability is real, and the rest relies on quantity and quality of unique software I cant find anywhere else.
 

TAJ

Darkness cannot drive out darkness; only light can do that. Hate cannot drive out hate; only love can do that.
Well the last point could still be true, we dont know how they customized the Chip. I wouldnt bet on it, but its possible. There has to be a reason for the fans right ?

Android TV has active cooling.
 

CrustyBritches

Gold Member
Yes because all that is ever needed is AAA third party games. Did you not pay attention of the amount of third party games on the 3ds? Where do you think those games are going to go? To the vita? Nintendo apologists lol. You aren't seeing the implication of having all of Nintendos ips in one place instead of splitting them between 2 platforms. Or did you just assume people bought the 3ds for its portability?

To be a "Hybrid" implies console support. This thing is just an expensive Nintendo handheld, competing against an established Nintendo handheld in the 3ds.

As a parent of 6yr-old and 8yr-old boys, the DS and 3DS were optimal due to their rugged nature, clamshell design, and affordability.

This is a $250-300 tablet that plugs into the TV. No way I'm trusting them after what they do to every tablet they've had.

This console is aimed at almost nobody in particular. You'd have to try to make it this bad.
 

J@hranimo

Banned
This thread is a nonstop mood swing between Gaffers of all corners of this forum. Looking forward to what matters most on Jan. 12th.
 

Eliseo

Member
Hopefully this finally kills the feverish hopes and dreams from some Nintendo diehards routinely insistent on Nintendo resecuring mainline AAA third party support once and for all. As beginning with the Wii Nintendo is completely, utterly disinterested in pursuing straight competition with Sony and Microsoft software markets.

The techhead in me is disappointed. But reality is my PC already fills that void and no amount of portability of third party games would make me buy them.

At least with this direction affordability is real, and the rest relies on quantity and quality of unique software I cant find anywhere else.

Considering it will have all the Nintendo games in one platform, I think that's a given.
 

Kazooie

Banned
I don't know the numbers, but the Vita is PS3-esque and this is much more powerful
The Vita is not close to the PS3.

I agree with you in that people are being unrealistic, and I am happy with the specs, actually find it impressive for a handheld.

But this is the fault of Nintendo for marketing this as a console since the beginning. First they denied it was a hybrid, then they said it was a home console first and foremost. They created the unrealistic expectations
If it can play a game like Breath of the Wild or Skyrim (which it can) it is powerful enough to be considered a home console.
 

The_Lump

Banned
Hopefully this finally kills the feverish hopes and dreams from some Nintendo diehards routinely insistent on Nintendo resecuring mainline AAA third party support once and for all. As beginning with the Wii Nintendo is completely, utterly disinterested in pursuing straight competition with Sony and Microsoft software markets.

The techhead in me is disappointed. But reality is my PC already fills that void and no amount of portability of third party games would make me buy them.

At least with this direction affordability is real, and the rest relies on quantity and quality of unique software I cant find anywhere else.


If they were still hoping for that at this point, then this won't change their minds.

Also, perhaps wait for the rest of the specs to come out before being dissapointed or talking affordability. Clock speeds alone ain't gonna give you that info...
 
Hopefully this finally kills the feverish hopes and dreams from some Nintendo diehards routinely insistent on Nintendo resecuring mainline AAA third party support once and for all.

Again. Publishers will go where the money is. They always do. Or are people forgetting about all the dumbed down versions of popular ips on the wii/ds? Remember call of duty on ds?
 
Nintendo no longer has to split their focus between home console and handheld. This is what the WiiU should have been.

There wont be a companion portable system. This is it. When viewing things from the perspective of a portable, this all makes sense. It will look nice, but it needs battery life. And reality is, batteries aren't that great in 2016.

I think some are underestimating this. Parents and users no longer have to decide between the two. Once they sunset development on the 3ds the Switch is going to be the main focus.
 
PS4 is $249 w/ Uncharted 4 right now on Amazon.com

good fucking luck to Nintendo if they launch this thing at $249. If you're releasing a home console (like the advertising says!) and yet claim you aren't competing with Sony or Microsoft, you can't price it like the competition!

Needs to be $199. 3DS at $99.

During a holiday sale. Don't expect PS4 to be $250 w/game regular priced in March. Not to mention, NS can do what PS4 cannot.

- portable
- insane local multiplayer options
- nintendo games
- insane controller configurations

$250 for NS is a good staring point for masses. Not for everyone as we all see value differently. But, 3DS XL special editions go for over $200 all the time and regularly sell at $200 all day, every day.
 
Driving a 1080p@60 display only takes about 4Gbit/s of bandwidth, leaving 6 still available. That should be plenty for all kinds of other accessories.

Oh, but we mean empowering the console via dock. You can't use USB 3.1 as an extension for the console. 10Gbps isn't enough, even less if the data is transmitted in bursts I guess
 
Nintendo should still be courting 3rd party PC developers and having them target Low Preset versions of their games. I'm sure they could get them to run at 30 FPS if Nintendo works with them. I think most hardcore gamers will understand this system to be truly a portable device and the people that see it as a home console won't really care about the lesser graphics.

Nintendo stated themselves that this is a home console first and foremost.
 

NBtoaster

Member
Calling doom on this one. Won't get third party games, Nintendo alone can't carry a console and console games on the go isn't an appealing enough gimmick.
 

prag16

Banned
The techhead in me is disappointed. But reality is my PC already fills that void and no amount of portability of third party games would make me buy them.

This is where I'm at. I wouldn't have bought Dark Souls or Mass Effect on this thing regardless. However if this is true it makes $249 kind of a tough sell for me. $199 I'm in and it'll probably sell very well at that price. But $249 seems more likely. Could sit out the launch if that's the case.
 

oti

Banned
Please enlighten me on how stuck they are? They are in no way losing even close to the amount of money they were on hardware last generation. They also make more profit for digital which has grown by a lot this gen alone.

If your talking stuck in a financials aspect I would suspect that's not accurate in the slightest.

If your talking development wise maybe for AAA gaming? But costs on certain things are way down compared to last gen like costs for engines. Also there are more programs now for indie development than ever before which help make smaller, but competitive retail titles.

I really want to hear what you have to say. I mean yea AAA gaming has been stuck for a while because of costs, but studios are now making games a little smarter with smaller teams, budget engines that are proven to work.

From what I'm hearing throughout the industry (personal contacts) it's getting pretty tough for everyone involved, from small indie developers to AAA publishers.

Sales of sequels going down, budgets going up, uncertainty with Brexit and Trump now going around. Everyone is trying for that WoW spot of being THE game gamers play daily/weekly and always come back to, hence turning them into services while also selling them for full price. Developing getting riskier, hence opting-in for "safer" projects, which brings us back to this year's sequels performances. Newer hardware not making things easier for them (in other words things are more complicated due to PS4 Pro and Scorpio), some console manufacturers are practically leaving certain markets as far as presence goes (shutting local offices). Just not much positivity in the business right now.

As far as Nintendo is concerned, I don't see why they would aspire to compete with Sony and MS. Consoles in Japan are going meh, developers face tough challenges developing AAA games for both machines and most of the time it isn't really worth it. Projects failing left and right, the used market getting stronger, video game prices falling faster and so on.

Again, if someone just plays games on their PS4 or Xbox One not caring about the industry I could see why they wouldn't know about this. Why should they.

I know some (mid-sized) Mobile developers too and oh booooooooooooooy that's a tough market to be in right now.
 

cyberheater

PS4 PS4 PS4 PS4 PS4 PS4 PS4 PS4 PS4 PS4 PS4 PS4 PS4 PS4 PS4 PS4 PS4 Xbone PS4 PS4
Why is that funny? I think everyone knows that running android eats up unnecessary resources and kills battery life? Running literally anything else would be a net performance gain?

No amount of 'secret sauce' is going to turn this into a high performance machine. Folks insisting this was going to be around Xbox One/PS4 performance levels can kiss that dream good bye as well a third party ports.
 
Well, 384-512 Shader Cores would explain why the clock speeds are so low compared to Tegra X1, and why there is a fan inside the Switch, right?

So I guess 384 atleast is pretty likely? How would that compare to Wii U and Xbox One?
 

asagami_

Banned
To be a "Hybrid" implies console support. This thing is just an expensive Nintendo handheld, competing against an established Nintendo handheld in the 3ds.

As a parent of 6yr-old and 8yr-old boys, the DS and 3DS were optimal due to their rugged nature, clamshell design, and affordability.

This is a $250-300 tablet that plugs into the TV. No way I'm trusting them after what they do to every tablet they've had.

This console is aimed at almost nobody in particular. You'd have to try to make it this bad.

I'm sure is aimed to grown-up people who can afford many video games but don't have time because commute. The children audience will come for the next, smaller Switch iteration :)
 

Aostia

El Capitan Todd
So who's excited to spend the next four years with an underpowered nintendo console again? Great for handheld fans, not so much for people who actually just wanted a console


Put this.way doesnt make any sense
Wii and ds (3ds too ) gave many great experiences

The issue isnt that per sé
But the incoherence of positioning this hw as a home console apparently pursuing western support and probabile pricing it 50 bucks too high
 

Scrawnton

Member
Nintendo stated themselves that this is a home console first and foremost.
They are also still trying to sell a handheld this holiday with its brand new Pokémon game. They didn't want to kill the 3DS right before it's swan song. But they also wanted to reveal Switch for the fans. They had to do things this way, it's why they still haven't publically revealed it's touch screen features. They still have 3DSs to sell.

Calling doom on this one. Won't get third party games, Nintendo alone can't carry a console and console games on the go isn't an appealing enough gimmick.

They carried 3DS all by themselves outside of some niche Japanese games. The Switch will do just fine.
 

KAL2006

Banned
To be a "Hybrid" implies console support. This thing is just an expensive Nintendo handheld, competing against an established Nintendo handheld in the 3ds.

As a parent of 6yr-old and 8yr-old boys, the DS and 3DS were optimal due to their rugged nature, clamshell design, and affordability.

This is a $250-300 tablet that plugs into the TV. No way I'm trusting them after what they do to every tablet they've had.

This console is aimed at almost nobody in particular. You'd have to try to make it this bad.

Really?

My nephew's can't be trusted with 3DS where as iPad is more durable.

Nintendo will have console support. Games like a new 3D Zelda wouldn't usually release on a Nintendo Handheld. Releasing 1 system allows Nintendo to have a better software output.

As for price I agree, $250/$300 is way too much for a system that needs to appeal to kids. However Nintendo can easily ammend this by dropping the price to 3DS level down the line.
 

JMY86

Member
It will be $249 like the rumors suggest. Still an acceptable price.

I think $249 is the absolute highest they can go with these specs. The $249 price may even be pushing it. I hope they have some kind of rabbit to pull out of their hat otherwise this may be a tough sell for anyone other than hardcore Nintendo fans who were not enough to save the Wii U.
 
Well, 384-512 Shader Cores would explain why the clock speeds are so low compared to Tegra X1, and why there is a fan inside the Switch, right?

So I guess 384 atleast is pretty likely? How would that compare to Wii U and Xbox One?

384 would put it at about the low end of the spectrum of the previous rumors (500 gflops 32fp, 1TF 16fp) which would put it squarely in between the two..
 

Miracle

Member
Nintendo has stated that the Switch is a home console first and wont be replacing the 3ds. I think this is why people are upset..but even if that was the case the performance while docked is more than the Wii U so not sure why people are upset.

Nintendos fault for leaving a 3 month gap in the messaging and letting people form these expectations from a 3 minute video. There is plenty of blame here and it starts with Nintendos messaging. I really do believe they are purposely misleading the messaging so they can premium price the product.

Somehow I wouldn't be surprised if they charged $399.99 for this thing.

Wonder what the reactions here would be like.
 

Steel

Banned
This... Is worse than the Nvidia shield tablet? The hell? My minimum expectations were at least on par or only slightly worse but.... What the hell?
 

Gradly

Member
Sorry if been answered before but how does this compare to a well known something like a smartphone, a console etc?!
 
To be a "Hybrid" implies console support. This thing is just an expensive Nintendo handheld, competing against an established Nintendo handheld in the 3ds.

As a parent of 6yr-old and 8yr-old boys, the DS and 3DS were optimal due to their rugged nature, clamshell design, and affordability.

This is a $250-300 tablet that plugs into the TV. No way I'm trusting them after what they do to every tablet they've had.

This console is aimed at almost nobody in particular. You'd have to try to make it this bad.

If you think that the Switch is competing with the 3DS then this is just plain FUD/trolling.
 
We are never getting a spec sheet from Nintendo so leaks will be as close we get for a long time. I think people are also a little crazy if they don't think that Switch will compete with the PS4 and XB1 to a significant degree. Just because the Switch will have Nintendo games doesn't automatically make it unique from the rest of the market especially as Nintendo expands into mobile gaming.
 

Easy_D

never left the stone age
This tells me Nintendo's priority is not the quality of the games, but rather the length of each gaming session via prolonging battery life.

Because quality of games is measured by the specs of the system they're on. I guess Wii, Wii U, DS and 3DS libraries is full of low quality games.
 
From what I'm hearing throughout the industry (personal contacts) it's getting pretty tough for everyone involved, from small indie developers to AAA publishers.

.

I have had several friends either change industries or job hop because of how difficult it is.

One thing to take under consideration is franchise fatigue. This is most evident with the dumbasses at EA releasing Titanfall 2 and Battlefield 1 in roughly the same launch window and then not realizing or not caring that Activision was also releasing Infinite Warfare shortly after... I believe all games under performed and there are rumors that Battlefield is going to take a long break before coming back. Look at Halo its sales have been decreasing every single release.. Games just dont sell as well as they use to.

Had Nintendo released a traditional system they would have been way more screwed than taking a chance on the Switch.
 
Vita is not even a 5th that of the PS3.


As for switch... We're looking at (as we currently understand the hardware) 5x in portable mode and 10-12x in docked mode versus Vita.

yeah, you're right. The PS3 owns the Vita, of course, but I wouldn't say a 5th - unless you specifically mean the processor, but the Cell isn't to be considered I'd say.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom