• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

The Order 1886 Review Thread

Status
Not open for further replies.

FordGTGuy

Banned
The Order isn't 1st party, but yeah, not a great start this gen.
I am sure they will get things rolling though once games like UC4, Tearaway, and GoW start to roll out....

1st Party
-Knack [54]
-Driveclub [71]
-Infamous SS [80]
-MLB [83]
-Killzone SF [73]

( 72 average metacritic score)

2nd Party
-LBP 3 [79]
-The Order 1886 [63]
-Bloodborne (coming soon)

(71 average metacritic score)

That moment when MLB is the highest rated first/second party exclusive over a year a half from launch... Ouch.

Hopefully Blood does well.
 

Steel

Banned
Then be worried about games that have zero connection between dev teams and directors. enjoy.

I wasn't saying it was completely rationale, but there's a trend of mediocre to bad AAA games right now that's hard to deny. Skepticism is a natural reaction to that.
 

Freeman

Banned
RYSE is bigger, longer, has less repetitive sections, better story, better story telling and not filled to the brim with cutscenes... Don't bring RYSE down to this games level.
Can anything be worse than Ryse? That game is pure shit and I played it on PC.
 
Yeah, the game seems to be crap, no question about that. What I find interesting about the reviews of The Order is that now that there suddenly is an AAA game that works fine technically - no big bugs, no framerate problems, crashes etc. this is hardly even mentioned in any of the reviews...even though everyone has been crying about how incomplete and buggy all the AAA releases have been lately...
I am still confused as to why high budget is now the same as AAA, when that term used to be reserved to those games that scored above a 90.
 
Well, I've been playing for 2 days now and It's definitely my cup of tea; I don't see why a game would need online and upgrades and collectibles to get good scores. But then again, big budget old-school titles don't have their place anymore since that kind of reviews have been happening before with Knack & Driveclub (two games I truly enjoy).

Or am I getting too old?
Honestly, it sounds like you just can't read. Seeing as the negative reviews are about the crappy quality of the story & gameplay, not the lack of upgrades.
 

Hasney

Member
Still want to play it but at least it's going to be on sale really fast

Well regardless of the overall quality, with it being this short and nothing to offer another playthrough, pre-owned markets will likely be flooded quick which should drive the price of both new and second hand copies down.
 

emrober5

Member
From the impressions I was expecting it to settle in the mid 70s on metacritic rather than the mid 60s, but overall it's not too surprising. Everyone knew this game would be divisive.
 

Cavalier

Banned
One way RAD can do to offset the cost is to license out their engine to other developers just like how Epic did with Unreal Engine.

Best of luck to them honestly
 
So uhm... where is shinobi?

Why does shinobi matter in the grand scheme of things?

At the end of the day, he's not part of the devs, or even part of the publishers. He has his resources that allows him to probably hear, and maybe even see some stuff earlier than we do, but it's not like he gets to actually play a development build of unreleased/unannounced games.

Shinobi was told some things about the game. Its length, its narrative focus, etc. All of it was true. But that doesn't mean the quality holds up.
 

Truant

Member
I don't know how anyone could have expected anything else.

I knew it was going to be a graphics benchmark, with basic Gears type gameplay and a tightly scripted experience. I'm fine with that.

Reviewers looking for RPG weapon leveling and branching story paths etc. Nothing of which was promised or I at least didn't expect any of it.

I've got the Collectors Edition arriving today and got it for $50 Canadian via E3 deals. Fine with that.

I'm still very excited to play it. You guys are nuts.

If you read most reviews, the main complaint is that it just isn't a very good game - even with the few mechanics it has.
 
The Order isn't 1st party, but yeah, not a great start this gen.
I am sure they will get things rolling though once games like UC4, Tearaway, and GoW start to roll out....

1st Party
-Knack [54]
-Driveclub [71]
-Infamous SS [80]
-MLB [83]
-Killzone SF [73]

( 72 average metacritic score)

2nd Party
-LBP 3 [79]
-The Order 1886 [63]
-Bloodborne (coming soon)

(71 average metacritic score)

See I whole heartedly disagree with the scores DC and KZ:SF received to me they are at least solid 80s.
This generation of reviews just seem so off base with my personal opinion it is just so damn odd, wasn't like this last gen...
 

Sendou

Member
Not a persecution complex, play the game even if you rent it and get back to me. If you have not played it your words are hollow.

The way you shot down opinions from people that actually played the game makes me think that wouldn't necessarily do the trick. "Looking at the scores of more recent games and then looking at the score the Order received just confirms these scores were set in stone quite a while ago." (lol)

Like maybe one day people realized there isn't some grand conspiracy against whatever you decided to like.
 
I must admit I'm not surprised at all at the scores. On the other hand, I don't know what some of the reviewers expected, but what they think are "cons" are things that are the core of the game. I think RAD aimed for that "interactive movie but still a videogame feel", and they succeeded. I viewed The Order as a game you must play for the "experience" it offers, just like you would watch a movie for the same reason, movie that you'd watch again occasionally because you enjoyed it. Oh well, I'm not going to write a novel but I'm kinda upset about some of the stuff I'm reading.
 

Hupsel

Member
Yeah after one year owning a PS4 Im disappointed with the exclusives. Theyve been absolutely mediocre and safe. Killzone, Infamous, Knack, Driveclub and the list goes on and on. Hopefully Persona 5 and Bloodborne will be good.
 

BriGuy

Member
This thread was at page 4, I drive to work, and it grows by 30 pages.

And wow, those scores. I thought I was being a tad pessimistic when I predicted it would get low to mid 70s. I wonder how what's his face is going to defend that "$100 steak" comment when the game is sounding more like value menu hamburger.
 

dark10x

Digital Foundry pixel pusher
Ryse does feel like a very good comparison.

And for what its worth, I think a lot of people who actually played it had a decent time with it, myself included. That said, I only paid $17 for it. No way in hell was it worth anything close to $60.
Yeah, it's an apt comparison, though I do think The Order plays a LOT better overall. It's much more refined, mechanically, and less repetitive...but there's less overall gameplay.

Like Ryse, however, it's very technically accomplished. Unlike Ryse, all of its cutscenes are real-time.
 
I think the Ryse: Son of Rome comparisons are appropriate in terms of what you're getting. Ryse has a bit more content but I think the single player is relatively similar content wise.

I enjoyed Ryse and I'm enjoying The Order.
 

TyrantII

Member
Still, as funny as it is making fun of fanboys , it's critics laughing at the expense of creators.

RAD is getting lambasted for a misguided although artistically brilliant game, having their efforts antagonized (4/10) while lesser games get comparatively given a free pass.

It doesn't seem fair.

Sony tends to get -2 review handicap because they don't strong arm publications and don't have the money to sweeten their relationships with them. Then there's the fact that they tend to be very hands off, and use their IPs as loss leaders. If they're not, all the better.

EA and Ubi have the deep pockets to market a mess of a game and find friendly eyes at the big sites. Not everyone does though. A better context would be they actually get a +2 handicap
 
Ryse does feel like a very good comparison.

And for what its worth, I think a lot of people who actually played it had a decent time with it, myself included. That said, I only paid $17 for it. No way in hell was it worth anything close to $60.

I enjoyed it too but to say that it's longer is just false, I played on the highest difficulty too.
I agree that paying 10$ for it (thanks again btw) helped in my appreciation of the game.
 

Inuhanyou

Believes Dragon Quest is a franchise managed by Sony
People are in danial. But honestly, I could not expect a 63 avarage in MC, but I as expcecting something between 7 and 8 at least. Its too linear, 0 (zero) replay value, and quite a short of a campaing.

Remember Uncharted 1? It was a SP only TPS game, but it has unlockable difficulties and much more gameplay. Still, Uncharted 2 and 3 both had online modes and unlockables (I'm not sure if U1 had unlockables).

Gears of War also had more replay value. And it had co-op, and competitive multiplayer mode aswell.

So I don't think this game is suffering from a big injustice. It just clearly doesnt offer the same as the top AAA TPSs out there... I'm sure Uncharted 4 will NOT suffer the same destiny if they keep the series qualities.

Bloodborne also may have good scores.

Yes, we could see 1886's problems coming a mile away even though i didn't really want to think bad of RAD considering their previous track records...

Its just unfortunate they spent all their time on the graphics engine. Sure in the visuals department it paid off, but every other area suffered because of that. It was the wrong call. Santa Monica should have been working on their own game in the time they spend assisting RAD
 

Gestault

Member
I'm consistently seeing the reviews note the length in the 6-8 hour range, and that it feels short and incomplete. All the video playthroughs, which there are now several, including collection complete ones, are in the 5-8 hour range.

How in the heck did so many Gaffers claim the game was a 14-hour experience? I wouldn't feel the need to ask, but there was clear effort to highlight the longer play-times, with an "average" of 12+ hours brought up often enough that it readily comes to mind.

It confuses me other cinematic games with godawful storytelling get reviewed better.

There's more nuance to games than just whether they're "cinematic" or not. People seem to think those other games were better than this one. You can read why in the write-ups themselves.
 

oti

Banned
Let's talk the sequel.

The Order: 1945.
Fight against WEREWOLF HITLER.
With crafting and RPG elements.

8/10.
 

140.85

Cognitive Dissonance, Distilled
This sounds like it would have been better as a launch title - sort of a throwaway tech showcase. PS4's RYSE. No offense, RYSE fans.
 

shandy706

Member
It's not just PS4. Next gen exclusives have generally disappointed so far. Even the massively hyped ones. Fortunately it's early days. Shame for this game though. The style and setting are just so cool. I really expected better

Sunset Overdrive and Forza Horizon 2 are awesome. Are we ignoring some recent exclusives on purpose?

Smash Brothers and Captain Toad?

There have been some great recent exclusives.


I agree with your last 3 lines.
 
The mediocrity in this instance though, very similar to the things DriveClub was criticised for, focuses a lot on the lack of player control, linearity, lack of upgrades etc. In that sense, your opinion might differ greatly to some of these reviews, in the same way it did for DriveClub.

Lol. Still defending. Still haven't played it.
 

Primeau31

Member
I wasn't saying it was completely rationale, but there's a trend of mediocre to bad AAA games right now that's hard to deny. Skepticism is a natural reaction to that.

also hard to deny that naughty dog and miyazaki are head and shoulders above most of the teams that have had games launch so far this gen that are labeled AAA. so ok.
 
I don´t feel bad about RAD, honestly. They wanted to make this game, it´s their vision, and they did not want to lower themselves to make portable games. Besides i don´t believe if reviews are it means the game is bad.

It's done imo and it is what it is. Yes, no one cares what I think neither do I care what others think.

It's a new gen, we want "new experiences" as shown in the review thread with tons of terrible reviews for this game, and yet so far, the only games to give us that are mostly the same franchises we all love and know that we hate at the same time when another sequel comes out. And then we hate that there are no new ip's.
FYI, they are making a new GOW game.
No the majority does not want "new experiences" whatever that means. That´s why there are so many sequels. People like them and buy them. Just because you don´t like a franchise, it does not mean that the franchise should not exist, and you should not ruin the enjoyment of millions of people by saying that games should not exist anymore. How selfish are you?
 

Pop

Member
See I whole heartedly disagree with the scores DC and KZ:SF received to me they are at least solid 80s.
This generation of reviews just seem so off base with my personal opinion it is just so damn odd, wasn't like this last gen...

What did MCC score again...yeaaaaaaaaa
 

Jigorath

Banned
RYSE is bigger, longer, has less repetitive sections, better story, better story telling and not filled to the brim with cutscenes... Don't bring RYSE down to this games level.

Oh it also had Multiplayer and was a launch title.



How many of those million still own the game?

Man you need to learn how opinions work. A lot of people, including myself, thought Ryse was terrible. I couldnt play the game for more than 20 minutes before sending it back to Gamefly. I'll see if the Order holds up better.
 

bosseye

Member
Reviews are about where I expected them to be. I'm still picking up tomorrow (will trade some stuff I'm done with) and will formulate my own opinions. Despite the mediocre reception, I'm still interested in the story, setting, atmosphere, cinematics and sexy visuals.

Plan is to buy, play, finish in a couple of days and then trade for Dying Light when it gets a physical release in the UK on 27th Feb.
 

Melchiah

Member
How many of those million still own the game?

Even if they had sold it, it would still count as a sale. Moving the goalposts doesn't change the sales figure. You could ask the same question about any other game as well.

Considering the PS+ upgrade costs 25€ now, and the physical edition 39€, I'd wager the digital option is more attractive.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom