• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

Ryanair boss: Why does every plane have two pilots?"

Status
Not open for further replies.

Ripclawe

Banned
http://www.businessweek.com/print/magazine/content/10_37/b4194058006755.htm

Why does every plane have two pilots?" asks Michael O'Leary, chief executive officer of Ryanair (RYAAY), the largest low-cost airline in Europe. Wearing sneakers, jeans, and an off-the-rack short-sleeved shirt, O'Leary is pontificating in his office at the company's conspicuously shabby headquarters on the outskirts of Dublin Airport.

"Really, you only need one pilot," he continues. "Let's take out the second pilot. Let the bloody computer fly it." What happens if the pilot has a heart attack? One member of the cabin crew on all Ryanair flights would be trained to land a plane. "If the pilot has an emergency, he rings the bell, he calls her in," O'Leary says. "She could take over."

From time to time, O'Leary, 49, lets loose with a statement like this—a reliably provocative idea about how he'd like to make air travel cheaper by doing something seemingly nutty. It's easy to dismiss his comments as the calculated ravings of a headline hound, but to do so would be to miss an opportunity to peer into the airline industry's psyche, which is usually hidden behind a phalanx of smiling, innocuous faces. At moments like these—or later, when O'Leary explains how he'd like to introduce standing cabins and pay toilets on all his flights—he gives voice to the industry's most primal survival instincts. He is the id of the airline business.

If times were lush, rival airline executives could afford to ignore him. But in recent years, with much of the global industry struggling to survive, O'Leary's subversive vision looks increasingly like a viable alternative to the status quo, which is threatened by obsolescence, attrition, and consolidation. He says what the others are thinking, and, more often than not, doing.

These days, any commercial flight may leave you with the impression that airlines consider you cattle. Only O'Leary will call you a cow, lick his chops, and explain how he plans to carve you up for dinner. His 17 years at the helm of Ryanair have been one long feast.


During an era in which the bulk of the commercial airline industry has lurched from one crisis to another—from the attacks of September 11 to the April explosion of the Eyjafjallajokull volcano in Iceland to the ongoing global recession—Ryanair has grown from a tiny regional airline into a legitimate powerhouse with 7,000 employees, flying 1,100 routes to 155 airports in 26 countries.


In July, Ryanair became the first airline in Europe to carry more than 7 million passengers in one month. The company has a market cap of $7.2 billion, dwarfing competitor easyJet ($2.3 billion) and Ireland's legacy airline Aer Lingus ($612 million) but still falling short of Southwest (LUV) ($8.29 billion) and Delta (DAL) ($8.22 billion).

Over the past decade, at a time when the global airline industry collectively lost nearly $50 billion, Ryanair turned healthy net profits in 9 out of the 10 years—most recently earning $431 million in the fiscal year ended in March.


None of this guarantees that any of O'Leary's wilder fantasies will ever be realized, only that his ideas will shape air travel for years. Beneath his success as a CEO is a radical reassessment of the nature of the commercial air traveler—a reclassification that has gained momentum over the years, evolving from fringe hypothesis to near-universal theorem.

At the heart of the O'Leary philosophy is the idea that commercial air passengers are not delicate creatures whose repeat business depends on free pillows, blankets, and tea. Rather, they are hardy beasts—parsimonious when buying a ticket, profligate once in the air—willing to endure discomfort and indignity just so long as they get to their destination cheaply and with their suitcases.

The question hanging over the airline business and passengers alike is not whether the O'Leary Way will be further adopted by airlines scrambling for survival but how far and fast his paradigm will spread.

In July 2002, passengers in England were boarding a Ryanair flight bound for Dublin when the pilot announced that the baggage handlers loading the plane were short-staffed. A major delay was imminent, the pilot said, unless people volunteered to move luggage. Soon after, a handful of passengers stepped out on the tarmac to heave bags onto the plane.

Someday, O'Leary would like to see this on all Ryanair flights. "Airports are ludicrously complicated places only because we have this utterly useless transaction of taking your bag from you upon departure, just so we can give it back to you at arrival," he says. "Get rid of all that crap. You take your own bag with you. You bring it down. You put it on."

O'Leary believes that the way airports are designed to handle baggage is a cumbersome vestige of a bygone era, dating to the years between world wars when the only people flying were the likes of the Vanderbilts and Roosevelts. "They were switching out of the presidential suite on the cruise ships, where they had a whole team of flunkies with white gloves who carried their bags, and onto Pan Am, where they expected the same thing. Well, sorry. It's 2010. Carry your own bag." O'Leary brags that Ryanair was the first airline to charge for luggage: "For a small little Mickey Mouse Irish airline, the whole industry around the world now watches what we do."

O'Leary has a dream: that someday all passengers will fly for free on Ryanair and that all of the company's income will come from ancillary revenue, such as baggage fees, in-flight sales, and commissions on travel insurance, hotels, and car rentals sold through the carrier's website. It's a distant dream. Ancillary sales make up only 20 percent of the airline's revenue. The litany of people and institutions he believes are standing between him and his dream includes trade unions (who drive up costs), politicians (who favor state-run airlines), and regulators, who prevent him from enacting efficiencies such as flying short flights with one pilot.

"If you don't approach air travel with a radical point of view, then you get in the same bloody mindset as all the other morons in this industry: This is the way it has always been, and this is the way it has to be," says O'Leary. "So nothing changes."

In exchange for cheap fares, he says, passengers will put up with just about anything. On Ryanair, that can include high luggage fees; relentless in-flight sales pitches for smokeless cigarettes and scratch-off lottery games; minimal customer service; bad, expensive food; cramped seats; and flights to secondary city airports that are sometimes hours from the actual city. (A $34 one-way ticket from Dublin to Frankfurt, for instance, will actually take you to an airport in Hahn, Germany, which is nearly two hours by bus from Frankfurt proper.)

Eventually, O'Leary would like to get rid of two of the three toilets on all short flights, which would allow Ryanair to pack in more passengers at lower fares. He would charge passengers one euro to use the remaining toilet. "In many ways, travel is pleasant and enriching," O'Leary says, leaning back in his chair. "It's just that the physical process of getting from point A to point B shouldn't be pleasant, nor enriching. It should be quick, efficient, affordable, and safe."

He puts his feet up on the table and gestures at his sparse office, which doubles as the staff meeting room. Hanging on the wall is a 2010 Ryanair charity calendar, featuring the airline's flight attendants in bikinis. Otherwise, the CEO's office could pass for a facility in an office park in New Jersey. The drab, 15,000-square-foot space, O'Leary says proudly, is "probably the smallest headquarters of any airline in the world." While the idea of sprucing up his work environment is repugnant to him, he'd like to renovate all 250 of Ryanair's Boeing (BA)737s. Earlier this summer, he announced that he was planning to replace the last 10 rows of seats on his aircraft with 15 rows of upright "standing seats"—vertical benches with shoulder harnesses and arm rests—which would allow him to pack 30 more passengers onto each plane.

The idea of vertical seats has been a third rail in commercial air travel since 2006, when The New York Times published a controversial front-page story about how aircraft manufacturers were considering using the contraptions. After publication, executives at Airbus played down their reported interest. "Our passengers and customers want more and more comfort," an Airbus spokeswoman told CNN at the time. Afterwards, the Times printed a lengthy correction, and in the interceding years passengers proceeded to do the opposite of what Airbus predicted, ceding more and more traditional comforts to airlines looking to boost their ancillary revenue.

O'Leary now says that after taking a look at the drawings, he has decided vertical seats won't save enough room. Instead, he has a better idea—replace the last 10 rows with a standing cabin, outfitted with various handrails, much like a New York City subway car, only without the benches and the panhandlers. The increased capacity, he says, would lower fares by 20 percent to 25 percent. "In no plane ever operated by Ryanair will it be all standing. You will always have the choice of paying for a seat," he says. "The argument against it is that if there's ever a crash, people will be injured. If there's ever a crash, the people in the sit-down seats will be injured, too."

O'Leary downplays the threat that turbulence would presumably pose for standing passengers. "Yes, somebody could get injured," he says. "I don't say that lightly. But we'd do exactly what we do in every other case: 'Ladies and gentlemen'—BING, BONG—'we're going to have some slight turbulence. Hold on to the rail tightly.' "

"He insults the dignity of the flying public every time he opens his mouth," says Kate Hanni, the founder of FlyersRights.org, a nonprofit passenger advocacy group. Hanni says that this past May, spurred by O'Leary's comments about pay toilets, she raised the issue during a meeting with the U.S. Transportation Dept. DOT officials told her they had verbal commitments in place from all the major U.S. aircraft manufacturers that they will never have pay toilets, she says. "We would pursue enforcement action against carriers as an unfair practice if they imposed a fee for using on-board toilets," confirms Bill Mosley, a spokesman for the DOT. Hanni says she will press officials for similar assurances against standing-room cabins.

As for the solo pilot idea, Patrick Smith, a longtime pilot and essayist, calls the notion "beyond preposterous." Smith says that O'Leary is stoking the common misconception that planes more or less fly themselves. "Even in routine operations, it's important to have a second person there," he says.

"What we don't want is to have Ryanair's wild and foolish ideas trickle into the U.S.," says Hanni. "What we've seen is that passengers freak out for a few minutes, and then they become resigned."


O'Leary was born in March 1961, the second oldest of six siblings. His father was an entrepreneur who had a series of ventures, including a textile business, a meat rendering plant, and a rabbit-breeding operation. Although his family was well-off—O'Leary attended Clongowes Wood, the same prestigious Irish boarding school that once graduated James Joyce—they never flew anywhere. Until the mid-1980s when Ryanair came along, Aer Lingus, Ireland's national airline, had a near monopoly on flights out of Dublin, and prices were high. Like most upper-middle-class families at the time, when the O'Learys traveled overseas, they did so by ferry. Looking back, he can't remember when he first got on an airplane. "Obviously, it wasn't that fantastic an experience. It wasn't like losing my virginity."

After graduating from Trinity College Dublin with a business degree, O'Leary worked for several years as a tax accountant at a large firm. He left to start a newsstand chain that, according to the biography Michael O'Leary: A Life in Full Flight, by Alan Ruddock, netted the entrepreneur a couple hundred thousand Irish pounds in two years.

In 1987 he took a job as a financial assistant to Tony Ryan, an entrepreneur who had made a fortune in aircraft leasing and who had recently started an airline, based at Dublin Airport. (Ryan died in 2007.) O'Leary agreed to work for no base salary and a significant percentage of Ryanair's earnings, should the airline's meager fortunes ever improve. The deal eventually made him one of Ireland's wealthiest men. He currently holds 55 million Ryanair shares valued as of Sept. 1 at $5.05. For the first several years of its existence, though, Ryanair struggled. Several times, O'Leary recommended that it be shut down.

Until 1994, when he became CEO, O'Leary was fairly conventional. He avoided the limelight. He wore blazers. He was largely unknown, even to the Dublin press. After stepping into the top job, though, he realized that a low profile was bad for business. He saw how other flamboyant airline executives saved advertising money by generating loads of free publicity. Herb Kelleher embodied the fun-loving experience that he was selling with Southwest; Richard Branson channeled a sense of adventure, which he used to market Virgin Atlantic. O'Leary chose to embody the role of a cheap, no-nonsense, slightly unpleasant Everyman, which he would exploit to sell a cheap, slightly unpleasant flying experience to the Everyman.

He ditched his tax accountant wardrobe and started showing up for work in jeans. At Ryanair headquarters, he cultivated a reputation for penuriousness, banning cover sheets on faxes and requiring employees to buy their own pens.

O'Leary worked hard to become known as the most unpleasant man in Ireland. He pulled off obnoxious stunts, including dressing up as the Pope to launch a route to Rome and riding a tank into an airport outside London. He took out advertisements insulting high-ranking government officials, including a series of infamous ads in 2001 depicting Mary O'Rourke, then the nation's top transportation official, first in a bubble bath ("Mary, Mary quite contrary," read the ad, "How does your monopoly grow? It doesn't") and later as a cowgirl, under the headline, "Welcome to Dublin Airport. This is a stickup!" During interviews and radio appearances, he further insulted public figures, once calling Ireland's former Taoiseach (the equi- valent of Prime Minister) Bertie Ahern, a "useless wastrel."

In his spare time, O'Leary breeds racehorses and cattle on his estate outside Dublin, where he lives with his wife and two children. He is a keen student of animal genetics and disposition. He would never mistake, say, a Beefmaster for a Belgian Blue. But O'Leary says that for decades, airlines have been mixing up their breeds of passengers—treating cheap budget travelers as though they were corporate tycoons, handling them with a level of courtesy they neither receive anywhere else in their lives nor truly expect.

Ryanair has become infamous for its customer service, which some would characterize as minimalist and others have described as hell. Complaints must be sent in by fax, not e-mail. Passengers have grappled with surprising surcharges for using such things as wheelchairs. Newspapers including The Guardian have created reader competitions dedicated to describing Ryanair horror stories.

Despite it all, more and more people are flying Ryanair—which, in the end, might be the ultimate validation of O'Leary's assessment of what travelers really want. "One of the great MBA-speak ideas is that the customer is always right," he says. "The customer is usually wrong. The only time you hear from a customer is when they're usually complaining because they want to break our rules. Why can't I get a refund for my non-refundable ticket? Bugger off."

Back in his office, O'Leary was growing impatient. The id of the airline industry is no fan of self-analysis. He's hinted in the past of someday stepping down from the company, though he says he has no plans for life after Ryanair. Political office is out of the question. "I'm unelectable," he says. Writing a memoir is of no interest. "I don't waste any time pulling wool out of my navel, analyzing my life," he says.

O'Leary finds questions about legacy equally annoying. "I'm not in it for the pride of how I served mankind," he says. "Would I like to see a statue made of me? Absolutely not."

He did concede one point of pride. "We finally exposed the myth that air travel was some kind of a uniquely sexual experience," he says. "It's not. It's just a commoditized way of getting from A to B."
 

Salmonax

Member
AutoPilot.jpg
 
Why don't they just try and make money in a different field instead of trying to make flying like a prison service.
 

ronito

Member
Why do we have CEOs anyway? Really the CFO and the Marketing/Sales Chief make all the decisions. I say get rid of CEOs and a computer sort out any problems between the CFO and Marketing/Sale Chief.
 

Brashnir

Member
Combine "why we still got co-pilots?" with "why we still got monkeys?" and the answer to both should become clear.
 

NumberTwo

Paper or plastic?
Why have window ports in the fuselage? You know what, fuck lights too. Just have them sit in the pitch black for 16 hours.
 

Goldrush

Member
I'm not sure if I would feel comfortable with the backup pilot being someone who don't regularly fly airplane. The only other option would be to require that all pilots work as cabin crew half the time. I'm not sure if any pilot would be up for that.
 
Topher said:
Why have window ports in the fuselage? You know what, fuck lights too. Just have them sit in the pitch black for 16 hours.
RyanAir only fly short haul, thankfully. I'm not sure long haul is legal for the lack of services they provide. There was talk they'd charge you to use the toilet at one point.
 

DrForester

Kills Photobucket
The co-pilot is not just there as a backup in case the pilot dies. There is a ton of things you have to keep an eye on and manage in flight. Not to mention things that need to be done. While the plane is cruising during flight, yes, the two pilots can pretty much sit on their butts without much work, but takeoffs and landing have a ton of things going on at once, especially landings.

Pilot's like any job get tired as the workday goes on. And when the hardest part of the flight is at the end, expecting one person to handle everything (Radio communications, radio frequencies, navigation frequencies, landing navigation patterns, altitude, speed, flaps, landing gear, speed brakes and more) is just insane. For many flight crews the first officer handles the radio com and relays information to the captain, who just worries about flying the plane.

Here's a graph from a flight training class.

11h886w.png
 
I'll never fly Ryanair again. Last bloody time I went on one of their flights there was an announcement every minute or so trying to flog stuff. All I wanted was to sit back and relax but instead I bombarded with crap trying to get at my money. Never again.

Mate of mine sent this on to me the other day, keep watching, gets better.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZAg0lUYHHFc
 

NumberTwo

Paper or plastic?
Visualante said:
RyanAir only fly short haul, thankfully. I'm not sure long haul is legal for the lack of services they provide. There was talk they'd charge you to use the toilet at one point.
Didn't know that. Still, its just gotten so comical now. Airlines in general. Next they'll charge you for the ability to breath oxygen while in flight.
 
Brashnir said:
Combine "why we still got co-pilots?" with "why we still got monkeys?" and the answer to both should become clear.

But it raises an interesting question. Why don't we have monkey co-pilots?
 

SmokeMaxX

Member
Eh, some people are budget conscious and don't care about inconveniences. He's right. Especially in these times where a majority of people have tight wallets.

We should have a few major airliners that offer all the bells and whistles and a few scraping the bones airliners that are dirt cheap but don't offer commodities previously seen as essential. This is mainly for short flights of course. But anyway, if you knock $50 off my ticket, I don't care if I have a pillow, headphones, a blanket, refreshments, in flight movies, or even a restroom (for flights under a couple of hours).
 

Ether_Snake

安安安安安安安安安安安安安安安
SmokeMaxX said:
Eh, some people are budget conscious and don't care about inconveniences. He's right. Especially in these times where a majority of people have tight wallets.

We should have a few major airliners that offer all the bells and whistles and a few scraping the bones airliners that are dirt cheap but don't offer commodities previously seen as essential. This is mainly for short flights of course. But anyway, if you knock $50 off my ticket, I don't care if I have a pillow, headphones, a blanket, refreshments, in flight movies, or even a restroom (for flights under a couple of hours).

K except prices won't go down because they remove a co-pilot. They'll just make more money.

And then add to this how much all of these cuts have a negative impact on the employees' stress levels. Then this stress is transferred to the passengers. It also increases the chances of accidents, or emotional outbursts by the employees or the staff towards one another.

So in the end the short-sighted CEO can tell its short-sighted investors the company is making more money for a few quarters, and then he can bail out with a golden parachute when the shares fall after a few accidents, a couple suicides, customer dissatisfaction and increased competition.

Fuck this POS.
 
Ether_Snake said:
K except prices won't go down because they remove a co-pilot. They'll just make more money.

Except prices have gone down every time they do something like this, there is a reason they are one of the biggest airlines in the world now even though their product is absolute garbage.
 
Ether_Snake said:
K except prices won't go down because they remove a co-pilot. They'll just make more money.

And then add to this how much all of these cuts have a negative impact on the employees' stress levels. Then this stress is transferred to the passengers. It also increases the chances of accidents, or emotional outbursts by the employees or the staff towards one another.

So in the end the short-sighted CEO can tell its short-sighted investors the company is making more money for a few quarters, and then he can bail out with a golden parachute when the shares fall after a few accidents, a couple suicides, customer dissatisfaction and increased competition.

Fuck this POS.

The company has turned profits 9 out of the last 10 years.

Half of you didn't even read the whole article.



UnluckyKate said:
Found:

http://www.instablogsimages.com/images/2010/07/01/ryanair-to-revolutionize-air-travel-with-vertical-seats-for-4-per-ticket4_GsyA4_3868.jpg[IMG]

It is Ryan Air:
[url]http://www.straitstimes.com/Breaking+News/World/Story/STIStory_399816.html[/url][/QUOTE]

Of course it's Ryan Air...it says so in the article! :lol
 

Jex

Member
Why we got safety devices in our planes? If they crash fast, everyone will just die anyway!

SmokeMaxX said:
Eh, some people are budget conscious and don't care about inconveniences. He's right. Especially in these times where a majority of people have tight wallets.
I don't know if only having one pilot is an "inconvenience" or "bloody stupid", but I imagine it's the latter.

hsukardi said:
People buy Ryanair. They make their choice.
No, I don't buy that either. If it's about comfort perhaps, yes. If it's about saftey, hell no, people shouldn't have a choice.
 

siddx

Magnificent Eager Mighty Brilliantly Erect Registereduser
Ether_Snake said:
K except prices won't go down because they remove a co-pilot. They'll just make more money.

And then add to this how much all of these cuts have a negative impact on the employees' stress levels. Then this stress is transferred to the passengers. It also increases the chances of accidents, or emotional outbursts by the employees or the staff towards one another.

So in the end the short-sighted CEO can tell its short-sighted investors the company is making more money for a few quarters, and then he can bail out with a golden parachute when the shares fall after a few accidents, a couple suicides, customer dissatisfaction and increased competition.

Fuck this POS.

Normally I'd agree but in this case the prices will go down. As someone else said, every other crazy gimmick ryan air has instituted has resulted in lower prices. Thats their entire gimmick, lowest prices possible. If they could, they would offer 1 dollar flights if they knew half of that dollar was profit. They've adopted the quantity not quality business standard and it's working for them.
 

mollipen

Member
Someday, O'Leary would like to see this on all Ryanair flights. "Airports are ludicrously complicated places only because we have this utterly useless transaction of taking your bag from you upon departure, just so we can give it back to you at arrival," he says. "Get rid of all that crap. You take your own bag with you. You bring it down. You put it on."

Can't say I agree with this guy on a number of his ideas, but I'm right there with him on this.
 

DrForester

Kills Photobucket
siddx said:
Normally I'd agree but in this case the prices will go down. As someone else said, every other crazy gimmick ryan air has instituted has resulted in lower prices. Thats their entire gimmick, lowest prices possible. If they could, they would offer 1 dollar flights if they knew half of that dollar was profit. They've adopted the quantity not quality business standard and it's working for them.


Yes, but this isn't a case of offering customers less services to cut cost. This would compromise the safety of the flight. I hope Europe's flight regulations prevent this. I know here in the USA the FAA assigns planes to be either single or dual pilot required.

As it stands there are not many jets that qualify for single pilot flight (not including fighter aircraft of course). Only 3 are currently flying certified. 4 are in flight testing, and a small handful are in development. They also seat a max of 8 people (including the 2 pilot seats) in the "largest" one (There is a 9 seat plane in development), and are not meant for commercial use beyond small air taxi companies.

example:

D-jet_in_ATP_livery-2.jpg


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_very_light_jets
 
Why bother with flight crews? Just more meatbags that could've fit more customers. Just throw a brief tutorial on the airplane control and let the customers take over if the pilot dies. Pretty sure they'll do just fine since they want to live.
 

Dilly

Banned
It's not like this is ever going to happen, he knows how to attract attention to his flight company. With succes it seems.

I had no complaints during my flight from Charleroi to Rome with Ryanair.
 

DrForester

Kills Photobucket
Now that I think of it, this will never happen for another reason.

Lets say he did get a Flight Attendant certified to fly a plane. No one smart enough to fly a plane would stick around being a flight attendant if they have the licenses to go out and get a job as pilot.
 
DrForester said:
Now that I think of it, this will never happen for another reason.

Lets say he did get a Flight Attendant certified to fly a plane. No one smart enough to fly a plane would stick around being a flight attendant if they have the licenses to go out and get a job as pilot.

Yeah, I don't see how this is a money saving idea. You're going to get rid of people already qualified to fly planes, so you can pay to train other people, who will most likely now demand a raise due to their increased responsibilities, or quit.
 

MNC

Member
Ryanair is basically the only airline that allows most of us younglings for a quick and cheap (but hopefully safe) travel. Flown with them to sardegna and back. lots of shit over the intercom for commercials, but they were good flights.

please gaf don't make me doubt ryanair so much :(
 

gofreak

GAF's Bob Woodward
Korey said:
What the hell that's horrible :lol :lol

Thank god they're an english brand, keep that shit overseas.

Ruh-roh.

Anyway, everyone: meet Michael O'Leary.

He regularly comes out with ideas that go nowhere simply to grab headlines. It's free PR and advertising.
 
MNC said:
Ryanair is basically the only airline that allows most of us younglings for a quick and cheap (but hopefully safe) travel. Flown with them to sardegna and back. lots of shit over the intercom for commercials, but they were good flights.

please gaf don't make me doubt ryanair so much :(

I fear not flying Ryan Air for what they are, but for what they might become.

They are the only company that allow people for really cheap small flight across Europe but they keep coming with terrible, terrible idea like this. One day, a smart ass dude will create a similar low cost company but he will take all RyanAir's idea (pay for every serivce, one pilot, vertical seats) and will make them general in his flight. He will make so much money that other company and the entire local flight will have to follow or die: in either case: we, passenger, loose.

Actually, to flight from Paris to Dublin, it cost $450 with Air France and about 50$ with a luggage with RyanAir.

So from here, you can count: if you want to eat and use the bathroom in the place, it's still cheaper to take RyanAir. Of course, you have to add the price of the taxi/bus to go to the airport (Because RyanAir is not using the international Airports in Paris, so you have to work you ass to get to a tiny airport lost in the subburbs) and even with this Ryan Air is cheaper than Air France.

So you have to ask yourself: is the confort and the service is worth the price difference between Air France and Ryan Air ? For sure, you are parked as meat in a Ryan Air flight, but can you take it for less than 2 hours ?

I have no problem with Ryan Air as it offers cheap flight solution today. But I have great fears about the future of local flight because of what Ryan Air is trying to do to always go more low cost.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom