Not with a sex offender tag.Can't she teach to adults then? There's plenty of adults in need of an education that could use the help.
Not with a sex offender tag.
I'm not saying she should be granted a job, just that her sentence should be over and her rights restored. I doubt any schools would want to hire her, but getting off the registry might let her teach at Community Colleges.to teach kids? I can't co-sign that. If she could be hired to teach adults fine but no way should she be around young boys all day. This woman if I remember went and hooked up with her teenage lover on bail and became pregnant the second time. She obviously has some self control issues.
And she went to jail for that. Her sentence should have ended when she was released and a sane probation period ended, not a lifetime one that imposes a string of burdens.welp sometimes crimes have consequences and I got to reiterate this again she went and had sex with a child while on bail for having sex with a child....... I don't see where she deserves any sympathy
I'm not saying she should be granted a job, just that her sentence should be over and her rights restored. I doubt any schools would want to hire her, but getting off the registry might let her teach at Community Colleges.
She hasn't relapsed in 12 years, she even teaches piano and tutors kids!
And she went to jail for that. Her sentence should have ended when she was released and a sane probation period ended, not a lifetime one that imposes a string of burdens.
So you're saying our justice system is not about rehabilitation, it's about moral punishments and how you feel. She's been out awhile and tutor's kids and she's not raping them, but because your feels tell you it's wrong you don't care.welp sometimes crimes have consequences and I got to reiterate this again she went and had sex with a child while on bail for having sex with a child....... I don't see where she deserves any sympathy
Anyhow Its not like she can't make money in other ways
people allow her around there kids? I don't want to go to deep into the gender aspects of this case but the treatment of convicted women child molesters is in start contrast to how American society treats male child molesters.
I agree on the gender point, but I imagine that at least some of the parents evaluated the situation and her and found her to not be a threat to their kids. Or not and she was just the cheapest.people allow her around there kids? I don't want to go to deep into the gender aspects of this case but the treatment of convicted women child molesters is in start contrast to how American society treats male child molesters.
Murderers don't tend to get out of jail very soon, especially first degree, and rarely are offered six month pleas with no registry requirements.I always felt it was the predatory aspect of the crime. I feel murderers should be on a registry for life as well if the circumstances have it tried as first degree.
So your saying our justice system is not about rehabilitation, it's about moral punishments and how you feel. She's been out awhile and tutor's kids and she's not raping them, but because your feels tell you it's wrong you don't care.
I believe in rehabilitation for most crimes but not crimes which show clear intent and planning and are violence or of a sexual nature. Crimes like those not only tend to show a clear disregard for others lives while they are being commited, they also have life long effects.
Lets look at her husband who married the woman who molested him. At 13 she was his first sexual partner and their relationship made him a teenage parent. Her lust and bad decision making has significantly altered his entire life. Why shouldn't it have the same effect on her own life as well?
Don't be that guy.I hate rehabilitation and second chances.
Lets look at her husband who married the woman who molested him. At 13 she was his first sexual partner and their relationship made him a teenage parent. Her lust and bad decision making has significantly altered his entire life. Why shouldn't it have the same effect on her own life as well?
Well, I see the issue, but I also believe that people can change.
I hate rehabilitation and second chances.
Umm wow... I don't even know where to begin. Some crimes don't deserve rehabilitation? Are you fucking serious? So if someone decides to commit a certain crime, potentially damaging or even ending someone else's life, their life should also be ended? So now we have nothing but the end of multiple lives. Where has this gotten us exactly? Oh that's right, fucking nowhere.
A one time child molester or public urinator or statutory rapist or even a rape-rapist while absolutely terrible aren't on the level of a first degree murderer let alone a mass murderer or serial killer in terms of their likely threat to society. This is evident in the sentences given to them.
Say a man rapes a woman, rape-rape, he serves his time in prison and is released. Should he have his voting rights restored? Should he be allowed to move? What about after 12 years of not raping anyone or getting anything more than a traffic ticket?
Don't be that guy.
Wait, the guy for rehabilitation and second chances? The way a justice system should fucking work. Nah, sorry, I'll happily be that guy.
I think he was taking you literally.
Wait, the guy for rehabilitation and second chances? The way a justice system should fucking work. Nah, sorry, I'll happily be that guy. They're now married with 2 kids for fucks sake.
I think he was taking you literally.
username
Well let's break this down on facts and evidence then, not what ifs or tends to's. The facts show me she is in no way a danger to any child. We have 12 years worth of data to back that up. If I could make you a data point graph, that shit would be at zero. So why should we keep punishing her? Don't answer with What ifs or maybe's either.
He doesn't care, notice how he ignored me when I told him to use facts rather then feels.
Wait, the guy for rehabilitation and second chances? The way a justice system should fucking work. Nah, sorry, I'll happily be that guy. They're now married with 2 kids for fucks sake.
Prison without rehabilitation = Life being ended. Let's not ignore this basic truth please.
A one time child molester or public urinator or statutory rapist or even a rape-rapist while absolutely terrible aren't on the level of a first degree murderer let alone a mass murderer or serial killer in terms of their likely threat to society. This is evident in the sentences given to them.
Say a man rapes a woman, rape-rape, he serves his time in prison and is released. Should he have his voting rights restored? Should he be allowed to move? What about after 12 years of not raping anyone or getting anything more than a traffic ticket?
Then why shouldn't she still be in prison?So no 12 years of her being clean doesn't mean she can't relapse. People have the capacity for change sure but people also have the capacity to wait 12 years and molest again. There is no cut off date on the willingness to rape
You know how many people I am debating in this thread because I am defending an unpopular opinion?
Then why shouldn't she still be in prison?
Maybe you should take that as a sign.
Isn't she in such a position? She just can't do it as a teacher.In a way she still is, parole is a limitations on your freedom. She deserves a chance to live her life. I find what she did disgusting but I won't begrudge her the happiness she found. With that said I feel it would be negligent to ignore what happened and allow her to be in a position to do it again.
Isn't she in such a position? She just can't do it as a teacher.
But no one is saying she should be made a teacher, merely that her sentence be ended. And one result of that is that she can pursue, and probably fail, at becoming a teacher again.
Was it statutory rape? That isn't nearly as bad as forced rape, even if it is still really weird in this situation.