• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

Speshal Nick [XboxEra]: Jason Ronald not Leading Next-Gen Xbox design (Replaced by Surface team).

King Dazzar

Member
I don't blame them. I also brag about being the "fastest ever" to my girlfriends.

They, however, never seem to be as excited about it as I am. 🤔
I'm sure they appreciated your 10 seconds of effort though.
q3uNSme.gif
 

Z O N E

Member
I think the XSS and XSX are great in terms of design, but you have to hand it to the Surface team, they were the ones that created the Xbox One X after the blunder that was Xbox One by another team.

So I'm all for it if they're creating the next console.
 

shamoomoo

Member
Pound for pound you’re going to deliver a lot better framerates and IQ with DLSS than any AMD-based setup. FSR3 is barely as good as DLSS 2 let alone DLAA and frame-gen capabilities of DLSS3.

If they want to swing hardware back in their favor and make Sony sweat going back to nVidia is their only choice.

but they won’t
But Microsoft is a software company and AMD has/can add dedicated ML hardware to their GPUs, there's nothing stopping MS from having a comparable or better solutions.
 
Last edited:

StereoVsn

Member
Does the surface team has a good track record on making hardware that anyone cares about?
The Surface team has been terrible last several years. They have been packaging outdated hardware into outdated chassis design for overpriced amount of money.

People saying this is a good change are crazy. At least XSX was overall a well engineered device and XSS for all its faults met quite low target price.

The issue, IMO, was more in being able to bring down manufacturing cost on XSX fast enough, but still…. This is basically politics bullshit and not based on engineering merit.

Again, if you have to deal with Surfaces devices, especially in the Enterprise, they are not great by any means.
 

Fredrik

Member
Pound for pound you’re going to deliver a lot better framerates and IQ with DLSS than any AMD-based setup. FSR3 is barely as good as DLSS 2 let alone DLAA and frame-gen capabilities of DLSS3.

If they want to swing hardware back in their favor and make Sony sweat going back to nVidia is their only choice.

but they won’t
Would cost $1000+ and have problem with backwards compatibility.
That train has left the station long ago. They’re stuck with AMD.
 

II_JumPeR_I

Member
Seems like he did lead design for both systems.

If so, he did not only fuck up on specs, he also kinda messed up not making them cost-savy enough, the X is very overbuilt and has a split board layout (which is expensive).

Well on the split board stuff, I think that was primarily because of Series X systems doubling as server blades. Putting the I/O on a separate board meant they didn't need to manufacture completely new boards for the server implementations of Series X units.

But we also know Sony have modified PS5s for a lot of their cloud streaming. Curious if they make specific boards for those or just use modified PS5 boards. If it's the latter, pretty sure they would be able to double the memory capacity and whatnot, but I'm mainly curious if that's cheaper for them than Microsoft's approach.

Every experience I've had with a Surface has been awful. They are shitty pieces of hardware that have nonstop issues.

Reviewers and tech heads/content creators seem to love them though. Still, interesting to hear takes from the less impressed.

The hardware is one part. Ms hasn’t delivered on the games front. And most probably Ronald had a more balanced machine in the original design. But uncle Phil must have asked him to make it cheaper to try to have an edge on the price vs Ps5. If the games were there nobody would have care. Look at the switch.

Well the Series X was originally going to have 20 GB of memory which would've made the memory situation a non-issue. But they cut it back to 16 GB for cost reasons.

In hindsight, not a good idea.

Honestly this is one of the takes on Xbox that I understand the least. The team that did the Series S/X had extreme limitations on it made by Xbox management. Because of the 360 red ring of death, they could not push termals as much as they would want. Because of the Xbox One failure, they had to find a way to make sure that their console would be superior to the PS5, while being not too costly and with limited time and ressources, as they had to do the One X before it, and did not have the same clear vision, mandate and freedom and experience that Sony got. They had to make the platform that will become the Series S and X also work as a base for Xcloud. On top of all that, they had to do 2 consoles AND find a way to have it work with the next Direct X(direct storage and maybe RT) implementation while another team was writing the specifications of it at Microsoft. Joker: give it some abilities beyong AMD standard specs with VRR/HDMI 2.1 implementation(before the standard is set again) and whatever they mean by machine learning and Sampler Feedback Streaming. We can be happy that Sony got smart with the PS5, and specifically the digital edition, a real masterclass IMHO as it will be the base model in the future. But I really think that the Xbox team that designed the Series S/X got fucked over by Xbox management.

Very good take on the constraints for Xbox hardware team for Series S & X. They had to play ball with the Azure folks and use some form of their stuff for Xcloud.

IMHO, the Xbox hardware team probably had ~ 3.5 years to design these Series systems. And they probably waited to see initial reception to the One S & One X to solidify redesigns that would become the Series S & X. Didn't the initial spec rumors for the systems leak in early 2018? That isn't too long after the One X launched, and MS like to put rumors out into the public so they get discourse, usually for some level of feedback.

Compared to the SIE hardware group, the Xbox hardware team was severely constrained and seemingly LTTP in 9th-gen console development. But that's what happens when your division gets funding cut for like two years; that's going to screw up R&D for new hardware for sure.
 
Can't wait to read up on how they skimp on memory with weird work arounds this time. Lets have 3 different types of unified ram this time around.
 

Quasicat

Member
The only Surface I have used was one from work and it made me move away from Windows at home. Everyday I come into work, I have to reboot it so that it will work properly. Plus, when I unplug it from the dock, it takes 20 minutes of fiddling around with it to get it to connect properly. Perhaps they can make a console that doesn’t do this.
 
Series S is the best designed media console I have owned due to amazing UI, commendable compatibility, and great price to performance ratio. Still do not know what Sony was thinking with their Alienware modem and sluggish UI. Not a fan of the mini-PC tower Series X design either. It is also embarrassing how poor the PS5 and Series X run software compared to mid-range PCs from a decade ago.
 
Last edited:

spons

Gold Member
Series S is the best designed media console I have owned due to amazing UI, commendable compatibility, and great price to performance ratio. Still do not know what Sony was thinking with their Alienware modem and sluggish UI. Not a fan of the mini-PC tower Series X design ever. It is also embarrassing how poor the PS5 and Series X run software compared to mid-range PCs from a decade ago.
You mean the operating systems and their apps? I think the OS of both consoles have literally only one core assigned to them, while games have the rest. The Xbox dashboard is sluggish as fuck if you do more than slowly and carefully working your way around it.
 

Mr Moose

Member
It was the "fastest selling ever" for like two months or something.....

MS usually likes to brag about "fastest ever" stuff to hide everything else
Yup, they do that magic math.
Did it with Xbox One launch, fastest selling console, which sold 909k in 9 days. PS4 did a million in 24 hours.
Why wasn't this the first reply.


I am curious, what does this guy get from these shitty "insider leaks"? Is it just attention or has he monetized it?
 
Last edited:

skit_data

Member
This might be an unpopular opinion but I'm raising my flame shield;

I think handhelds are starting to become a bit of a fad, almost similar to how Nintendo became succesful when using motion controllers on Wii. Now everyone wants a piece of the pie. It's a better, way more promising thing than motion controllers/cameras etc. but I can still see Xbox coming out with a handheld just as consumers start to realize "hey wth, back to basics" in a similar manner to how the idea of Kinect fell off in popularity quite quickly because consumers just wasn't interested in that market anymore.
 
Last edited:

Shin-Ra

Junior Member
Yup, they do that magic math.
Did it with Xbox One launch, fastest selling console, which sold 909k in 9 days. PS4 did a million in 24 hours.
I am curious, what does this guy get from these shitty "insider leaks"? Is it just attention or has he monetized it?
Magic Math, ahh takes you back.


Started the whole ‘flak’ ridicule thing by cultists too.
 

kruis

Exposing the sinister cartel of retailers who allow companies to pay for advertising space.
Every experience I've had with a Surface has been awful. They are shitty pieces of hardware that have nonstop issues.

Our company used to have tons of Surface devices, but people hated them. Lousy keyboards, always problems with power management. We've completely switched to HP now. Colleagues are much happier now.
 
You mean the operating systems and their apps? I think the OS of both consoles have literally only one core assigned to them, while games have the rest. The Xbox dashboard is sluggish as fuck if you do more than slowly and carefully working your way around it.
Not for me. I can get to anything in a few button presses and I have everything grouped in a way that makes it hassle-free. After startup it takes me on average 3 seconds to boot what I want unless the application itself has a UI to navigate.
 
Last edited:

Mr Moose

Member
Magic Math, ahh takes you back.


Started the whole ‘flak’ ridicule thing by cultists too.
The good old days, when that MS guy came on here and straight up lied to us. That clown, forgot his name... "We invented DirectX" guy.
Edit: Albert Penello.
 
Last edited:
I’ve been expecting this pivot. Eventually the goal is that all devices can play all games. That’s the future Xbox sees & wants. So none of this should come as a surprise. If their next hardware is an Xbox handheld I’d be interested. Assuming it did what I wanted it to do.
 

LordCBH

Member
The good old days, when that MS guy came on here and straight up lied to us. That clown, forgot his name... "We invented DirectX" guy.
Edit: Albert Penello.

God that post aged poorly lol.
 

ReBurn

Gold Member
My surface book 2 is the most finicky laptop I've ever owned, but with its crisp screen and GTX 1060 it was a pretty good gaming laptop for its time.
 

LordCBH

Member
My surface book 2 is the most finicky laptop I've ever owned, but with its crisp screen and GTX 1060 it was a pretty good gaming laptop for its time.

Just for funsies I loaded up their website and went through their questionnaire so they could pick out a model for me. They picked up a Surfsce Laptop Studio 2 (thsts a fuckin name. Not a good one. But it is a name). They want like $3k for an i7 and a 4060.
 

eNT1TY

Member
Surface hardware was always premium and sturdy, my old Surface Book 2 with a gtx 1060 still chugs along fine, the hinge still has proper tension and the attach/detach interface is still responsive and solid. It is no longer my primary laptop, i replaced it with an m2 macbook pro a while ago but it is still quite competent for most tasks light gaming included. If some of the design language and build philosophy carries over we will have one slick looking Xbox that can take a fall or two.
 

ReBurn

Gold Member
Just for funsies I loaded up their website and went through their questionnaire so they could pick out a model for me. They picked up a Surfsce Laptop Studio 2 (thsts a fuckin name. Not a good one. But it is a name). They want like $3k for an i7 and a 4060.
That's Microsoft trying to pretend to compete with the MacBook Pro. I don't know why anyone would buy the studio line. You can get a laptop with an i7 and a 4060 for less than half of what a studio machine costs.

I used my surface book as part of my job because it was easier to travel with than the 17" 11 lb. developer laptop I keep on my desk. I I mostly only used it for games when I was in a hotel and it was pretty great for that at the time. I still use it from time to time but with GeForce Now I can game on pretty much any laptop I take with me.
 

DenchDeckard

Moderated wildly
This could be awesome news. Surface team are pretty bonkers with design but no idea how it could be built on a budget. Also, why am I putting in any weight into rumours by this lot.
 

XXL

Member
They're making a Steam Deck / Switch like console.
If they actually think competing with Steam or Nintendo (in handhelds) is going to be any easier than competing with PlayStation (in consoles) they are in for a HUGE reality check.

I would say their best chance was against Playstation.

Playstation themselves know they can't compete with Nintendo when it comes to handhelds and Steam is more dominant on PC than the others are in their respective markets.
Morgan Freeman Good Luck GIF
 

SkylineRKR

Member
Series might be the biggest flop in Xbox history all things considered. Maybe the original Xbox but that was a different situation and their entry into this business. Maybe he put up that tag a month after launch or something.
 
Top Bottom