Read again, I never claimed that action RPGs were never a thing in Japan.
They've always existed, but the most popular ones were always turn-based (i.e. DQ, FF, Pokemon)
Exactly why they don't need to change Final Fantasy's formula, that's my point. Did you even read what I wrote?
Them moving away from turn-based or whatever just sets a precedent -- a point of no return.
Final Fantasy's identity was always about favoring character skill over player skill, never about mashing buttons.
In other words, it was never an action RPG.
I still don't get why you're getting so worked up over this.
Do you really think it's productive to call me names or attempt to label me in a pejorative way?
You're free to disagree with me, but seriously, I expected a more respectful attitude from you.
During this entre conversation I never tried to downplay you for simply having a different opinion.
Final Fantasy doesn't need to change it's ways. They can come up with a spin-off or some new IP.
Also, Squeenix has plans to change DQ. It might not be turn-based for long. THIS is my main concern.
If they've changed FF, there's nothing stopping them from changing DQ as well.