In that post it is your only example
You seem to still don't understand what an example is and what is it's purpose.
The offending bigot sandwich comment wasn't even made to the bigot.
What a weird defending argumentation.
B-b-but the bigot didn't even heard her calling him bigot!
That totally changes the purpose of the scene, obviously. It's not like the purpose of the scene is to comunicate with the audience, not with the white old bigot.
In the first game Bill was gay and lived in a church, did that ruin the game for you then?
Oh, you seem very intellectually honest with not totally at all loaded qüestions and desperate ad hominems.
What is your next question going to be. Something like
"are you afraid of strong women?" or
"why do you hate gays?"
Everytime the agenda is critiziced, every time there's some crazy reactionary who borderline calls the people who criticize it as sexist, racist, homophobics and what not.
It really makes for a great honest conversation.
He said it was political, no shit. All narrative driven games have political agendas,
Then why are you so triggered that we criticize this political agenda in particular? We have to agree with third wave feminists or then that means we hate women?
You, like the other wolves disguided as sheeps, have a very totalitarian reaction to anybody making fun or criticizing the political agenda of the game.
What is so bad about the design of the female characters in Druckmann's games and why is it poor design?
I've never said the character designs are bad per se, but seems clear it's too much asking you some level of reading comprehension when you are already jumping to the extremist 101 reaction.
Cuckmann is constricted to a very narrow version of how females have to be. The hypocisy of his political agenda is really comical, but he is totally entitled to design his characters in the way he wants.
In real life women come in all shapes and sizes, they are not all models.
That's precisely what the game lacks, women from all shapes and sizes. But you can only have certain type of women in the game, otherwise you are sexist.
Is Anita in the credits for TLOU2?
Neil has cited Anita as a big influence on his games. She doesn't need to be in the credits for her ideals to be in the game.
Do you identify with the man behind the bar? Are you homophobic?
I like to identify myself as a bigot sandwich. Pronouns: The greatest/Xe.
Regarding trans people, they do exist.
Well, that's like, your opinion, man.
But again, you are too focused in your totalitarian mode you don't even understand that the problem isn't trans people, or lesbians or whatever. The problem is the weaponization of those "minority groups™" to virtue signal. Nobody really cares to whom a fictional videogame character has sex with, but it's all a part of a very new and clear political propaganda.
Ironically, Lev was one of the most sympathetic characters in the game. And it's a little bit weird, because he hardly has a personality.
She-hulk? You mean Abby right. Power fantasy, okay. How many games have power fantasy male characters been the playable character. Have you complained about that before? Abby's frame was taken from an actual woman. There is proof biological women like that exist, you may not like the figure but some women do look like that. If you have a problem with her frame and it's unrealistic, then you must also be angry with the big fucker in Scar Island as he wouldn't be that size and frame either without steroids (That wouldn't work this far into the future) either. I'm sure you simply forgot to include that in your cons list of this game. You are allowed to not warm to Abby as a character but if her frame is your only issue, you are sad. I have problems with parts of her character but I don't give a shit what she looks like.
Again, someone points at the moon and you look at the finger.
You wanted more examples of the political agenda, but if we take into account how Abby plays as the typical power fantasy role in the third wave feminists (like Nadine too), you still get mad.
And yes, obviously the power fantasy is super male centric. But that's because every art is based on reality. And men are just genetically much more gifted for combat than women.
You were likely spoiled by the leaks and told there was a trans character and you hate Abby as a result and affected by the big spoiler near the start. This anger in you festered as you didn't have an overall view of the game. The leaks comments were more SJW than the released game.
I knew that Abby wasn't going to be the trans character, because that then would dismiss the most important trait of her design; which is to play to the
women are as strong as men feminist fantasy.
If she or Nadine were actually biological dudes, then that would defeat the purpose of their designs and their incredible strength.
I didn't had any anger when the leaks happened, to the contrary, they were the best thing that happened in gaming this year. I had such a great time when it all happened.
As I said in earlier posts, give examples. You wrote vague shite, mention lesbian and trans oppression and expect me to finish your homework.
The funny thing is that you still don't understand that your damage control is irrelevant. Literally the creator of the game has stated his political agenda based on third wave feminism and Anita Sarkeesian that he materializes by character design alone. It's a fact, no matter how much you try to not acknowledge it.
But don't worry, you are not the first to do this type of bullshit.