• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

Xbox going OEM route for next-gen? 3rd party consoles in the making?

icerock

Member
So, this has been circulating in a discord I'm a part of which necessarily hasn't been picked up by Xbox community. The person was on the money on Indiana Jones, and is further corroborating about Xbox multi-platform stuff but the most intriguing aspect was on the hardware bit where the poster seems to allude that next-gen Xbox consoles will be akin to partnership like 3rd party controllers whereby other manufacturers will make the hardware which can run Xbox games. It opens up a lot of possibility, such as significantly different configurations (both powerful and weak) but it will also push the cost up as 3rd party won't sell hardware at a loss.

So, what does the Gaf think? I am personally bit torn, I know Microsoft are eating a lot of loss to sell Series S/X but I always thought they would build another Xbox. This rumor also gives a different perspective on FTC leaks, whereby Xbox were aiming at some sort of ARM+Cloud hybrid for next-gen. Was this their plan all along? To have 3rd party sell different kind of consoles which can run their games, meanwhile their focus will be purely on pushing software on multiple platforms, while pushing Cloud as their proprietary hardware for next-gen Xbox.

LLGOMgX.png
 
Last edited:
Will they have the ability to install Steam? Or Epic Store?

Gamepass seems to only require that a game has a GTX 1050 level of ability. The games themselvs don't seem to have PC requirements listed.
 
Last edited:

jroc74

Phone reception is more important to me than human rights
So kinda like a Steam Machine?

Good luck. Its not a bad strategy, have to do something different hardware wise to try to change things.

All I will say is its starting to look eerily similar to how the smartphone market went for them. Trying so much different stuff before finally bowing out the hardware side.
 

Ozriel

M$FT
Yeah, this is implausible nonsense.
You can always tell when the ‘insiders’ try to give information at different levels of access.

A person who has access to info on MachineGames Indiana Jones also managing to have access on info on next gen plans and conversations with multiple manufacturers? 🤣
And people are gullible enough to believe that? reminds me of when people thought Colt Eastwood had sources feeding him info on Microsoft’s acquisition targets.


There’s also a term for machines with multiple specs that can play Xbox games. They’re called PCs.

Rubbish.
 
Last edited:

ManaByte

Gold Member
So, this has been circulating in a discord I'm a part of which necessarily hasn't been picked up by Xbox community. The person was on the money on Indiana Jones, and is further corroborating about Xbox multi-platform stuff but the most intriguing aspect was on the hardware bit where the poster seems to allude that next-gen Xbox consoles will be akin to partnership like 3rd party controllers whereby other manufacturers will make the hardware which can run Xbox games. It opens up a lot of possibility, such as significantly different configurations (both powerful and weak) but it will also push the cost up as 3rd party won't sell hardware at a loss.

Sounds like someone read the Wikipedia entry on 3DO and is hoping people don't remember that.
 

LakeOf9

Member
It's true

Feel free to not believe it though, that's the smart thing to do. but the next 2-24 months, you will see this for yourself.
 
Last edited:

jroc74

Phone reception is more important to me than human rights
3rd party Xboxes...

So it's just a PC with maybe some guidance for "target specs." It's nice watching console warriors want a fight and Microsoft just being like "I'm so tired. No."
I mean...if this happens, and I'm reading this right.....MS would no longer be making consoles....

This would be MS going full 3rd party.
 

GHG

Member
So will this "third party hardware" need to be certified and branded by Xbox? Or will it just be a free for all like it is in the PC space?

No going to lie though, an Xbox branded handheld that plays all Xbox games (and gamepass) would actually have the potential to sell well.

But the issue with this is where does the hardware go next? Who decides if and when the Series S stops being the target spec for their games? Or do they just take the PC approach?
 

Chukhopops

Member
I laugh every time I see people saying Flight Sim will be multiplat.

Do you honestly think MS will sell a lot of full price MSFS games to PS5 players? Do you think it makes sense financially with the loss of a 40-year old MS license and property? Do you?

Seems like a copy paste of the same insider bullshit we had on GAF.
 

Astray

Gold Member
I have a very hard time believing this..
I don't.

If they are indeed going full-on 3rd Party publisher, then still spending tons of R&D costs on your own bespoke console is not a good idea because the two business directions cannibalize each other.

They would need to either fully discontinue the console (very risky given they still wanna keep those Gamepass revenues, and not piss off their customers more than they have already), or they need to pass on the risk to someone else, enter Acer/Lenovo/MSI/Asus, who will happily make those "Xboxes", but not without getting their full commission.
 

dem

Member
Theres absolutely no point in having a slew of 3rd party consoles....
That's called PC.

It would be a nightmare. If that is the plan, then Phil is even more of a retard than I thought.
 
Last edited:

StreetsofBeige

Gold Member
It will great if we can finally get 3 tiers of hardware, but the price points will suck, especially on the low end where you will
Need something like the xss to cover that $200-300 range, there is no way an OEM can pull that off and offer the same quality as the xss provides currently.
Prices will be jacked up because if consoles right now are about breakeven-ish, no third party company is going to make a Series Y for $500 US. MS would as they can sustain it and subsidize it with software sales. So a Samsung Series Y would be $800. Unless the systems are tied to sharing digital download cuts like MS/Samsung split it 15% each or something.
 

Killjoy-NL

Member
I laugh every time I see people saying Flight Sim will be multiplat.

Do you honestly think MS will sell a lot of full price MSFS games to PS5 players? Do you think it makes sense financially with the loss of a 40-year old MS license and property? Do you?

Seems like a copy paste of the same insider bullshit we had on GAF.
As if Flight Sim will be a succes on Playstation.
The Playstation installbase will largely ignore it.
 

JohnnyFootball

GerAlt-Right. Ciriously.
It will be a shame because the engineering team that put together the series x and s did an outstanding job on the design and the build quality is top tier for that price point.. I very much doubt an OEM can do better
That won't be the point. The point will be profit. They will likely have tiers of $500 or $1000.

Yes, I do agree. The Xbox Series X really is a remarkable piece of machinery.

The only real major knock...and it's a big one....is the lack of expandable M.2 storage.
 

Dr_Ifto

Member
Will these console manufacturers have their own store to sell the games? Or receive a cut of each game sold on their console?
 
Last edited:

jm89

Member
Yeah, this is implausible nonsense.
You can always tell when the ‘insiders’ try to give information at different levels of access.

A person who has access to info on MachineGames Indiana Jones also managing to have access on info on next gen plans and conversations with multiple manufacturers? 🤣
And people are gullible enough to believe that? reminds me of when people thought Colt Eastwood had sources feeding him info on Microsoft’s acquisition targets.


There’s also a term for machines with multiple specs that can play Xbox games. They’re called PCs.

Rubbish.
4-1.png
 

SlimySnake

Flashless at the Golden Globes
So, this has been circulating in a discord I'm a part of which necessarily hasn't been picked up by Xbox community. The person was on the money on Indiana Jones, and is further corroborating about Xbox multi-platform stuff but the most intriguing aspect was on the hardware bit where the poster seems to allude that next-gen Xbox consoles will be akin to partnership like 3rd party controllers whereby other manufacturers will make the hardware which can run Xbox games. It opens up a lot of possibility, such as significantly different configurations (both powerful and weak) but it will also push the cost up as 3rd party won't sell hardware at a loss.

So, what does the Gaf think? I am personally bit torn, I know Microsoft are eating a lot of loss to sell Series S/X but I always thought they would build another Xbox. This rumor also gives a different perspective on FTC leaks, whereby Xbox were aiming at some sort of ARM+Cloud hybrid for next-gen. Was this their plan all along? To have 3rd party sell different kind of consoles which can run their games, meanwhile their focus will be purely on pushing software on multiple platforms, while pushing Cloud as their proprietary hardware for next-gen Xbox.


I like it. $500 consoles are stupid and result in low resolutions, FSR upscaling and shitty RT. I wouldnt mind buying a more powerful $1000 console as long as it doesnt have the retarded windows nonsense i have come to despise. just the other day i couldnt do copy paste in windows anymore. the fucking HDR and Dolby Atmos sounds dont automatically engage. There are bizarre shader compilations that last up to five minutes and stuttering that plagues like half of the games i play on my $2,000 pc.

No thanks. Give me a $1000 Xbox Pro with a good OS and console quality of life improvements and Im all in.
 

Heisenberg007

Gold Journalism
icerock icerock - I had already predicted that there won't be another traditional Xbox console and that X|S are the last ones. There's also plenty of evidence about them going multiplatform, so not surprising. But the supposed timing of the announcement certainly is interesting.

I have two questions for you if you can kindly answer them:
  1. Which Discord server is this? You can DM me if you prefer to (or just ignore this question altogether)
  2. How was this poster correct about Indy and other stuff? Did they share this info before reveal? It says "today" in the time stamps.
 

JohnnyFootball

GerAlt-Right. Ciriously.
Theres absolutely no point in having a slew of 3rd party consoles....
That's called PC.

It would be a nightmare. If that is the plan, then Phil is even more of a retard than I thought.
I slightly disagree. I think there is value in having a machine that plays games only. No driver issues. No extra overhead software.
 

Sanepar

Member
Well to evolve cloud tech they will need some kind of hw right? Or they will be stuck on 12tflops machines?
 

twilo99

Member
That means they are getting rid of the Xbox engineering department.. shame. They’ll probably shift some of them to Surface but still, lots of talent will be lost.

They do have a lot of connections and history with OEMs so all of this is really not far fetched.
 

Three

Member
This would mean consoles that are not subsidised and sold at a markup for profit. It's not farfetched if they feel their competitor isn't going to undercut them otherwise it just wouldn't work that well. Will be interesting to see if "$599" price tags are still an issue for the xbox crowd instead.


I can see them just basing everything on a controller input standard and only a min spec for licencing (hence why they were talking about blocking other unlicensed controllers and talking about new licencing partnerships back in November). The min spec is probably going to teeter towards handheld performance too. They're out of the console race but will still try and push their content store and subscriptions with the 3rd party hardware manufacturers getting profits.
 

Shakka43

Member
Instead of going against PlayStation and Nintendo they will go against Steam... I don't see that race going any better.

As Steam OS matures the likelihood of Valve entering the Console market becomes more of a possibility and if priced right as the Steam Deck they could be a true contender.
 

SlimySnake

Flashless at the Golden Globes
But the issue with this is where does the hardware go next? Who decides if and when the Series S stops being the target spec for their games? Or do they just take the PC approach?
It is basically a PC that will run the Xbox OS instead of windows or steam os, and games will be target profiles similar to the steam deck. All you will need to do is get yourself Xbox OS certified like how the current Steamdeck process works.

icerock icerock - I had already predicted that there won't be another traditional Xbox console and that X|S are the last ones. There's also plenty of evidence about them going multiplatform, so not surprising. But the supposed timing of the announcement certainly is interesting.

I have two questions for you if you can kindly answer them:
  1. Which Discord server is this? You can DM me if you prefer to (or just ignore this question altogether)
  2. How was this poster correct about Indy and other stuff? Did they share this info before reveal? It says "today" in the time stamps.
Date in Jan 15th.
 
Last edited:

Sanepar

Member
icerock icerock - I had already predicted that there won't be another traditional Xbox console and that X|S are the last ones. There's also plenty of evidence about them going multiplatform, so not surprising. But the supposed timing of the announcement certainly is interesting.

I have two questions for you if you can kindly answer them:
  1. Which Discord server is this? You can DM me if you prefer to (or just ignore this question altogether)
  2. How was this poster correct about Indy and other stuff? Did they share this info before reveal? It says "today" in the time stamps.
FIrst post on the image, everything was said on January 15
 
Top Bottom