• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

Ex-Insomniac dev throws his bosses under the bus over Rivet's design being too feminine.

ShadowNate

Member
Not sure if you got a reply, but a 'cis man' means that he identifies as man and was born man as opposed to transgender. Why the fuck it's just not called just 'A MAN' I've not idea.
I used to hate it, but by now I see its usefulness. It is one of the many signs to nope out of giving too much thought on comments using it.
 
  • LOL
Reactions: TLZ

Nickolaidas

Member
The dude when he was working on R&C:

tenor.gif
If this is how female co-workers will be greeting me, I am SO applying for a job at Insomniac, sleep deprivation be damned.
 

Cyborg

Member
I'm glad common sense prevailed here, Rivet is amazing how she looks. This all seems like a big internal discussion about the way forward (like in every company ) the bosses wanted something else but in the end, they didn't end up forcing it down the throat and listened to the feedback. I mean there is nothing bad in having a big discussion about something like this and like I said I'm glad common sense won.

I mean giving female snakes breasts is far beyond pointless. Yeah, Xcom 2 I'm looking at you!
 

StreetsofBeige

Gold Member
Ratchet's Game Director and Art Director wanted Rivet to look feminine. This guy and two others did not. Sounds like any other workplace disagreement but the fact that he publicly throws his bosses under the bus just rubs me the wrong way. There is nothing wrong with what they did. They are the directors. It's THEIR game, but this guy is making it sound like they were sexist and blatantly uses the Blizzard Activision sexual harassments lawsuits to make a point that there are other types of sexual discrimination taking place in the industry that we dont know about. As if making a female character feminine will somehow lead to hostile workplace environments and sexual harassments of women.












Pretty shameful stuff. This is why devs shouldnt even worry about female characters imo. You will never please these idiots.

That last quote is something. No, putting tits on rivet harms no one. If you are taking offense to it, you have other issues that you need to get sorted out.

Got to say I love the games industry.

No other industry has so many industry people acting and look weird, and airing out dirty laundry for clicks, attention, turning work into politics and publicly backstabbing coworkers and bosses. The guy might as well make it easy for the rest of us and name those people.

As I've said many times, game companies and their workers are like the wild west. Even in 2021.

Love it.
 
Last edited:

mrBandoza

Neo Member
Good that he speaks up the and takes a stand against the absurd portration of women that have gone and are still going on in games over the years. I think the characters should reflect what the game is about. Always cringe to play games like Dark Alliance 2 where women have absurd character models. This thread shows that gaming as an industry has a lot of work left to clean up the pubertal boy fantasy character design.

Would be nice to know what the end result became, if his changes stayed or if they chose to make the character more feminine.
 

SJRB

Gold Member
"Attention, please report to the HR department.

And please bring all your personal belongings from your workstation.

Thank you!"


Eject these idiots from the workplace, please.
 

Airbus Jr

Banned
Not sure if you got a reply, but a 'cis man' means that he identifies as man and was born man as opposed to transgender. Why the fuck it's just not called just 'A MAN' I've not idea.
It is a derigatory insult commonly used by people on Era for straight men

They used that term alot there
 

Whitecrow

Banned
My god what an asshole. And how is he so dumb to air all of this on social media??

He may have ruined his employment just to get some attention... what a world we live in.
 

RJMacready73

Simps for Amouranth
Good that he speaks up the and takes a stand against the absurd portration of women that have gone and are still going on in games over the years. I think the characters should reflect what the game is about. Always cringe to play games like Dark Alliance 2 where women have absurd character models. This thread shows that gaming as an industry has a lot of work left to clean up the pubertal boy fantasy character design.

Would be nice to know what the end result became, if his changes stayed or if they chose to make the character more feminine.

nah mate it shows that most of us can see through the bullshit purple haired gender politics, ignore it and play the fucking game as a game, the character was deliberately made more feminine because 99% of the fucking world still recognise females as females and we associate curves with women. I personally thought it was a class design, the character from any reviews i've read has been positively praised so wingnut here has just made an utter tool of himself like most of the loons on twitter.
 

Tommi84

Member
It is a derigatory insult commonly used by people on Era for straight men
Is it xDD? Oh my God :messenger_tears_of_joy: I knew they were shit weird over there, but 'MyGod.gif' :messenger_tears_of_joy:


Anyways, getting back to the topic. I think Rivet looks GORGEOUS!! And I'm happy she looks the way she looks

update - it seems I misunderstood and the current Rivet's design is the old one and this is what the guy in question was fighting for. Geez, I would like to know how the 'new' one would look like ;)
 
Last edited:

StreetsofBeige

Gold Member
My god what an asshole. And how is he so dumb to air all of this on social media??

He may have ruined his employment just to get some attention... what a world we live in.
So they had an internal discussion about a character design, HIS design wins out and he still throws them under the bus. Wow. Can't wait to hire you mr freelance!
It's pretty obvious game companies dont make employees go through mundane mandatory Code of Conduct workshops and online training programs like at places I've worked at.

Badmouthing people in public (in this case he didnt mention names so technically it's vague) can actually be grounds to be sued if someone can prove their name is being trashed when it comes to getting employment.

That's why some companies or people decline giving references because if you say something bad about someone killing their chance at scoring a job, that applicant finding out you trashed their name can sue you. All it takes is them proving your negative comments were untrue or totally overstated and you're potentially liable. You dont even have to say anything bad. You can say something inaccurate. That's why some people dont want to hassle and will only confirm something like "Yes, Bob worked here from 2007-2015 as an Analyst. But thats all I can comment on"

Of course, it's not like the typical video game employee with their prized Twitter account would know any better.
 
Last edited:

Fredrik

Member
There's something truly strange happening in the video game industry where devs are afraid to make women look like women, in case someone gets upset.
I wonder if anyone has bothered talking to any women about this. Going by western gaming you’d think women in the year 2021 are actually ashamed of their curves and only like pants, leather jackets and sneakers.

But at the end I just wonder what happened to the ”It’s just pixels” thinking. Curves on a space rat should be no more upsetting than watching in slow motion when a chopped off head is flying away from a body gushing blood out the neck after a critical hit.
🤷‍♂️
 

Whitecrow

Banned
It's pretty obvious game companies dont make employees go through mundane mandatory Code of Conduct workshops and online training programs like at places I've worked at.

Badmouthing people in public (in this case he didnt mention names so technically it's vague) can actually be grounds to be sued if someone can prove their name is being trashed when it comes to getting employment.

That's why some companies or people decline giving references because if you say something bad about someone killing their chance at scoring a job, that applicant finding out you trashed their name can sue you. You dont even have to say anything bad. You can say something inaccurate. That's why some people dont want to hassle and will only confirm something like "Yes, Bob worked here from 2007-2015 as an Analyst. But thats all I can comment on"

Of course, it's not like the typical video game employee with their prized Twitter account would know any better.
Common sense is what made me not air anything about my last boss despite all the anger I got and how I hate him.
But I guess virtue signaling is the most important thing in life now : /
 

Black_Stride

do not tempt fate do not contrain Wonder Woman's thighs do not do not
Her face can be feminine but god forbid she has tits and hips.

Should have gone full Hyena then and made her more handsome than Ratchet.

Heck call The Coalition and ask them how to design a strong Alien female
0QW4GjI.png
 

SJRB

Gold Member
Something as simple as putting titties on a space rat can harm people.

Still chuckling over this quote. What kind of world do you live in where people get harmed this way?
 

StreetsofBeige

Gold Member
Common sense is what made me not air anything about my last boss despite all the anger I got and how I hate him.
But I guess virtue signaling is the most important thing in life now : /
There's something about video game employees where they might be good at art and making games and such, but they have this weird mentality like they have no idea whats proper to say or do. Its like zero code of conduct policies, badmouth people on Twitter, and intertwining work, politics and personal life into one public profile. Like they are all 40 year olds acting like 8 year olds.

Even athletes and celebs dont do this unless it's a high level thing like BLM or Weinstein scandals which both affect tons of people.

But game employees air out petty things from whatever millionth meeting they have during a month.

Zero filter.
 
Last edited:

Whitecrow

Banned
There's something about video game employees where they might be good at art and making games and such, but they have this weird mentality like they have no idea whats proper to say or do. Its like zero code of conduct policies, badmouth people on Twitter, and intertwining work, politics and personal life into one public profile. Like they are all 40 year olds acting like 8 year olds.

Even athletes and celebs dont do this unless it's a high level thing like BLM or Weinstein scandals which both affect tons of people.

But game employees air out petty things from whatever millionth meeting they have during a month.

Zero filter.
I'm not keeping track of who says what, but devs are just normal people.

And most normal people thinks that being good at something makes them very smart, so they talk about things like this like if they were experts.

can you screenshot it and expose this hypocritical drama furry :pie_roffles:
Love your avatar < 3
 
Last edited:

cormack12

Gold Member
These muthaf'ers are so thick. So the animals they are modelled on are larely indistinguishable talking male/female

Ron-Day-%E2%80%93-Portfolio-Images-Day_Foxes_Grooming_2013_Top_100.jpg

lemurs-1024x684.jpg


But if you accept that, then you can't shriek about how progressive you are for putting a female counterpart in your game. Either you make them indistinguishable by nature and both characters are androgynous or you want to differentiate the male and female with common biological charcteristics, that make it evident. Differentiating the female with like white-ish/lilac-ish fur is just as bad of a cliche, or implementing anime eyes and jaw.

I don't understand his tweet chain though. Did he leave because he lost the argument, or was a compromise reached? It's pretty obvious that Rivet is a female character because of the standard choices that get made to illustrate artistically that the character is a female (even when non human). Did anyone not know the Cadburys rabbit wasn't a female? There was no T&A there.

C8erzXhXYAEOafZ.jpg


In summary, the tweet is just there to self inflate this dude's ego and he is fishing for praise for being woke. When most people just look at it as a work dispute, probably guided by marketing and other stuff that affects the bottom line. The kind of shite we do every day in work but ultimaetly get over ruled by the strategic stuff. It's called being an adult. You want that freedom, start your own studio - that's what the free market is. If all these twitter people are sales then it will be easy.
 

StreetsofBeige

Gold Member
In summary, the tweet is just there to self inflate this dude's ego and he is fishing for praise for being woke. When most people just look at it as a work dispute, probably guided by marketing and other stuff that affects the bottom line. The kind of shite we do every day in work but ultimaetly get over ruled by the strategic stuff. It's called being an adult. You want that freedom, start your own studio - that's what the free market is. If all these twitter people are sales then it will be easy.
Who knows what happened in those meetings, but there's one thing about creative people (artists), is that they are stubborn and dont like doing rework if possible.

I see that all the time in our marketing department who work with ad agencies and third party companies to do art work. We hire them to do a job. No doubt they can chime in with their view on what it should be or improved upon, but if we (the authority figure who approves) wants to change something and do it how we want, then do it.

Dont push back or stonewall us. If the marketing coordinators or packaging people handling the execution with you says change it, do it. Dont be an ass and require the marketing directors or VP to pull rank and say change something. And don't piss back or give attitude sticking to your guns or resubmitting half assed work. Just do the changes as asked by us. The marketing dept has the money and they are the ones who have detailed survey results and history what works and doesn't. A guy being told to make art based on guidelines is going by what he thinks works.
 

Banjo64

cumsessed
01-default-1623328860737_n1v3.1080.jpg


What is that guy on about? He's acting like Rivet was running around the game only dressed in a miniscule bikini with her huge breasts always on the cusp of falling out.
She could have done with a nice big pair of melons.
 

Whitecrow

Banned
Also, why does Ratchet have those awful cheeks while Rivet have a more human-like face?

And yes, I never liked Ratchet design.
 

nekrik

Member
So! To my understanding, this guy tried to force-impose his beliefs - (i call it woke furry lgbtq warriorism) on every R&C player on the planet by designing the female character less feminine? What a loser. +1 for the directors!
 
Last edited:

StreetsofBeige

Gold Member
Right? How dare a women a woman have breasts? Oh but she has a dick? Congratulations! what an achievement!

the world is fucked. Please don't have children guys.you really want them being bought up in this current world?
The funny thing about the Twitter guy is he doesn't support the other employee's view on stereotypical feminine straits like curves and tits, yet the character is pink and purple which is totally chick colours. And the mouth and eyebrows are smaller so they arent huge like Ratchets when in reality they can be equally sized between men and woman. Rivet even has earrings which is a stereotypical female trait, while Ratchet doesn't when in reality it can be the reverse. Rivet even has a tuft of hair to ensure people know she's female because women are expected to have more hair on their head. Even Rivet's feet are smaller.

In other words, hips and tits not acceptable. Anything else that feeds stereotypical female traits is a-ok.
 
Last edited:

Dibils2k

Member
nobody came out of that looking well

the argument should have been "if we add huge knockers, we will have to design different suits for Rivet, rather than have same for both, doubling our work. Is it really worth it?"
 

RJMacready73

Simps for Amouranth
The funny thing about the Twitter guy is he doesn't support the other employee's view on stereotypical feminine straits like curves and tits, yet the character is pink and purple which is totally chick colours. And the mouth and eyebrows are smaller so they arent huge like Ratchets when in reality they can be equally sized between men and woman. Rivet even has earrings which is a stereotypical female trait, while Ratchet doesn't when in reality it can be the reverse. Rivet even has a tuft of hair to ensure people know she's female because women are expected to have more hair on their head. Even Rivet's feet are smaller.

In other words, hips and tits not acceptable. Anything else that feeds stereotypical female traits is a-ok.

Don't expect anyone who lives and breathes twitter validation to think like a normal human being, the fact that this really small minority of lunatics is so loud and can affect so much simply cause they live online is staggering to me, i mean can we not simply tell people to fuck off anymore? Why do companies even hire these people, sure they may be talented but you are letting a nut into the workforce...
 

StreetsofBeige

Gold Member
Don't expect anyone who lives and breathes twitter validation to think like a normal human being, the fact that this really small minority of lunatics is so loud and can affect so much simply cause they live online is staggering to me, i mean can we not simply tell people to fuck off anymore? Why do companies even hire these people, sure they may be talented but you are letting a nut into the workforce...
I skimmed the guys twitter to see what it's like.

It's mostly politics and corporate clash based messages, tons of retweets and he had one tweet bragging about how his salary has jumped from company to company (he even states how much he made at each place) and "it's about getting PAID".
 
Last edited:

longdi

Banned
nobody came out of that looking well

the argument should have been "if we add huge knockers, we will have to design different suits for Rivet, rather than have same for both, doubling our work. Is it really worth it?"

To be fair, this has been a one-sided whine from purple furry-guy only.

We have not heard from the 'accused'. I do not think IG Directors will objectify Rivet as whiney purple guy claims.

Who knows, he could be a terrible employee and was unhappy he got the boot. 🤷‍♀️
 

StreetsofBeige

Gold Member
Who knows, he could be a terrible employee and was unhappy he got the boot. 🤷‍♀️
He was vague on that. After the blow up , he said he left a few weeks later. But didnt state who initiated it.

- Contract over
- He quit
- He got canned

Who knows. Based on the blow up I'll say IG canned his contract.
 
Last edited:

RJMacready73

Simps for Amouranth
I skimmed the guys twitter to see what it's like.

It's mostly politics and corporate clash based messages, tons of retweets and he had one tweet bragging about how his salary has jumped from company to company and "it's about getting PAID".
Anyone who actively engages in anything furry related in public is a fucking no no in my book, hell i work with people who still view a 47y.o. playing videogames as a bit fucking strange lol they'd have a field day with thon cunt
 

TheGrat1

Member
nobody came out of that looking well

the argument should have been "if we add huge knockers, we will have to design different suits for Rivet, rather than have same for both, doubling our work. Is it really worth it?"
I have not played the game so I can not speak for all of them but one of the suits have slight differences between the Lombaxes.
02_Galactic_Ranger.png

Rivet's suit has a wider (to take her hips into account) and thinner "belt" and a smaller codpiece.
 

ShadowNate

Member
The tweet is for points with the usual crowd.

We don't know the original design (if there was another) or how the art and game director pushed their idea (to look more feminine); presumably they would show some concept art or several and then discuss on those and/or making new ones or changes. The art could have been ridiculous or oversexualized (the actual oversexualized kind, not the one on this dude's mind) for all we know. It's not too likely considering the rest of the art direction, but yeah, it could have been.

Still the meeting happened, and the topic was up for discussion. According to him, he and a few of the women in the meeting argued against it.

He presents the discussion as an example of a hostile environment and, admittedly, he threw a tantrum towards the end of the discussion.

I don't think he comes off as the sane guy in this. In any way.
 

RJMacready73

Simps for Amouranth
In order to make a proper informed decision as to whether or not he was right we'd need to see the original designs from the meeting, as for the dude himself an opinion can be made quite easily...
 
Top Bottom