-
Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.
Microsoft told digital foundry that the Series X is their mid-gen refresh (DF direct Weekly #116)
DeepEnigma
Gold Member
diffusionx
Gold Member
Series S-isters… they’re gonna blame us….
Last edited:
MasterCornholio
Member
Huh?
chromhound
Member
Thaedolus
Gold Member
kanjobazooie
Mouse Ball Fetishist
The MS spokesperson was probably joking and they took him seriously. What do I know.
Last edited:
Thirty7ven
Banned
Sure, then next year
*pitch black*
*footsteps*
*fade in*
*it’s Phil Spencer and Sarah Robot*
“We hear you”
*pitch black*
*footsteps*
*fade in*
*it’s Phil Spencer and Sarah Robot*
“We hear you”
Last edited:
diffusionx
Gold Member
That’s really not how spokespeople approach their jobs
Last edited:
James Sawyer Ford
Gold Member
Really don’t like Microsoft’s vision for consoles :/
1 machine, powerful as possible for power supply constraints, per significant node size shrink
That’s what should always be done.
1 machine, powerful as possible for power supply constraints, per significant node size shrink
That’s what should always be done.
Last edited:
kanjobazooie
Mouse Ball Fetishist
I mean, we know Greenberg is crazy.
adamsapple
Or is it just one of Phil's balls in my throat?
Isn't that what many of us also said in 2020 ?
GHG
Gold Member
Richard further follows up on John's comments, it doesn't sound like it was a joke. It was what they were told around the launch of the consoles - that they consider the S and X to be the equivalent of the S and X last gen.
Although plans could have changed so who knows, but regardless I think it's a strange way of looking at things.
X-Wing
Member
No.
Varteras
Gold Member
Look I'm just going to be honest. That would be par for the course on how Xbox has handled itself since 2010.
GHG
Gold Member
ChiefDada
Gold Member
No.
Sleepwalker
Member
I bought a series X day one but ever since then it has been clear the Series S is their main console, they are trying to make it stick no matter what, offer it for $200, include years of GP, bundle it with shit, they've done it all. The X might not even exist.
Further proof is that they took it to their showcase to announce a NEW series S model with a price increase. (terrible value btw imo)
Morrie’s wig shop
Member
Until it’s not…..
DeepEnigma
Gold Member
adamsapple
Or is it just one of Phil's balls in my throat?
MasterCornholio
Member
So I really don't believe that either the PS5 or XSX are equivalent to mid gen refreshes. I'm sure if you were to release a system in the middle of a gen it would be more powerful than those two systems.
I always saw the X and S as being two pieces of bread with the PS5 in the middle.
I always saw the X and S as being two pieces of bread with the PS5 in the middle.
Last edited:
Bernardougf
Gold Member
bitbydeath
Gold Member
They’ll probably wait until Sony releases there’s and launch a year or two later to take the power crown.
Hendrick's
If only my penis was as big as my GamerScore!
With PC as an option, I don't see the need for a mid-gen refresh. That said, they will 100% still have one at some point. This comment just confirms it won't be soon.
bender
What time is it?
No.
Thaedolus
Gold Member
I guess…man I thought the series S was perfectly fine for the budget conscious gamer jumping in at reduced settings, but with its other bottlenecks and it being the baseline this gen…le sigh.
adamsapple
Or is it just one of Phil's balls in my throat?
GHG
Gold Member
Well when you consider what their direct competition considers to be their baseline for hardware in terms of this gen then it seems to be misguided.
If that's the strategy they really want to follow through with for the reminder of the gen, good luck.
Even if Microsoft was already finishing work on Xbox Series X Pro, Spencer would not tell anybody from public. He is not stupid especially since he has a game coming that could be a true system seller.
Even Sony is keeping it hush about that new revision of PS5 without disc drive and that console is supposed to be out in September according to Henderson because they have stock of old PS5 consoles to sell.
I have no doubt that if Sony has PS5 Pro in the works Microsoft would have to respond whether they like it or not.
Even Sony is keeping it hush about that new revision of PS5 without disc drive and that console is supposed to be out in September according to Henderson because they have stock of old PS5 consoles to sell.
I have no doubt that if Sony has PS5 Pro in the works Microsoft would have to respond whether they like it or not.
Last edited:
bender
What time is it?
Crispy Gamer
Member
The fact DF didn't have this same take is baffling and then Alex saying he would be pissed if Sony has a Pro variant is equally bizarre
Varteras
Gold Member
Because if you don't and your competitor does, that is a great marketing piece for them to say the only way to play most games at 4K/60FPS, as an example, is to buy their premium console that you don't have.
However, this does seem to conflict with that picture a while back where there was a space for a yet to be announced device. Though, we don't really know for sure what that meant.
DeepEnigma
Gold Member
Towing the narrative.
Imagine a tech face-off channel not wanting improved tech to analyze and be excited for.
You transparent clowns are in the wrong line of work then.
Last edited:
Shadowstar39
Member
So what? I don't get some of you sour about this.
Its common sense. You can't release a lower tier spec and then make it not work with newer games (unless you are nintendo, ala new 3dsxl, but ms and sony don't have loyalists who worship them like ninty and apple do).
And honestly anyone who has a pc should know this isn't an issue at all. One can do 1080p the other 4k. Thats it. You don't need as much vram or performance for a lower resolution. Everything else can stay the same. Its not like they are really pushing ray-tracing. Honestly 4k is probably too much for this gen and should of been just upscaling from 1080 or 1440p anyway.
On a pc a lower spec system would lower the resolution, or lower the graphics from ultra to high, to med, to low as needed. Or the resolution, there is tons of options to play with.
Also mid gen refreshes are pointless and just appease a few graphics whores. The PS5/series x haven't really had many exclusives yet to push the base models.
Its common sense. You can't release a lower tier spec and then make it not work with newer games (unless you are nintendo, ala new 3dsxl, but ms and sony don't have loyalists who worship them like ninty and apple do).
And honestly anyone who has a pc should know this isn't an issue at all. One can do 1080p the other 4k. Thats it. You don't need as much vram or performance for a lower resolution. Everything else can stay the same. Its not like they are really pushing ray-tracing. Honestly 4k is probably too much for this gen and should of been just upscaling from 1080 or 1440p anyway.
On a pc a lower spec system would lower the resolution, or lower the graphics from ultra to high, to med, to low as needed. Or the resolution, there is tons of options to play with.
Also mid gen refreshes are pointless and just appease a few graphics whores. The PS5/series x haven't really had many exclusives yet to push the base models.
Last edited:
Sleepwalker
Member
The PS5 is already great value vs a PC, even at $599-799 depending on the performance uplift it could be incredible value. What if Sony makes it so the gap in performance between a PS5 pro and the regular PS5 is close to the gap between Series S and X?
DeepEnigma
Gold Member
Who's sour? I think it's comical, much like the S.
X-Wing
Member
Now in a more serious tone. I think the future of Xbox hardware is tied to the success of the Activision acquisition. If they close the deal they will support Series until the end of the generation but then they will stop making hardware since they will have the content to pull people into their subscription model without the consoles. This means they would no longer need to sell hardware at loss just because it is the biggest entry point for Gamepass.
If the acquisition fails I see them giving a last push to try and get as many consoles in people's homes as possible in the hope of increasing subscriptions numbers there.
If the acquisition fails I see them giving a last push to try and get as many consoles in people's homes as possible in the hope of increasing subscriptions numbers there.