• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

Covid 19 Thread: [no bitching about masks of Fauci edition]

QSD

Member
I do hope more people get vaccinated. There's enough unnecessary pain and suffering going around in the world as it is.


Do you know how does 6.1 deaths per 100.000 cases stack up against other common ailments such as pneumonia, bladder infection, shingles etc? Or is the problem more with the infectiousness, less with the mortality?
 

Rentahamster

Rodent Whores
Do you know how does 6.1 deaths per 100.000 cases stack up against other common ailments such as pneumonia, bladder infection, shingles etc? Or is the problem more with the infectiousness, less with the mortality?
edit: it should be noted that this data is for the whole year. The tweet is talking about the average per capita mortality per week, which makes the comparison all that more stark.

Dividing 1.5 by 52 weeks in a year gives an average per capita death rate of 0.03 deaths per week, compared to the 6.1 per week for COVID.

In 2019, the deaths per capita in the USA due to the flu was 1.5 for the year. Deaths per capita due to pneumonia was 10.8.

qwgGVzF.png


Or is the problem more with the infectiousness, less with the mortality?
It's both. Compared to the flu, it's more likely to spread and more likely to kill you if you get it.
 
Last edited:

QSD

Member
In 2019, the deaths per capita in the USA due to the flu was 1.5. Deaths per capita due to pneumonia was 10.8.
So is this 10.8 'deaths per capita' the same figure as the 6.1 figure for covid unvaxxed? Cause if so it would seem pneumonia is more dangerous (but probably much harder contract?)
It's both. Compared to the flu, it's more likely to spread and more likely to kill you if you get it.
Hmmm, well there was a news story the other day about a new vaccination "novavax" getting approved here in the Netherlands, which isn't mRNA based so maybe that will convince a few hold-outs.
 

DragoonKain

Neighbours from Hell
Nick Christakis said if you’re hospitalized with COVID you’re more likely to die than if you were hospitalized with a heart attack. Not sure if those numbers included vaccinated people or not.
 

Rentahamster

Rodent Whores
So is this 10.8 'deaths per capita' the same figure as the 6.1 figure for covid unvaxxed? Cause if so it would seem pneumonia is more dangerous (but probably much harder contract?)
Actually I was in error. The tweet was referencing COVID deaths per 100,000 per week. The flu statistic I put up was flu deaths per 100,000 per year.

Here is a better apples to apples comparison:


rPbJW39.png


If you want to see the flu numbers from previous years, here they are too. I'm using influenza (J09-J11) to ID the deaths in both charts.

qxklcP8.png


The exact numbers for flu deaths for 2020 don't match up exactly, but I assume that has to do with some sort of database update or perhaps I just messed up the tags when I queried the flu data from https://wonder.cdc.gov/ The key takeaway is that COVID deaths far surpass flu deaths in a "normal" year.

You'll also see different numbers depending on which part of the CDC website you look at due to differences in how they calculate things. For example, if you go here, you'll see estimated deaths for the 2019-2020 flu season to be at 20,342, which is quite a bit different, but they explain why




Why doesn’t CDC base its seasonal flu mortality estimates only on death certificates that specifically list influenza?

Seasonal influenza may lead to death from other causes, such as pneumonia, congestive heart failure, or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. It has been recognized for many years that influenza is underreported on death certificates. There may be several reasons for underreporting, including that patients aren’t always tested for seasonal influenza virus infection, particularly older adults who are at greatest risk of seasonal influenza complications and death. Even if a patient is tested for influenza, influenza virus infection may not be identified because the influenza virus is only detectable for a limited number of days after infection and many people don’t seek medical care in this interval. Additionally, some deaths – particularly among those 65 years and older – are associated with secondary complications of influenza (including bacterial pneumonias). For these and other reasons, modeling strategies are commonly used to estimate flu-associated deaths. Only counting deaths where influenza was recorded on a death certificate would be a gross underestimation of influenza’s true impact.
 
Nick Christakis said if you’re hospitalized with COVID you’re more likely to die than if you were hospitalized with a heart attack. Not sure if those numbers included vaccinated people or not.

just some hearsay that doesn’t mean anything without a source, cohort context or even disparity numbers…who even is “you’re”?


10-20% vs 13-66% for heart attacks
 

QSD

Member
Nick Christakis said if you’re hospitalized with COVID you’re more likely to die than if you were hospitalized with a heart attack. Not sure if those numbers included vaccinated people or not.
I mean, it's not that crazy if you consider that things have to be pretty bad for you to get hospitalized with covid and there are few effective treatments. If you get hospitalized with a heart attack (i.e. they get to you before you die) there is a lot they can do to help you.
 
Yeah doesn't make sense to not use newer methods that can also identify influenza strains. And especially with the new variant hopefully the new method can differentiate Omicron from Delta.
Edit: I'm guessing the highlighting is by some moron who doesn't understand how PCR works.
Yeah me.
 

QSD

Member
Actually I was in error. The tweet was referencing COVID deaths per 100,000 per week. The flu statistic I put up was flu deaths per 100,000 per year.

Here is a better apples to apples comparison:

So what I'm getting from all this is that pneumonia is nearly as dangerous as Covid. But it's complicated because pneumonia can also be a downstream consequence of flu. Either way it's in the same ballpark. Flu deaths are much lower, but perhaps underreported (although I imagine this won't change the figure several orders of magnitude.
 

DragoonKain

Neighbours from Hell
just some hearsay that doesn’t mean anything without a source, cohort context or even disparity numbers…who even is “you’re”?


10-20% vs 13-66% for heart attacks
Take it up with him.just relaying what I heard.
 

Rentahamster

Rodent Whores
So what I'm getting from all this is that pneumonia is nearly as dangerous as Covid. But it's complicated because pneumonia can also be a downstream consequence of flu. Either way it's in the same ballpark. Flu deaths are much lower, but perhaps underreported (although I imagine this won't change the figure several orders of magnitude.
You can't really separate the two like that since they're both intertwined. Many COVID deaths are caused because COVID caused pneumonia in the patient. One of the reasons COVID19 is so deadly is because of its propensity to cause severe pneumonia in its victims. There's also many other causes of pneumonia in the world besides the flu and COVID19.
 

DragoonKain

Neighbours from Hell
I’m not looking for anything more mate, I’ve already said all I need to on the content you decided to share
You asked who "you're" was and unless that was rhetorical, I'm trying to tell you that I don't have the answer to that question because it isn't my data and you should ask him.
 
You asked who "you're" was and unless that was rhetorical, I'm trying to tell you that I don't have the answer to that question because it isn't my data and you should ask him.

it apparently was rhetorical because you obviously have absolutely no interest in following up on your post
 

DragoonKain

Neighbours from Hell
it apparently was rhetorical because you obviously have absolutely no interest in following up on your post
I don't have the data or know where he got it from. He said it on a podcast with Sam Harris. So I'm not sure how I'm supposed to follow it up with information I don't have access to.
 
I don't have the data or know where he got it from. He said it on a podcast with Sam Harris. So I'm not sure how I'm supposed to follow it up with information I don't have access to.

and I had no idea what else you know or had heard or worked out when I initially replied, so while I would have preferred it to not have been a rhetorical question it’s turned out as good as one, no big deal
 
Last edited:

SF Kosmo

Al Jazeera Special Reporter
Do you know how does 6.1 deaths per 100.000 cases stack up against other common ailments such as pneumonia, bladder infection, shingles etc? Or is the problem more with the infectiousness, less with the mortality?
As ever, it's the two numbers multiplied together... The death rate times the infection rate.

I am not sure why this concept is so really challenging for people. I think American culture is so individualistic that people have trouble thinking past "What are MY odds if I get it," and have trouble imagining the public health as a concept.

This is also a lot of the problem with Americans understanding of nearly every issue.
So what I'm getting from all this is that pneumonia is nearly as dangerous as Covid.
Pneumonia is not a disease, it's a symptom. Pneumonia is caused by severe Covid, among other diseases.
 
Last edited:

Rentahamster

Rodent Whores
I am not sure why this concept is so really challenging for people. I think American culture is so individualistic that people have trouble thinking past "What are MY odds if I get it," and have trouble imagining the public health as a concept.

This is also a lot of the problem with Americans understanding of nearly every issue.
Yup.

Shitty math education isn't helping either.
 

Rentahamster

Rodent Whores
True. This is why case numbers matter. Even if there is a less amount of severe outcomes going forward because of increased immunity from vaccination or prior infection, better therapeutics, or new variants being intrinsically less deadly, a number of those positive cases are going to be people in mission critical jobs like healthcare. The more of these people need to wait on the sidelines, the more our society and way of life suffers.

 

TheFarter

Banned
Dude you came in with that post complaining about some people in here acting high and mighty and always right or whatever all while talking down from a holier than thou mindset. Handing out advice like you are some benevolent know it all who is above such things while also managing to come off more snooty and stuck up than all of the rest of us combined.


Get over yourself lol
I wasn't complaining. I was giving words of wisdom. He shouldn't waste his time.
 

Malakhov

Banned
My kids arrived yesterday home for christmas, ex-wife calls me today, says she got covid. She had a runny nose this morning and did a quick test home and it turned positive, only people she saw last week was her family, all vaccinated, great.

Sooooo I test both the kids and myself tonight, both the kids are positive with the home tests, I am negative so far. Now's the time to see if I'll get it this week, Im off 2 weeks with them at home, and I have no intention to isolate them from me nor change any of our routine.

Let's see how this shit goes lol
 
Last edited:

Rentahamster

Rodent Whores
My kids arrived yesterday home for christmas, ex-wife calls me today, says she got covid. She had a runny nose this morning and did a quick test home and it turned positive, only people she saw last week was her family, all vaccinated, great.

Sooooo I test both the kids and myself tonight, both the kids are positive with the home tests, I am negative so far. Now's the time to see if I'll get it this week, Im off 2 weeks with them at home, and I have no intention to isolate them from me nor change any of our routine.

Let's see how this shit goes lol
As long as you're vaccinated, even if you do contract it, you'll most likely only experience mild, cold like symptoms. Your kids, unvaccinated or not, will probably be fine. If they're vaccinated, they'll probably clear the infection even faster. The responsible thing to do would be to make sure none of you are exposing other people during your infectious period.
 

Loki

Count of Concision


Been seeing a couple of articles making this point, specifically re: NYC. Is there any corroboration of this from other US cities or other nations? Any theories yet on why this would be the case? I don't recall hearing anything about a marked increase in child hospitalizations due to Omicron in SA or the UK, which is why I ask.
 
Last edited:

Rentahamster

Rodent Whores
I need to take the morning off to read through all of that in detail
Did you read it all in detail yet? Did it change your mind?

Ok I'll listen to both, and I've quickly Googled to find the guy "Nagase", I was almost right... here's a video for you since you said I should start listening.

Thank you for the link and I listened to what he had to say.

He is doing the same thing to this report that others do with the VAERS data. Just because some adverse event happened during the trial period doesn't mean that it was caused by the vaccine. During the trial, do we lock up the participants in a controlled environment? No. They go about living their lives, doing other behaviors that might entail risk, and they also bring with them all of their pre-existing conditions that they already had. Just because 27% of pregnant women had a serious event during the trial period doesn't mean that it's solely the fault of the vaccine.

Nagase has claimed that stillbirths in Canada increased due to the vaccine, but that is not true at all. He's making shit up. If the vaccine really was that harmful to pregnant mothers, with the millions of doses we've administered already, we'd already be seeing the tragic consequences. But we don't. Because it isn't true.




Dr. Peter Potts, joint chief of staff at Grand River Hospital in the Waterloo region of Ontario, told the Canadian news site CityNews that 12 stillbirths occurred in the last fiscal year between both Grand River Hospital and Cambridge Memorial Hospital in Cambridge, Ontario.

“This year, we have had 982 deliveries in Cambridge and four still-births,” Kristin Wadsworth, chief of obstetrics and gynecology at Cambridge Memorial Hospital, said in the CityNews article. “That is a still-birth rate of 0.41%, which is our average.”

Potts also said, “we feel COVID vaccinations during pregnancy are a normal part to prenatal care and the obstetricians and midwives in the community strongly support the vaccination during pregnancy. There is a growing body of evidence that the vaccination is safe.”


Around 10 minutes in, he talks about shedding into breastmilk, and he says this is proof, but it is not proof and he doesn't know how to interpret this data properly.

Around 11:40 he talks about the "theoretical risks" of injecting RNA into a person. Scaremongering. We already know the method of action the mRNA vaccines take, and what it does specifically, and we already know through both clinical trials and actual widespread global use that it is safe in practice. He tries to use an appeal to authority "as a scientist", but this is useless when millions of other doctors with better credentials than his say that the vaccine is safe.

He talks about the failure of vaccines at around 12 minutes due to waning protection against variants, but that is misleading. The vaccines' main goal is to stop severe illness and death, which is what it overwhelmingly does. It still does offer some protection against variants, and the infection prevention effect wanes after a few months, (which is normal), but that can be overcome with a booster.

12:30 he talks about the trial data showing the vaccines are unsafe, but again he is demonstrating his ignorance in how he doesn't know how to interpret trial data.

"after a new substance is introduced to the human species, any adverse event can be attributed to that substance" lol no. Very flawed logic.

He then goes to talk about more dangers of the vaccine and political corruption and all that.

My verdict? He doesn't know how to separate correlation from causation, and doesn't know how to read and interpret trial data. He spreads false information about stillbirths, and fear that is undue.

Upon further looking into him, apparently he got reprimanded for treating patients with ivermectin obtained from an agricultural source. If he thinks ivermectin works but vaccines don't, then that is a very big red flag into his ability to interpret clinical data, and he should go back to school


Alberta Health Services (AHS) has received complaints about Nagase, who has worked as a fill-in doctor at the Rimbey Hospital and Care Centre, 65 kilometres northwest of Red Deer. AHS says he is spreading misinformation.

"Neither the veterinary nor human drug versions of ivermectin has been deemed safe or effective for use in treating or preventing COVID-19," reads an AHS statement issued earlier this week.

Using the veterinary version "can pose potentially serious health problems if consumed by humans," AHS said.

"It is extremely disappointing that someone would spread misinformation about COVID-19 treatment in this way, and suggest that AHS is withholding treatment for patients."
 

Rentahamster

Rodent Whores
Been seeing a couple of articles making this point, specifically re: NYC. Is there any corroboration of this from other US cities or other nations?

COVID-NET: Hospitalization Rates in Children Ages 4 Years and Younger​

CDC’s Coronavirus Disease 2019-Associated Hospitalization Surveillance Network (COVID-NET) shows that hospitalization rates remain elevated in young children. For the week ending November 27, the weekly rate of COVID-19-associated hospitalizations for children ages 4 years and younger is 1.9 per 100,000. The rate of hospitalization in this age group is higher than rates seen for both older children ages 5–11 years (0.4 per 100,000) and adolescents ages 12–17 years (0.9 per 100,000). Unlike older children and adolescents, children ages 4 years and younger are not yet eligible for any of the available COVID-19 vaccines.

Any theories yet on why this would be the case?
Because that age group can't get vaccinated yet is one of the most obvious implications.

I don't recall hearing anything about a marked increase in child hospitalizations due to Omicron in SA or the UK, which is why I ask.
The point isn't about an overall rise in child hospitalizations, it's how that most of them are from the very young age group. In the UK, most of the hospitalizations in the age 0 to 14 range are from 0-4 years old.


RANmPs7.png
 

Loki

Count of Concision
Because that age group can't get vaccinated yet is one of the most obvious implications.

Obviously, but they also weren’t vaccinated against alpha, beta or delta, yet this strain seems to be causing greater hospitalization for children than previous variants - that was my point. My question is whether there are any theories (biochemically) as to why that might be. Like, say, something about the highly mutated nature of the spike protein in Omicron which allows it to better overcome children’s super robust general immunity.
 

Chittagong

Gold Member
Obviously, but they also weren’t vaccinated against alpha, beta or delta, yet this strain seems to be causing greater hospitalization for children than previous variants - that was my point. My question is whether there are any theories (biochemically) as to why that might be. Like, say, something about the highly mutated nature of the spike protein in Omicron which allows it to better overcome children’s super robust general immunity.

If we look at the symptoms for a clue, Omicron seems to be more an upper respiratory tract virus rather than a pneumonia inducing virus. It multiplies 70x more in the nose and throat, ostensibly causing loads of more mucus.

Young kids have tiny respiratory tracts and are not yet very proficient in clearing them.

That would be my guess.
 

Rentahamster

Rodent Whores
Obviously, but they also weren’t vaccinated against alpha, beta or delta, yet this strain seems to be causing greater hospitalization for children than previous variants - that was my point.
We don't know if it's because of the strain, or if it's because more people in general are being infected, or if it's something else. We would need more data. There's only so much the hospitalization graph can tell us.


V1ZKFvS.png


If you could see what the infection rate is in the past, and cross reference that with the hospitalization rate, than you can determine if the hospitalization rate changes along with the variants, but I don't have that data. And even if we did have that data, there are still other variables at play too that can confound the analysis.

My question is whether there are any theories (biochemically) as to why that might be. Like, say, something about the highly mutated nature of the spike protein in Omicron which allows it to better overcome children’s super robust general immunity.
I have no idea. I don't really see why that would be the case, and until there's a plausible theory put forward, the most reasonable explanation would be to me, that it's because there's more virus circulating in the population, which means more kids get infected, thus more kids go to the hospital, especially the ones who aren't vaccinated yet.
 

Rentahamster

Rodent Whores
If we look at the symptoms for a clue, Omicron seems to be more an upper respiratory tract virus rather than a pneumonia inducing virus. It multiplies 70x more in the nose and throat, ostensibly causing loads of more mucus.
No. This hasn't been proven (yet). I assume you're referencing the Hong Kong study.
 

SF Kosmo

Al Jazeera Special Reporter
My holiday plans got ruined because my brother (much younger, still lives at home) got Covid. He's doing okay, he was vaccinated but not boosted so it was like a flu for a.few days. No one else in the house got sick.

My mom got it too, she has been trying to fend off the virus with alternative grains, and it turns out that doesn't work, so she was in pretty bad shape for a couple weeks.

Schools going remote again. They say for two weeks but we're worried it will be longer. Omicron is crazy the spike we are getting is more than double our highest daily case rate from the earlier waves and no signs of slowing down.
 
Last edited:
Top Bottom