It quite pisses me off that i've and many other Tekken players always asked Harada to give us character specific themes in new Tekken games based from the first Tekken games, Tekken 2 and Tekken 3 had some of the best videogames music of all times. But Kazuya actually got his remix theme that he always deserved in ... SMASH...
That being said they actually finally gave us Pool X Beach stage with remixed music from the original with the new Stage that came with Lidia, maybe Harada finally got it, maybe.
Yeah i know, but it's still quite recent, i mentioned Harada because it was long time ago the requests were happening, also Harada still has big role in Tekken, actually as much as Murray if not more, he even said after Murray nominations that people can still talk to him directly about their wishes in Tekken.Michael Murray is at the Tekken helm.
Yes, because Murray had a breakdown on twitter. So, Harada had to step in. Btw. he already said he wants to get the fuck away from Tekken but now what? Feeling lonely? Pshh.Yeah i know, but it's still quite recent, i mentioned Harada because it was long time ago the requests were happening, also Harada still has big role in Tekken, actually as much as Murray if not more, he even said after Murray nominations that people can still talk to him directly about their wishes in Tekken.
Trailer:
Move list:
Move list comparison to Tekken 7.
Picture by Tekken Project:
Hanashi ni naran na!
This game is just getting stranger and stranger. What's next? Scorpion and Simon Belmont added?
Who's next, Virtua Cop and Lucas Kain?Simon’s already in the game.
I'm not a fan of those fighting game characters they keep including in SSB. I don't like Ryu, I don't like KoF dude and I don't care about this dude either. They're gonna try to adapt him as accurately as possible which doesn't leave much room for interesting move sets IMO. Also, he's probably the most boring choice they could've gone with for a Tekken rep.
Why? Who doesn’t like more content in their games?They need to just stop with releasing more characters for this game.
Maybe he doesn't really like the game?Why? Who doesn’t like more content in their games?
I'm all for more content in games, but it just seems like overkill at this point. Less is more. New characters used to feel like big events for Smash. I think it can make the meta and balancing a lot more unbalanced, too.Why? Who doesn’t like more content in their games?
Fuck yeah. Kazuya's the shit. So glad it was him and not Heihachi or Jin.
He's the Chris Redfield of the series.
Nice remix in the trailer but God damn I'm gonna be upset if the original isn't included.
In fact, add as many tracks from Tekken 1 and 2 as much as possible cuz that was easily the series' high when it came to the music.
Na.They need to just stop with releasing more characters for this game.
....why?It sucks.
I think that Smash should have only Nintendo characters.
I am only buying Min Min, Homura and Byleth.
Because I think that Nintendo characters are better and more relevant than the others.....why?
You think Snake is irrelevant? That's one way to clue me in about your age range. But do go on and tell me how Snake is less relevant than Fire Emblem, lol.Because I think that Nintendo characters are better and more relevant than the others.
Plus, Smash was conceived to be a Nintendo celebration. Imagine to have irrelevant characters like Snake in the same game as Mario. It is just absurd.
I think he means in terms of Nintendo? Snake isn't a prevalent character on their systems.You think Snake is irrelevant? That's one way to clue me in about your age range. But do go on and tell me how Snake is less relevant than Fire Emblem, lol.
Nah, he literally stated that all Nintendo characters are uniformly more relevant than others, which is obviously untrue.I think he means in terms of Nintendo? Snake isn't a prevalent character on their systems.
Ah yes, I went back and did misread that. In that case yeah, not less relevant.Nah, he literally stated that all Nintendo characters are uniformly more relevant than others, which is obviously untrue.
Snake is irrelevant regarding Nintendo history.You think Snake is irrelevant? That's one way to clue me in about your age range. But do go on and tell me how Snake is less relevant than Fire Emblem, lol.
Of course, that in the context that Smash is a celebretion of Nintendo characters, this is true.Nah, he literally stated that all Nintendo characters are uniformly more relevant than others, which is obviously untrue.
No, you literally said that 'Nintendo characters are more better and relevant than others,' leaving no nuance to differing interpretation. If you meant any different, you failed superbly to convey that. Unknown? Gave you an out and now you're using it to jump from one inference to the next. Color me surprised.Of course, that in the context that Smash is a celebretion of Nintendo characters, this is true.
But you, conveniently, ignored this.
No, he isn't. There were like two MGS games on the NES, and one on the GameCube.Snake is irrelevant regarding Nintendo history.
Uh? in the same post that I replied to you, I said that Smash was conceived to be a Nintendo celebration.No, you literally said that 'Nintendo characters are more better and relevant than others,' leaving no nuance to differing interpretation. If you meant any different, you failed superbly to convey that. Unknown? Gave you an out and now you're using it to jump from one inference to the next. Color me surprised.
No, he isn't. There were like two MGS games on the NES, and one on the GameCube.
Okay, let me break down to you your lies.Uh? in the same post that I replied to you, I said that Smash was conceived to be a Nintendo celebration.
'Nintendo characters are more better and relevant than others.'
Plus, Smash was conceived to be a Nintendo celebration.
I'm not American. Is anyone who dissents to your opinion an American?And I was posting in good faith and you started to attacking me personally, american. Grow up.
And why does Sony live rent-free in Nintendo fanboys to the point they tack any perceived slight towards Sony, even if they haven't been mentioned at all in the discussion?I do not know why Sony fanboys get angry with Nintendo success. It is not Nintendo fault if Sony doesn't have iconic characters as Mario.
And Metal Gear games have more sales overall. So I think their inclusion in Smash Bros. is more warranted than Fire Emblem, lol.Plus, Fire Emblem has more games and sold more than Metal Gear on Nintendo consoles.
Well you're in luck!They need to just stop with releasing more characters for this game.
And I was posting in good faith and you started to attacking me personally, american. Grow up.
All you American, grow up!
Snake is officially dead, while fire emblem just got a new entry.You think Snake is irrelevant? That's one way to clue me in about your age range. But do go on and tell me how Snake is less relevant than Fire Emblem, lol.
Snake isn't dead just yet.Snake is officially dead, while fire emblem just got a new entry.
Unless Konami revives him, the dude is dead, just like splinter cell.
And he isn't relevant anymore in this generation, just like how sam fisher isnt.