O
u
Are you thick? When Sony launched PS1 (which is when they bought Psygnosis) which is what Xbox shills are comparing the acquisition of AB to. Sony buying Psygnosis was because Sony were going to launch the PS1 therefor they would need an experienced publisher and developers. Beside owning the world class and leading pub/developer Sony Imagesoft renowned for its multi million selling franchises and super talented devs.
Your the one who said Sony had unlimited money. Then they were a bigger company than Nintendo and Sega. Then it was because they sold TVs, hifi, Walkmans etc etc.
Moneyhatting and buying two massive publishers is the same to these shills.
Fully priced games, and now available day one on game pass. Thanks Microsoft! Hope it closes soon so they can add the back catalog and buy more!
) to embarass you with your own posts, because you have had some of the most cringiest and pathetic posts I've seen on a regular basis... but I was bombarded with posts of you claiming Game Pass will be demolished by PSNow (
) and that the ABK purchase is a waste of money because CoD is dead and Sony will spent money wiser by buying other publishers (), which ironically are both proven wrong by Sony's own words in the OP. The irony threw me off guard here, ngl
Bloody hell you must be sad and desperate going back through post histories.So mad, you quote me 5 times and it looks like you had stroke in the beginning of your rant.
Seems like you're making excuses as to why Sony used money from their other ventures to buy their way into the industry, and then go on to cry because Microsoft is doing the same later on as opposed to earlier on. They played by the rules of the market leader for quite some time while you rats lapped it up, and now that they're competing and fighting back on their own terms you're crying? Too bad. Deal with it.
Literally doing the thing I've always mocked yall for lmao "so what if Sony moneyhats? Nothing stopping MS from doing the same thing!" meanwhile when MS tried that last gen with RotTR the vitriol and hatred spread by the blue rat plague was so fierce that GAF went down momentarily and MS had to be transparent and change their whole philosophy on the future of Xbox, which was investing more in 1P. So, you're partially to blame for the beast finally awakening and Microsoft buying to own instead of renting.
Sony would do the exact same shit, but can't afford to do so, so they're going with sloppy seconds with Bungie after talks between MS/Bungie fell through in 2019. All of ya post histories show y'all begging for Sony to aquire X, Y and Z publisher, so miss me with these crocodile tears.
Microsoft was "crying like bitches" when Google dominated search and advertising, and when Windows Phone failed? Lmao, says the very angry Sony shill on a video game forum? Sure, Jan. Your rabid hatred for Microsoft and their success is almost palpable. 2023 is gonna be a bloodbath.
"Sad and desperate" for using a feature of the site, especially when I recognize the hypocrisy of a rats post due to one of theirs I've seen previously? Spare me.
What crap. Sony joined way later than Nintendo and Sega. Yet dominated first time. MS have had plenty of time to get it right. You can't grasp the fact MS have been shite. They have had to spend big but even then still in 3rd. Yes legitimate reasons 4 gens in.
Yet you ignore the plethora of like-minded rats crowing about MS getting in trouble with regulators eons ago with Windows in this very thread? Or talking about Windows Phone on this very page by a person who you leave a "like" on his posts?
Funny story, I went through your post history (
Sony bought their way into the industry buy you want to cry because Microsoft is doing the same thing later rather than earlier? Might want to buckle up, because they already stated they're not slowing down after this deal goes through.
What games, franchises or major IPs Sony took away from Sega and Nintendo when they bought Psygnosis? I'm still waiting. Keep in mind they bought them in 1993 before Wipeout and Destruction Derby were out. The 40% market share in Europe was also in 1996. This is your whole argument so I want to hear game titles.
Looks like someone did this guy a favor and freed up his time wasted posting here lol
you guys are such a detriment to the company you worship, lmao. If regulators actually listened to your "xBoX has nO gAeMz" propaganda then you'd single-handedly allow Microsoft to easily buy up the whole industry.
So no titles? No games? You are always agressive and angry about the Psygnosis deal. What is this about then? You were a fan of Lemmings and you didn't want the devs under Sony? Just admit you never looked at the facts and your dates are all wrong. Your whole argument fell apart.You continue to move them goalposts far and wide. So now it's about the IP that Sony did or didn't take away? I can't keep up anymore. The entire premise of the thread is about Call of Duty, which is Sony's main thing they care about. Call of Duty has been confirmed, at least for the forseable future, to remain multiplatform. But go on being disingenuous. You're actually acting as if Sony didn't moneyhat ENTIRE IPs and their sequels in the cutthroat PS1 era?
Nobody cared about Psygnosis until corporate lickspittles started crying about the acquisition and said Sony never bought a publisher, which was rampant in January until they had to eat crow. Now it's been repeated enough times that it seemingly causes some of y'all PTSD and you loathe when it's brought up. You're just angry your narrative went to shit and now you have to continue and create new ones.
Another short ban. He has infinite lives for some reason.DidLognor get back from his ban and got himself banned again the same day? His hate boner for Sony is something else.
Could you provide the receipts of what games Sony Moneyhatted or prevented coming out on other platforms during the PS1 era? Obviously you know more than everybody else.You've dodged so much shit I threw your way the last few posts that slapped your rhetoric down and all you can now finally muster is that... Sony dominated the first time? You're proving my point, with how aggressive Sony was in the beginning with moneyhatting and buying up studios and even a publisher to get their foot through the door. Which is your entire excuse, that they had to do it to break in the console space but are not doing it in the 4th gen (except they are, more then ever... they just don't have the money Microsoft does, lmao). Microsoft ain't playing by Sony's rules anymore. You wanted them to compete and you got it. Looks like every other publisher including ABK's rivals agree with Microsoft here and Sony are the odd one out.
3rd is exactly why this deal will go through without a hitch
You continue to move them goalposts far and wide. So now it's about the IP that Sony did or didn't take away? I can't keep up anymore. The entire premise of the thread is about Call of Duty, which is Sony's main thing they care about. Call of Duty has been confirmed, at least for the forseable future, to remain multiplatform. But go on being disingenuous. You're actually acting as if Sony didn't moneyhat ENTIRE IPs and their sequels in the cutthroat PS1 era?
Nobody cared about Psygnosis until corporate lickspittles started crying about the acquisition and said Sony never bought a publisher, which was rampant in January until they had to eat crow. Now it's been repeated enough times that it seemingly causes some of y'all PTSD and you loathe when it's brought up. You're just angry your narrative went to shit and now you have to continue and create new ones.
He hasn't got any. He's just spouting shite. I'm still waiting for him to provide the proof for all the games Sony moneyhatted or prevented from appearing on other platforms during the PS1 era? Just watch him twist it around to something else.
You are a very unique and special human
As a PS fan, I’m afraid of PlayStation going third party
Came across that tweet and I realized that it would be pretty bad for Sony to do that:
A whole lot of nothing once again. Yes, Sony bought a small worthless publisher for 20 millions back in 1993. And? What was the damage on their competitors? You can't even provide one game that had any impact. How is that like Activision again?You want me to answer your incredibly blatant strawman while you ignore most of the things I embarass you on? Titles and games for what? Where have I been aggressive and angry about Psygnosis? Projecting your insecurities about ABK much? My whole argument still slaps you down, and you're just throwing random sentences together to try and gain internet points for the one, singular like-minded blue rat liking and circlejerking your post. But to reiterate:
You rats squeaked about how Sony never bought a publisher, and got served crow. Then it was that MS is buying their way into this industry unlike Sony, and got served crow. Earlier today I'm told it doesn't matter if Sony is very aggressive with their moneyhats because Microsoft has done it, too, and them having done it at all makes us hypocrites. When the same argument is used back with Psygnosis, you rats come outta the woodwork to downplay that and defend Sony at all costs against the big bad evil Microsoft, and that's exactly why you're whining about the subject right now.
All you do is cry because Sony bought a knife to a tank fight. If Bungie is brought up, (y'know, being a publisher), which contradicts a majority of the shit you spew, you'll just say it doesn't count because they cost less then what Microsoft is getting. And continue to move them goalposts. That's the whole point. Sony can't afford these things. They'd rush to buy them if they could. But you already know this and are just in desperation mode after Sonys disparaging comments.
You've answered fuck all. Just gone round in circles and try to name call. Your a sad green rat(see I can do that too). You haven't provided any proof but your own assumptions. The last 3 gens must have been tough on you eh? Or were you a Sega fan before switching to MS?You want me to answer your incredibly blatant strawman while you ignore most of the things I embarass you on? Titles and games for what? Where have I been aggressive and angry about Psygnosis? Projecting your insecurities about ABK much? My whole argument still slaps you down, and you're just throwing random sentences together to try and gain internet points for the one, singular like-minded blue rat liking and circlejerking your post. But to reiterate:
You rats squeaked about how Sony never bought a publisher, and got served crow. Then it was that MS is buying their way into this industry unlike Sony, and got served crow. Earlier today I'm told it doesn't matter if Sony is very aggressive with their moneyhats because Microsoft has done it, too, and them having done it at all makes us hypocrites. When the same argument is used back with Psygnosis, you rats come outta the woodwork to downplay that and defend Sony at all costs against the big bad evil Microsoft, and that's exactly why you're whining about the subject right now.
All you do is cry because Sony bought a knife to a tank fight. If Bungie is brought up, (y'know, being a publisher), which contradicts a majority of the shit you spew, you'll just say it doesn't count because they cost less then what Microsoft is getting. And continue to move them goalposts. That's the whole point. Sony can't afford these things. They'd rush to buy them if they could. But you already know this and are just in desperation mode after Sonys disparaging comments.
Mate forget it he's an Xbox shill. He can't answer because he's full of shit. He's probably Dealer's gaf account. He deals in absolutes.A whole lot of nothing once again. Yes, Sony bought a small worthless publisher for 20 millions back in 1993. And? What was the damage on their competitors? You can't even provide one game that had any impact. How is that like Activision again?
Going back 30 years and still failed to make a point. Keep searching on Wikipedia
How long did it take you to Google that? It's fun waiting on green rats furiously searching Wikipedia for information......Provide receipts to common knowledge because you're being contrarian due to having defend Sony at all costs? Tomb Raider ring a bell? Sony signed a deal with Eidos to make the sequel and all future games exclusive. They didn't have a mascot and even though they signed a deal with Jason Rubin and Naughty Dog (which they worked out with Universal who were the reasons Naughty Dog changed their name in the first place prior) and were very aggressive to have Crash combat Mario/Sonic, they still wanted Lara Croft as the face of PlayStation.
Let me guess, that one doesn't count, right? For reasons? You're extremely predictable.
And lmao, what rules and criteria do you pray is imposed on Microsoft regarding ABK? Please, do tell.
.
As a PS fan, I’m afraid of PlayStation going third party
Came across that tweet and I realized that it would be pretty bad for Sony to do that:
A whole lot of nothing once again. Yes, Sony bought a small worthless publisher for 20 millions back in 1993. And? What was the damage on their competitors? You can't even provide one game that had any impact. How is that like Activision again?
Going back 30 years and still failed to make a point. Keep searching on Wikipedia
Sega didn't need sonys help to fuck themselves over. The infighting between the American and japanese branches ensured segas doom as a console manufacturer. Also, saying the purchase of pysgnosis being equal or whatever to buying act/blizzard is beyond retarded.So now it's about what's damaging their competitors? Not only have you moved goalposts like 3-4 times in this topic, but you ask questions and then ignore the response with said new goalpost.
And you have the testicular fortitude to talk about damaging competitors? As if Sony didn't expedite Segas exit from the industry, which is well documented? As if Sony wasn't trying to banish Xbox to the netherrealm multiple gens in a row, especially when they smelled blood?
You keep crying about 30 years ago as if Sony isn't buying up publishers and studios this generation and looking to buy (what they can afford lmao) more. Again, you're just angry Sony can't spend on the level of Microsoft.
And Wikipedia? What have I said that's on Wikipedia? Care to show me? Desperate after getting fact-checked that you automatically assume?
just like you got mad people were using "triggered" on your posts only for you to immediately do it to others? Your hypocrisy isn't limited to your rabid defense of a corporation, it seems.Sony shill calling others an Xbox shill.
Who is this "Dealer" and why does he irk you so much? Did he touch a nerve?How long did it take you to Google that? It's fun waiting on green rats furiously searching Wikipedia for information......
Tomb Raider. But you just named one. Out of the thousands of games released on PS1 you came with one game. Is that it? You should be embarrassed, laughed at
Also non of the games like Tomb Raider were established IP like COD. Obviously your too stupid to work that out otherwise you wouldn't be pathetic enough to come up with that conclusion. Same way as Ghost has smoked you in asking you which IP did Sony take away when buying Psygnosis? After numerous posts you still haven't got the brain capacity to come up with an answer?
Your stupidity knows no bounds. Those past gens must have been tough no wonder your crying like the sad pathetic cretin you are. See if Bing can find you those moneyhats that Sony did?
P. S. Don't use Google as you don't want MS going to the regulators again now do we?
Big bad Google.................
"
Mate he's probably a sore Sega loser now defected to MS because they got money. He's disingenuous and full of shit. It's so cringe and embarrassing that he keeps on responding even when getting owned. The only reason people hate MS cause of sad creepy basement dwellers like this guy.
Aww how long did it take you to write this crying rant???Crying about name calling when you "like" the other post of the other guy that literally got banned for name-calling me? Or you saying I'm pathetic and stupid and all the other shit in your tear-filled rants?
Except I have provided proof, which intimidates you. You asked WHY Psygnosis was mentioned, and I gave it to you in detail. I never said ABK=Psygnosis 1:1, because that was irrelevant to my point. It's just a sad strawman you have while ignoring everything else, because you have no response. I said Sony entered the console space by buying their way in, to refute you pretending this is limited to MS. I said Sony would jump through hoops to aquire ABK if they could only afford so, which is guaranteed 100%. I refuted you and your rats' notion that MS is doing the same thing as Sony by moneyhatting at all, and compared that logic to Psygnosis, which threw you into a frenzy. Anybody can scroll back these past few pages and watch you and your tag team buddy get slapped with retorts only to either cherry-pick or move on to the next goalpost, and still fail.
Like right here, your raging jealousy and hatred of Microsoft has you going off in a tangent of unrelated shit (hint: you do this ALOT, as we will see):
"*sniff* oH yEaH? wELL...*sniff*... xBoX iS dOiNg bAd iN SaLeS! DOnT tAlK about gP anD MaU...! LoL xBoX hAs nO gAeMz!"
Why do you constantly project your insecurities when you have fuck all else to say?
Sony shill calling others an Xbox shill.
Google? Wikipedia?
Jason Rubin was on Iron Lord's podcast just last night, saying some of this. The co-founder of Naughty Dog who now works at Meta. LOL. Can you show me on Wikipedia where this info is at? Y'all are so intimidated by getting your bullshit strawman arguments answered that you immediately assume Wikipedia.
And you're doing EXACTLY what I said you would do in the very post you're quoting, completely oblivious, too. Tomb Raider doesn't count because it's just "one game," Tomb Raider wasn't "established like CoD" (despite the first game being massive for the time period), etc. You literally asked me to provide receipts for games Sony took away from competitors in your wierd damage control about how acquiring Psygnosis didn't take games away from others. I gave you a very easy example to shut down your post (and actually your entire rants over the last few pages, but I digress), and it doesn't count now? Keep moving them goalposts
You want to talk about being smoked? I smoked yall long ago when you yall kept asking for games Psygnosis kept from other platforms by pointing out that the OP in question and Sony's entire defense in this very OP is singled on Call of Duty, which was confirmed to stay multiplatform. And was subsequently ignored. So why are you harping about Psygnosis being multiplat and demanding such a weak strawman? We all know why.
And again, you're throwing your jealousy and insecurities regarding MS my way which makes you look desperate as fuck:
"lOL gO use BiNg cUz BiNg iS oWnEd bY MS huRhUr gOtEm, lOL biG bad GoOgLe and ReGuLaToRs dErRr BiNg
Jesus Christ lmfao your seething hatred and rage for Microsoft is oozing out of your posts like you have PTSD and they keep you up at night. This gen scaring the shit outta you THIS much? You know it ain't over with ABK, right?
Sega were their own doing. Nintendo managed to survive didn't they? Instead of blaming Sony who purchased one publisher and devs under Psygnosis. Yet Sega had far better developers and more of them. They had established IP and experience. Sony was a new comer. Sony were successful is because they caught everyone off guard with the PS1. Their model for 3rd party development was better than the status quo. So stop your crying and blaming Sony.
You're so desperate and can't retort to anything I said since you've been proven wrong and embarrassed so much that you sound like a petulant child.
I explained I'm detail why Psygnosis was mentioned. Thoroughly. It's in the post you quoted. Anybody can scroll up. Why lie? Calling me "retarded" all the time isn't going to change anything.
Huh? I'm making myself look stupid by using terminology that isn't going to make me look smarter? Strawman and goalposts are common words used here on GAF on a regular basis. Why do they intimidate you?
Your pathetic and three gens of being third have obviously irked you. Aww did SONY dominating damage your fragile ego?
As a PS fan, I’m afraid of PlayStation going third party
Came across that tweet and I realized that it would be pretty bad for Sony to do that:
Another retarded essay not worth my time.You're so desperate and can't retort to anything I said since you've been proven wrong and embarrassed so much that you sound like a petulant child.
How long? 10 minutes, why? You're angry I thoroughly dismantled you and assume I spent hours or something? Big brain over here
Bing? Who tf uses Bing? Why are you so hellbent on Bing?
Shilling for MS? How has dismantling your bullshit equated to shilling? Again with the seething random MS hatred, which was proven very thoroughly in the post you're quoting for everyone to see?
You literally asked for a title and I gave you one, and now you're demanding more. Why? Explain. You're not proving your point, you're embarrassing yourself. You already cry foul when I write too much for your smoothbrain to digest but now you're demanding more? For what, to move the goalpost for the 5th time?
I explained I'm detail why Psygnosis was mentioned. Thoroughly. It's in the post you quoted. Anybody can scroll up. Why lie? Calling me "retarded" all the time isn't going to change anything.
Huh? I'm making myself look stupid by using terminology that isn't going to make me look smarter? Strawman and goalposts are common words used here on GAF on a regular basis. Why do they intimidate you?
Calling me "pathetic, stupid and retarded" over and over and then finishes it up with talking about how I'm in "third" and Sony is dominating. Perfect finish which sums up your posts and mindset quite succinctly *chefs kiss*
There is nothing to retort. What points? Two other guys have smacked you in the face with the facts. They've labelled you retarded. Stop Embarrassing yourself even more.What...are you even saying? How can I be "stupid and retarded again?" Like, do these afflictions come and go with time? You're so angry that you aren't even making coherent sense in your ramblings about big bad evil Microsoft. And you have the audacity to call me a clown?
They harder...what? You've done nothing to retort anything. Why would I try harder when you succinctly prove my points?
Yup! Nothing more needs to be said. Sony and MS paid to be in the games industry. Sony has worked pretty hard to deny content to other platforms with plenty of 3rd party timed exclusives and MS has started purchasing more studios to ensure they will continue to get content for Game pass. There are no good guys or bad guys it's all business and it's great to see plenty of competition because gamers benefit.
As a PS fan, I’m afraid of PlayStation going third party
Came across that tweet and I realized that it would be pretty bad for Sony to do that:
Who? Where? I demolished the FUD thrown my way in a precise and in depth manner; one guy got banned, the other didn't respond but left some emojis, and then there is you who is only responding with short anger filled bursts, completely ignoring anything and everything I'm saying and acting like a bratty child throwing a tantrum.
