• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

ESPN loses over 3 million subscribers over the past year

Status
Not open for further replies.

Kinsella

Banned
Decades?

I don't think so.

People forget that the revolution started by the iPhone is less than a decade old (2007).

I don't think anyone could have predicted this pace of advancement and shift in terms of how we consume media.

Those business models are not easy to change nor is the in-built infrastructure. Look at how long it took for the music industry to embrace MP3. Look at how long it took them to ditch DRM. Look at how long it took them to get to streaming services when we were all streaming MP3's on Napster way back at the turn of the millennia.

They are moving about as fast as you can expect these giant tankers to move.

The iPhone's affect on cable wasn't just in how people consume media, but also where they prioritize spending their cash. It's hard for many people to justify the high cost of cable and the high cost of a phone plan. Something had to give, and for many that appears to be cable. Probably because you can recover what you lost on phone more easily than you can recover what you lose by giving up a phone with TV.
 

phaonaut

Member
HBO, the long-cited "other" reason to own cable and a company that was seemingly just as entrenched in the cable infrastructure as ESPN, moved pretty quickly to launch an over-the-top solution.

ESPN has to have known this day was coming but they don't seem to have prepared for it as well as they should have.

You mean opening their subscription up? They only launched that a few months ago, they were dragging their feet as well. And they tied it to other partners, Apple devices and Sling.
 
Since cutting cable I just watch less sports period.

I know a cord cutter that stopped watching sports because he is fighting the good fight against evil cable companies.

Are there lots of cord cutters now or it just seems that way because cord cutters will go out of their way to tell you they are cord cutters and make you listen to their rants about how evil cable companies are? The weird thing is that some of these people still pay the "evil" cable company for Internet. Whatever. I'll enjoy paying $45 a month so I don't have to try to watch some spotty sketchy Russian pirate stream to enjoy the sports I like. Putting cable companies out of business wouldn't be in the top 1000 issues of changes I would like to see in the world.
 

Cheebo

Banned
I blame esports.

Sports broadcasts themselves are skyrocketing in viewership for sports (other than Baseball lololol). NBA for example is doing extremely well on TV. This years finals was the highest rated since 1998.

The talking heads ESPN sort of shows are what is falling.

Sports themselves and sports broadcasts for the most part are rising and rising
 
Lebron and NBA 24/7

And shit shows like Sports Nation. And then shows which were once good like PTI are no longer good because of instead having Tony and Mike there they have Jason Whitlock and Dan Lebatard on all the time. It's SHIT.

Hey, I like LeBatard.
 

Draxal

Member
ESPN is such a strong brand that it's used to force cable providers to take other ABC properties at a higher price.

It's brand is diminishing due to the specialized network channels/local sports channels.

And the people who want ESPN at 5.99 at a month are daydreaming as the OT clearly states.

ESPN would have to charge about $30 a month per customer in an over-the-top offering to make the same money using that model, analysts say.

Sports broadcasts themselves are skyrocketing in viewership for sports (other than Baseball lololol). NBA for example is doing extremely well on TV. This years finals was the highest rated since 1998.

The talking heads ESPN sort of shows are what is falling.

Sports themselves and sports broadcasts for the most part are rising and rising

Baseball is doing great, it's just a very localized sport, people want to watch their teams and announcers covering it.
 

rexor0717

Member
I blame esports.

This was going to be my post.
troll.gif
 
Now that Olbermann is gone I'll probably only watch PTI and Around the Horn here and there. I'm really gonna miss Olbermann. Always looked forward to his opening rants and the Worst Persons in the Sports World.
 

Cheebo

Banned
Baseball is doing great, it's just a very localized sport, people want to watch their teams and announcers covering it.

Locally it is doing great yeah, I mean more on the national level. There really isn't the national interest in following baseball anymore. People follow the playoffs for the NBA and NFL in America even without a home team to root for. They used to in decades past for MLB as well but that really in't the case nearly as much anymore.

Interest in NBA at a national level has been rising however.
 

Vanillalite

Ask me about the GAF Notebook
The biggest thing is ESPN has always tried to push personalities as brands and faces for the company, but then those people in turn have negotiated more and more of a piece of the pie.

The rub is people don't give a shit. They just want to watch the games and check the highlights. They don't go to watch Sportscenter for the ancors nor do they go to watch talking heads shows for the people.

ESPN seems to be wising up that they were creating an over inflated market relative to the return on the investment.

The two areas that should get core focus and $$$ are having good people doing the live broadcasts and good people doing the actual investigate reporting so they can break stories to drive traffic.

People don't give a fuck enough about Bill Simmons or Colin Cowherd to pay them truckloads of cash. The money just isn't there.
 

JCX

Member
I only care about ESPN during college football season. I'd buy a season pass if that were possible
 
I cut the ESPN cord too.

I like my local NFL/MLB/NHL teams and all of those games are on local TV; even the ESPN Monday Night Football games are simulcast on my local TV station.

I have an HD antenna too, so it's not like I need a cable TV subscription for my sports in HD.

Screw ESPN and ALL those channels above the basic cable tiers.
 

Zach

Member
I only care about ESPN during college football season. I'd buy a season pass if that were possible

Yep. And I just don't watch a lot of college ball because of it. But if I could watch college football for ten bucks a month or pay a couple of bucks per team or whatever, I'd be on board. As it stands currently, they make $0.00 off of me.
 
People don't give a fuck enough about Bill Simmons or Colin Cowherd to pay them truckloads of cash. The money just isn't there.

I think people care about Bill Simmons but they rather follow him on Twitter than watch him on that awful ESPN NBA halftime show. I hate Bill Simmons but for some reason he has his fans. Yeah I agree nobody cares about these "personalities" and you can plug any talking head in there and the ratings will be the same.
 
If i wasn't a huge NFL fan i would have cut the cord long time ago, I don't like their network anymore, they have gone from covering sports to becoming closer to a WWE presentation of sports, and they constantly give blow jobs to a handful of teams and ignore the rest, another dislike, any type of tragedy they have been trying their best to find the sports angle, Killings in SC they found a sports angle with one of the victims, I don't want to see that on my screen, i have a real news channel for horrible stuff..
 

Vanillalite

Ask me about the GAF Notebook
I think people care about Bill Simmons but they rather follow him on Twitter than watch him on that awful ESPN NBA halftime show. I hate Bill Simmons but for some reason he has his fans.

He has fans, but NONE ZERO ZIP NADA of them have enough fans to actually make a ton of money off of them. It just doesn't maximize Disney's dollars.
 

The_Dama

Member
FOX and NBC have their own sports channels now. ESPN is loosing rights to soccer, Nascar, and other sports to them. That doesn't help either.
 

facelike

Member
I like how they figure they will need to charge $30 per subscription to offset costs when they should price it correctly and then work to increase the number of subscriptions by increasing program quality.
 
I only watched highly questionable and his and hers and those have podcast, and I don't watch mnf anymore so I just get local broadcast.
 

Lunar15

Member
I also think that the potential of a 24/7 sports analysis channel loses it's luster when I can go on a variety of websites on my mobile phone to get up-to-date news on exactly the teams I follow. It also doesn't help ESPN that they're not really good with their mobile solutions, I personally prefer Bleacher Report's team stream.
 
I made it just fine without an espn sub last year. I just went to a bar anytime I need a game on that channel. Local cable for 19.99 does me just fine with a Netflix subscription

Also yeah espn is useless now with so many good sports websites
 

Vanillalite

Ask me about the GAF Notebook
I only care about ESPN during college football season. I'd buy a season pass if that were possible

That's because CFB is the only sport where ESPN is actually the main broadcaster of the sport itself.

Hell ESPN's family of networks in one CFB week probably broadcasts more CFB games than they do NFL games for the entire seasons. Ditto for MLB in that they tend to have 1 game a week on.

College sports in general is the one area where they actually broadcast the sports themselves vs highlights. Well that and Tennis.
 

Future

Member
I also think that the potential of a 24/7 sports analysis channel loses it's luster when I can go on a variety of websites on my mobile phone to get up-to-date news on exactly the teams I follow. It also doesn't help ESPN that they're not really good with their mobile solutions, I personally prefer Bleacher Report's team stream.

Exactly. Anyone can get 24/7 sports these days, and the coverage is pretty good. I only miss ESPN when there are certain games on, at which point I can go to a bar or friends house to watch as a group (better and more fun anyway)
 

idlewild_

Member
If there was a way to purchase a sports-only cable plan I think they could grab some people back. The cheapest way for us to get ESPN is to pay an extra $45/mo to get the standard cable options instead of just local channels, and most of the games we care about are on local channels anyways.
 

Allforce

Member
I like how they figure they will need to charge $30 per subscription to offset costs when they should price it correctly and then work to increase the number of subscriptions by increasing program quality.

The problem is if they offer an ala-carte service like HBO Now, then the cable companies have the clause to just take them off their packages along with the 6 bucks per subscriber they already have.

Do the math on 92 million subscribers at 6 dollars per subscriber per MONTH (paid by the cable company). It's astronomical money they're pulling in even when they're down 7%. They'd never recoup those subscriber numbers with even a 14.99/month plan to offset what they'd lose from cable subs.
 

TS-08

Member
FOX and NBC have their own sports channels now. ESPN is loosing rights to soccer, Nascar, and other sports to them. That doesn't help either.

This has nothing to do with the issue. People aren't "unsubscribing" to ESPN and "subscribing" to Fox Sports 1. Those sports channels are in the same boat. This is the result of people just choosing to cut cable and no longer paying for packages that include ESPN (which is basically all of them).
 

McHuj

Member
I like how they figure they will need to charge $30 per subscription to offset costs when they should price it correctly and then work to increase the number of subscriptions by increasing program quality.

They're just going to have to accept less. In turn, the big sports leagues are going to have to accept less as well.

This might actually have a pretty big ripple effect on all college sports that are being driven by the ESPN/television revenue stream.
 
I only watched highly questionable and his and hers and those have podcast, and I don't watch mnf anymore so I just get local broadcast.

Those are both decent shows but I don't see the need to listen to more than one of those shows because they are all the same issues over and over.

What is wrong with the Knicks/Lakers?

Check out with this 3rd string receiver you never heard of said on Twitter. Let get outraged.

Lets pile on this athlete for giving an honest answer or dodging the question. It doesn't matter we will criticizes them either way.

Check out Gronk. He so crazy. Look at this video of him eating toast.

We know you aren't tired of Deflategate.

Never too early to talk about the NFL draft.

Let's ask the hockey analyst what he thinks about this issue going on in football because nobody cares about hockey.

Let's talk about baseball.....as long as it is centered around A-rod.

Teabow.
 
I'm kind of surprised this is still a thing, because I honestly haven't met anyone my age with cable in around five years, and it's never been a topic of discussion with any roommates who have moved in with me. ESPN is going to be a decade behind the rest of the world soon enough.
 
Seen this a mile away. I don't know but looking at the numbers now, you really see where the BS regarding ESPN being a must have comes from because it surely isn't. People are happy to leave their ISPs for them and aren't too concerned about having them back.

I can't help but think about that Slingbox thread where some people thought that the service will fail without ESPN as well as Vue.... Seems like that's not the case.
 

TomShoe

Banned
Who even uses ESPN on TV to get their sports news fix? It's so damn slow.

Personally I use a mix of SBNation & Bleacher Report, and it's worked just fine.
 

borghe

Loves the Greater Toronto Area
This has nothing to do with the issue. People aren't "unsubscribing" to ESPN and "subscribing" to Fox Sports 1. Those sports channels are in the same boat. This is the result of people just choosing to cut cable and no longer paying for packages that include ESPN (which is basically all of them).

basically... ironically this news has virtually nothing to do with ESPN. ESPN is probably the single best barometer for the health of the basic cable industry. 3M subs lost basically means 3M US consumers who have cut the cord 100%.
 

mcfizzle4

Member
I cut the cord years ago and it's honestly been great. The only two services I consistently buy are Netflix and MLB.TV. Early on, I thought I'd miss ESPN but honestly, I'm happier without their bad programming and absolutely terrible announcers.
 

Tubie

Member
ESPN lost the rights to pretty much anything Soccer related in just a few years.

They lost the EPL to NBC Sports Network, they lost La Liga (and the Italian/French leagues) to BeIN Sports and they lost the next 3 World Cups to Fox Sports 1.

These 3 competing networks are driving up the prices on all sports broadcasting deals, so not only are they losing viewers but the cost of them doing business is going up at an insane pace.
 

3rdman

Member
I watch SC often on SlingTV but I will happily go without it should it disappear from my programming.

These media companies really need a kick in the ass and get into the 21st century...I am DONE with any and all long term contracts and cable subscriptions.
 
I think people care about Bill Simmons but they rather follow him on Twitter than watch him on that awful ESPN NBA halftime show. I hate Bill Simmons but for some reason he has his fans. Yeah I agree nobody cares about these "personalities" and you can plug any talking head in there and the ratings will be the same.

Bill is good for an article or two and a tweet but his shtick gets really old really quickly if you're exposed to more than that and he is terrible on air. His fans over estimate how much content he has and how willing people are to pay for it.
 

RiccochetJ

Gold Member
basically... ironically this news has virtually nothing to do with ESPN. ESPN is probably the single best barometer for the health of the basic cable industry. 3M subs lost basically means 3M US consumers who have cut the cord 100%.

I wonder though if ESPN is the last thing tying a lot of people to paying for cable. Purely anecdotal, but that's honestly the only reason I still pay for my satellite package.
 
Whoever the new anchors are sometimes for late night Sportscenter are really hard to watch.

I'll take a 30 for 30 marathon channel though >_>
 
For a sports fan, ESPN is the reason to have cable. If you enjoy live sports, they're the biggest provider.

That said, I also pretty much have no use for SportsCenter anymore. If it could go back to the days when it was just two people (actually, just Dan and Keith) behind the desk having fun running down highlights, then it would be watchable. But it's not, it's various loudmouths beating on the dead horse topic of the week, with the occasional fun highlight sprinkled in apparently for contractual reasons.
 

chuckddd

Fear of a GAF Planet
I don't mind paying for espn, as I at least watch that channel. There's plenty of other channels that I get that I've never even tuned to.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom