• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

Microsoft / Activision Deal Approval Watch |OT| (MS/ABK close)

Do you believe the deal will be approved?


  • Total voters
    886
  • Poll closed .
Status
Not open for further replies.

//DEVIL//

Member
Ahahahahaha. Ahahahahaha

Fucking A man. I am happy 😁😁😁😁 .

" I wanna block your merger " eat shit Jimbo. What an ignorant bish :/.

I still don't own an Xbox my self. Just a PC and PS5. . Only S for my 8 years old. But when this deal closes and call of duty on game pass, I'll subscribe to game pass for sure .between call of duty. Diablo, Forza horizon this year, I'll save way more instead of paying for these games. And this way I can share it with my son as well
 
Last edited:

HeisenbergFX4

Gold Member
Just ready for it to be over one way or the other

Jim Halpert Reaction GIF
 

Elios83

Member
CMA changing their idea relatively to the competition in the console market is obviously a major development that imo is now going to get this deal approved.
Without speculating about what changed their minds and why it wasn't noticed before, it seems that CMA and Europe have alligned in focusing about the cloud market, but with the deals that Microsoft has signed with competitors in that market it's likely that this will get approved with the remedies that Microsoft has proposed unless there are further unexpected u-turns.
It will be interesting to see what's going to happen with the FTC, it they want to go in court over this or if they'll settle.
 

ulantan

Member
I don't think you fully grasp the concept of ownership. Sony has no rights to CoD unless it produces CoD. Sony needs to sign a deal with the owner of CoD if it wants a legal guarantee of feature parity and releases. Say the deal falls through and Microsoft agreed to an exclusivity deal with Activision (insane but possible). Sony would have no recourse. Thats why its in Sony's best interest to strike a deal. Especially given its heavy reliance on third party sales.
Nope if they want they can treat them like any other publisher. Those don't make you sign ten year deals Microsoft want call of duty on PlayStation.
 

ToadMan

Member
That's what @reksveks was saying. I haven't gone through all the document yet

Partly …. they agree with MS that the way they determined the value of a person switching platform wasn’t accurate.

That led them conclude it would be fiscally unsound for MS to remove COD from other platforms, and that instead MS Will operate COD like Minecraft - i.e. permanently multiplat.

Then they dismissed the partial foreclosure scenarios as not insurmountable for competitors.

So now we await the cloud decision.

What this means for consoles? Well if MS do as they say and take a Minecraft approach with CoD then Sony will probably be happy - that’s basically multiplat with no time limit, and the offer to the EC of third party monitoring gets Sony parity.

So because the CMA erased the SLC for consoles there’s no more to this unless they receive new information.
 
Last edited:

foamdino

Member
Strange u-turn from CMA, but I voted that it would pass based purely on an innate pessimistic feeling that the industry is going to consolidate more. (will MS stop here or are they still shopping? Take Two next?)
 

Topher

Gold Member
Fox Sports Networks wasn't in the deal and Sky PLC stake wasn't required, it was sold before it was finalized to reduce debts. What they had to divest was not even a scratch to their plans, its like saying that they would have to divest Demonware from ABK.

If that's your take then fine, but what I said is correct.
 

Snake29

RSI Employee of the Year
Ahahahahaha. Ahahahahaha

Fucking A man. I am happy 😁😁😁😁 .

" I wanna block your merger " eat shit Jimbo

I still down own an Xbox my self. Only S for my 8 years old. But when this deals close and call of duty on game pass, I'll subscribe to game pass for sure .between call of duty. Diablo, Forza horizon this year, I'll save way more instead of paying for these games. And this way I can share it with my son as well

I bet Xbox fans wouldn't bother with this merger if their wasn't a subscription service. We all know why Xbox fans shill for this or want MS to buy everything in their path, because of Gamepass and nothing else.

I know this fanbase want to see the gaming industry to be fallen apart with less quality and only quantity shit.
 

skit_data

Member
Not to be all ”onto the next acquisition!” but seeing as this seems to be pretty much a done deal I think we’ll 100% see Sony pick up one of the Japanese publishers.
 

StreetsofBeige

Gold Member
activision-blizzard-acquisition-could-be-approved-by-ftc-with-concessions-report.webp




The UK CMA has issued an update on its provisional findings in its assessment of Microsoft’s proposed acquisition of Activision Blizzard. Although the update is provisional, the UK CMA has said that “the CMA inquiry group has updated its provisional findings and reached the provisional conclusion that, overall, the transaction will not result in a substantial lessening of competition in relation to console gaming in the UK. To many, this will be deemed a major step closer towards closing the proposed acquisition.

The UK CMA will report its final report on April 26, 2023.

Martin Coleman, chair of the independent panel of experts conducting this investigation, said:

Provisional findings are a key aspect of the merger process and are explicitly designed to give the businesses involved, and any interested third parties, the chance to respond with new evidence before we make a final decision.

Having considered the additional evidence provided, we have now provisionally concluded that the merger will not result in a substantial lessening of competition in console gaming services because the cost to Microsoft of withholding Call of Duty from PlayStation would outweigh any gains from taking such action.

Our provisional view that this deal raises concerns in the cloud gaming market is not affected by today’s announcement. Our investigation remains on course for completion by the end of April.

You can read the full report here.

Havent kept up with all the wheeling and dealing. So what's the latest deals by MS to get it done?

- Nintendo 10 year deal (I think this is a done deal as they announced it)
- MS offered Sony 10 year deal (did they take it?)
- I thought there was something about cloud expansion
- Anything else?
 
Last edited:

Heisenberg007

Gold Journalism
Except Microsoft swore before God, Jesus, and the government that they would never take it off playstation it would cripple them in the eyes of regulators especially since they want to acquire more publishers.
Eh, I wouldn't count on that, to be honest.

They have used the same arguments as they did with Zenimax, i.e., making COD exclusive will not be financially viable. After a few years, they can decide that it's now financially viable (surprisingly!) so they are making it exclusive now.
 

Trekinspace88

Neo Member
Hopefully this means the deal will go through as i want all Activision games on gamepass. I can see them keeping Call of Duty multi-platform for longer then 10 years as they will be making a lot of money from PS owners(and other companies too) though i can see them making all other Activison games exclusive to Xbox/PC.

I wonder what MS next acquisition will be i hope they make some in roads in Japan and buy the likes of Capcom or Square Enix. I can also see Sony attempting to buy more studios but since they tried to block this deal i can see MS trying to block any of their purchases. Though i hope not as the back and forward drama with this deal was more then enough.

Either way it will be interesting to see how the gaming industry is shaped in the next 10 years thanks to MS being more pro gamer these days.
 
I really don't think you're gonna see xbox go after a publisher for a long long time. The optics and pr from all this have been damaging to their brand. They're gonna focus on Activision blizzard getting integrated and reformed.

That being said I expect to see certain affinity bought almost immediately after this deal closes lol.
 

KingT731

Member
CMA basically did an about face on everything they said previously. Microsoft does not have incentive to foreclose COD. The acquisition does not significantly lessen competition.

Done deal
I would have liked to see the calculation that MS used that was redacted. I do suspect they it was likely just based on consumer only buying CoD and no accessories or other games/services.
 
Last edited:
I really don't think you're gonna see xbox go after a publisher for a long long time. The optics and pr from all this have been damaging to their brand. They're gonna focus on Activision blizzard getting integrated and reformed.

That being said I expect to see certain affinity bought almost immediately after this deal closes lol.
Certain Affinity, INTERIOR/NIGHT, Squanch. That's all I would ever expect. Small shit, or nothing.
 

Ozriel

M$FT
Surprised they think that Microsoft will keep their word here. The same rhetoric was used when buying Bethesda so I expect COD to leave PS sooner than the 10 years. The last COD on Playstation will be PS5 only [no next gen, I guarantee it]

They say it’s Not really a major concern if they keep their word or not with respect to exclusivity as it still will not cause an SLC.
 

StreetsofBeige

Gold Member
Hopefully this means the deal will go through as i want all Activision games on gamepass. I can see them keeping Call of Duty multi-platform for longer then 10 years as they will be making a lot of money from PS owners(and other companies too) though i can see them making all other Activison games exclusive to Xbox/PC.

I wonder what MS next acquisition will be i hope they make some in roads in Japan and buy the likes of Capcom or Square Enix. I can also see Sony attempting to buy more studios but since they tried to block this deal i can see MS trying to block any of their purchases. Though i hope not as the back and forward drama with this deal was more then enough.

Either way it will be interesting to see how the gaming industry is shaped in the next 10 years thanks to MS being more pro gamer these days.
Yup.

The fear from Sony is a BS tactic. MS isn't going to spend $70B so they can limit it to Xbox and PC. They didn't do that to Minecraft. And if there was ever a time to do it was that game because it was just getting off it's feet on consoles. So if MS wanted to be scrooge they could had walled it off asap, but they didn't. The game still sells and makes shit loads of money, so no point walling it off. COD too.

As if MS is going to cut off all the revenue annually from selling 10M copies + mtx on PS.
 

Dane

Member
If that's your take then fine, but what I said is correct.
Disney wasn't planning to acquire Fox Sports, that was meant to be kept into Murdoch's Fox Corporation alongside Fox News, because it would screech into antitrust issues that are regulated with TV channels, their only divestments that MIGHT have been out of the plan were just a tiny fraction.

The reason why they had to divest rather than having it spun out to Murdoch in the deal was because they couldn't find buyers for the local channels in time, so Disney had to "own" temporarily as allowed by the Deparment of Justice.
 
Last edited:

skit_data

Member
Look on the flip side, if this gets done, Sony can just finally go ahead and buy Square Enix and no one has to play that "but why aren't they putting their games on xbox" game anymore.
Tempting no doubt, but I would deem Capcom more likely given Sonys investments into e-sports and all that jazz
 
Look on the flip side, if this gets done, Sony can just finally go ahead and buy Square Enix and no one has to play that "but why aren't they putting their games on xbox" game anymore.
Sony only has $5 billion left for Gaming Acquisitions. Doubt Sony would get Square Enix. Square Enix would want premiums which would take them over $10 Billion
 

Topher

Gold Member
Disney wasn't planning to acquire Fox Sports, that was meant to be kept into Murdoch's Fox Corporation alongside Fox News, because it would screech into antitrust issues that are regulated with TV channels, their only divestments that MIGHT have been out of the plan were just a tiny fraction.

That's not in line what I've read, but I'm not going to take this thread that far off topic.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom