• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

Microsoft / Activision Deal Approval Watch |OT| (MS/ABK close)

Do you believe the deal will be approved?


  • Total voters
    886
  • Poll closed .
Status
Not open for further replies.

Mr.Phoenix

Member
Did people commenting here bother to read the OP or just read the title? He specifically says about versions of games/content, if the games releases on multiple platforms there will not be exclusive quests, maps, mode etc that is Xbox only. Multi platform games will offer parity in this context. So if the game is multi platform it will be same across all platforms, if the the game is exclusive it will be the whole game not only specific in game content that is exclusive.
Do you really think that's what this is about?

Ah well, I always wondered who buys into the stuff this man says. Guess I have an answer to that question.
 
Last edited:
Kid, I don’t think you know what the word “community” is.
Kid? There's a greater than 0% chance that I might be your father. Of course if that's actually the case however unlikely, I'm immediately signing my rights away.

And you dear sweet delusional child. I'm afraid it is you is doesn't know what "pulled" means.
 

Mr.Phoenix

Member
No, I merely stated that they were never announced for, or promised to be on PS.

You can type it however big you want, and make it any color you like. It won't change the fact that those games weren't promised to be or announced to be available on Playstation.
Hehe... ignorance is bliss huh?

Doom eternal, Ghostware Tokyo, deathloop... published by Bethesda in the last 3 years. Two of which were timed PS exclusives. And your straw here is that their biggest game since ES wasn't announced for the PS5? Were they announced for the Xbox? You do know that if just going by the recent trend, chances are it would have been another timed exclusive for PS right?

No need to move the posts.
 
.
I'll remember that next time I hear a cry about Forspoken or FF7 remake or FF16 not being on Xbox.

"iT wAs NeVeR anNOuNcED oR PrOmiSEd tO bE oN Xbox, sO Sony dIdN'T bUy aNy eXcLuSiViTY!"
That's fine. Of course you won't hear those cries from me.
At least you recognize how hypocritical it is to cry about one and not the other though, seeing as that goes both ways. So seeing as how much you're crying about Xbox's games... Surely there's evidence somewhere around here of you crying about Forspoken or FF16 being "pulled" from Xbox right?
 

RoboFu

One of the green rats
It’s not about being exclusive, just making it so Sony can’t buy exclusive content would be a win but more importantly owning that ip when consoles are not a thing anymore is the bigger prize.
 

Chukhopops

Member
So will Elder Scrolls 6 be on playstation? Hellblade 2?

I’m almost certain we’d be having a different conversation if they were never pressed by the FTC/CMA/EU regulators. There was a lot of talk before about simply honoring sonys contracts, then it became 3 year deal after the contract, then it became a 10 year deal, now its a 10 year deal with full parity no additional dlc and whatever. They aren’t making these promises out of the goodness of their hearts. They full intended on flipping the script on sony with the timed exclusive content and gamepass offerings with COD.

They met their match with regulators so now they’re playing the “everybody gaming wins” angle but still refuse to acknowledge they’re not doing it with Bethesda.
It’s not exactly a secret that the ten-year contract for CoD is a consequence of regulators being worried about the « « « « monopoly » » » » and Sony crying like a bitch.

What this has to do with Bethesda remains to be seen though. The message from Day 1 was: some games will be exclusive. And they will be.
 

fermcr

Member
Microsoft's main goal is to put Call of Duty on Gamepass, and probably make timed exclusive DLC to sweeten the pot... the same way Sony does presently with Call of Duty.
Taking away Call of Duty from Playstation is simply bad business.
 
Hehe... ignorance is bliss huh?

Doom eternal, Ghostware Tokyo, deathloop... published by Bethesda in the last 3 years. Two of which were timed PS exclusives. And your straw here is that their biggest game since ES wasn't announced for the PS5? Were they announced for the Xbox? You do know that if just going by the recent trend, chances are it would have been another timed exclusive for PS right?

No need to move the posts.
No straw needed, as I'm not making that kind of argument.

It's not moving the posts to say that because a game wasn't announced for a platform, there's no reason to believe that the platform is entitled to it.

If Starfield was announced to be on Playstation, then you'd have an argument... but it wasn't.... so you don't.
 

dotnotbot

Member
He's not interested but someone taking his position in the future might be. He won't be head of gaming division forever so in response to those deals spanning generations his words matter close to nothing.
 
Last edited:

Neofire

Member
Microsoft's main goal is to put Call of Duty on Gamepass, and probably make timed exclusive DLC to sweeten the pot... the same way Sony does presently with Call of Duty.
Taking away Call of Duty from Playstation is simply bad business.
👀 what about the other IPs MS gets to gobble up? Would it be "bad for business" if MS took those away(which I am 100% sure MS will make them exclusive)from the Playstation platforms?

MS isn't spending 70 billion for CoD....
 

Mr.Phoenix

Member
No straw needed, as I'm not making that kind of argument.

It's not moving the posts to say that because a game wasn't announced for a platform, there's no reason to believe that the platform is entitled to it.

If Starfield was announced to be on Playstation, then you'd have an argument... but it wasn't.... so you don't.
I doubt ANYONE, any single person has said that the PS platform is entitled to it.

What they have said, however, is that if Bethesda wasn't owned by MS,it would have no doubt also been coming to the PS. And there is evidence to suggest it would have even come to the PS and PC first just going off recent trends pre-acquisition.

The point peope are making, and that you seem to be trying to conveniently ignore, is that the reason that game is not or definitely not coming to PS is that Bethesda is now owned by MS. And I don't even have a problem with that. If I were them I would have done the same thing.

The problem people have though is that you can't be going around talking about games for everyone and being all about for the gamers and whatnot... when simultaneously pulling shit like that.
 
Last edited:
Why are people having such a hard time admitting that Starfield was going to be released on PlayStation before Zenimax was acquired by Microsoft?

My god. lol
If you're referring to me, then let me clarify. I'm not claiming that Starfield wouldn't have been released had MS not bought them. I'm just saying that until a game is announced for a platform, that it shouldn't be expected to be. There's a reason why every publisher clearly states which platforms a game will be on when they announce it.
 

Ar¢tos

Member
.
That's fine. Of course you won't hear those cries from me.
At least you recognize how hypocritical it is to cry about one and not the other though, seeing as that goes both ways. So seeing as how much you're crying about Xbox's games... Surely there's evidence somewhere around here of you crying about Forspoken or FF16 being "pulled" from Xbox right?
I'm ever so sorry, but those games were never announced or even promised to release on Xbox, so it is impossible that they were pulled from it.
 

DenchDeckard

Moderated wildly
Sony guys salty that they aren't going to get future games after a studio is purchased by the competition once again....

...we need more Jim Ryan talking about cats and dogs ....but he got a gagging order by Sony.

Brakes Be Quiet GIF by DeRay Davis
 

Riky

$MSFT
Bethesda is first party, Microsoft is paying the development costs in full, just like Guerilla was multiplatform before they were purchased. First party means they do as they please and anything not announced for another platform is just that.
Paying third parties to not let Xbox owners play maybe indefinitely is a real cheap move.
 

Ozriel

M$FT
Hard to know when the exclusivity game matters

Apparently it didn’t matter initially with Bethesda when he said he had no intent on fracturing any communities for their games…

Until it did

The thriving Starfield community was fractured?

Of course. Everybody expected that, but Phil Spencer talked about it as if they weren't going to do that. That's the issue. He initially lied.

Bethesda? Phil never made the claim that all subsequent Bethesda games would be multiplatform.

Phil Spencer says many things

Microsoft is offering legally binding contracts for this, enforceable by the EU.

So will Elder Scrolls 6 be on playstation? Hellblade 2?

I’m almost certain we’d be having a different conversation if they were never pressed by the FTC/CMA/EU regulators. There was a lot of talk before about simply honoring sonys contracts, then it became 3 year deal after the contract, then it became a 10 year deal, now its a 10 year deal with full parity no additional dlc and whatever. They aren’t making these promises out of the goodness of their hearts. They full intended on flipping the script on sony with the timed exclusive content and gamepass offerings with COD.

They met their match with regulators so now they’re playing the “everybody gaming wins” angle but still refuse to acknowledge they’re not doing it with Bethesda.
Man says they aren’t planning exclusivity with COD. You’re here piping up that ES6 and Hellblade 2 should therefore be on PlayStation. How does that make sense?

‘Fully intend to flip the switch’? When there’s a legally binding contract on offer that says otherwise?
How does putting COD on Gamepass harm PlayStation players?
 
I doubt ANYONE, any single person has said that the PS platform is entitled to it.

What they have said, however, is that if Bethesda wasn't owned by MS,it would have no doubt also been coming to the PS. And there is even evidence to suggest it would have even come to the PS and PC first just going recent trends pre-acquisition.

The point peope are making, and that you seem to be trying to conveniently ignore, is that the reason that game is not or definitely not coming to PS is that Bethesda is now owned by MS. And I don't even have a problem with that. If I were them I would have done the same thing.

The problem people have though is that you can't be going around talking about games for everyone and being all about for the gamers and whatnot... when simultaneously pulling shit like that.
I think we might agree most of this then.

My stance is that whether or not Starfield would've ever came to PS is irrelevant because it was never announced to be. I'm not denying that it wouldn't have had MS not bought them. I'm just saying that it doesn't matter either way. I also think it doesn't matter whether or not Sony would've been able to moneyhat Starfield, but there's no evidence of that being the case that I'm aware of.

But let me be clear about this. I'm not "conveniently ignoring" anything. Nor is the "problem people are having" related to anyone talking about "being for the gamers and whatnot". The problem is that some people are upset that a game they expected to be on their console of choice turned out not to be. That's it. As a result, they're now crying foul because of it, when they should realize that they should've never had that expectation to begin with.

.
I'm ever so sorry, but those games were never announced or even promised to release on Xbox, so it is impossible that they were pulled from it.
Well I know that. I'm just wondering why you don't.
 
We know all this is to try and get approval from regulators. Nothing more. Just be quiet Phil. Nobody is believing your good guy "everybody plays" act. The fact that he's only talking about call of duty tells you everything. What about the other Activision ip Phil? This guy is so hypocritical it's absolutely pathetic. Its so see through aswell.
 
Last edited:

Ozriel

M$FT
Prove it with Bethesda.

Already done. They’ve released FO76 DLC and updates + Doom DLC post acquisition. None of Bethesda’s games on other consoles have been removed. Their recently announced big update to Elder Scrolls Online is also coming to PlayStation.

And not only have they kept Minecraft multiplatform, they’re bringing ALL spin-offs to other platforms and putting a Minecraft game on PS+.

Oh, you meant putting all upcoming single player Bethesda games on PlayStation? Why is that a pre-requisite to making COD - a GaaS shooter - multiplatform? 😂
None of that was promised pre acquisition.
 

The_Mike

I cry about SonyGaf from my chair in Redmond, WA
So you only have a Xbox because of the extra comfort.

The console exclusives you mentioned are on Playstation with the same advantages, too.

Additionaly RDR2 was released back on 2018...

Sonys exclusives do not end with their first party lineup.
They have so many third party games which get a console release only or first on Playstation.
Be it from big publishers or some indie games.

Everything you mentioned, except the Xbox Play Anywhere could be done with a PS5, too.
Maybe with the "cross-progression" you are right, but this still has to be suppported by the game itself.

It is just, MS is not doing much, except gamepass, to lure the people to Xbox consoles.
MS Exclusive games? You can play it on PC or Xbox. If you already have a capable PC, you dont really need a Xbox, because it offers no new games.
PS5 or NSW on the other side...
Theres plenty of reasons why I got an Xbox.
Pre 2013 I was a hardcore pc master race player. While I've had ps 1 to ps3, and an Xbox 360 I once sold to get pc parts years ago, but playing with a controller never clicked for me.
When I moved into my own house in 2013, I wanted to game in my living room. I had a room dedicated to pc gaming, because it never occurred to me to have my pc in my living room for some odd reason.

I picked up an Xbox One because I like their exclusives. Gears of War, Halo, and especially Forza. I also like the eco system and the controller.

Under the big discussions about ps4 and Xbox one regards graphics being much better on a ps4, I once caved in and bought a PS4.
I bought the last of us remaster and that racing game (driveclub?) for it.
I did enjoy TLOU at first, but got dropped midway because I got bored with it.
The place I last can remember was I was in the sewers playing Ellie (?), and when you come to a house in the middle of nowhere where you either get raided by humans or zombies.
I didn't like driveclub either. I compared the game to Forza, which was what I also played at the time, and I didn't feel it at all. I remember that when the cars just got a little up in speed then just with the slightly turning your steering wheel to each side then the tires would just excessively scream like crazy. The graphics weren't as good as people hyped it to be.
Forza wasn't either, but the way Gaf sold the game then it sounded like it was a generation leap between that and forza.
Under covid we got a few games like the uncharted collection.
Tried to get into the first, but really felt it was slow paced and eventually abandoned if after the place where you have to climb a waterfall or something and a car you shoot at gets comically blown up.

I actually like that the news came out that xbox games would hit pc, as I've never been a controller player, and even though I use my xbox a few hours a day, I'm still not a controller player, and I probably never will be.

But I prefer the controller, it is without a doubt the best on the market.
Add to that, I prefer the eco system as well. I enjoy achievements.
Also, having game pass ultimate, I can play for a low cost on both my pc and Xbox, and there's several games where I can play on my pc and resume on my Xbox.

My girlfriend also have an Xbox, and it's also way cheaper as I buy everything digitally. That means that both of us can play the same game at the same time on both machines, with the price of one digital game.
Add to that we share game pass ultimate between our two pcs and Xbox machines makes it a really integrated part in our gaming hobby.

These are things playstation can't give me, so there's personally no reason for me to use one. I ended up only using my ps4 for fortnite, but after I got bored with it I tossed my xbox in there.

If I was interested in ps exclusives, then it would be a no brainer. But I don't.
I also have a switch but even though I like it and their exclusives, I always end up booting my pc and Xbox.
 
Last edited:

Ozriel

M$FT
The problem people have though is that you can't be going around talking about games for everyone and being all about for the gamers and whatnot... when simultaneously pulling shit like that.

Everyone knows MS makes those statements with PC and XCloud in mind. Via streaming, lots of people can play their games on any modern browser.
 

Kerotan

Member
Already done. They’ve released FO76 DLC and updates + Doom DLC post acquisition. None of Bethesda’s games on other consoles have been removed. Their recently announced big update to Elder Scrolls Online is also coming to PlayStation.

And not only have they kept Minecraft multiplatform, they’re bringing ALL spin-offs to other platforms and putting a Minecraft game on PS+.

Oh, you meant putting all upcoming single player Bethesda games on PlayStation? Why is that a pre-requisite to making COD - a GaaS shooter - multiplatform? 😂
None of that was promised pre acquisition.
It's in their own interest to stay relevant. PlayStation would be MS biggest market for most games
 

Ozriel

M$FT
It's in their own interest to stay relevant. PlayStation would be MS biggest market for most games

Eh, they’ll probably sell just as much on Steam. And there’s really not much danger of sliding into irrelevance for most of those franchises.

there’s reasons why exclusivity for some first party titles matters, not the least of which is helping to drive console sales.
 

DForce

NaughtyDog Defense Force
If you're referring to me, then let me clarify. I'm not claiming that Starfield wouldn't have been released had MS not bought them. I'm just saying that until a game is announced for a platform, that it shouldn't be expected to be. There's a reason why every publisher clearly states which platforms a game will be on when they announce it.

I'm referring to anyone who says stuff like this.

It's already been stated by an employee from Bethesda they had no plans to make the game exclusive to Xbox. That's clear as day.

And to say it shouldn't be expected is rather dumb since we're talking about one of the best-selling platforms. People think they were really going to skip the Xbox platform.

The majority of their games are released on multiple platforms, but now people are questioning if the game was really going to be released on PlayStation.

Do you really think when this game was announced, people were saying, "Oh we shouldn't expect this game on next-gen consoles since it wasn't announced yet"?
 
Talking, always talking, is the ultimate legacy MS has given to gamers and gaming in general for the last 10 year. I mean, i had more fun with that fucking WiiU than a Xbox since the 360.

Anyway, the COD we know is dead without the PlayStation fan base. COD would cost to much and would have to be rebrand and highly scaled down. And Phil knows it. And Phil fears it.
 
Last edited:
Are you going to tell us the Playstation Community never had Elder Scrolls too when VI won’t come out on it? Doom, Wolfenstein etc as well?

Exactly. Using that is just stupid. So any timed exclusivity sony do isn't taking anything away because there was no xbox version out? So fucking stupid. Of course we know there are xbox versions but they are delayed or even cancelled. Same for starfield. Which is fine! I just want Microsoft to be up front about and cut out the good guy bullshit.
 
Last edited:

Thebonehead

Banned
.
I'll remember that next time I hear a cry about Forspoken or FF7 remake or FF16 not being on Xbox.

"iT wAs NeVeR anNOuNcED oR PrOmiSEd tO bE oN Xbox, sO Sony dIdN'T bUy aNy eXcLuSiViTY!"

Oh I very much doubt you'll hear a cry about the loss of that from anyone, let alone from Xbox fans.

You can't tell me you're looking forward to the next Luminous Studios production.. Oh Wait.
 
I'm referring to anyone who says stuff like this.

It's already been stated by an employee from Bethesda they had no plans to make the game exclusive to Xbox. That's clear as day.
Ok and??? Sony signed time exclusive deals for Ghostwire Tokyo and Deathloop. Do you think that Bethesda planned to delay those games on Xbox the entire time?
And to say it shouldn't be expected is rather dumb since we're talking about one of the best-selling platforms. People think they were really going to skip the Xbox platform.
No. To expect any 3rd party game on any platform, unless it's been announced is what's dumb. Neither Sony, MS, nor Nintendo is entitled to any third party game unless they've signed a contract stating as much.
The majority of their games are released on multiple platforms, but now people are questioning if the game was really going to be released on PlayStation.
Well that's great. Still doesn't change a thing. Look, you're free to make whatever expectations you want. Just don't be upset when you make poor ones.
Do you really think when this game was announced, people were saying, "Oh we shouldn't expect this game on next-gen consoles since it wasn't announced yet"?
I think people shouldn't expect a game to be on ANY console until it's announced to be. I don't know why some of you can't seem to grasp this, as it's not that difficult. You can rephrase it or create whatever "what if" scenario you want. It's not gonna work. You've picked a poor argument to successfully debate I'm afraid. Continuing to try and argue in favor of having bad expectations is only proof that you're....

continuing to argue while having bad expectations. It's a negative feedback loop.
 

pasterpl

Member
Do you really think that's what this is about?

Ah week, I always wondered who buys into the stuff this man says. Guess I have an answer to that question.

You should read the OP and then read my comment. I know that reading with comprehension can be challenging for some people. Comments in this thread show that many did it even read the op and just came here to shit on ms and Phil.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom