What are you taking about? I took a screenshot from the video still on the phone and just cropped about the same area with Photos’ built in tool (iOS) on each image (duplicated the original image twice) to kind of have the same zoom factor.
.
Doom Eternal was built for an 18 CU console as the baseline. Of course narrow and fast will have a slight advantage.
VRS abuse, for some reason, I speculate?
Yeah good luck lol.
SFS's purpose is to use only parts of the textures a GPU requires for a scene when it needs as opposed to loading everything, but Matt isn't talking about that in his tweet. He is talking about vertex culling via GE which allows devs to free up compute resources which also happens to free up some memory.
Yeah, for someone like me who neither have perfect eyesight nor play at 400% zoom it’s like magic, I get much better performance and can’t see any IQ flaws, makes my paltry 3070Ti shine when it really shouldn’t.
The GE is orthogonal to VRS and doesn't replace it, since the two features correspond to different stages of the rendering pipeline (vertices vs. pixels).
on static screens, you can see at 10:45 shimering with dlss on and no shimering on consoles
This heavily depends on the game. These consoles are way more powerful than the previous two gens at launch. Besides, the 2060 is basically running the game at 900p-1800p whereas consoles are running at 1500p-1800p. we are looking at 2x more resolution.
In other games, like AC odyssey, the PS5 GPU outperforms the 2080. the XSX in Hitman outperforms the 2080. In Control, both consoles are on par with the 2070 Super.
DLSS 2.0 or DLSS 2.2 with DLL are all upscaling techniques and consoles will have their own versions of it. The PS4 Pro was doing checkerboard 4k back in 2016. A technique DF couldnt tell apart from native 4k unless paused and zoomed in. Would you say that the 1080 was beaten by the 4.2 tflops PS4 Pro GPU? Of course not.
The consoles also shipped with fantastic CPUs, top of the line SSDs and some killer I/O which will help with memory management and free up the CPU and GPU. They also cost a fraction of what these GPUs and CPUs are going for in this market. You want the rtx 2060? You are in luck. They are in stock. $500-700.
rtx 2060 | Newegg.com
Search Newegg.com for rtx 2060. Get fast shipping and top-rated customer service.www.newegg.com
That's not from ebay or craigslist. The 2080 which is what these consoles are roughly equivalent to is going for a cool $1,000.
12 CUs (Xbox One).
Well, when you absolute want win the resolution war... you need sacrifice..
PCMR
I wonder if one day say Phil Spencer joined Sony under Jim Ryan who went on becoming group CEO… I think you would breakno surprises that 2060 Super is still a beast.
It is bigger than both APU.
It has dedicated bandwidth
It has dedicated power for gpu alone. IIRC ps5/sx uses around 180w, 2060super eats that amount alone.
It has more dedicated gpu trannies.
PCMR
.
He'd apply at SonyI wonder if one day say Phil Spencer joined Sony under Jim Ryan who went on becoming group CEO… I think you would break
there's no advantage in 12nm technology.no surprises that 2060 Super is still a beast.
It is bigger than both APU.
It has dedicated bandwidth
It has dedicated power for gpu alone. IIRC ps5/sx uses around 180w, 2060super eats that amount alone.
It has more dedicated gpu trannies.
PCMR
Does Geometry Engine improve performance? That seems to be the main goal of VRS. If it does I wonder what the reason for the resolution differences at 120fps in this title is.
Ya they’re protected but some Gamepass games can be modded. I know Skyrim and Oblivion have an option to make some files available to the user.
Short answer: Yes, it should.
are you sure? those benchmarks dont show the rtx 2060 super (which is roughly 15% more powerful than the 2060) is outperforming the xsx. The 2070 super does beat the xsx so I was wrong there.I think 2060 Super outperforms console version on any resolution setting (with the same presets)
About Hitman:
AC Valhalla is running poor on Nvidia cards so it's a not valid comparison and Control is running reflections on consoles at half the resolution so it's not comparable to PC version at all (you can't set reflections like that).
Checkerboard in many games looked like shit (RDR2) so it's not even close to what DLSS is doing
So using DLSS while the consoles are using native resolutions is fair but comparing Nvidia cards on Valhalla isn't because reasons?
To be fair there is always some caveat in comparing console to PC.
It was weird when they did the Valhalla comparisons (consoles use DRS while the PC versions didn't and that was the lowest res in that section they tested) but yeah, DF are the ones making the comparisons.
PS5 Geometry Engine, from what has been said, improves performance by allowing custom and very high speed culling of geometry thus removing the need to process, rasterise, and ultimately shade them (I think from the available patents it can also help control geometry shading rate).
They are valid, assuming you include the ones that are not in such a good light. Like wdl and so on.
Hardly any. The reality is “gamers” once again got sold something that’s really only beneficial to developers as something that’s better for their games.
The most recent version able to hide motion artefacts is a huge improvements as people were dismissing those quite a bit too hastily before: you see the issue in the video and how the replaced DLL fixes it.
Nvidia boned Microsoft and then boned Sony. It’s not about being cheap but more about how Nvidia handled their respective partnerships in the past.
