I think it would raise anti-trust issues. Unreal is used by a huge amount of the competition's studio.
Not true, MS never said that they want to keep it "until 2023". Spencer said they want to keep CoD on PS. In the SEC filing they said that want to keep supporting these communities where they are, mentioning previous Bethesda and Mojang acquisitions (where they kept releasing all the post acquisition games, updates and dlcs on PS and none of them has been Xbox exclusive) and particularly mentioning Minecraft (all its post acquisition console games, dlc and updates are on PS and Switch many years after the acquisition) as example of it in the SEC filling when explaining their plans to investors and regulators.
Nvidia buying ARM would mean monopoly, a distant market leader on their area.
. Anyways, not that I would rain on that parade as in such a scenario it takes very little time for the monopolist to start exploiting their advantage against consumers 
.This is exactly why they review these deals, the point is what would happen after the deal is done in terms of market effect. It feels like you are almost deliberately missing the point thereS
As I remember they had a budget for acquisitions for this and next year of ~$14B. So now ~10B+ after the acquisition. They have way more money than that, but if they don't rise it that's their budget for now.
No problem, Sony and SIE are Japanese companies and PS a Japanese brand. They did open a 2nd HQ for SIE in USA, but they continue having their original one in Japan.
Sony bought 100% of Bungie, so obviously also bought all the assets Bungie had, including all current and future Bungie IPs. Bungie IPs are only one of the different things they buy with these $3.6B.
Who it the US government gives a fuck about an online shooter? Every company on the planet is free to make a competing game.
Maybe Sega Sammy (they also own Atlus) or Koei Tecmo. ARC System Works bought Technos Japan, or Kadokawa From Software. Then there are more minor ones like Grasshopper. Bandai Namco bought Banpresto. Or Square Enix bought Taito.
This will actually be a way better anti-trust case than Activision, since EA has an exclusive licence, which means FIFA will be locked to one platform.
Nobody teased shit enough to even give a hint
In addition to owning EVO and have the Street Fighter V exclusive, Sony also got many more fighting game 3rd party exclusives during this generation, like Guilty Gear Strive last year. Sony also funded several fighting games tournaments, and made the Tournament features mostly used by fighting games in online tournaments hosted by Sony. Soon they'll release an enhaced version for PS5 of the Tournaments feature, recently highlighted at CES.
Why would CoD need to stay multi platform for the deal to pass? It’s a big purchase but it doesn’t create any monopolies.
Genshin Impact says hi!!
www.pcgamer.com
Jim Ryan hinted at that responding to the deal saying something about expanding and connecting with gamers beyond console. That can mean even more PC ports, mobile or both. There is no way Bungie's next game (which will surely be another game heavy into GAAS) is PS only. It might not be on Xbox, but it's not going to be a 4 year old port to PC. It'll be on PC day one.
they seem to have a type of contract where k my Bungie say how can the Ip be used
let's be honest here ...is not for Destiny that as been always a so so success (started with a boom after very bad and then grow up)
Why would Sony make a FIFA that isn't a scam when that's where the value is? To create less value, but be a more loveable brand? When they are already the most loved gaming brand? Please...
next game seem to be around 2025...at that point I'm sure that Sony will release multiple titles day one on PC
