For the devs lol.If you get in on the ground floor it is basically free money.
Eh. I'd argue most people know what they're getting into.
True, but at the same time there were plenty of people who DID see where it was going.I remember when DLC, microtransactions and loot boxes weren't going to interfere with gameplay or game design.
Good times.
You must be a Greta Thunberg type. All criticism of NFTs is super easy to handwave away if you just pretend it doesn't exist!Lmao this rich. Most people don't even understand what NFTs are.
Yes, and these people are not the ones buying NFTs, for the most part.Lmao this rich. Most people don't even understand what NFTs are.
I’m not respond to the OP I’m responding to your blanket statement in my first quote where you used “games” as a plural and I’m telling you not all cases are like this and it’s up to the devs. DLC is not new, but now people can sell their dlc for profit. Also, again, not all games will charge to win these.Read the OP once again.
"To become a “metahuman,” players will be able to bid for an NFT."
I'm not arguing whether or not you NEED to pay for it. It's that you HAVE to pay if you want it. Your example doesn't work nor matter because THIS ISN'T FREE!
That kind of internet has been long, long dead. Acting like it's still there doesn't really serve anyone.
Eh. I'd argue most people know what they're getting into.
This is FUD from the Greta Thunberg types. Especially since the energy needed to run NFTs could be made from renewables. It's a complete non-issue.
Yes, and these people are not the ones buying NFTs, for the most part.
By what I am understanding reading this thread, it seems to me they're basically only selling an NPC, which someone can trade later for real money according to demand (which I can't see any, but what do I know these days). It doesn't seem to involve any sort of mining.Screw this game. They just killed all interest I had for it.
Not going to have my system be some kind of mining machine for some scummy bastards.
The majority will plain and simple, as has always been the case. It's pandoras box and it's another scenario where people like yourself will defend it even though it's very clearly seen as another way to monetize games. Yes plural, because microtransactions didn't stop at one game. Neither did in game currency, or season passes, or lootboxes. Talk to me again in 10 years where this becomes the new normal and things given out as "free" are considered generous acts from developers, which come to think of it was one of the bigger points about CDPRs handling of DLC. You know, the thing people said over a decade ago would end up being used to nickle and dime players? Yeah that came true. So will this.I’m not respond to the OP I’m responding to your blanket statement in my first quote where you used “games” as a plural and I’m telling you not all cases are like this and it’s up to the devs. DLC is not new, but now people can sell their dlc for profit. Also, again, not all games will charge to win these.
By what I am understanding reading this thread, it seems to me they're basically only selling an NPC, which someone can trade later for real money according to demand (which I can't see any, but what do I know these days). It doesn't seem to involve any sort of mining.
Or am I not understanding at all?
I see NFTs as a potential way to get the old internet back by giving The People™ a piece of it instead of Apple, Amazon, Microsoft, Alphabet and Meta owning everything (including owning its users, lmao). How this exactly happens is yet to be seen.And it doesn't even really take away from that "kind" of internet because it's essentially infinite, it's just the concept that's slimy. It's the internet version of selling somebody a bridge. 99% of NFTs are completely and totally useless aside from trading and any that aren't could be achieved without the tech - like this auction to be in a video game, which people have been doing for years.
True, one could argue that giving people the opportunity to participate in a potential Ponzi scheme is immoral, even though the people participating know it's a Ponzi scheme. Then again, people have been participating in those since forever, NFTs didn't change anything tbh.Sure, most people know what they're getting into as much as anyone who gambles, it doesn't make lootboxes any less of a shitty concept either in the context of NFTs in games either. It's preying on people's FOMO, or lack of knowledge, or need to be seen, or addiction, or whatever. I don't even especially care about those people but it's not morally black and white.
The carbon footprint of NFTs is so small that I can't really take the concern seriously. Especially since it's a "problem" that is very solvable. Ethereum 2 dropping will solve most of the problem by itself.And I'd love to know how NFTs are currently 100% renewable, because they aren't, and until they are, it's not going to be a non-issue for everyone. You don't have to be a Greta to appreciate how burning through stacks of energy for the sake of enabling digital trading cards that make rich people richer is not inherently something to be celebrated.
Idk if the technology is incredible, but it certainly opens up a lot of new possibilities. We'll see what people will come up with. So far it's been extremely primitive, but you wouldn't judge the internet by how it was back in 1995, would you?Again, I don't blame people for making money off of people losing money, the concept has been around forever. It's just a new way to do it and people are acting like it's some incredible technology. It's not.
By what I am understanding reading this thread, it seems to me they're basically only selling an NPC, which someone can trade later for real money according to demand (which I can't see any, but what do I know these days). It doesn't seem to involve any sort of mining.
Or am I not understanding at all?
I'm also unaware of how blockchain works, but by a quick google search it seems to me some sort of encrypted token, that I imagine that exists in order to reliably store this ownership data you mentioned. But does it have anything to do with mining?The whole concept is based on these objects being signed by a blockchain and having a history of ownership.
I remember when DLC, microtransactions and loot boxes weren't going to interfere with gameplay or game design.
That's basically exactly what is happening. MTNs on steroids, being pitched as "the future." The cannibalization and extreme monetization of games is all that this is.Yeah, it's kinda scary to think about that the only reason we don't have to pay our way through to be able to see the end of a relatively full game experience right now is because we as customers raised hell about MTX.
This is round 2, and we need to be even more vocal this time around. Make no mistake about it, the Ubisofts around are carefully monitoring the community's response, and we need to let them see that we haven't budged one bit whether it was Horse Armor or CSGO Lotto.
Fuck the Stalker 2 devs, this has unfortunately completely changed my opinion about the game for the worse.
I'm also unaware of how blockchain works, but by a quick google search it seems to me some sort of encrypted token. But does it have anything to do with mining?
It only gets worse:
Stalker 2 dev GSC Game World cites "community needs and requests" in decision to use wasteful proof-of-work blockchain tech for NFTs
I dont disagree with the dlc model either. I never asked for freebies in a game that I paid for. If a dev chooses to be nice, great but I have no expectation of it. I have nothing more to say to you.The majority will plain and simple, as has always been the case. It's pandoras box and it's another scenario where people like yourself will defend it even though it's very clearly seen as another way to monetize games. Yes plural, because microtransactions didn't stop at one game. Neither did in game currency, or season passes, or lootboxes. Talk to me again in 10 years where this becomes the new normal and things given out as "free" are considered generous acts from developers, which come to think of it was one of the bigger points about CDPRs handling of DLC. You know, the thing people said over a decade ago would end up being used to nickle and dime players? Yeah that came true. So will this.
The two go hand in hand. You can't have NFTs without cryptocurrencies which need to be mined
I see, but a game that features NFT (like the case of Stalker 2) is not necessarily mining your hardware resources, correct?Mining is basically what allows a blockchain to function. The blockchain for bitcoin is now so large that it takes an inconceivable amount of total compute power to keep the entire system running.
Yep, fastest ive ever gone from “looks rad” to “hope it bombs”Me yesterday: Can't wait till this game comes out, it's looking good.
Me today:
![]()
I see, but a game that features NFT (like the case of Stalker 2) is not necessarily mining your hardware resources, correct?
Damn, it's so confusing, I feel like I need to sign to a course to understand this tech! lmao
I see, but a game that features NFT (like the case of Stalker 2) is not necessarily mining your hardware resources, correct?
Damn, it's so confusing, I feel like I need to sign to a course to understand this tech! lmao
I'm glad you're glad with the fact gaming has essentially become a new way to fleece people of their money for less and less effort. At least you can admit it, and realize nothing of what I said is false. You yourself said it, "I have never asked for freebies in a game that I paid for." I myself never asked for content or experiences to be locked behind paywall for something I already purchased, but I guess we can both be surprised, in opposing ways.I dont disagree with the dlc model either. I never asked for freebies in a game that I paid for. If a dev chooses to be nice, great but I have no expectation of it. I have nothing more to say to you.
With crypto I always take profits. Hodling is a meme.
Honesty it feels like the people telling everyone to hodl are also the people quietly selling and taking profits in the background.
Greatest pyramid scheme of our times.