they didn't add scope to the world. If anything, the flaw was keeping 1st person.It's the kind of bad people try to excuse with 'oh it's a young adult book'.
The first book is the only good one because the attempt at adding more scope to the world in 2/3 is clearly way out of reach of theauthorset up of the first.
I wouldn't say Martin is a great writer either. I've been stuck on the first half of Storm of Swords for months because I can't stand his self indulgent world building backstory shit that seems to permeate every chapter. The books could be half the size.
Looks like a low budget SyFy production.
I wouldn't say Martin is a great writer either. I've been stuck on the first half of Storm of Swords for months because I can't stand his self indulgent world building backstory shit that seems to permeate every chapter. The books could be half the size.
Ok, so I haven't read the book, nor do I really know the story, but from my understanding there are some pretty brutal things in this correct? Does anyone know yet if the movie shy's away from that, or has butchered the story at all? I'm just curious what the word on the street is.
Anyways, I'm going to see the movie and then pick up the book since I have heard pretty good things. Here's hoping this turns out good.
No, it is pretty bad.
Nothing in the first book that could seriously be affected by a PG-13 rating. Execution is all that matters, so we won't know until we see the movie.Ok, so I haven't read the book, nor do I really know the story, but from my understanding there are some pretty brutal things in this correct? Does anyone know yet if the movie shy's away from that, or has butchered the story at all? I'm just curious what the word on the street is.
Anyways, I'm going to see the movie and then pick up the book since I have heard pretty good things. Here's hoping this turns out good.
You should put spoilers on that.If theare out, then I will watch. If not, I am out.people faced dogs
I dunno, like, fantasy is not really my thing but I gave Game of Thrones a shot anyway and fell in love with the characters and the web of betrayals and scheming that led to the last hundred pages of the book was amazing. Most of CoK and what I've read of SoS haven't lived up to that, and what I've heard about AFFC sounds downright infuriating.I was far more immersed in the story of ASOIF due to that. It took me a bit, but reading the Hunger Games after finishing the first 5 in that series was really jarring.
, then I will watch. If not, I am out.If the people faced dogs are out
I dunno, like, fantasy is not really my thing but I gave Game of Thrones a shot anyway and fell in love with the characters and the web of betrayals and scheming that led to the last hundred pages of the book was amazing. Most of CoK and what I've read of SoS haven't lived up to that, and what I've heard about AFFC sounds downright infuriating.
What the hell, man. Spoiler tag that shit.
Nope. It only starts getting really fun once they step in the arena, and the trailers didn't show it at all.
This can't be emphasised enough. The trailers only show the duller parts of the book (whilst all together necessary to build a somewhat coherent story).
Book has GOD AWFUL writing, I have no idea how people made it through that garbage. I'm looking forward to the movie only because I like Gary Ross.
LOL you don't want people spoil the ending of the movie in your avatar do you?Sorry, wasn't thinking. BUT PEOPLE SHOULD KNOW!
Book 1 is fantastic so far, looking forward to the movie.
EDIT: Huh, odd to see people hating on the book and writing. I like it a lot so far. Sure, the writing isn't War & Peace, but this style of writing keeps me reading quickly.
Saw the trailer for this during Woman in Black, first few seconds had me thinking it might be kind of cool, like a Never Let Me Go sort of thing. Then Lenny Kravitz' neck and a bunch of youngsters acting serious showed up and I realized it's actually a hilarious comedy.
Some people just can't handle "simple"-styled writing. The books are absolutely fine.
they didn't add scope to the world. If anything, the flaw was keeping 1st person.
Some people just can't handle "simple"-styled writing. The books are absolutely fine.
There's absolutely nothing wrong with simple writing styles. However, there is good simple, bad simple, and bland simple. The book is bland simple.
Book has GOD AWFUL writing, I have no idea how people made it through that garbage.
Really good book and I'm not big into Young Adult Literature so I'm hyped for the movie. I really hope it doesn't disappoint but their is a lot of good vibes about it right now. But Midnight showing on that night, you'll find my ass watching The Raid and I'll wait a couple weeks and watch The Hunger Games after all the tweens got their filling.
Why am I even doing this, butTeam Gale!
I understand how someone could say that, but not this:
I understand how someone could say that, but not this:
Girl to the right is hot.
Can't agree with that. The voice of the story is myriad and everyone is assumed to be duplicitous, but for different means - including Katniss. For a book with ridiculous one voice syndrome I recommend Robopocalypse.I dunno man, I'm through 2 books now and I can't comprehend how these books have crossed over to being considered good by non-teenage girls. I find the writing in these to be pretty terrible. Between the myriad sentence fragments and poorly conceived and structured ideas, I see an inability of the author to adequately describe the most basic of elements like character and location descriptions, which has obviously lead to a lot of confusion in readers over the look and feel of the world and characters.
It seems to me (especially noticeable in the second book more than the first) that every character seems to A) have the same voice and B) seems to share a thought process. The author is incapable of assigning separate intelligence to each individual character so Katniss will share inner monologue with the reader and then jump directly into a conversation with other characters and they will all have reached the same far-fetched, boneheaded conclusions about their situations of their own accord. This makes for really maddening reading.
Can't agree with that. The voice of the story is myriad and everyone is assumed to be duplicitous, but for different means - including Katniss. For a book with ridiculous one voice syndrome I recommend Robopocalypse.
There are few times where Katniss even gets, much less agree with, what other people are talking about because she simply is. That is extremely apparent in the 2nd and 3rd books.not interested in the big picture until she is thrust into it
I think the 1st person throws people off because it is from the view of a teenage girl that has been given way too much responsibility which keeps her confused with her hormones. Honestly, I think the author nails that. It just may not be a voice everyone is interested in listening to. Ideally,I would have liked the 1st book to stay 1st person, but change perspective as the battle grows and Katniss becomes more of an inspiration. She could have even been martyred in the first one.
Yeah, the second book would need to have some parts that way.Maybe that could'vemade the third book a bit better, but I think the second is definitely better in first person. I think the way everyone acts out in the arena with the escape in mind without her knowing is awesome.
Yeah, the second book would need to have some parts that way.My problem with it is that the setup was obvious almost immediately upon returning to the Capital but we were forced to see Katniss struggling with it the whole time. If one is not interested in Katniss, then the story's flaws are more obvious even as we enjoy the action of the Games & the setting of the Capital.
I don´t know anything about the book, but i read it´s like Twilight. Is that true?
I like Katniss quite a bit too but I get the love/hate thing for her. When the writer spends a lot of time on the main character (Shock lol) and you may not empathize with her, it creates a new flaw of not explaining the parts of the book you do like enough.But then again I had no problems whatsoever with Katniss.Plutarch made it obvious with his clock, yeah, but I still enjoyed finding out exactly how things panned out.
I don´t know anything about the book, but i read online that it´s like Twilight. Is that true?
There are few times where Katniss even gets, much less agree with, what other people are talking about because she simply is. That is extremely apparent in the 2nd and 3rd books.not interested in the big picture until she is thrust into it