Personally, I prefer the sensationalized Kotaku style which would have gone something like; "Incompetent writers can't decide on definitive ending to their own game"
I wonder if the vocal minority squeals even made it to their attention.
I mean if it fits the "Rules of Golden Journalism" it really should be on the list.
Is there a list of things it does have to counteract the things it doesn't?
Just to be clear this news is positive with the game having multiple endings, so how is it looking more and more like an Indie game?
Avowed is going to be Xbox' Knack.
Hmm. Let’s look at a few recent, well received Open world games.
Zelda TOTK has just one ending for all intents and purposes (has another secret additional post-credits ending, but doesn’t change the first).
‘Basic feature’ indeed. y’all just talking out the ass at this point.
Dude you said multiple endings is a basic feature in open world games and he cited two massive games that do not. Take the L
Because there hasnt been any bad news really. A lot of the 'missing' features are stuff that was never promised in the first place, so how can it be missing?.
You need to read the thread title again, it DOES have multiple endings.
Nothing against you personally, i value your opinion but i really dont want to get into this again.
Saying anything positive about a Microsoft first party game is "extreme" around these parts.
"Its like unless Avowed is 500 hours long, has 50 races to chose from, you can romance the pet dog, well all it means that this has a 50k budget and is an Indie game and proof MS are leaving the console business blah blah"
