S0ULZB0URNE
Member
Do tell us.
-
Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.
[IGN] Outriders PlayStation vs Xbox vs PC Performance Review
Hendrick's
If only my penis was as big as my GamerScore!
No time, heading over to the Kojima
Xbox thread.
Last edited:
S0ULZB0URNE
Member
Edited for truth.No games, heading over to the Kojima
Kojima? Man hasn't been relevant since MGS4.
Hendrick's
If only my penis was as big as my GamerScore!
I completely agree. I'm just enjoying the show.
S0ULZB0URNE
Member
It's probably ugly in there I'll give you that lol
Exanthus
Banned
01011001
Banned
Shoutout toNXGamer
He says:
- XsX and PS5 are somewhere between high and ultra on most settings.
- XsX can have around 30 percent higher resolution than PS5
- PS5 has better texture filtering than PC (and XsX).
- Performance is rock solid on both XsX and PS5.
- Load times
PC with SSD - 4 seconds
XsX - 4.2 seconds
PS5 - 3.5 seconds
not gonna do a full summary, a lot is covered here
wtf is it with developers and sleeping on texture filtering? texture filtering is literally free on modern GPUs... like... what is this? and even on PC it is worse than PS5? the fuck is up with that?
LivingD3AD
Member
Why would they do that?
01011001
Banned
Why would they do that?
simple guess, because he posts on here? that would be a resetera thing to do.
Md Ray
Member
Md Ray
Member
01011001
Banned
these consoles have hardware as close to PC as you can humanly get without it being a PC. I can't see any reason that the texture filtering on PS5 is better than both XBox AND PC! that makes zero sense.
Guilty_AI
Member
From what i heard, developer tools for the XSX arrived later than PS5's and even then it still had some issues.
Then the PC version was most likely a lazy XSX port.
Last edited:
VFXVeteran
Banned
I returned the game after I couldn't get HDR to work. I'll revisit when they patch the game. It's funny because there was none of this kind of screwup with the demo.MaybeVFXVeteran can shed some light on the pc and Xbox issues here? they seem well rehearsed in pc tech.
Game is UE4. There are no excuses on how any developer can screw this up.
Last edited:
Hawking Radiation
Member
I once said over on that forum that Michelle Obama was hot for her age. I got a permanent ban for that.Why would they do that?
So you should get an idea of what kind of people you're dealing with over on Resetera.
Hawking Radiation
Member
I thought we were over texture filtering issues. Early PS4 games suffered from low AF. Are we still on that fucking song and dance how many years later?
Is low AF still a fucking issue on consoles?
Tchu-Espresso
likes mayo on everthing and can't dance
That may indeed happen in the future but it hasn’t stopped you making a complete and utter fool of yourself in several threads already up to this point.
Last edited:
DJ12
Member
I
I see, mention one thing that isn't true, then switch to something else entirely. Good fanboying for your team.
DenchDeckard
Moderated wildly
THe reasons without any real knowledge that the ps fans come up with for why there is an odd difference etc is absolutely incredible. It’s some of the best spin I have seen in 20 years haha.
cmon guys, it’s not that deep.
it’s like reading a sony marketing pamphlet.
it’s obvious that the increased io coupled with the mesh scrubbers and powerful geometry engine is linked directly to the light speed multiplayer allowing the increased polygon count through the raw data input of the flamabaloogin into the retina blaster which makes the ps5 perform better than a pc with 64 gb of ram and a 3090.
please guys...its not it.
cmon guys, it’s not that deep.
it’s like reading a sony marketing pamphlet.
it’s obvious that the increased io coupled with the mesh scrubbers and powerful geometry engine is linked directly to the light speed multiplayer allowing the increased polygon count through the raw data input of the flamabaloogin into the retina blaster which makes the ps5 perform better than a pc with 64 gb of ram and a 3090.
please guys...its not it.
Last edited:
mxbison
Member
That's not the point of DLSS.
It's a great tech, no point in trying to play it down. Gives a major performance boost with very minor visual downgrade when implemented well.
When you can already run a game well at 4K you obviously don't need it....
DJ12
Member
You deny evidence everyone can see to post drivel?
It's not spin to say the ps5 version looks better.
I guess the first stage is denial though...
The only funny thing is there's hundreds of posts across multiple threads holding up this smoking gun evidence that will almost certainly go away with the next patch.
If both sides could just stop jumping the gun, this would stop happening time and time again.
GymWolf
Member
Go for it, i paid full price on ps5 and i have zero regret.
Loot itself like armours\weapons looks decent\nice, but the perks to make different builds are absolutely ace.
But yeah don't expcet destiny2 exotic weapons or borderlands 3 strange weapons tier, the game is a bit more dull in terms of weapon look (but they have a lot of cool effects like chains, thunders, swords from the sky etc.)
Last edited:
DenchDeckard
Moderated wildly
I've said the AF looks better in all the various comparisons and clearly the light bulb does.
Its the reasoning from some ps5 fans that it looks better that is insanity.
Here's a hint. A game should never look better on console vs a high end extreme pc.
Most of this game could fit in a 3090s ram and have io speeds higher than anything seen in the ps5.
MasterCornholio
Member
I saw screenshots where the AF looked fine in the PC version. Plus I believe that
NXGamer
is saying that DLSS is causing those texture issues. As long as you don't use it you will be fine.
DenchDeckard
Moderated wildly
I saw screenshots where the AF looked fine in the PC version. Plus I believe that
I need to watch the video properly because if this game isn't using raytracing I don't see how a 3080 or 3090 would need dlss to hit 60fps
Last edited:
Spukc
always chasing the next thrill
i got it.
cover mechanic is ass
loot is good
difficulty spikes are weird first boss seemed all over the place nearly beat him on the first try,, on world difficulty 3
then he turned into super saiyen..
died 4 times trying afterwards on constant cover glitch errors,
set difficulty on world 2.. then he became piss keyboard faceroll easy.
boss def need some tinkering reminded me of day one destiny 2 bosses,
i want to try out each class first not sure what to pick yet. i have the earth dude now.. he seems ok. i need to get a shotty tho.
as the first boss had no adds to kill so hard to get regen.
Last edited:
Werewolfgrandma
Banned
AF looks the samePC LOW vs Series X
There is no issue with filtering on the PC, the dude above that you got it from misheard. NXG said it was DLSS that cause his texture issue, not the filtering as you can clearly see here with LOW having far better filtering than series x.
Can you post a single pic of better textures please.
paulyboy81
Neo Member
The AF thing is thoroughly odd, I mentioned this about the demo in another thread but with the retail code being looked at here it more or less confirms it.
The AF setting looks more or less the same across all Xbox machines, and vice versa for the PlayStation machines as well.
So we have a thoroughly odd situation where even a base PS4 has better texture filtering than the Series X.
The AF setting looks more or less the same across all Xbox machines, and vice versa for the PlayStation machines as well.
So we have a thoroughly odd situation where even a base PS4 has better texture filtering than the Series X.
assurdum
Banned
I agree see the higher resolution version of the game with worse IQ of the lower one really killing it. Isn't it an easy achievement.Xbox is really killing it. What's going to happen when all the 1st parties start dropping? Game Pass is a fucking juggernaut.
Last edited:
assurdum
Banned
Absolutely no. Where did you seen that?
Soulblighter31
Banned
this is how we used to play games. now one single frame drop is the end of the world
Thats how the lowly tribals from the home plastic boxes domain were playing games. The esteemed gentlemen of the Personal Computer taste would never sully their delicate hands with such peasantry.
Werewolfgrandma
Banned
That's not shown in that pictureXSX in lower than low
paulyboy81
Neo Member
Just looking at the comparison screens in the video for the various versions. All the Xbox version textures blur at approximately the same distance from the camera. The PlayStation versions are higher obviously, but again, seemed to be shared across the entire PlayStation family of consoles.
My general point was that even a base PS4 has better texture filtering than a Series X, which can be seen by comparing shots at 5:35 and 15:27.
Werewolfgrandma
Banned
People just parrot incorrect shit here non stop and circle jerk around it ignoring, loling, and posting dumb gifs if you prove them wrong.
DJ12
Member
You hope, these issue were in the demo and there was a rather sizable day 1 patch already. Running as expected is what I'd suggest to you.
Why? I mean XSX is supposed to offer better graphics and performance, right? We are all expecting it each and every single time, but it keeps having trouble keeping up with PS5. You are calling people out because you were acting like a troll ignoring the obvious facts and got proven severely wrong? You are calling people out because something ends up as expected? Fixing the bug doesn't change the fact you made a complete fool of yourself? I mean we all acknowledged Series X having a higher resolution. No one is denying that, like you denied PS5 being sharper.
DenchDeckard
Moderated wildly
Exactly, If you think a PS4 pro can have better AF than a series X due to the magic IO of the PS5 and Mark Cerny sauce you are smoking something haha
To elaborate, all these crazy reasons why the AF is better on the PS5 is not what you think it is...Proven by the fact that the PS4 Pro version has better AF than the Series X.
Last edited:
DJ12
Member
And it doesn't. Ps5 looks nothing like pc on high.
It's looks better on nxgs capture with dlss enabled though for sure, the later comparisons with the different modes ps5 appear to be about medium settings, series x low.
This is what I'm talking about. You haven't got a clue what you're talking baout, but are making decisive statements because it makes your "team" feel good.
Lets say this gets fixed in a week's time. Are you going to stand up and say "I was wrong. I let lazy trolling get the better of me."
No, you'll be in some other thread doing exactly the same thing you're doing here.
You'll keep having egg on your face if you won't stop dangling them over your head.
Last edited:
Hendrick's
If only my penis was as big as my GamerScore!
DenchDeckard
Moderated wildly
Game is really fun,level 20 over here World tier 9! Loving it. It's the perfect Gamepass game.
replicant-
Member
XSX in lower than low
Who cares. Looks great playing it on my OLED.
Werewolfgrandma
Banned
It's actually not lower. Look at the pic. Pretty much everything is higher on series x. The person who posted that gif is an idiot.
Die Namek Ability
Member
Can you provide proof for this? Other than the upper bounds of resolution, from everything i have seen and heard, most everything is set higher on PS5. At least the stuff that had been identified as a difference.
Last edited: