My main issue is with OP taking that little bit of already known info and creating a frankly useless thread with no new details (the nvidia leak provided us with what kind of custom chip the Switch succesor will use).
...just look at the replies in this thread, they are all mostly low effort memes.
Heh, can't blame the internet for being the internet...
Draugoth could have framed this better than just posting in full some other
summarizer's article from VideoGamesChronicle (btw, hey man, thanks for the find from me, but if you're going to loot content, give some credit where you found it.) And some of the regular GAFers here who try to hold court as smartmarks should take the time to read the content before making fun of it. This thread isn't going well, and maybe could be edited to steer the convo better (or it could just fall off the front page if we have nothing else to post besides memes... don't know why people don't realize that all you're doing is bumping up a post you think is irrelevant for somebody else to get mad at,) but hey, time is free and the internet isn't going to hit a ceiling of too many posts.
What I find valuable in this Reuters piece is that NVIDIA is planning a comeback in custom chip supplying, after a decade of quiet, fallow progress in many markets it once was heavy in. (The Tegra product line went from boom to bust. ) The included Nintendo news is the least well-sourced content and had no insight, it probably should be downplayed in the post, but overall, there's something to get out of the news.
Draugoth
here to please explain why this needs to be a thread in the first place, even if it's a 'different angle' as you put it there in your reply.
