• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

U.N. envoy calls on Japan to ban "extreme child manga porn"

Status
Not open for further replies.
Anime/Manga GAF incoming?

genki-world-war-z-gerry-brad-pitt-runs-away-from-the-crowd.gif
 

FyreWulff

Member
A grown adult drawing a child having sex in no way directly, or indirectly, harms actual children.

What if someone draws one of these with drawn kids that look like your kids?

Oh, THEN you'll suddenly get why we need to consider drawn child porn along the same lines as actual child porn. It doesn't fucking matter if the picture was made with a camera, pen, or sculpture. It's child porn. Victims of rape still have to feel the damage of an act someone did to them, whether it was themselves videotaped or someone decided to draw them participating in the act. There is only negatives that come with allowing such sick shit to exist.
 

andymcc

Banned
there is one store in Akihabara in particular (that used to be a games store) that is so off the charts dodgy i don't even know where to start.

Stocking dvd/br of 8 year olds sucking bananas is one thing - having meet and greets from the people in the dvd/br is a whoooooooooooooooole different level.

Old media land? Shit's beyond fucked.


Normal people over here don't respect it


Wait till he finds out that, outside of a few series, most manga is niche stuff that is assumed to only be consumed by introverts.
 
I mean yeah, when you consider the Gravure idol kind of stuff with pre-teen/early teen children, I can understand and agree, it's more than a little creepy.

Stepping into the manga realm though..... now I'm on the fence here. A grown adult drawing a child having sex in no way directly, or indirectly, harms actual children.

I think it's also a little harder to claim underage when it's not a real person. The age of most characters in a manga is usually unspecified. Often times you can deduce it based on the social context (for example the person is in grade school, or college, or is a teacher), but most of the time there's not enough context. Even when you can figure it out, they still look younger than you know they are based on the context.

Since anime -- by definition -- has no basis in reality, the line is kind of blurred and I think it would be hard to come up with an enforceable definition of what constitutes underage in anime

Agree that the gravure idol stuff has got to stop though, there's no legitimate defense of that stuff. Same obviously applies of any legitimate CP (although I have no idea the extent of the problem with regards to that)
 
This came up in a thread before, I think it was non-nude but sexually provocative photos of children that are legal while possession of child pornograghy was outlawed this year.

Either way, Japan is majorly fucked up when it comes to sexualizing kids.

outlawed this year with a year's grace period to ditch the crap. japan's legal system is fucked up.

and yeah I want to reiterate that child pornography was only made illegal in 2015
 
This would have no legal basis whatsoever. First, thought crime isn't something envisioned in modern legal systems. Pedophilia isn't accepted because childs can't consent and consequentially they can't have sex or anything (with exceptions of both minors and whatever). There is no consent dilemma in cartoons. Banning it would be more alike at banning omosexuality, where adults do things in full consent and it's still banned because it goes against "morality". The gateway argument make no sense either; it made no sense for drugs, it made no sense for games that promote killings, and it make no sense here.

Second, you have no ways to define a child in stylized drawings. What define a child? Being short? I just give it long ears and call it an halfling. Pubes? Plenty of adults shave. Small tits? Plenty of women have no tits. Even if such a ban went in effect, the only thing that would change is that everything would be considered done by adults cosplaying. Sorta like "this work is fiction" and whatever.

There's way more ground to ban actual children models. That has proven disastrously effects on a lot of children's psiche, and i don't think a parent giving consent is a strong enough rebuttal, since we ban most dangerous things from childrens no matter the opinion of the parent. There's a reason that kind of thing is not done anywhere else in the world but japan afaik.
We've got a live one!
 
there is one store in Akihabara in particular (that used to be a games store) that is so off the charts dodgy i don't even know where to start.

Stocking dvd/br of 8 year olds sucking bananas is one thing - having meet and greets from the people in the dvd/br is a whoooooooooooooooole different level.

Japan should work on curbing this first. All sorts of creepy.
 

DeaviL

Banned
I genuinely don't care about drawn children.
How about they get those real children out of the skimpy bikinis first?
 

BriGuy

Member
Shit's gross, but I don't know how I would feel about prosecuting someone for possessing depictions of cartoon characters. I mean, I guess maybe imposing fines or something might be ok, but prison time and sex offender registration should be out of the question I think. It's a tricky area to draw a line.
 
Hopefully they ban all types.

That would go against the quote in support of artistic expression. If they ban all imagery of children that can be taken sexually then years down from now the law could be incredibly weak and permit all kinds of overreach.

The question is what kind of trade they consider permissible. I'm all for the lessening of sexual imagery in space that is not explicitly erotica, or involving real children. But is that as extreme as sexual imagery in content that is sold as erotica, with all the restrictions that already come with that? What's the mixture they are aiming for? Would it actually reduce the number of sexual crimes against children? It would definitely improve the situation of sexual objectification in Japan, but does that extend to pornography? This is not simple. Especially in Japan.

I genuinely don't care about drawn children.
How about they get those real children out of the skimpy bikinis first?

They are, curiously enough the article is heavily skewed towards that aspect of child exploitation and only passingly mentions manga.
 

MayMay

Banned
I don't know, I'd rather pedophiles satisfy their urges with "extreme child manga porn" than actual cp - or even worse actual children.

But at the end of the day I can't argue against banning that stuff, even though who knows what kind of effect this is gonna have. I bet there's alot of people actually relying on this fictional stuff to satisfy their sexual fantasies. If it's banned and harder to obtain they might turn to real children instead...
 
Those in dissent are largely correct though.

You may have issue with it (I generally just dislike it seeping into other works I enjoy), but it's rather difficult to actually enforce as a ban, since the nature of creative work means there's a great deal of variance.
 
How about they get those real children out of the skimpy bikinis first?

I mean you'd think that'd be the next logical step

man, the comments on that article. like, who defends even drawn versions of kiddie porn?

What does this even mean?

no clue. unless the author is just now realizing that a lot of japanese women tend to look younger than their actual age, at least when compared to westerners.
 
What does this even mean?
image.php

You know, you could try to argue against him, you silly gooses.

Gravure idols and sexulisation of real children are a problem that should be eradicated. But it gets more difficult in the realm of total fiction. Are you banning murder in fiction, too?
I don't think I need to argue. I think they are both part of the same problem.

People don't read murder mysteries because they want to go out and kill someone.
 

d00d3n

Member
For all of you who are in favour of banning cartoons and comics (a majority, it seems): to close all "loopholes", wouldn't it be safest to ban literary depictions of child abuse as well?
 
Nothing is going to happen with manga. It's a massive grey area that has big names in a major export industry behind it. Morally, at it's base, it's a victimless crime.

Stuff that includes real children on the other hand absolutely needs to stop, and fortunately it seems they're going in that direction. Shit like junior idos is blegh.
 

stufte

Member
For all of you who are in favour of banning cartoons and comics (a majority, it seems): to close all "loopholes", wouldn't it be safest to ban literary depictions of child abuse as well?

If it's in the form of erotica, fuck yes?
 

wolfhowwl

Banned
The oppression of VitaGAF has reached such heights that I wouldn't even admit to owning one (which I don't) lest I be hazed off the forum.
 
For all of you who are in favour of banning cartoons and comics (a majority, it seems): to close all "loopholes", wouldn't it be safest to ban literary depictions of child abuse as well?

this is a dumb argument, and like I was trying to say earlier, it would be a shame if actual literature (or historically/critically important manga) got banned as a result

but if you don't think there's an awful lot of shit out there that has no reason to exist except to cater to a very particular crowd, then you are not aware of what actually exists
 

Chariot

Member
I don't know, I'd rather pedophiles satisfy their urges with "extreme child manga porn" than actual cp - or even worse actual children.

But at the end of the day I can't argue against banning that stuff, even though who knows what kind of effect this is gonna have. I bet there's alot of people actually relying on this fictional stuff to satisfy their sexual fantasies. If it's banned and harder to obtain they might turn to real children instead...
What kind of effect does it have? I think pedophiles aren't created by the existence of lolicon content. Pretty sure there are plenty of pefophiles outside Japan and plenty of those who hate anime or don't even know it. It's really a similiar argument with rape fantasy porn, incest or murder in any media.
 
What if someone draws one of these with drawn kids that look like your kids?

Oh, THEN you'll suddenly get why we need to consider drawn child porn along the same lines as actual child porn. It doesn't fucking matter if the picture was made with a camera, pen, or sculpture. It's child porn. Victims of rape still have to feel the damage of an act someone did to them, whether it was themselves videotaped or someone decided to draw them participating in the act. There is only negatives that come with allowing such sick shit to exist.

Wait, are you saying a real act happens and then someone draws it? That's absolutely in poor taste, but once again has no legal precedent unless the artist was taking part in the act.

If it's purely the artist's imagination, thought crime.
 

kswiston

Member
For all of you who are in favour of banning cartoons and comics (a majority, it seems): to close all "loopholes", wouldn't it be safest to ban literary depictions of child abuse as well?

Like pornography laws everywhere, it would sort of be one of those you know it if you see it deals. Most governments that already have bans on the sort of manga in question haven't also banned things like the novel Lolita.

Jokes aside, Japan has pretty strong free speech laws. I doubt anything comes of this, even if there are serious culture issues in Japan regarding the sexualization of children and youths.
 

MayMay

Banned
What kind of effect does it have? I think pedophiles aren't created by the existence of lolicon content. Pretty sure there are plenty of pefophiles outside Japan and plenty of those who hate anime or don't even know it. It's really a similiar argument with rape fantasy porn, incest or murder in any media.

My comment was mainly directed towards Japan. What I'm saying is, that kind of material is readily available in stores over there. There's probably plenty of pedophiles that make use of that, and if that's taken from them who knows what they'll turn to instead.

I suppose you're right, though.
 

Linkyn

Member
I don't know, I'd rather pedophiles satisfy their urges with "extreme child manga porn" than actual cp - or even worse actual children.

I see this come up a lot, so I was wondering whether there are any hard statistics on the spread of people who watch / read it. I wouldn't be surprised if quite a few non-pedophiles still occasionally consume hentai featuring child-like characters. I mean, I've watched some really messy porn, but I don't think I'd actually do some of those things in real life. It's a fantasy for a reason.
 

bjork

Member
What if someone draws one of these with drawn kids that look like your kids?

Oh, THEN you'll suddenly get why we need to consider drawn child porn along the same lines as actual child porn. It doesn't fucking matter if the picture was made with a camera, pen, or sculpture. It's child porn. Victims of rape still have to feel the damage of an act someone did to them, whether it was themselves videotaped or someone decided to draw them participating in the act. There is only negatives that come with allowing such sick shit to exist.

There's manga detailing things that really happened. I forget it if's Girl in the Concrete Drum or Girl in Concrete, but it's about a girl that was kidnapped and tortured in real life. I doubt her family thought that was too cool.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom