• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

FTC Seeks to Block Microsoft Corp’s Acquisition of Activision Blizzard

Swift_Star

Banned
They were watching stocks plummet before this deal. They were not willing to sell until their backs were against the wall.

If this falls through, just watch their stocks tank quickly and immediately. Not to mention, their right back to have to figuring out what to do with Bobby Kotick.

I'm not saying that Activision just goes away, but they will be in a very difficult place.
Best scenario is this falling through and A/B getting sliced into chunks and being sold to several parties.
 

3liteDragon

Member
Whats the difference between the FTC & SEC?

And isn't it usually normal that government agencies like the SEC & FTC ALWAYS win?
SEC regulates the markets & their job is to protect investors, so things like individuals or companies buying shares in another company (among A BUNCH of other things) will have to be filed with the SEC. FTC’s role is to protect consumers by enforcing antitrust law on companies. I’m most definitely oversimplifying it but that’s my brief description for you.
 

adamsapple

Or is it just one of Phil's balls in my throat?
That lawsuit is pretty fucking dumb. Which I don't how to feel about it, because people working at that level have superior education and you will expect for that to show in such document.

It is, it really is.

Their (FTC) arguments are flimsy at best and I'm looking forward to the court proceedings and them losing yet again.
 

adamsapple

Or is it just one of Phil's balls in my throat?



MSM websites have started to pick this up. I hope DE is happier now :D
 
Last edited:

Chiggs

Gold Member
That lawsuit is pretty fucking dumb. Which I don't how to feel about it, because people working at that level have superior education and you will expect for that to show in such document.

With what I've read so far, the merit of it does appear to be...questionable. The problem is that Phil Spencer has bungled this whole thing and he has been insincere, so who knows what other sort of dirt will come out--and that goes for Sony too. You had better believe MS is going to attempt to smear them as much as possible.

What's really hilarious is that this acquisition has a very real chance of making it all the way up to SCOTUS if MS loses the initial trial and then the appeal. That's crazy.

MSM websites have started to pick this up. I hope DE is happier now :D

Humiliating.
 
Last edited:
Best scenario is this falling through and A/B getting sliced into chunks and being sold to several parties.
Yes and no. If the deal falls through and Sony, MS, EA, Amazon, etc --- all end up with pieces, seems like the end result would be much worse for consumers.

I don't want to make MS out to be the good guys here or the savior, because at the end of the day their goal is to make money and if that means cutting others out down the road, they will do that -- they are responsible to the shareholders and not to the consumers, and when those two things align is when everyone wins but its not often. But having said that, ABK is getting sold regardless, to someone, either in whole or in pieces, and I don't really see the alternative to MS buying them being a more friendly outcome.
 

Ezekiel_

Banned
B7-B195-CD-3-D9-F-43-BF-8-FC8-E582-F265355-B.jpg





The rest of the article pictures are in this link

[/URL][/URL]

Please feel free to stop any time.
Hummmm... Who is this 'watchdog'?

Happy Dog GIF
 

NickFire

Member
You do such a good job with the recaps, but don't do this. It literally sources the same post on the other place. And also says:

"Nonetheless, we've contacted the European Union to receive an official confirmation on the statement and will update this story if we hear back."

Posting different sites all sourcing a message board post creates an impression without a foundation. Let's wait for someone to report an official response from the EU.
 

adamsapple

Or is it just one of Phil's balls in my throat?
You do such a good job with the recaps, but don't do this. It literally sources the same post on the other place. And also says:

"Nonetheless, we've contacted the European Union to receive an official confirmation on the statement and will update this story if we hear back."

Posting different sites all sourcing a message board post creates an impression without a foundation. Let's wait for someone to report an official response from the EU.

Yes I know, just pointing that more mainstream websites have also picked this up. Which will prompt more info on this.

However I don't know, or expect, EU to make a formal press release any time soon.

They'll probably only reply to similar inquiries and those will similarly be not accepted because it's not in PDF or something I guess.


Hummmm... Who is this 'watchdog'?

Happy Dog GIF

The EU Commission *is* the watch dog (courtesy of ReBurn ReBurn )

 
Last edited:

Heisenberg007

Gold Journalism



MSM websites have started to pick this up. I hope DE is happier now :D
Kloriblle, a known fanboy and an MS employee, tweeted that in defense and these "journalists" just ran with it.

FTC never once said that MS had made commitments. Here is what they wrote:

Microsoft decided to make several of Bethesda's titles including Starfield and Redfall Microsoft exclusives despite assurances it had given to European antitrust authorities that it had no incentive to withhold games from rival consoles.

Not commitment. MS said it had no incentive to withhold games. And they did say that. Right here.

HvbzmQl.png


EU saying they didn't break any commitment is true, because they never made any commitment in the first place. And it does not invalidate FTC's argument (which never once mentioned commitment).

But MS did lie and misrepresented and misled, saying that they had no incentive and it would not make sense to make games exclusive until they hit certain numbers, etc. But made the games exclusive without hitting those numbers the very next day the acquisition closed.

Kloribille intentionally confusing "commitment" and "lying" is disingenuous. Both things are true at the same time.
 

graywolf323

Member
Star Trek Reaction GIF


My brain after reading that comment.

I swear some of you guys. How do you make shit up like this.

These big corporations are living rent free in your head, brainwashed.

They laugh on people posting shit like this while collecting their money.
you might wanna go look in a mirror there
Kloriblle, a known fanboy and an MS employee, tweeted that in defense and these "journalists" just ran with it.

FTC never once said that MS had made commitments. Here is what they wrote:



Not commitment. MS said it had no incentive to withhold games. And they did say that. Right here.

HvbzmQl.png


EU saying they didn't break any commitment is true, because they never made any commitment in the first place. And it does not invalidate FTC's argument (which never once mentioned commitment).

But MS did lie and misrepresented and misled, saying that they had no incentive and it would not make sense to make games exclusive until they hit certain numbers, etc. But made the games exclusive without hitting those numbers the very next day the acquisition closed.

Kloribille intentionally confusing "commitment" and "lying" is disingenuous. Both things are true at the same time.
don't bother, he lives up to his tag
 

DeepEnigma

Gold Member
Like I said, this is all a reply to an e-mail we have no access to because the sender haven't disclosed what they asked. It definitely has no relevance whatsoever.
Yep. Without context of the question, this is just a soothing response padding for their nervous clients. We are going to see a lot of warfare like this over the next 6-8 months. Some genuine, and a whole lot of BS as well.
 

Ronin_7

Member
Kloriblle, a known fanboy and an MS employee, tweeted that in defense and these "journalists" just ran with it.

FTC never once said that MS had made commitments. Here is what they wrote:



Not commitment. MS said it had no incentive to withhold games. And they did say that. Right here.

HvbzmQl.png


EU saying they didn't break any commitment is true, because they never made any commitment in the first place. And it does not invalidate FTC's argument (which never once mentioned commitment).

But MS did lie and misrepresented and misled, saying that they had no incentive and it would not make sense to make games exclusive until they hit certain numbers, etc. But made the games exclusive without hitting those numbers the very next day the acquisition closed.

Kloribille intentionally confusing "commitment" and "lying" is disingenuous. Both things are true at the same time.
Good post.
 

gothmog

Gold Member
This is online narrative bullshit. Phil Spencer went to AB three days after the news scandal and they offered a proposal to buy the company. AB looked for competing offers, MS was the best.

When an offer is made that will be beneficial to shareholders it must be considered and let the shareholders vote for approval.

But what else is new in the world of green fandom, narrative narrative narrative. At one point y’all were spreading bs like AB went to MS asking to be bought “saved”.
I also find it interesting that that this sale pops up after Mike Ybarra, long time Microsoft employee who left for Blizzard, became president of Blizzard. Could just be a coincidence but given the complexity of some of the astroturfing Microsoft has gotten caught doing I keep thinking about it. After all people always suspected that Steven Elop left Microsoft and became CEO of Nokia in order to acquire them as well. Absolutely wild if there's even a tiny bit of truth to it.
 

DeepEnigma

Gold Member
Never heard of this guy before I'm 50 minutes in. There is some twisting of the law and a lot of personal opinion and bias in his delivery. I deal with lawyers every day, they are generally right to the point and not this ..... opinionated.
He used to be like that, but now he's high on his own supply. Appeared on Xbox podcasts and the like.

He now has a niche he is capitalizing on. Ironic to say the least.
 

Thirty7ven

Banned
I also find it interesting that that this sale pops up after Mike Ybarra, long time Microsoft employee who left for Blizzard, became president of Blizzard. Could just be a coincidence but given the complexity of some of the astroturfing Microsoft has gotten caught doing I keep thinking about it. After all people always suspected that Steven Elop left Microsoft and became CEO of Nokia in order to acquire them as well. Absolutely wild if there's even a tiny bit of truth to it.

Nokia came to mind instantly.
 

DeepEnigma

Gold Member
I also find it interesting that that this sale pops up after Mike Ybarra, long time Microsoft employee who left for Blizzard, became president of Blizzard. Could just be a coincidence but given the complexity of some of the astroturfing Microsoft has gotten caught doing I keep thinking about it. After all people always suspected that Steven Elop left Microsoft and became CEO of Nokia in order to acquire them as well. Absolutely wild if there's even a tiny bit of truth to it.
Think About It GIF by Identity
 

Gavon West

Spread's Cheeks for Intrusive Ads
They might just do that…. And when it comes up in court they can play dumb and say “We planned on putting Starfield on Playstation all along!”
Not going to happen. Sorry not sorry. The contract states that they will keep current games on competitors platforms, and keep those games available for purchase. They've kept to it. New IP is on a case by case basis. No way they put new Bethesda games on competing platforms.
 

adamsapple

Or is it just one of Phil's balls in my throat?
I also find it interesting that that this sale pops up after Mike Ybarra, long time Microsoft employee who left for Blizzard, became president of Blizzard. Could just be a coincidence but given the complexity of some of the astroturfing Microsoft has gotten caught doing I keep thinking about it. After all people always suspected that Steven Elop left Microsoft and became CEO of Nokia in order to acquire them as well. Absolutely wild if there's even a tiny bit of truth to it.

tinfoil-hat.gif
 
Last edited:

Drewpee

Banned
So then console sales are important? A lot of people have been saying that, especially this gen for awhile but hardcore Microsoft fans didn't want to hear it.

I think most Microsoft fans just assumed there would be more ways to be successful in the industry. Clearly regulators disagree and feel that the way Sony does business is the way it should be allowed to be done. That is the most interesting part of this situation imo.
 
Last edited:

adamsapple

Or is it just one of Phil's balls in my throat?
ABK was on sale for TWO YEARS!! Sony and no one else stepped up. What else needs be said?

MS made them an initial offer, Activision refused it, *they* wanted to sell to fucking META (Facebook).

MS then made them a second offer which they accepted.



It's the "MS having shadow-bought Crystal Dynamics and have them only with Embracer by name only" category XD
 
Last edited:

DeepEnigma

Gold Member
MS made them an initial offer, Activision refused it, *they* wanted to sell to fucking META (Facebook).

MS then made them a second offer which they accepted.




It's the "MS having shadow-bought Crystal Dynamics and have them only with Embracer by name only" category XD
No, this is lobbyists that once held a career political position and now sit on board of directors for mega corps and vise versa territory. ;)
 
Why are people angry that another massive Merger and Acquisition might get blocked? Why are people angry that market consolidation might be avoided?
Why?

Why is this even a stance? Are people's affinity to plastic boxes that play games that powerful, that they must throw consumer interests in the bin so their corporate overlord can get a W?

Why is it that Microsoft buying ABK a good thing, just because people with GamePass get more games? What about people who use PS++? What about those subscribers? Why does Microsoft need to be the one to control which subscription services get what?
 

adamsapple

Or is it just one of Phil's balls in my throat?
No, this is lobbyists that once held a career political position and now sit on board of directors for mega corps and vise versa territory. ;)

It would have to be a real long con for that to be true lol. I think it's just straight up tinfoil hat stuff.
 

Bo_Hazem

Banned
I also find it interesting that that this sale pops up after Mike Ybarra, long time Microsoft employee who left for Blizzard, became president of Blizzard. Could just be a coincidence but given the complexity of some of the astroturfing Microsoft has gotten caught doing I keep thinking about it. After all people always suspected that Steven Elop left Microsoft and became CEO of Nokia in order to acquire them as well. Absolutely wild if there's even a tiny bit of truth to it.

MS are smart outside where it matters.

bill gates illuminati GIF by Tyler Menzel, GIPHY Editorial Director
 

Greggy

Member
I wish you could listen to yourself.

Some of you automatically assume that people love streaming over having a dedicated device. The choice, if taken away, is gone from those people, something they currently DO have. If they have the box MS wants them to have, then that's a non-issue but I don't think the person you are quoting was referring to them/nor in the scenario he was mentioning.
Facts matter. There is no reason to even suspect that the choice will be taken away from anybody. There are many reasons to be sure that a lot of new people will have access to COD.
 

adamsapple

Or is it just one of Phil's balls in my throat?


Approving this merger with the labor agreement that we fashioned with Microsoft to protect collective bargaining rights would have sent a game-changing message to corporate America that workers do indeed have a seat at the table and their concerns matter and must be addressed. We believe the FTC’s case is not likely to convince a federal judge, particularly as the European Commission may move to approve the deal, and that workers at Activision Blizzard will finally have the opportunity to improve their wages, benefits and working conditions through their union.


We found MS's first character witness for the trial :messenger_clapping:
 
Top Bottom