• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

So What is Sony Doing For The PlayStation 6?

Killjoy-NL

Member
Adorably all digital? No.
With us, it's Purely Physical.
Not gonna happen.

Split between Disc and Digital will probably be 40/60 or something like that.
I can see them taking the same approach as this gen, except more emphasis on Digital compared to this gen.
 
Last edited:

sendit

Member
As long as they dont go fully digital, they should be fine
Every major player is going full digital, the two consumers/people hanging on to physical releases isn't going to affect their success.
 
Last edited:
There won't even be a next-gen Xbox.😶
I can't tell if you are serious. Have you not seen the slide where it says 2028 is a new gen platform?;
F17c11C.png
 
Did you miss the news about MS ending Xbox if GamePass doesn't grow big enough outside of consoles by 2027?

It's already stagnant. There hadn't even been any growth for 9 months in 2022. It's (near) hitting it's plateau.
No, i did not.

If you seriously believe that then I don't know what to tell you. Yes, MS will shutdown Xbox after purchasing multiple studios and investing 80 bil for ABK. Give me a fucking break

The gloom and doom and MS going third party narrative has been going forever now. I am pretty positive that was purposely said by MS to make themselves look dire in the situation for the FTC to give them the greenlight for ABK. Have you not noticed that? They been playing "pity me" to get their ways, it's just 4D chess, not much else.
 
Last edited:

Killjoy-NL

Member
No, i did not.

If you seriously believe that then I don't know what to tell you. Yes, MS will shutdown Xbox after purchasing multiple studios and investing 80 bil for ABK. Give me a fucking break

The gloom and doom and MS going third party narrative has been going forever now. I am pretty positive that was purposely said by MS to make themselves look dire in the situation for the FTC to give them the greenlight for ABK. Have you not noticed that? They been playing "pity me" to get their ways, it's just 4D chess, not much else.
No doubt in my mind that this gen was meant as a transitional generation, where MS is trying to move over to game streaming and leave consoles.

But you can't just suddenly do so, as a platform-holder, you'd have to shift the entire market.
They are trying and as they're losing market share in the console space, on top of GamePass becoming stagnant, they're getting desperate and start buying everything left and right to force the industry to play by their rules.

It's all there, even Spencer conceded to the console wars and went as far as stating that 'Xbox as a brand is untenable without the mobile market'.

I don't understand how people are so obtuse to the facts and label those who point out these facts as 'fanboys' or something similar.
 
No doubt in my mind that this gen was meant as a transitional generation, where MS is trying to move over to game streaming and leave consoles.

But you can't just suddenly do so, as a platform-holder, you'd have to shift the entire market.
They are trying and as they're losing market share in the console space, on top of GamePass becoming stagnant, they're getting desperate and start buying everything left and right to force the industry to play by their rules.

It's all there, even Spencer conceded to the console wars and went as far as stating that 'Xbox as a brand is untenable without the mobile market'.

I don't understand how people are so obtuse to the facts and label those who point out these facts as 'fanboys' or something similar.
I see goal posts have now moved. End of discussion here for me, best wishes.
 

Robb

Gold Member
Hopefully they’ll think twice about the design of the actual system and make something that’s not the size of a building.

Other than that I don’t really care as long as the games are good (although that is also a concern of mine considering their GAAS push which I have little interest in). I’m sure they’ll have the hardware to make things look/run great.
 
Last edited:
  • AMD GPU+CPU (same gen as the Xbox)
  • High improvement in raytracing
  • High improvement in real time global illumination
  • High improvement in SSD speed
  • Cerny's AI powered better than DLSS resolution and framerate upscaling up to 8K 240fps/Hz tvs
  • Splittable DualSense now can produce smells, is designed for VR and to be attached to phones or tablets
  • Hardware designed with PSVR3 in mind
  • Single diskless SKU
  • Full PS1+PS2+PS3+PS4+PS5+PSP+Vita+Minis+PSVR+PSVR2 BC including original digital and physical disks without needing to buy them again
  • Optional disk drive unit that accepts PS1-PS5 disks + UMD reader + memory card reader to read PS1+PS2+PS3+PS4+PS5+PSP+Vita
  • Many PS1/PS2/PSP/Vita games added to the PSN store
  • Most recent wifi and bluetooth specs
  • Buy a game once in PSN and play it crossbuy on PC, console, mobile, tv locally or (if you pay PS+ Premium) via cloud gaming
  • PSN store on Windows and mobile
  • Next gen PS cloud gaming on PS, PC, phones, tablets, tvs, etc.
  • No 'power of the cloud' fantasy bullshit

and-then-you-woke-up-waking-up.gif
 

Go_Ly_Dow

Member
I used to be so fucking excited for Sony first party games but this gen is so fucking dull, it worst than Marvel taking over movie industry. If it wasn’t for 3rd party games I have no fucking reason to keep my PS5.


giphy.gif

Yup, 3rd partys are saving the show. 🙌
 
I hope that with PS6 that they just punt on the big, quarter billion dollar budget, focus grouped, need-to-sell 20M copies or else, AAA titles and divide their studios up into smaller teams. Smaller teams that will, overall, end up producing more content that is also more diverse. UE tools are getting to the point where you don't need 500 people and 6 years to produce a game with amazing visuals.

Actually more optimistic than I used to be. At least for the smaller teams/studios. The big AAA dev houses are cooked.
 

midnightAI

Member
Doesn't make sense talking about specs right now. Maybe 2026 the earliest, where we can get a better idea based on AMD hardware at that time.

Imo, they would still with AMD for both CPU and GPU though. AMD tech keeps getting better and better over the years.

Hardware features we can discuss though.
For me, some things I'd like to see,
- Full Raytracing / Path Tracing,
- Heavy AI influence (upscaling, in-game AI, physics, etc.)
- Nanite or similar on all game engines.
- Nanite but for pixels (if possible)
- Storage/RAM hybrid solution.
Several of the things you mention there are more software not hardware (nanite for example, as is in game AI and physics even though they could be accelerated with dedicated hardware but most devs arent even pushing AI or physics as is)
 

Loxus

Member
Several of the things you mention there are more software not hardware (nanite for example, as is in game AI and physics even though they could be accelerated with dedicated hardware but most devs arent even pushing AI or physics as is)
Should I have to mention the hardware is built around Nanite?

With use of AI, dev don't have to do much.
Mostly just training, which is done mostly by a computer anyway.
 
Should I have to mention the hardware is built around Nanite?

With use of AI, dev don't have to do much.
Mostly just training, which is done mostly by a computer anyway.
Isn't the PS5 already built around Nanite? Fully programmable geometry sharers and the hardware supporting them have been critical in allowing Nanite to function.
 

midnightAI

Member
Should I have to mention the hardware is built around Nanite?

With use of AI, dev don't have to do much.
Mostly just training, which is done mostly by a computer anyway.
Why would you build hardware around nanite? It doesn't need specialist hardware and what if something better comes along, what if they suddenly recode it to be 10x performant and the hardware then doesn't work with it?
It's just way too specific. Now you can add hardware that benefits all engines including nanite if that is more to what you alluded to.
 

Loxus

Member
Isn't the PS5 already built around Nanite? Fully programmable geometry sharers and the hardware supporting them have been critical in allowing Nanite to function.
Why would you build hardware around nanite? It doesn't need specialist hardware and what if something better comes along, what if they suddenly recode it to be 10x performant and the hardware then doesn't work with it?
It's just way too specific. Now you can add hardware that benefits all engines including nanite if that is more to what you alluded to.
When I said hardware built around Nanite, I was talking about a console built around this Mark Cerny patent.

8fIA8ao.jpg
chkecbE.jpg
keLLv95.png


A TV screen divided in 4 for GPUs A, B, C, and D.
Tij4jeS.png


This patent also resembles RDNA4 imo.
Each AID (3 in total) houses a Command Processor, so it can at as 3 different GPUs or 1 GPU.
gcNe66E.png
 

Clear

CliffyB's Cock Holster
Just going to say it: MS is completely clueless about gaming.

All Sony and Nintendo have to do to continue to lead the dance is not to fuck up. Period.

The more money MS pours into the division the more imperative it becomes that they establish a universal portal for gaming across every type of device that can connect to their services. This is, and has always been their vision.

They fail to see the distinctions between the various sub-markets within the gaming landscape; they believe that by offering "best in class" product across mobile, console and pc domains under the same unified banner it will make them dominant and unstoppable. Everything they do is geared to delivering this.

Problem is; nobody really wants this! Especially so when its not achieved in any sort of organic manner.

Console gamers don't see having access to mobile titles as much as a value add. PC gamers don't see having access to either/both the other categories as that big of a deal, its just more money per month for stuff they've already decided is not for them.

Sure, there are certain key titles that enjoy broad appeal across all areas (like Fortnite, or CoD) but that's not reflective of the entirety of gaming or the interests of gamers. Especially as the different interfaces offered are particularly suited/unsuited to particular styles and genres, so trying to munge them all together just results in inferior experiences when they are mis-matched.

Most importantly, because of these intrinsic differences in need and expectation growth of this unified service will always be slower than it "should" be. They are literally creating a thing that is inevitably going to end up as less than the sum of its parts because its incoherent.
 

Hudo

Member
Probably nothing too mind-blowing. It will be a deliberately conservative evolution of the PS5. Just as the PS5 was a deliberately conservative evolution of the PS4 pro. And the jump between PS5 Pro to PS6 will most likely be equally small.
 

Xtib81

Member
Hopefully a machine able to hit full path tracing + 60 fps. By 2028, we should be there at a reasonable price.
 

Xyphie

Member
  • Highly evolutionary design based on whatever mid-range Zen*+RDNA* IP is available at the time at appropriate cost/thermal envelope/packaging. PS6 will be a "PS5 Pro 2" basically.
  • Digital only.
  • Software-side will see new social-style features which will facilitate GaaS engagement across Console/Mobile/PC.
 

NahaNago

Member
Honestly, I don't think Sony goes all digital next generation. That is a big bold move, they will let someone else do it first. I imagine they will have some sort of physical drive available, either included or at a cost. Especially if MS were to go all digital, I could see Sony using physical games options as a PR selling point.
I'm kind of iffy on this one. If they are already trying to phase out the disc drive by having it optional , then I can see them start off next gen with that in mind. The question is if this is simply a "slim" ps5 or getting folks ready for the all digital future.
 
I hope we get an significant leap in the memory and it's sub-systems. 32GB VRAM sitting on a ton of bandwidth is going to a gamechanger.
 

Mattyp

Gold Member
Did you miss the news about MS ending Xbox if GamePass doesn't grow big enough outside of consoles by 2027?

It's already stagnant. There hadn't even been any growth for 9 months in 2022. It's (near) hitting it's plateau.

They’re not ending shit, but we can put a years gold bet on it for 2027 if you wish since we both know they’re not getting to 100m subs by then. Easy gold for you.
 
Top Bottom