• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

Game of Thrones is bad. Like, really bad. Here's why. (Spoilers)

Status
Not open for further replies.
I have a love-hate relationship with Game of Thrones. I was looking forward to seeing a good bashing of Game of Thrones in here as I've never been able to articulate my thoughts well on the negative aspects. But for a thread where you say you aren't a book purist, you focus on how the characters were in the books way too much in comparison. And a lot of your points you don't finish. You simply describe how something is in the show, as if that by itself means something to your point.
 

Frostburn

Member
There are certainly problems with the show and comparing them to the books is going to let any reader* down. (*who read the books when GRRM was writing them because something as grand and epic as ASOIAF could never be made on TV). I think they adapted and changed some things for the worse as well OP but I think they did their best to make ASOIAF into a TV show (A medium the books were not designed for). A Game of Thrones has the same issue almost any TV show or Movie has when based on an amazing series of books - Reading and imagining what the author created in your own mind is ALWAYS going to be better than someone else's literal adaption into reality (Show or Movie)
 

gutshot

Member
But she DOES offer Ned sex and we have a scene of her and Lancel pretty early too. Its clear that they didn't know what they would be doing five seasons later.

Right because in S1 they stayed very true to the books in character and plot. As the show went on they began to stray away from that for various reason. I'm speculating that part of the reason for Cersei's change in characterization came from the actress.
 
I have a few fine points of disagreement with OP, but overall, OP is right.

jeremiah_johnson_nodding.gif


D&D are hacks who are saved just often enough by good directors and great actors. Every single character created for the show is awful. Characters altered for the show have almost all come out worse. Seasons 4-6 have been directionless messes.

Bad Pussy, anybody?

9661435.gif


Karl Fookin Tanner?

What+the+did+you+just+say+about+me+you+_941fa5eae3f5e016aae9cfddd333940c.jpg


Intimidating Shirtless Ramsay?

tumblr_n5hvifbOFW1tswso1o4_r1_250.gif


20 Good Men?

5171012-0883555371-BML2Q.gif
 

marrec

Banned
Sure in the sense that the first 3 are top tier fantasy books, AFFC is good and ADWD is very good.

ADWD is a slog that's only saved by Theon's chapters. The only reason I give the show any credit compared to the books is that the books had already dropped so precipitously in quality. Somehow S6 of the show presented a more coherent trajectory toward ending this massive pile of plot overreach.
 
It's massively overrated.

I have a feeling people watch it because it's like a watercooler social type thing where everyone else is watching it so you have to too.

Your feeling is wrong.

I don't follow hype. I don't put up my opinion based on how other people judge it.

Game of Thrones won multiple awards. It is rated to be one of the best series ever released. You don't win stuff like that because it is 'bad'

There are different tastes but hating on Game of Thrones is just like hating on the Lord of The Rings movie franchise because it is different from the books.

Not everything written is portrayed just as great on the screen. Sometimes adjustments need to be made.
 

gutshot

Member
Sure in the sense that the first 3 are top tier fantasy books, AFFC is good and ADWD is very good. Also, AFFC is hurt by covering the most boring characters in the book.

ADWD had some good moments but the way it ends just completely ruins the book. How are you going to cut the climax of a story that you've just spent almost a thousand pages working towards?
 
This OP is the first i've ever read that made me want to read the books.

As for your assertion OP, reading it makes me think that we're missing out greatly. Why?

TV.

Let's use the Walking Dead as an example.
This season started out with two grisly murders of beloved characters Abraham and Glenn.

The response to those actions? Derision. How DARE they
kill off these beloved characters, and with no reprisal on top of it?!
Go into the corresponding Walking Dead thread and you'll see tons of posts from people saying they're going to drop the show because they're frankly outraged.

My point? Some subjects are too racy for broadcast, and even cable television. We're more likely to deal with grisly things in a movie because we've paid the price of admission. To be frank, I can't say I wouldn't be offended by the things you posted were omitted from the show, and I don't offend easily at all.

That said, just because you can display something on TV doesn't necessarily mean you should. I feel GoT is a great show even with those omissions. You do not agree, but hopefully you can at least appreciate why they did it that way.
 
I think a lot of the story and characterisation has weakened as the seasons have went on, but I still mostly enjoy the show thanks to the acting, spectacle and set/costume designs.
 

cwmartin

Member
Did you miss the part about how problematic the show is? No one seems to have rebutted the sexism, racism or homophobia yet.

What is there to rebut? Can a show not depict sexism, racism, or homophobia?

Are people allowed to like a show that depicts these things?
 

Llyranor

Member
The show does feel homophobic. Loras does pretty much nothing but get arrested and tried for being gay. He's just a plot device.

In the book, Margaery's trial has nothing to do with her brother being gay. And instead of being a passive plot device awaiting trial, book Loras leads the charge on Dragonstone and gets incapacitated because he was desperate to free up the fleet sieging the island so that they could used against ironborn ships raiding Tyrell territory. From honor and bravery in the book, to having no qualities and doing nothing in the show for the past few seasons aside from 'is gay' (and then using that to make up an excuse for a trial)
 

Kill3r7

Member
ADWD is a slog that's only saved by Theon's chapters. The only reason I give the show any credit compared to the books is that the books had already dropped so precipitously in quality. Somehow S6 of the show presented a more coherent trajectory toward ending this massive pile of plot overreach.

It was impossible for the books to maintain the momentum and quality once GRRM decided to stretch the series to 7 books. I do agree that GRRM has a really tall task of trying to tie all the loose ends together. There is so much story to be told that I have serious doubts about his ability to deliver a satisfying ending.
 

CrunchyB

Member
I agree with the OP. First season is about as good as you could reasonably expect, but afterwards things go downhill fast. Second season is based on some of the best parts of the books, but on TV it's only mediocre. Some great action scenes though.

I could forgive a lot of things, but the showrunners are obviously hacks and stuff that was merely irritating at first just keeps getting worse. Gone is all the subtlety of the books and it's replaced with stupidity instead. It's just a trashy TV show now, I can totally understand people enjoying it, but it's no longer for me.
 

Sande

Member
I know this isn't the best way to judge, but I watched that British 5-season recap (if you know what I'm referring to), hoping that it would make me want to watch it.

It all seemed so lifeless, and so... slow? Even with all the events crammed together... nothing really seemed to happen?

A few people went here... some moved there gradually, with some dragons... some stern conversations were had... and... I dunno... apart from the sheer scope, epic nature, and chilling production design, what am I truly missing?
Things are happening constantly, albeit at a pretty slow pace most of the time. Then there are the big events that are usually saved for episode 9. I don't know how you can say nothing happens when the show has gone through like
7
kings (official or self-proclaimed), entire armies have been wiped out and pretty much every major character has either changed immensely or died.
 

HotHamBoy

Member
What is there to rebut? Can a show not depict sexism, racism, or homophobia?

Are people allowed to like a show that depicts these things?

It isn't the fact that it depicts it that is problematic, it's how it depicts it and the hypocrisy of those depictions.
 

duckroll

Member
On one hand the script can be pretty terrible at times, and sure the characterizations are all over the place, it can be heavy handed and really silly.

On the other hand...

j2wTdnR.jpg


iYQEkp9.gif


rg3ITXp.jpg


KD4U9Pz.jpg


LKWGgEa.jpg


fpfjW91.gif
 

gutshot

Member
The show does feel homophobic. Loras does pretty much nothing but get arrested and tried for being gay. He's just a plot device.

In the book, Margaery's trial has nothing to do with her brother being gay. And instead of being a passive plot device awaiting trial, book Loras leads the charge on Dragonstone and gets incapacitated because he was desperate to free up the fleet sieging the island so that they could used against ironborn ships raiding Tyrell territory. From honor and bravery in the book, to having no qualities and doing nothing in the show for the past few seasons aside from 'is gay' (and then using that to make up an excuse for a trial)

How does changing the actions and attitudes of a minor character make the show homophobic?
 

rambis

Banned
I love the show but is it even still that popular? I know alot of people come back when the season starts but I havent heard one peep about the show in ages, even from people I used to talk about it with on the regular.
 

btrboyev

Member
You have to assume that a lot of these characters timelines are not taking place at the same time. I guess that's the only way of suspending belief in how the show portrays things. However, some traveling no matter how hard you look at it is, ridiculous. Little Finger and Varys are the worst offenders.
 

Jarmel

Banned
On one hand the script can be pretty terrible at times, and sure the characterizations are all over the place, it can be heavy handed and really silly.

I think that's the way I view the show in that it's a bunch of dumb shit happening but it's fun to watch. It doesn't have the depth that the books do but it's also more entertaining. Tradeoffs I suppose.

You have to assume that a lot of these characters timelines are not taking place at the same time. I guess that's the only way of suspending belief in how the show portrays things. However, some traveling no matter how hard you look at it is, ridiculous. Little Finger and Varys are the worst offenders.

Littlefinger is a literal magician in the TV show.
 

gutshot

Member
I love the show but is it even still that popular? I know alot of people come back when the season starts but I havent heard one peep about the show in ages, even from people I used to talk about it with on the regular.

Yeah, it's popular. The show is on an extended break while it films its final seasons so the buzz has cooled for now. It will ramp up again once the season is a few months out from airing.
 

Ratrat

Member
The show does feel homophobic. Loras does pretty much nothing but get arrested and tried for being gay. He's just a plot device.

In the book, Margaery's trial has nothing to do with her brother being gay. And instead of being a passive plot device awaiting trial, book Loras leads the charge on Dragonstone and gets incapacitated because he was desperate to free up the fleet sieging the island so that they could used against ironborn ships raiding Tyrell territory. From honor and bravery in the book, to having no qualities and doing nothing in the show for the past few seasons aside from 'is gay' (and then using that to make up an excuse for a trial)
He's not only gay but is depicted as a talentless idiot who brings down his whole family. And the sequence of events are incredibly dumb.
Littlefingers man who appears to actually run the brothel somehow becomes the heir to High Gardens squire?
He lacks any sense of caution in spite of his sisters warning.
Is proven guilty because of a birthmark that easily could have been viewed outside of a sexual situation.
I dont like that a man would even be arrested for his crime as it deminishes the sexism of the whole trial and religion. Also Littlefingers gay patrons are murdered on the spot....wtf.
 

VDenter

Banned
Sad fact is you are not wrong. I still consider Game of Thrones decent. However all the deeper nuances and subtexts of the books are completely gone at this point. I can understand them changing stuff after all if they did not this show would have to be atleast 20 seasons long to cover all the material but it feels like the spirit is missing completely. Some of the changes are so bad that they contradict everything laid out in the books. (Jaime) The whole thing feels so shallow at this point basically devolving into good vs evil the end. I dont want to be to quick and lay the blame completely on writers since honestly i feel like they probably had some strict guidelines from HBO to follow and Martin not finishing up the final two books has also left them somewhat stuck in a corner. The writing is on the wall at this point unfortunately since Game of Thrones has penetrated into main stream it was inevitable that things would get downgraded to the core.
 

Kinyou

Member
The show does feel homophobic. Loras does pretty much nothing but get arrested and tried for being gay. He's just a plot device.

In the book, Margaery's trial has nothing to do with her brother being gay. And instead of being a passive plot device awaiting trial, book Loras leads the charge on Dragonstone and gets incapacitated because he was desperate to free up the fleet sieging the island so that they could used against ironborn ships raiding Tyrell territory. From honor and bravery in the book, to having no qualities and doing nothing in the show for the past few seasons aside from 'is gay' (and then using that to make up an excuse for a trial)
Does that make the show homophobic or simply Loras a not interesting written character? I mean, the show only makes you feel empathy for Loras, not hate him.
 

Oppo

Member
You could have saved us a lot of time, OP, if you had just written "PEOPLE ARE MEAN IN THESE BOOKS IN WAYS I DISLIKE".

Even the teleporting bits, where you could have had a good point, falls flat since your examples are actually poor.

And despite all this you've obviously watched several seasons of it.

Reminds me of the folks who put 400 hours into Fallout and then declare that It Sucks.

It's supposed to be Tits & Dragons. It's trying to be Tits & Dragons. The redeeming quality is that it manages to push a cast of dozens forward, somehow, while remaining a nice pulpy ride, and NOT relying on hamfisted magic spells most of the time. It's a dumb yarn, for sure, but that doesn't mean it's bad. Point is, it has entertained countless million people, so I'd say it accomplished what it set out to do.

You are ignoring some truly great moments that would have been totally unheard-of in television, even 10 years prior. The crazy battles, 5-6 locations, a preposterously large web drawn together (again for TV standards) and so on. The Red Wedding is probably the most amazing – or at least, infamous – scene on TV in the last 5 years.
 

HotHamBoy

Member
Please do tell, what is the "proper" way to depict something as awful as homophobia?

I believe in the case of the show being homophobic they are saying the show marginalizes the gay characters from the books into two-dimensional plot devices or uses them for a cheap laugh "he's a sword-swallower, through-and-through."
 
You could have saved us a lot of time, OP, if you had just written "PEOPLE ARE MEAN IN THESE BOOKS IN WAYS I DISLIKE".

Even the teleporting bits, where you could have had a good point, falls flat since your examples are actually poor.

And despite all this you've obviously watched several seasons of this.

Reminds me of the folks who put 400 hours into Fallout and then declare that It Sucks.
It says right there in the OP they love the books but hate the show's interpretation.

There are even significant rumblings that Martin doesn't like their adaptation all that much.
 

Chuckie

Member
And one of them is making it into Iron Fist on Netflix! Can't keep them down!

Yeah whip girl was in Star Wars too.

We'll see if she is a good Colleen Wing. I'll give her the benefit of the doubt though, because I think the problem with the Sand Snakes is more the writing than the acting.
 

Ratrat

Member
Does that make the show homophobic or simply Loras a not well written character? I mean, the show only makes you feel empathy for Lora, not hate him.
They turned a guy who was defined by his unrivaled skill with a sword and his devotion to Renly and Margaery...into a stereotype. If he's not being humiliated by Cersei, he's telling whores family secrets and jeopardizing everything.
 
I haven't read the books, but I did watch until the first couple of episodes of season 5 and then stopped because I realized I don't have time for media about suffering. Also I got really bored with it.
 

Jarmel

Banned
And despite all this you've obviously watched several seasons of this.

Reminds me of the folks who put 400 hours into Fallout and then declare that It Sucks.

I always hate this line of argument. It's stupid because there could be multiple reasons why a person does something they hate or watch something they hate. I play COD yearly despite hating the franchise now because I play it with my friends. I've watched multiple movies I've hated because my friends watched it. GoT is a cultural phenomenon and even if I wanted to drop it, I'm not going to because it's part of the mainstream now and so it's worth knowing to stay up to date as a general talking point.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom